You are on page 1of 34

GALA VOCATIONAL SCHOOL

Gamay, N. SAMAR

INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE COMMITMENT AND REVIEW FORM ( IPCRF ) for


Teacher I-III

Name of Employee:JEROME T. VISTAL Name of Rater: JIM J. LEBICO


Position: TEACHER- I Position: HEAD OF ACADEMIC DEPARTMEN
Division: NORTHERN SAMAR Date of Review:
Rating Period: JUNE 2019- APRIL 2020
TO BE FILL
4
EVALU
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT PER Very RATING
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
KRA QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Results Q
Showed Showed Showed Showed No
knowledge knowledge knowledge knowledge acceptable
of content of content of content of content evidence
and its and its and its and its was
integration integration integration integration shown
within within within within
Quality and across and across and across and across 3
subject subject subject subject
areas areas areas areas
1. Applied knowledge as shown as shown as shown as shown
Basic 1. Content in MOV 1 in MOV 1 in MOV 1 in MOV 1
of content within and
Education Knowledge and 7.5% 3
across curriculum with a with a with a with a
Services Pedagogy
teaching areas. rating 7 rating 6 rating 5 rating 4
Submitted Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted No
at least 4 lessons lessons any 1of the acceptable
lessons using using using given MOV evidence
MOV 1and MOV 1and MOV 1and was
Efficiency 3
supported supported supported shown
by any 1 by any 1 by any 1
of the other of the other of the other
given MOV given MOV given MOV
Timeliness
TO BE FILL
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
EVALU
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT PER Very RATING
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
KRA QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Results Q
Facilitated Facilitated Facilitated Facilitated No
using different using different using different using different
acceptable
teaching teaching teaching teaching
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that evidence
promote promote promote promote was
reading, reading, reading, reading, writing
writing and/or writing and/or writing and/or and/or shown
numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills numeracy skills
as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
Quality MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a 4
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4

2. Used a range of
teaching strategies
that enhance learner
7.5% 3
achievement in
Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1
literacy and numeracy least 4 learner- learner- learner- learner-
No
skills. centered centered centered centered acceptable
lessons as lessons as lessons as lessons as evidence
evidently evidently evidently evidently was
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in any of
Basic 1. Content 1 and 1 and 1 and the given MOV shown
Education Knowledge and supported by supported by supported by
Efficiency 4
Services Pedagogy any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the
other given other given other given
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Used different Used different Used different Used different No
teaching teaching teaching teaching acceptable
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
develop critical develop critical develop critical develop critical evidence
and creative and creative and creative and creative was
3. Applied a range of thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or thinking and/or shown
teaching strategies to other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as other HOTS as
develop critical and shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
7.5% Quality 4 4
creative thinking, as
well as other higher-
order thinking skills.
TO BE FILL
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
EVALU
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT PER Very RATING
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
KRA QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Results Q
1 with a 1 with a 1 with a 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1
least 4 lessons lessons as lessons as lessons as No
as evidenced evidenced by evidenced by evidenced by acceptable
by MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the
supported by supported by supported by given evidence
any 1 of the any 1 of the any 1 of the MOV was
Efficiency other given other given other given
MOV MOV MOV shown

Timeliness
Used Used Used Used No
classroom classroom classroom classroom
management management management management acceptable
strategies that strategies that strategies that strategies that
evidence
engage engage engage engage
learners in learners in learners in learners in was
activities/ activities/ activities/ activities/
tasks as tasks as tasks as tasks as shown
Quality shown shown shown shown 3
in MOV 1 in MOV 1 in MOV 1 in MOV 1
4. Managed with a with a with a with a
classroom structure to rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
engage learners,
individually or in
2. Learing
Basic groups, in meaningful
Environment
Education exploration, discovery 7.5% 3
and Diversity of
Services and hands-on Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1
Learners No
activities within a least 4 lessons lessons lessons lessons
range of physical supported by supported by supported by supported by
learning acceptable
MOV 1 and MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any
environments. any any any of the evidence
1 of the other 1 of the other 1 of the other acceptable
Efficiency acceptable acceptable acceptable MOV was 3
MOV MOV MOV
shown
Timeliness
TO BE FILL
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
EVALU
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT PER Very RATING
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
KRA QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Results Q
Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher Applied teacher No
management management management management acceptable
strategies of strategies of strategies of strategies of
learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior learner behavior evidence
that promote that promote that promote that promote was
positive and non- positive and non- positive and non- positive and non-
violent discipline violent discipline violent discipline violent discipline shown
as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
5. Managed learner Quality with a rating of 7 with a rating of 6 with a rating of 5 with a rating of 4
4
behavior
constructively by
applying positive and
7.5% 3
non-violent discipline
to ensure learning-
focused
environments. No
Submitted at Submitted 3 of Submitted 2 of Submitted any 1 acceptable
least 4 of the the the of the evidence
Efficiency given strategies given strategies given strategies given strategies
was
4
as observed in at as observed in 3 as observed in 2 as observed in
least 4 lessons lessons lessons any 1 lessons shown

