Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 08
Design of Reinforced
Concrete Column
Contents
Introduction
Examples
1
11-May-16
Contents
Interaction Diagram
Examples
Examples
Introduction
2
11-May-16
Introduction
Introduction
1. Concentrically/Axially loaded
No eccentricity. Centre of gravity and
centroid matches
2. Eccentrically loaded
a. Uniaxially eccentric
b. Biaxially eccentric
3
11-May-16
Introduction
Short columns
Long columns
Introduction
Short Columns
The strength is governed by the strength of the materials. The failure
happens because of the crushing of materials and the geometry of the
cross section.
Slender columns
The strength may be significantly reduced by lateral deflections. Failure
happens because of lateral deflections (buckling).
4
11-May-16
Introduction
Longitudinal/Main Reinforcement
The main reinforcement in columns is longitudinal, parallel to the
direction of the load.
Introduction
Lateral Ties
The lateral ties are bars arranged in a square, rectangular, or
circular pattern.
They are provided to resist buckling, to hold the main bars and to
resist shear.
5
11-May-16
Introduction
6
11-May-16
Mechanics
Cc = Ac * fc
Mechanics
The section will reach its axial capacity when strain in concrete reaches
a value of 0.003.
The yield strain values of steel for grade 40 and 60 are 0.00138 and
0.00207 respectively.
Therefore steel would have already yielded at 0.003 strain. Hence fs1 =
fs2 = fs3 = fs4 = fy and fc = 0.85 fc′
Let As1 + As2 + As3 = Ast and Ac = Ag – Ast , where Ag = gross area of
column section, Ast = total steel area
7
11-May-16
Mechanics
Φ Pn = Pu
Mechanics
8
11-May-16
9
11-May-16
i. 1.5 in.
ii. 1.5db
10
11-May-16
11
11-May-16
Examples
18″
18″
Examples
Solution
Nominal strength (ΦPn) of axially loaded column is:
ΦPn = 0.80Φ{0.85fc′(Ag – Ast) + Ast fy}
Ag = 18 x 18 = 324 in2
Let Ast = 1% of Ag = 0.01 x 324 = 3.24
ΦPn = 0.80 × 0.65 × {0.85 × 3 × (324 – 3.24) + 3.24 × 40}
= 492 kips > (Pu = 300 kips), O.K.
Therefore, Ast = 0.01 × 324 = 3.24 in2
12
11-May-16
Examples
Solution
Main Bars:
Using #6 bar, with bar area Ab = 0.44 in2
No. of bars = As/Ab = 3.24 / 0.44 = 7.36 ≈ 8 bars
Use 8 #6 bars
Examples
Solution
Tie Bars:
Using #3 bar, with bar area Ab = 0.11 in2
Center-to-center spacing shall not exceed the least of;
i. 16db of longitudinal bar = 16 x 0.75 = 12″
ii. 48db of tie bar = 48 x 3/8 = 18″
iii. smallest dimension of member = 18″
Therefore use #3 ties @ 12″ c/c
13
11-May-16
Examples
14
11-May-16
Mechanics
moment Mu = Pu e
Mechanics
Pn = Cc + Cs - T
Where; Cc = 0.85fc′ab, Cs = As1fs1 and T = As2 fs2
15
11-May-16
Mechanics
ΦMn = Mu
Pu
Cc = 0.85fc′ab
Cs = As1fs1 and
T = As2 fs2
Mechanics
Mu = ΦMn
As1 = As2 = As
16
11-May-16
Mechanics
Mu = Φ [ 0.425 fc′ ab (h – a) + As {h / 2 – d′ }
( fs1 + fs2 )]------(2b)
Mechanics
17
11-May-16
Mechanics
Mechanics
In the same way, equations (1) and (2b) may be used for design of
RC member subjected to compressive load with uniaxial bending
Pu=Φ{0.85fc′ab+As1fs1 – As2fs2} …………………………………(1)
Mu=Φ[0.425fc′ab(h – a) + As{(h/2) - d′}(fs1 + fs2)] ………… .(2b)
18
11-May-16
Mechanics
Mechanics
19
11-May-16
Mechanics
Mechanics
20
11-May-16
Mechanics
Alternative Approach
Mechanics
Alternative Approach
ФPn and ФMn are calculated for various values of “c” from 0
to h, with the check that during calculations fs1 and fs2 do not
exceed fy for both eqns.
