BRE{ CRETARLE ROMANA: FAVTORVM ACTA 36 2000 Ganka ISEHIE* id Gerwulf Schneider AEGEAN COOKING WARE IN THE EASTERN ADRIATIC ‘Accasserole witha lid, a cooking jar and a mug of Aezean types, common in the Aegean in the period ¢.60-250 AD." were found in the graves below the hillfort of Rodik- ‘Ajdov8tina?, the native settlement situated near the Roman main-road from Tergeste to Tarsatica (fi, 1,1)’. One of the graves is dated by the lamps to the 2° century. In Slovenia, these vessels have analogies atthe site of Ad Pirum (Hrusica), Emona (Ljubljana) and Grosuplje near Ljubljana. Atd Pirum (fig, 1,2), an important posting-sta- tion at the pass of the Roman road between Aquileia and Emona, fragments of casseroles have been found (fig. 2)5 Among the finds fiwur Emon (fig. 1,3) the cooking-jars, ‘mugs and a pinch-mouthed jug of Aegean types (fig. 31-3) ‘ean be found.* Jars of similar form in typical local fabric are not rare among the pottery from this site (fig. 34-6)’, and locally made mugs also oecurt. According to Plesnigar-Gec’ the ribbed jars were in use at Emona in the second half of the century and in the 2" century. From a close look at the Emonian graves containing these small jars it results that only grave 239" cannot be dated later than the beginning of the second half of the 1* century, i. early, compared to the dating of the Aegean cooking-ware. As the grave assemblage comes from old excavations atthe beginning of the century, it {is possible that the grave assemblage was mixed up. From Grosuplje, a settlement in the ager of Emona, two siall-han- dled mugs, imports judged by macroscopic examination, are stored in the National Museum of Slovenia." Casseroles, cooking-jars, mugs and pineh-mouthed jugs ‘of the same types as those in figs. 2-3 constituted the cargo ‘ofa ship which sank off the Paklent island archipelago, near the island of Har (fig. 1,20) and another sunken ship found near Viganj in the PeljeSac canal (fig. 1,21)". The same types of vessels were recorded in the little-known under- water find off Nerezine (figs. 1,11; 4,1-3.5; $,1-8)," so it ‘may be assumed that they also were ship's cargo. At all three underwater sites the same types of vessels occur as a cargo (figs. 4-5): casseroles, jars, lids, pinch-mouthed jugs. mugs, frying-pans and cooking-dishes ‘The speck off Paklent islands the only one which was excavated by archeologists. Aecording.o the short reports which have been published," the ship's cargo consisted of cooking ware of Aegean types, Easter sigillata B and stone blocks. It ‘was estimated that more than 10,000 pottery vessels had sunk, During the excavations about 3,000 whole vessels were re- covered. The shipwreck off Pakleni island was dated by the excavators to the 2° century AD. It seems tht its dating could be limited to the first half ofthe 2™ century, as ESB was prob- ably not produced later." The shipwreck might be even earl- ier, rom the 70s of the I" century AD. An example ofa name stamp CTIO:POY on ESB is reported to have been found to- gether with geometric and floral stamps.” For the dating of the shipwreck the whole assemblage of the ESB (and the rest of the cargo) is relevant, so it can not be assessed before the fall report is published, In the Eastern Adriatic there are numerous finds of ves- sels ofthe types known from the wrecks already mentioned. Visalovig terms them ‘rough provineial pottery of serial production’. Aside from the already mentioned shipwrecks he cites numerous other submarine sites (sporadic finds at shipwreck sites, scattered finds in the sea, finds at the sites The author would like to thank Telckom Slovenie for its kind provision of financial suppor forthe research. 