Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/313847403
CITATIONS READS
0 797
1 author:
Rafael Fuentes
University College London
5 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
Calendrical politics in global Sikhism: Time, space and diaspora View project
All content following this page was uploaded by Rafael Fuentes on 27 February 2017.
The fourth and last stage of Sikh nationalism in India commenced in the early 1980s
when Sant Jarnail Bhindranwale – by then the head of a minor Sikh seminary named
Damdami Taksal – erected himself as leader of entire Sikh panth (spiritual way) and
challenged the secular and federalist approach of the Akaly Dal party triggering, in the
process, the biggest political crisis between Punjab and the central government of India in
recent history. Bhindranwale’s first objective was to revitalize Sikhism. Sikh identity as
previously defined by Singh Sabhas – this is by merely wearing the external symbols of
Sikhism – was of little use for him. Instead, Bhindranwale emphasized how Sikhs must
demonstrate allegiance by taking baptism and joining the khalsa or brotherhood of the pure.
Drawing heavily from doctrines of Sikhism, Bhindranwale presented his audience a clear
message of orthodoxy and austerity. His message highlighted how Sikh communities in
Punjab were undermined by both internal conflicts and threats from Indian government. He
specifically blamed the Akali Dal party and Hindus for it. However, it was an attack on the
Nirankaris, a sect of Sikhism already proclaimed as enemies of the panth by priests at the
Golden Temple, what really transformed Bhindranwale into one of the most popular Sikh
figures in Punjab. In 1978, on the holiest of Sikh festivals named Vaisakhi, Bhindranwale
delivered a passionate speech at the Golden Temple and launched a collective assault on the
Nirankaris during which more than a dozen Sikhs were killed. According to Telford (1992:
976), this incident marked the beginning of Sikh movement’s radicalization and allowed
Bhindranwale to gain legitimacy and mobilize devotees towards a greater political
achievement, supremacy within the Sikh community. Despite his popularity, Bhindranwale
necessitated the support of a mass base which he gathered amongst the poor and educated
Sikhs of the Majha region, who were suffering from the uneven distribution of wealth
generated by the Green Revolution.
The modernization of agricultural techniques and strategies in India from the 1960s to the
1980s, commonly referred to as the Green Revolution, generated an acute increase of
cultivated products in Punjab (Byres 1983: 38). Thus, agricultural output grew exponentially
from 4.2 million tons in 1996 to 11.96 million tons in 1980 (Telford 1992: 976). Nonetheless,
benefits of this modernization were unevenly distributed amongst different districts of
Punjab. Whereas Malwa region’s districts occupy the top six positions, Amritsar and
Gurdaspur districts within the Majha area performed considerably worse. The crisis of Sikh
separatist movement in Punjab during the 1980s did not merely respond to politico-religious
ideas, it clearly presented class and regional dimensions too since militants behind
Bhindranwale proceeded mainly from Sikh poor rural farming families from Majha districts.
On the other hand, Akali Dal supporters belonged to Sikh wealthy landowner clans from the
Malwa region. In fact, it was a period of intense turmoil since these two factions – which
represented different economic classes of Sikhs – competed with each other for hegemony
while continuing in profound disagreements with the Central Government in New Delhi.
Furthermore, a considerably improvement in education accompanied the Green Revolution in
Punjab. Agricultural modernization permitted children to release themselves from labour and
attend schools. As a result, literacy rose from 27 % in 1961 to 41% in 1981 (Telford 1992:
979). Regrettably, these new conditions did not translate into an economic improvement for
rural Sikh youths from the Majha region, who continued to show high levels of
unemployment. In addition, Indian wars with Pakistan made of Punjab a troubled border state
which received a lack of investment towards its industrial sector from the Central
Government. After ‘Punjabi Suba’ division in 1966, industrial facilities from New Delhi were
transferred to Haryana and extraction of minerals and forest resources to the newly formed
Himachal Pradesh. Therefore, this delayed and almost non-existent industrial development
together with improvement of educational opportunities created a high level of
unemployment amongst college and university graduates.