c (in) ФPTable
n (kips)
4 ФMn (kip-ft)
0 ≤ c ≤ (h = 12)
3.69 0 36.25
5 64.6 41.59
7 133 43.09
9 185.3 36
12 252.64 19.44
Axial capacity 281 0
21
11-May-16
Mechanics
Alternative Approach
Interaction Diagram
General:
For a column of known dimensions
and reinforcement, several pairs of P
and M from various values of “c”
using equations 1 and 2b can be
obtained and plotted as shown.
Such a graph is known as capacity
curve or interaction diagram.
Nominal and Design diagram are
given in the figure.
22
11-May-16
Interaction Diagram
General:
If the factored demand in the form of
Pu and Mu lies inside the design
interaction diagram, the given
column will be safe against that
demand.
Interaction Diagram
Important Features of
Interaction Diagram:
Horizontal Cutoff: The horizontal
cutoff at upper end of the curve
at a value of αΦPnmax represents
the maximum design load
specified in the ACI 10.3.5 for
small eccentricities i.e., large
axial loads.
23
11-May-16
Interaction Diagram
Important Features of
Interaction Diagram:
Linear Transition of Φ from 0.65
to 0.90 is applicable for εt ≤ fy/Es
to εt = 0.005 respectively.
h = γh+2d′
γ = (h-2d′)/h b X
Y
Once γ is calculated, the interaction
diagram corresponding to the value of γ is
selected & then column can be designed Reference: Design of Concrete Structures 13th Ed. by
using steps given on the next slides. Nilson, Darwin and Dolan.
24
11-May-16
Examples
12″
12″
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 320 Reinforced Concrete Design-I 50
25
11-May-16
Examples
Examples
26
11-May-16
Point 02: c = h
Point 2 corresponds to
crushing of the concrete at
the compression face of the
section and zero stress at
the other face.
27
11-May-16
28
11-May-16
εc = 0.003
εt >> 0.005
29
11-May-16
Examples
12″
12″
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 320 Reinforced Concrete Design-I 59
Examples
Solution:
Design interaction diagram will be developed by plotting (06)
points as discussed earlier.
30
11-May-16
Examples
Solution:
Point 2: c = h
c = 12 ″ (c = h); a = β1c = 0.85 × 12 = 10.2″
fs1 = 0.003E (c – d′)/c = 0.003×29000(12 – 2.25)/12 = 70.69 ksi > fy,
use fy = 40 ksi.
fs2 = 0.003E (d – c)/c = 0.003×29000(9.75 – 12)/12 = -16.31 ksi< fy
Therefore, ΦPn = Φ {0.85fc′ab + As fs1 – Asfs2}
= 0.65{0.85×3×10.2×12 +0.88×40+0.88×16.31} = 235.09 kip
ΦMn = Φ [0.425fc′ab (h – a) + As {(h/2) – d′} (fs1 + fs2)]
= 0.65[0.425×3×10.2×12×(12–10.2)+0.88×{(12/2) – 2.25}(40-16.31)]
= 233.41 in-kip = 19.45 ft-kip
Examples
Solution:
Point 3: c = (h-d ′)
c =12-2.25=9.75; a = β1c = 0.85 × 9.75 = 8.29″
fs1 = 0.003E (c – d′)/c = 0.003×29000(9.75 – 2.25)/9.75 = 66.92 ksi > fy,
use fy = 40 ksi.