53. Hayes, Handbook of Mediterranean Roman Pottery (London 1997) 79, Hayes 1991, 80, Inhis earlier paper Hayes (1983, 105) dated this ware to the 2" and 2° century CT. also K. Warner Slane, The Sanetusry of Demeter and Kore. The Roman Pottery and Lamps, Corinth XVIIL2 (Princeton NJ 1990) 76. 2 Istenié 1987 pls. 94-5: 11,1: 12,1. J.Istenie, Kuhinsko posude ‘egeskihtipova na nalazistu Rodik — nektopola Pod Jezerom. Diadora 10,1988 pls. 12-3; 3.1, J. Istenié would like to thank fda Murgel (National Museum of | Slovenia) who made fig. 1 and the drawings in figs 2-S and also Roman Hribar (National Museum of Slovenia) who designed figs. 2-5, Istenié 1987 grave 6 pls. 9-10. Fragments of two casseroles were published already by U. Giesler, Die Kleinfunde nT Uber (el), Ad Piram (Husica). Mnetone Beite Vor- und Frahgesch, 31 (Munchen 1981) 245 nos, 9-10 pL SL.7-8. Here they were mistakenly classified 2s (postmedieval Unfortunately there is no stratigraphic evidence forthe dating of| those casseroles at ths site Plesniar-Gee 1972 pls, 241; 53,10. — Petru 1972 pls. 18,27; 22,31; 43,18; 8523 — on author's personal examination except ‘examples rom Plesnitar-Gee 1972 (they were not available in the period of my study there also the jug National Museum of| Slovenia Ins, no, R 9050 (= Petru 1972, 36 grave 201, without drawing), (CF-below and Plesniar-Goc 1972 pls, 1.2; 4,3: 5,22; 728; 10.13; 12a tats 13564 17,10; 18,118,115 36,9298], 05112 74,1, 80/7, 138,14; 164,11; 184,6; 195,3, — Petru 1972 pls. 11 (7), 20,20; 24.21: 25.21; 36.12.13; 42.34; 43.30; 110.18.20.28 —on Author's personel macroscopic examination For example National Museum of Slovenia, Inv. no. R 6118 (= Petr 1972 pl. $4.32), L Plesnitar-Ge, Keramika emonskih nekropol. Diss et Monogt 20 (Ljubljana 1979) 48 pl. 66-15. © Petra 1972 pl. 24 "Tay. nos, R 8886, 8 8487. They originate from old unprofessional © Tlakovac 1968. — M. OrligIM. Jurisié, Rekognosciranja i Istrazivanya u jedranskom poumoru, Obaviest 18-1. 1986, 48. “'M, OrligIM. Iurisie, Podimorska arhooloske istrazivanja na Jadranu. godini 1986, Obavijesti 18.3, 1986, 0. — IurisicRadié 1099. MJunsg,Istraivanje podmorskih arheolskih fkalitet ‘uHrvasko)tijekom 1990. godine. Obavijest 23.1, 1991, 26-28. his shipwreck i situated near the cape zmetse’s off Pakien| island there is another shipwreck in the bay Stari Slani ‘horae dated from I* century BC to 1 century AD (ef M. Oni M-lursi, Zasttn istrazivanjeantitkog brodoloma na Paklenim ‘tocima. Obavijesti 19:3, 1987, 3940), ° Reapanié 1972. —Z. Rapanié, Vigna na PojeStu ‘brad, Ath, Pregled 14,1972, 79-80.—D. Visalovi, Istazivanja Feastita podmorskih'arheoioskin spomenika wu Sit Hrvatska} (Zagreb 1974) fg. 30, J. Tsien would lke to thank Zetjka Cetinié for che kind permise son to publish these Find, stored in the Povijesni | pomorski ‘uz hrvatskog Primorja at Rijeka (Croatia) inv. nos. K274- 283. The museum acquired these find from sponge-divers ' Soe note 12 "Hayes 1985, 51 © Jurisie/Radié 1980, 34. — CE Hayes 1985, 52. 