Rise of Bhindranwale in Punjab during the 1980s coincided with a really dreary
situation for a first generation of educated rural Jat Sikhs. On top of the financial difficulties
due to unemployment already mentioned, we must also consider the alienating aspects of the
urban environment into which they attended universities and how the Akali Dal was engaged
in federal politics which did not collect their demands. These ‘... enormous changes in
economy, society and culture...’ within such a short time, less than twenty years, generated
the basis for two ideologies that subsequently engaged in a relationship of co-existence
(Singh & Purewal 2013: 135). Firstly, Marxist ideas commence spreading amongst rural
educated Sikh youth at universities across Punjab. Maoist stress on armed struggle blended
well with Sikh historical tradition and further encouraged students to pursue a Sikh identity
with egalitarianism at its core. Secondly, religious revivalist groups started divulgating
ethical interpretations of pure ‘Sikh’ way of life. At this point, Bhindranwale emerged
launching a moral crusade against the depraved way of consumerist style of life which,
through capitalist modernization of the agriculture, was penetrating Punjab and broadening
the use of alcohol, cigarettes, pornography and lewd music. He emphasized how ‘new ways’
of capitalism aggravated social differences and eliminated opportunities for those individuals
of lower status, making his message really attractive amongst those educated young Sikhs
from poor farming families in the Majha region of Punjab.
Indira Gandhi regained control over the Indian state in 1980 and dismissed the Akali regime,
who as a result attempted to consolidate support once again amongst communities in Punjab
by endorsing the figure of Bhindranwale. Indira Gandhi clearly intended to centralize
administration of natural resources such as river waters and improve the distribution of wheat
from Punjab to the rest of the country amid increased blockades in the region (Chopra 2011:
50). She had dismembered Pakistan in 1971 with creation of Bangladesh and this time
promised to eradicate the enemy within that Sikhism represented. Meanwhile, Bhindranwale
organized a huge rally in Amritsar to proclaim his innocence in the murder of a Nirankari
leader, an event in which he received the support of every senior Akali leader. However,
Bhindranwale did not intend to stop there and violence quickly escalated in Punjab after
Amrit Singh, leader of All-India Sikh Students’ Federation (AISSF) and fervent supporter of
his ideas, was released. In June 1984, Indira Gandhi launched ‘Operation Blue Star’ and the
Indian army fought their way into the Golden Temple (Amritsar) where Bhindranwale and
his supporters had entrenched. After one week of an intense armed struggle in and around the
temple, Indian army gained control of the situation and Bhindranwale and Amrit Singh –
amongst many other Sikh followers – were killed. In October that very year, Indira Ghandi
died at the hands of her two Sikh bodyguards in an act of retaliation for ‘Operation Blue
Star’. Violent anti-Sikh riots erupted in New Delhi and other parts of the country claiming
more victims in response to her assassination. Peace was partially restored in 1985 when
Rajiv Gandhi, brother and successor of Indira, signed an agreement with Akali leader
Harcharan Singh Longowal. However, weeks after the accord Longowal was also murdered
by Sikh militants and no other figure since Bhindranwale has been able to unify the internal
cleavages of the Sikh community. After his dead, that according to many Sikh devotees
resembled those of the Sikh martyrs in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries, this era of
Sikh separatism seemed to fade away.
Display of Bhindranwale’s image in Punjab during the late 1980s gave a sense of ‘lest
we forget’ the incidents of ‘Operation Blue Star’. During the 1990s instead, his image
disappeared completely from public life as police targeted baptised Sikhs and their families.