fs2 = 0.003E (d – c)/c = 0.003×29000(9.75 – 9.75)/9.75 = 0 ksi< fy
Therefore, ΦPn = Φ {0.85fc′ab + As fs1 – Asfs2}
= 0.65{0.85×3×8.29×12 +0.88×40} = 187.77 kip
ΦMn = Φ [0.425fc′ab (h – a) + As {(h/2) – d′} (fs1 + fs2)]
= 0.65[0.425×3×8.29×12×(12–8.29)+0.88×{(12/2) – 2.25}(40)]
= 391.67 in-kip = 32.64 ft-kip
31
11-May-16
Examples
Solution:
Point 4: Point representing balance failure: The neutral axis for
the balanced failure condition is easily calculated from
c = d {εu/ (εu + εy)} with εu equal to 0.003 and εy = 40/29000 =
0.001379, c = 0.68d
Examples
Solution:
Point 4: Balance failure: For the balanced failure condition, fs = fy.
fs1 = 0.003E (c – d′)/c = 0.003×29000(6.68–2.25)/6.68= 57.69 ksi > fy,
32
11-May-16
Examples
Solution:
Point 5: This point is in tension controlled region for which εt = 0.005, Φ = 0.90:
For εt = 0.005; c = d {εu/ (εu + εt)} = 9.75× {0.003/ (0.003 + 0.005)}
= 0.375d = 3.66″
a = β1c = 0.85 × 3.66 = 3.11″
fs1 = 0.003E (c – d′)/c = 0.003×29000(3.66 – 2.25)/3.66 = 33.51 ksi < fy
fs2 = 0.003E (d – c)/c = 0.003×29000(9.75 – 3.66)/3.66 = 144.76 ksi > fy,
use fy = 40 ksi.
Therefore, ΦPn = Φ{0.85fc′ab + Asfs1 – Asfs2}
= 0.90{0.85×3×3.11×12 +0.88×33.51–0.88×40}= 80.50 kip
ΦMn = Φ [0.425fc′ab (h – a) + As {(h/2) – d′} (fs1 + fs2)]
= 0.90[0.425×3×3.11×12×(12–3.11)+0.88×{(12/2) – 2.25}(33.51+40)]
= 599 in-kip = 49.91 ft-kip
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 320 Reinforced Concrete Design-I 65
Examples
Solution:
Point 6: Point on capacity curve for which εt >> 0.005:
Let εt = 2 × 0.005 = 0.01; c = d {εu/ (εu + εt)} = 9.75× {0.003/ (0.003 + 0.01)}
= 0.23d = 2.25″
a = β1c = 0.85 × 2.25 = 1.91″
fs1 = 0.003E (c – d′)/c = 0.003×29000(2.25 – 2.25)/2.25 = 0 < fy
fs2 = 0.003E (d – c)/c = 0.003×29000(9.75 – 2.25)/2.25 = 290 ksi > fy,
use fy = 40 ksi.
Therefore, ΦPn = Φ{0.85fc′ab + Asfs1 – Asfs2
= 0.90{0.85×3×1.91×12 +0.88×0 – 0.88×40} = 20.90 kip
ΦMn = Φ [0.425fc′ab (h – a) + As {(h/2) – d′} (fs1 + fs2)]
= 0.90[0.425×3×1.91×12×(12–1.91)+0.88×{(12/2) – 2.25}(0 +40)
= 384.16 in-kip = 32.01 ft-kip
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 320 Reinforced Concrete Design-I 66
33
11-May-16
Examples
Solution:
M vs P
500
450
Nominal Interaction
400
Curve
350
300 Design Interaction
Curve
P (kip)
250
0.80fPo
200
150
100
50
0
0 20 40 60 80
M (kip-ft)
Examples
12″
12″
Prof. Dr. Qaisar Ali CE 320 Reinforced Concrete Design-I 68
34
11-May-16
References
ACI 318-14
35