Timeliness
2. Learing Applied Applied Applied Applied No
differentiated differentiated differentiated differentiated
Environment teaching teaching teaching teaching acceptable
and Diversity of strategies to strategies to strategies to strategies to evidence
Learners address learner address learner address learner address learner
diversity as diversity as diversity as diversity as was
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
Quality 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 3
shown
7 6 5 4

6. Used differentiated,
developmentally
appropriate learning Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted any 1 No
experiences to least 4 differentiated differentiated differentiated
7.5% differentiated teachingstrategie teachingstrategie teachingstrategies 3
address learners’ acceptable
teachingstrategie s in at least 2 s in at least 2 in only 1 lessons
gender, needs, s in at least 2 lessons as lessons as as evidenced evidence
strengths, interests lessons as evidenced by evidenced by shown was
evidenced by MOV 1 and MOV 1 and any 1 of the
and experiences. MOV 1 and supported by supported by acceptable MOV shown
Efficiency supported by any 1 of the other any 1 of the other 4
any 1 of the other acceptable MOV acceptable MOV
acceptable MOV
Timeliness
TO BE FILL
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
EVALU
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT PER Very RATING
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
KRA QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Results Q
Planned and Planned and Planned and Planned and No
implemented implemented implemented implemented
developmental developmental developmental developmental acceptable
ly sequenced ly sequenced ly sequenced ly sequenced evidence
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and
learning process learning process learning process learning process was
Quality as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in shown 4
MOV MOV MOV MOV
1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of 1 with a rating of
7 6 5 4
7. Planned, managed
and implemented
developmentally
Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 Submitted 1 No
sequenced teaching least 4 developmental- developmental- developmental-
and learning developmental- ly sequenced ly sequenced ly sequenced acceptable
7.5% ly sequenced teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence 4
processes to meet teaching and learning learning learning
curriculum learning process as process as process as was
requirements and process as evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown shown
evidently shown in MOV 1 and in MOV 1 and in
varied teaching in MOV 1 and supported by supported by any 1 of the
contexts. Efficiency supported by any 1 of the any 1 of the given 4
any 1 of the other given other given MOV
other given MOV MOV
MOV

3. Curriculum
and Planning
Timeliness
Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely
participated in participated in participated in participated in No
LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ acceptable
meetings to meetings to meetings to meetings to
discuss discuss discuss discuss evidence
teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner teacher/learner was
feedback to feedback to feedback to feedback to
Quality enrich instruction enrich instruction enrich instruction enrich instruction shown 3
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
8. Participated in
collegial discussions
that use teacher and
7.5% 3
learner feedback to
enrich teaching Participated in at Participated in 3 Participated in 2 Participated in 1 No
least 4 LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/ LACs/FGDs/
practice. LACs/FGDs/ meetings as meetings as meetings as acceptable
meetings as evidently shown evidently shown evidently shown evidence
evidently shown in any 1 of the in any 1 of the in any 1 of the
Efficiency in any 1 of the given MOV given MOV given MOV was 3
given MOV shown
Timeliness
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING TO BE FILL
EVALU
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT PER Very RATING
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
KRA QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Results Q
Developed and Developed and Developed and Developed and No
used varied used varied used varied used varied acceptable
teaching and teaching and teaching and teaching and evidence
learning learning learning learning
resources, resources, resources, resources, was
including ICT, including ICT, including ICT, including ICT, shown
to to to to
Quality address address address address 4
learning goals learning goals learning goals learning goals
as shown in as shown in as shown in as shown in
MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a MOV 1 with a
rating of 7 rating of 6 rating of 5 rating of 4
9. Selected,
developed, organized
and used appropriate
3. Curriculum Submitted any
teaching and learning 7.5% 4
and Planning teaching and No
resources, including Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 learning
ICT, to address least 4 varied varied varied acceptable
resources,
learning goals. teaching and teaching and teaching and including ICT, evidence
learning learning learning as evidently
resources, resources, resources, was
shown in
including ICT, including ICT, including ICT, any of the shown
Efficiency as evidently as evidently as evidently acceptable 3
shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV MOV
1 and 1 and 1 and
supported by supported by supported by
any1 of the any1 of the any1 of the
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
Designed, Designed, Designed, Designed, No
selected, selected, selected, selected, acceptable
organized and organized and organized and organized and
used used used used
evidence
diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, diagnostic, was
10. Designed, formative and formative and formative and formative and shown
selected, organized summative summative summative summative
and used diagnostic, assessment assessment assessment assessment
strategies strategies strategies strategies
formative and consistent with consistent with consistent with consistent with
4. Assessment
summative 7.5% Quality curriculum curriculum curriculum curriculum 4 4
and Reporting
assessment requirements as requirements as requirements as requirements as
strategies consistent shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV shown in MOV
1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating 1 with a rating
with curriculum of 7 of 6 of 5 of 4
requirements.
TO BE FILL
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
EVALU
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT PER Very RATING
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
KRA QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Results Q
No
Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2
acceptable
Submitted 1
least 4 varied varied varied
assessment evidence
assessment assessment assessment
Efficiency tools as evidently tools as evidently tools as evidently
tools as evidently was 4
shown in any of
shown in any 1 shown in any 1 shown in any 1
the acceptable shown
of the acceptable of the acceptable of the acceptable
MOV
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
No
Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely
acceptable
monitored and monitored and monitored and monitored and evidence
evaluated evaluated evaluated evaluated was
learner progress learner progress learner progress learner progress shown
and and and and
Quality achievement achievement achievement achievement 4
using learner using learner using learner using learner
11. Monitored and attainment data attainment data attainment data attainment data
as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the as shown in the
evaluated learner MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
progress and
7.5% 4
achievement using
4. Assessment learner attainment No
and Reporting data. Submitted a Submitted a Submitted a acceptable
combination of at combination of 3 combination of 2 Submitted 1 evidence was
Efficiency least 4 of the of the acceptable of the acceptable acceptable MOV shown 4
acceptable MOV MOV MOV