3411 Isrewe/G, Sevneroen Eau Wt Pater Exchanges ‘Adriatic sea and the hinterland in the Roman period — sites where Aegean cooking-ware was found (#) and sites of shipwrecks loaded with Aegean cooking ware (): 1 Rodik. — 2 Hrusica. —3 Ljubljana, — 4 Grosuplje. — 5 Buzet-Funtana, — 6 Katoro by Umag. — 7 Sorna near Pore®. —@ Krings. —9 Pula. — 10 Baijuni, — 1 Shipwreck off Nerezine. — 12 Shipwreck of lovik, — 13 Nin, — 14 Zadar. — 18 Nadin-Gradina, — 16 Biljane Donje. — 17 Pasman, — 18 Smokvice by Sibenik. 19 Satré, — 20 Shipwreck off Paklent island. — 24 Shipwreck near Vigan] in the Peljesae canal, — 22 Shipwreck off Mljet. — 23 Aquileia. — 24 Oderzo. — 25 Corte Cavanella de Lorco. — 26 §, Basilio. — 27 Voghenza, — 28 Russi. — Ravenna, — 29 Portorecanati, — “The distribution ofthe Aegean cooking ware in the Adriatic inthis figure has no intention to be complete: a detailed work inthe stores of the museums in the region would be necessary to complete this task. On the inserted map of the Mediterranean are indicate: the region where the Aegean cooking ware was supposedly produced (8) and the most important sites (2) where this ware was found 1. RaiéM. Juri, Das antike Sehiffowrack von Mlje, Kroatien ‘of harbour installations and other constructions)."* Aegean- type cooking vessels are also published from some other submarine sites (shipwrecks off Hovik south of island of Lofinj' and off island of Mljet, fig. 1,12.22) as well as from littoral and hinterland cemeteries (Buzet-Funtana’", Pula®, Biljane Donje near Zadar”, Zadar, Nin and island Pasman®, Satrié™, fig. 1,5.9.13-14.16-17.19) and settle- ments (Nadin-Gradina/Nedinum”, fig. 1,15). Some further ™. Vsaloid, Arheolota istrabivanjau podmorjuistoénog Joana Republitki zavod 2a zat spomenika Kulture (unpublished PhD thesis Zagreb 1979) 411-417. Regrettably, most of the finds are not documented with drawings or photographs nor descriptions: these find-spots are not on fig ® M. Onli, Antithi brod kod otoka Hoviks, Mala biblioteka podisnjaka zastte spomenika Hrvatske Suppl 10/1, 1984/85 (1986), 31-32 figs. 25:27 342 Germania 71, 1993, 124 Tig. 8 2 VJurkig, Rimska Zama nekropola na Funtani pod Buzetom,Hisria Arch, 10.2, 1979, 62; 68-69 fig. 113 > Ro Matijalié, Campus Martius. Antitka nekropota izmedu Premanturske i Medulinse ulce u Puli (strazivanje 1985-1986 godine), Monogr. Ka Arh, Maz, [sie (Pula 1991) gave 7 3, irave 16 pl. 81-2; grave 39 pl. 16.1: grave 6 pl. 231, grave 75 1 30,1, — A, Stara, Antighi pail iz sondaznog iskopa kod trkve Se, Nikole u Puli, godine 1961. Opuscula Areh. (Zagreb) 161, 1992, 188 pl. 33-4 Lai, Anika nksopolsu Biljanim Donji kod Zadra, Diadora 11, 234 pls 3,6; 41-6: 10 ® 8, Gluwevi, Rimika Keramika u Kaljsko uli. Diadora 12,1990, 142-143 pl. 24,1 Tlakovae 1968, 192-193. » §.GlusZevig, Rmskanekzopolau Saiéu. Arhooloska thistoiska brastina Ceke kraine. Zork Cetinske keine (Sin 1981) 205; 206; 208 nos. 10: 15: 18 pls. 210: 3.15; 5.18 KE, Grimtth, The Roman Powtery from Nadin-Gradina, Dalma- ‘Yugoslavia. RCRF Acta 29/30, 1991, 120; 122 figs. 2-3,Ea Pst Exchanges unpublished find-spots of Aegean-type casseroles (Soma near Poreé™, Smokvice near Sibenik fig 1,7.18) and pots (Kringa®, Brioni", fig. 1,8.10) were noted during visits t0 the museums. In the Gradski muzej Umaga a casserole, two jars, a pinch-mouthed jug, a small handled-mug and a fry- ing-pan from a submarine site near Katoro by Umag (fig. 1,6) are exhibited” From the Western Adriatic, many examples of handled ‘mugs, some examples