Particularly, if they belonged to villages in militant districts such as Amritsar, Batala or
Gurdaspur (Pettigrew 1995: 14-23). Additionally, curfews and men disappearing under
unusual circumstances cemented a feeling of continuous unrest, fear and retribution. More
than 25.000 cases of torturing practices involving the police were reported within this period
(Singh & Purewal 2013: 138). Director General of police in Punjab, K.P.S Gill, acquired a
particular notoriety amongst rural Sikh communities where he infamously became to be
known as the ‘butcher’ of Punjab in honour to his sinister methods. India’s government
response was to continue employing him as an advisor to contain insurgence of Maoist
Naxals in Central India and Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka. Images of Bhindranwale were
removed from gurdwaras in India and abroad, in a clear attempt to eradicate the implicit
association between Sikh religious ideas and Sikh separatist politics represented by his
persona. Dissatisfaction increasingly gathered in Punjab and the diaspora given the total lack
of official recognition or justice towards these crimes. Indian government and police ignored
completely claims of civil society and their actions commenced to be interpreted as the attack
of one community on other one. Perpetrators of the mentioned anti-Sikh riots have not been
charged yet and there are serious allegations against Delhi police for the events which
resulted in killings of hundreds of Sikhs after Indira Gandhi’s murder. The Akali Dal party
failed to voice these concerns and their demands to the central government were not in
accordance with the popular sentiment of corruption and power politics in Punjab.
Beginning of the new millennium has witnessed in Punjab a revival of Sikh separatist
movement and a continuous search for justice and recognition regarding atrocities committed
during ‘Operation Blue Star’ and its aftermath. Amongst Sikh communities Bhindranwale has
become a symbol of their cause and a reminder of the repression and resistance endured after
his dead. Since 2008 his images have commenced once again to be emphatically displayed
across public places in Punjab. From 1998 India has pursued a model of political unification
by seeking support from regional moderate parties. Thus, the alliance of Akali Dal party and
the Hindu ‘Bharatiya Janata Party’ (BJP) has shaped Punjab politics in recent years
generating a sense of alienation and lack of any real options. Bhindranwale’s images
personify a mode of resistance against this partisan manner of doing politics and highlight the
discontent amongst poorer Sikhs towards social differences created by current penetration of
market economy in Punjab. He is visible across local bazaars which sell coffee mugs,
watches and car stickers with his image, often also displaying the sentence: “I will have to
make a comeback”. In addition, youths in villages are frequently seen wearing bright T-Shirts
with a picture of Bhindranwale carrying an AK-47 assault rifle (Singh & Purewal 2013: 143).
Sikh separatism and formation of Khalistan continues to have an enormous appeal in Punjab.
A clear example of this is the mass rally organized against the scheduled hanging of Balwant
Singh Rajoana in 2012. Pleading guilty of leading the assassination of Chief Minister of
Punjab in 1995, Rajoana also refused to supplicate mercy and his position has become a
contemporary sign of Sikh stance against Indian state and refusal to accept its autocratic
demands. Rajoana’s case still reverberates in Punjab and the diaspora by way of multiple
organizations, particularly, through the ‘Pledge Orange Campaign’.
Over the last hundred years Sikh community in Punjab has revealed profound
cleavages in its vision of a possible independent nation and the mechanisms required to attain
it. These divisions have exhibited profound disagreements not merely on class relations,
particularly between wealthy landowners from the Malwa region and poorer educated
farmers of the Majha area, but also on which steps leadership should take regarding the
demands of an excessively centralized Indian political and economic system. Opportunities
have arisen along the years to consolidate a Sikh identity and subsequently lay the
foundations of Khalistan, the Sikh state. Nonetheless, leaders in Punjab – often baffled by
political interests – have been ambivalent between a clear support of this cause or to contest it
altogether from within. The Akal Takht – Sikhism’s highest governing body – and Akali-led
SGPC implemented NC in 2003. However, seven years later both organisms altered NC’s
solar features by introducing numerous lunar elements from the previous Bikrami Calendar,
which is also used by Hindus, to determine all Sikh religious events. This is interpreted by
Sikh bodies that support implementation of NC’s original version as ‘vote-blank politics’
from governing party Akali Dal (Tribune 2015). They believe Akalis are operating under
pressure from Hindu organizations such as Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) who aim to
force Sikhs to continue using Bikrami Calendar or, at the very least, its lunar features.