No
Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was
Timeliness across 4 across 3 across 2 only 1 shown 4
quarters quarters quarters quarter

No
acceptable
evidence was
Consistently Frequently Occasionally shown
Rarely showed
12. Communicated showed prompt showed prompt showed prompt
prompt
and clear and clear and clear
promptly and clearly communication of communication of communication of
and clear
the learners’ needs, communication of
the learners’ the learners’ the learners’
the learners’ needs,
progress and needs, progress needs, progress needs, progress
progress and
7.5% Quality and and and 4 4
achievement to key achievement to achievement to achievement to
achievement to
key stakeholders,
stakeholders, key stakeholders,
including parents/
key stakeholders,
including parents/
key stakeholders,
including parents/
including parents/
including guardians as guardians as guardians as
guardians as
shown in the MOV
parents/guardians. shown in the shown in the shown in the
submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
shown in the MOV
parents/guardians. shown in the shown in the shown in the
submitted
MOV submitted MOV submitted MOV submitted
TO BE FILL
TO BE FILLED IN DURING PLANNING
EVALU
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
WEIGHT PER Very RATING
MFOs KRAs OBJECTIVES TIMELINE
KRA QET Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor Actual
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1) Results Q
Submitted a Submitted a Submitted No
combination of combination of any 1 of the acceptable
3 of the 2 of the given evidence was
Submitted a shown
Efficiency combination of acceptable acceptable MOV
at least 4 of the MOV MOV
acceptable
MOV
No
Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV Submitted MOV acceptable
were distributed were distributed were distributed was completed in evidence was
Timeliness across 4 across 3 across 2 only 1 shown
quarters quarters quarters quarter

No
acceptable
Consistently Frequently Occasionally Rarely evidence was
shown
performed performed performed performed
various related various related various related various related
work/activities work/activities work/activities work/activities
that contribute that contribute that contribute that contribute
Quality to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching to the teaching 5
learning learning learning learning
13. Performed various process as process as process as process as
related shown in the shown in the shown in the shown in the
works/activities that MOV MOV MOV MOV
5. Plus Factor 10.0% submitted submitted submitted submitted 5
contribute to the
teaching -learning
process. No
Submitted at Submitted 3 Submitted 2 acceptable
Submitted any evidence was
least 4 different different kinds different kinds shown
1 of the
Efficiency kinds of of of
acceptable 5
acceptable acceptable acceptable
MOV
MOV MOV MOV

Timeliness
OVERALL
RATING FOR
ACCOMPLISHMENT

LEGEND:
NUMERICAL RATINGADJECTIVAL RATING
4.5 - 5.00 Outstanding
3.5 - 4.49 Very Satisfactory
2.5 - 3.49 Satisfactory JIM J. LEBICO JEROME T. VISTAL ROMULO D. ALBINO
1.5 - 2.49 Unsatisfactory RATER RATEE APPROVING AUTHORITY
1.49 - and below Poor
for

DEPARTMENT

TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION

RATING SCORE

E T Ave.

3 3.0 0.23
TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION

RATING SCORE

E T Ave.

3 3.0 0.23

4 4 0.30
TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION

RATING SCORE

E T Ave.

3 3 0.23
TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION

RATING SCORE

E T Ave.

3 3 0.23

4 3.5 0.26
TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION

RATING SCORE

E T Ave.

4 4 0.30

3 3 0.23
TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION

RATING SCORE

E T Ave.