of ribbed pots and few examples of ‘casseroles are published, mostly from graves (Aquileia”, Oderzo™, Corte Cavanella di Loreo and San Basilio near Adria”, Voghenza and its environs, Russi-Ravenna” and Portorecanati/Potentia south of Ancona”, fig. 1,23-29) and many more probably exist in the stores of the mu- seums in this region, ‘The tim diamoters of the published vessels indicate that their measurements/volumes were standardized: the casser~ oles (fig. 6), pots, pinch-mouthed jugs and probably also frying pans are of three different sizes, while cooking-dishes. are of two sizes.” This, as well as their identical or very similar technical details, indicate a mass-production. Aegean cooking ware was distributed along the whole Mediterranean littoral: in addition to the Adriatic sites al- ready mentioned they are known also from the coast of north-west Arica, from southern France and western Italy. It is generally accepted that they were produced in the East- cern Mediterranean. ‘The shipwreck off Pakleni island suggested thatthe cen- tte of production of Aegean cooking-ware was in the same region as Easter sigillata B, that is in Western Asia Mi nor! This was confirmed by the discovery of the pottery. production site at Foga in Western Asia Minor, as well as by petiographic analyses of samples from this and some other sites in Asia Minor by Roman Sauer:® The analyses have ‘shown that these high-quality cooking vessels were produced in the region of Foga (Roman Phocaca), Possibly Phocaea was not the only major production cen- tre of Aegean cooking ware.* At Ostia two fabric groups of ‘Aegean cooking vessels were distinguished: a fabric group with voleanic inclusions, which may probably be identified with the products from Foga, and a fabric group for which crystalline schists are characteristic. For this group a source in Attica or the Aegean islands is hypothesized. “Arholoaki muzej Pale inv, nos. A9722, A.9S77, My visto the AAtheoloski muze) Pule tok place 14 years ago. | would lke to ‘hank V. Juri Gita then dtectr a the museum, for pemnission| te sce the pottery inthe storerooms. ‘Arheotosk! muze) Pule, inv. no. A477 ‘Arheolotki muze) Pule, inv. no. 4886, — 8. Mlakar, Zastino iskopavanjerimskihpepeoni rebovau Kring! 1960, pode, Histia ‘Arch. 4.1, 1973, 36-37 (without drawing) > Atheolosi muzej Pale, inv, no, 8086, Further Aegean-type cook ing vessels are stored atthe Muscum of Brion (ef. paper by V. ‘cis Peshe hisvolume 263-269). ® Twoul thane Narisa Bolte Feri fo the information on the site where these vessels were found and Verena Vidrh Perko for drawing my attention to these vessels, © Li Mandruzzato, La necropolis lcalita Colombara:scavo 1995. In A, Giovannini, Recent sea nee necropoliaquiliesi. Aguile Nostra 68, 1997, 73-198, —Cr-also the paper by L, Mandnzzat . TiusiV. Degrass in this volume p. 359-364 GM. SandrinvA. SaccocedG, Rallo, Cinque pozzi romani ad Oderzo, Quad. Arch. Veneto 4, 1988, 80 fig 23.10. ACGEAN COOKING WARE N THE EASTERN ADRIATIC © U, Dallemulle era, La villa rustica di S. Basilio. In: Lantico Palsine. Testimoninizeacheologiche paleoambientai Catalogo csposizion! Adria e Rovio, Febbraio-Novembre 1986 (Padova 1986) 192 fig. 5.26.31. — L. Sanesi Mastrocingue ef af, Linsediamento romano di Corte Cavanella di Lare. In: op. cit 242-244 pls 413-1421; 5.22, % C.Comelio Cassai, Proposte ‘eechie nua itrovamen- 16. F Ber, Lanccropat romana di Voghenza. In: Bandini Mazzanti 1984, pls. 182 (grave 8); 22,8; 28,5-6; 29.2 (grave 47): 32,2 (graves 48, 50); 331 (grave $1): 33,2 (grave 52), 37.2 (grave 62) figs. 88; Us. {. Mazzeo-Saracino, Russi Ravenna). Campagna di scave 1971. Nit, Seavi Ant, 831, 1977, 14] fig. 76,656. 2 LMereando, Porirécanati(Macerata). La necropoli romana di Portorecanat, Not. Savi Ant. 828, 1974, graves 7,8, 10, 16, ‘8,11, 35,40, $5, 58, 65,93, 128 bis, 140, 183 A, 187, 213,215, 220, 255, 304, 305, » Casteroles, Group I: mean 14.0, standard deviation (4)0.7, ‘umber of vessels (= N}9; Group 2: mean 19.2, 20.8, N Group 3: mean 243, 1.7, N= 10. ‘Group {s mean 11-1, 21.7, N=21; Group 2: mean 18.2, 1,5, N= 13; Group 3: mean 22.0, 40.7, N= 5, Pineh-mouthed jugs, Group T: mean 10.5, 40.28, = 2; Group 2: 124, 202, N=, Group 3: mean 16.1, 404, N Frying pans, Group 1: mean 23.7, 40.6, N 26K, £LS, N= 11s Group 3: mean 352, 40.8, N Cooking-dishes, Group I: mean 288,09, N= 10;Group2:mean 340,205, In addition othe publications already mentioned, the following, were also used for collecting measures of Aegean cooking ware: Goldman (ed. Excavations a Gozld/Kule, Tarsus. The Hel lenistic and Roman Periods (Princeton 1950). — H. Goldman, ‘The acropolis of Halae. Hesperia 9, 1940, 381-14. — H_S Robinson, Pottery ofthe Roman Period. Chronology. The Athen Agora V (Princeton NI 1959), 1. A. Riley Coarse Pottery. in JA. Lloyd (ed), Excavations at Sidi Khebish Benghazi (Berenice) M1. Suppl, Libya Amt 52 (Tripoli 1979) 91-236 CF. also lakovac 1968, 192 * V_Di Giovanni, Produzione e consumo di ceramica da cueina nella Campania romana (Ifa.C--Il dC). tn 'M, Moliner, Céramiques communes & Marseille d’aprés les les récentes. In: Bats 1996, 244-247, — M. Pasgualini, Va ‘commune de able cde cuisine en basse Provence au lisse de notre ee In: Bals 1996, 295-296, —CaletiPavolini 1996, 398 401; 409-412 with references, ‘The most likely rea of engin of ESB is ancient Trails in West- cm Turkey. CI. G, Schaeider, Roman red and black slipped pot- tery rom NE-Syria and Jordan, Fist results of chemical analy Sis, In: H, Meyzail. Mlynarezyk (eds), Hellenistic and Roman tery in the eastern Mediterranean — advances in scientific stud tes. Acts I Nieborow pottery workshop, Nieborow 18 -20, De ‘cermber 1993 (Warsaw 1995) 416. —G, Schneider, Lasituazione delle ricerche archeometriche sulla sigilata orientale sulle ‘oramiche Fini di epoca tardo antica. In: G. Oleese (a cura di), Coramica mane tiie, hla deg stu At Gionate Intemaz, Sta Castello di Monteyufon! 26-27 Aprile 1993 (Firenze 1994) 64. —R. SaueriG. Schneider. Ouschar, Combined petro- graphical and geochemical studies inthe determination of pottery production centers —- The ease of Ephesos. Poser at the 20" Inet. Symposium on Archaeometry 1994 in Ankara. — G. Schneider, Chemical grouping of Roman Tera Sigillata finds from “Turkey, Jonfan and Syria In: §, Demite/A. M. OzeriG. D. Sum- mers (6s), Archacometry 94. roe. 29" Intemat, Symposium on ‘Archacomelry, kara 94 May 1994 (Ankara 1996) 189-196, “© RY Sauer, Preduktionszentrenspithellenistischer und romischer Keramik an der {etrlchen Untersuchungen fir das FWF Projelt Ne P9280 (un published report Wicn 1995), — S. Zabehlicky-SchefTenogger, Spathelenistisches und frihkaiserzitliches Kochgeschit In RCREragmenta. Beitr zur Kerarnikin Epesos, Herausgeyeben anliBlich des XXI Interationalen RCRF-Kongresses in