3 3.5 0.2625

4 4 0.30
TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION

RATING SCORE

E T Ave.

4 4 4.00 0.30

4 4 4.0 0.30
TO BE FILLED DURING
EVALUATION

RATING SCORE

E T Ave.

5 5 0.50

FOR 3.65
LISHMENT
Very Satisfactory
PART II - COMPETENCIES

CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES

4.2 Self Management 5 Drives consensus and team ownership of decisions 2.6 Written Communication
4 Sets personal goals and directions, needs and development 5 Works constructively and collaboratively with others and across 3 Knows the different written business communication
5 Undertakes personal actions and behavior that are clear and purposive and organizations to accomplish organizational goals and objectives. formats usedin DepEd.
takes into account personal goals and values congruent to that of organizations. 3 Writes routine correspondence/communications,
4 Displays emotional maturity and enthusiam for and is challeged by higher goals. 4.4 Service Orientation narrative and descriptive report based on readily available
3 Prioritize work tasks and schedules (through Gantt charts checklist, etc.) to achieve goals 4 Can Explain and articulate organizational directions, issues, and problems. information data with minimal spelling or grammatical
5 Sets high quality, realistic goals for self and others 4 Takes personal responsibility for dealing and/or connecting error/s (e.g. memos, minutes, etc.)
customer service isues and concerns. 4 Secures information from required references
4.4 Professionalism and ethics 4 Initiates activities that promotes advocacy for men and women (i.e., Directories, schedules, notices, instructions)
4 Demonstrate the values and behavior enshrined in the Norms of Conduct and empowerment. for specific purposes.
ethical Standards for public officials and employees (RA 6713) 5 Participates in updating of office vision, mission, mandates, and 3 Self-edits words, number, phonetic notations and content if necessary
4 Practices ethical and professional behavior and conduct taking into account the strategies based on DepEd strategies and directions. Demonstrate clarify, fluency, impact, conciseness and
impact of his/her actions and decisions. 5 Develops and adopts service improvement programs through effectiveness in his/her written comunications
5 Maintains and professional image: being trustworthy, regularly of attendance and simplified procedure that will further enhance service delivery.
punctuality, good grooming, and communication. 4.8 Computer/ICT skills
5 Makes personal sacrifices to meet the organization's needs. 4.6 Innovations 5 Prepares basic composition (e.g. letters, reports, spreed
4 Acts with sense of urgency and responsibility to meet the organization's needs, improve 5 Examines the root cause of problems and suggests effective sheets, and graphic presentation using word processing
systems and help others improve their effetiveness solutions. Fosters new ideas, process, and suggests better ways and exel)
to do things (cost and/or operational efficiency). 4 Identifies different computer parts, turns the computer
4.8 Result Focus 5 Demonstrate an ability to think "beyond the box". Continuously on/off, and work on a given task with acceptable speed and
5 Achieve results with optimal use of time and resources most of the time. focuses on improving personal productivity to create higher value accuracy and connects computer peripherals (e.g printers,
4 Avoids rework, mistakes and wastage through effective work methods by placing and results. modems, multimedia projectors, etc.)
organizational needs before personal needs. 5 Promotes a creative climate and inspires co-workers to develop 5 Prepares simple presentation using powerpoint.
5 Delivers error-free outputs most of the time by conforming to standard operating original ideas or solutions. 5 Utilizes technologies to: access information to enhance
procedures corectly and consistently. Able to produce very satisfactory quality of work 4 Translates creative thinking into tangible changes and solutions profesional productivity, assists in conducting research
in terms of usefulness/acceptability and completeness with no supervisions required that improve the work unit and organizaton. and communicate through local and global professional
5 Expresses a desire to do better and may express frustration at waste or inefficiency. 4 Uses ingenious methods to accomplish responsibilities. networks.
may focus on new or more precise ways of meeting goals set. Demonstrates resourcefulness and ability to succed with minimal 5 Recommends appropriate and updated technology to
5 Makes specific changes in the system or in own work methods to improve performances. resources. enhance productivity and professional practice.
Examples may include doing something better, faster, at a lower cost, more efficiently;
or improving quality, customer satisfaction, morale, without setting any specific goal. CORE SKILLS OVERALL COMPETENCY RATING

5.0 Team Work 4.0 Oral Communication


5 4
CORE BEHAVIORAL COMPETENCIES 4.57
Willingly does his/her share of responsibility. Follows instructions accuracy.
5 Promotes collaborations and removes barriers to teamwork and goal accomplishment 4 Expresses self clearly, fluently and articulately.
across the organization. 4 Uses appropriate medium for the message.
CORE SKILLS 3.80
5 Applies negotiation principles in arriving win-win agreements 4 Adjust communication style to others
OVERALL RATING 4.18
4 Guides discussions between and among peers to meet an objectives.
OVERALL RATING 4.18

You might also like