Epesos Group 2: mean ‘und Pergamon 1998 (WienSeleuk 1998, a brochure disinbuted {a the participants ofthe congress) 36 note |. — 8, Ladstter, Mitelkaisereitliches Kochgeschire bid. 40 note 3. © Hayes 1983, 108. — Hayes 1991, 80, * ColetivPavolini 1996, 410; 412 343Eases Pane changes J IsteMelG. Sewvcioen “puowgeuetygnty wor (9-F) stone 1) amen 8ur{000 weafoy “¢ “Sta €:1 9189S ‘wnarg P¥maigeayy wos (Sajoxasseo} xvas Tupjooo uwaRoy Jo swuawiTesy :z By f iON aii fhe _ He ne | 344Eas. Pat changes shipwreck off Nerezine. Seale 1:3 Fig. 4: Vessels of Aegean types from shipwrecks in the easter Adriatic: 1-3.8 from the Fig. 5: Vessels of Aegean types from: shipwrecks in the eastern Adriatic: from the shipwreck off Nerezine and 4 off Viganj (from Rapanié 1972, 147). Scale 1:31 Isrewe/G, Semseve ‘number of vessels Est Por Exchanger Fig. 6 Histogram showving rim diam eters of casseroles. Casseroles from the shipwreck off Pakleni island (8), casseroles from other sites (Q). Fig. 7: Thin-section microphotographs (XPL) of casseroles from Aquileia (width of field=2 mm): 1 showing two characteristic inclusions of acid voleanic rock (F945). — 2 showing a fragment of pumice (F947). (Chemical (WD-XRF, table 1 )® and mineralogical (thin-sec- tion) snalyses ofa jar and thee eassernls frm Acq (hy G. Schneider) have shown that their chemical (table 1) and min- ceralogical compositions (fig. 7) closely match one of the ‘groups of kitchen-wares from Ephesus”, which, according to R. Sauer (unpublished report), was produced at Piiocaea. The results of the analyses ofthe Aquileian vessels also match the published analyses of kitchen-wares from Phocaca.® From Emona a small jar® (fig. 3,1) and a mug" (fig. 3,2), regarded as imports by macroscopic examination, and three jars’! (fig. 3,4-6), classi copies of Ae ‘cooking-ware were chosen for chemical analyses. The re- sults (table 1) have confirmed that the three jars (fig. 34-6) are of local origin® and the jar and the small mug (fig. 3,1-2) imported. The small jar matches well the analysed exam- ples from Aquileia and is most probably a Phocean prod- uct; the origin of the imported mug cannot for now be es tablished ed as loci an 346 ‘Analyses were done by wavelength-dspersve X-ray fluorescence (Phtns PW abo on amples nt a HC fs fein {loin iven in por cont, mejor elements were normalized to ‘constant sum of 100% and in pr ent, traces are in ppm, elements in brackets are determined with low precision and accuracy ‘We would like to thank Franca Masel Scot forthe kind permis sion to see the finds inthe stores and to take the samples for fnalyses. These were taken from casseroles now published by Mandraezato’Tist in this volume, 361 fig. 1-3 ahd fragments ‘of jar from the excavations of Aquileia Telecom, sratigraphie unit 21, G-XI-1996, Samples from Ephesus were kindly provided for chemical analy ‘Sishy Ulrike Outschar; EPHO16 coresponds to Hayes 1983 ig. 5 1.58; the other samples are from the Hanghaus’ and are dated F. Maye, Pico, Une siille phocéenne tardive (‘Late Roman C Ware’) et s2 diffusion en Oceident Figlina 7, 1986, 133 table | Narodni maze Slovenij, inv. no, R $902. [Natodn muze) Slovenie, inv. no. 5497. [Narodn muze)Slovenie, inv. nos, R 3896, R $918, R 3399. ® According to their chemical composition they match well the reference group from Ernona (analyses by Schneider, a paper by Pesnitar-Ciee Schneider Istenit isin preparation).ACEAN COOKING WARE IN THE EaSTERN ADWariC ase Pner Echangee vessels this evidence was also confirmed by chemical analysis using WD-XRF. Three shipwrecks from the East- ‘em Adriatic coast, loaded with the same types of Aegean ‘cooking-ware, provide evidence of the route via which these ‘vessels reached Westem Slovenia, Conclusions In Slovenia there are at least four sites where cooking- wares of Aegean type were found. They originate in the Western Asia Minor, probably in Phocaea. For one of the x95 ns 26s ie rot seo wes 16 amt wet sot e090 we ors ort set eo or we wt we set wt wo o s RBaR gad 6 oe * w uw * ® BRaH om set 6 os tt rt x © st as oct 26 cad me se me sat at 6 er wr ost ae © en 338 3 $88 er er 8 rs “ se w op “ oo” ee ez uy sts 6s as gR8 ose aga se © “ «© ee eRe st ow ve 6 ea zat io sor aa g8aa8 agar ® sa wr oot on 86 oer oor o « a % o ot gag aS NBaGa 3 4 ana 2 8 on sx so o REESE et B 6 B oe a UFO GST Wo BCD BO OW Ber CIO: Set cL ccEEE YO BT LEO OTT 90 T'O Bey Eee COT CUD BOSSE sero wz LEO FO Us'O ZO YO CLIT He N6RDE Roof ‘wu Seo SEE OF CLO SET eEN'O TL LUE SeHO BID LeRGE ‘woduur ‘euour ao TT oro co co ao co St oro ot FEE @0 er ee TT Ot ew os PE SO LO om (c= 8 “wos wooig -W) aneaqTo anbquresp9‘9g00%q Wooo ovr He? ore HET OevO UC GE Sisto Te uM WO GF ere UO SET REO LFS TE GeO OFS FUT U0 B's LE BO oO LITO WP BEE OD wee CLT oo us cre Wo oro tav'O ees Oe Ouro aeID SOOM 960 SES GEE OO SLO LADO TSS 9 HED SED STOKE (sdeosiqns on) sasagdg UO 6S OT OT OT WOO GS THE oD LAS eR oot Heo wr GY we wT Gro ws we ce TO LGD U0 ws OFT HT OT HIEO Se9 Laz ESD OOP aD evo SP eer wT eT eNO O's EEE aD SO Las UO © OE WT WT UFO 6s ore a0 TO NS wrejinby Sof ou oa om mM on Glas fly OU Tos “sa ste u7700 sR Jo TAXA SEAEEY = UAE, 347JL IsvewelG, Sowweien Bibliography Bandini Mazzanti 1984 Bats 1996 Coletti/Pavolini 1968 Hayes 1983 Hayes 1985 Hayes 1991 Hakovac 1968 Istenié 1987 Jurisig/Radié 1989 Petru 1972 Plesnitar-Gee 1972 Rapanié 1972 348 ase Wet Pater changes, M. Bandini Mazzanti (a cura di), Voghenza, Una necropoli di ett romana nel territorio fetrarese (Ferrara 1984), M. Bats (ed.), Les eéramiques communes de Campanie et de Narbonnaise 1996 (Us. av.J-C.—IFs. ap. J-C.), La vaiselle de cuisine et de table. Actes des Journées {étude organisées par le Centre Jean Bérard et la Soprintendenza Archeologica per le Province di Napoli e Caserta, Naples 27-28 mai 1994. Coll. Centre Jean Bérard 14 (Naples 1996) C.M, Coletti/C. Pavolini, Ceramica comune di Ostia, In: Bats 1996, 391-419, J.W. Hayes, The Villa Dionysos Excavations, Knossos: The Pottery. Annu. British School Athens 78, 1983, 97-169. J.W. Hayes, Sigilate orientali. In: EAA Atlante delle forme ceramiche Il, Ceramica fine romana nel bacino mediterraneo (Iardo ellenismo e primo impero) (Roma 1985) 1-96, J.W, Hayes, The Hellenistic and Roman Pottery. Paphos Ill (Nicosia 1991), B. lakovac, Keramika iz anti¢kog broda potonulog kod Paklenih otoka, Diadora 4, 1968, 183-202, J. Istenig, Rodik — grobiée Pod Jezerom. Arh, Vestnik 38, 1987, 69-136, M, Juri8ié, Radié, Hidroarheotogija 1988. godine, nastavak ranije zapodetih istrazivanja, Obavijesti 21.1, 1989, 34-35, S, Petru, Emonske nekropole odkrite med Ieti 1635-1960. Kat. in Monogr. 7 (Cjubljana 1979) L. Plesnigar-Gee, Severno emonsko grobisée. Kat. in Monogr. 8 (Ljubljana 1972). Z. Rapanié, Antitki brod s teretom keramike kod Vignja. Zborik otoka KorEule 2, 1972, 141-147.