You are on page 1of 3

Essay foreign currency deposit cannot be

invoked to escape liability for the


A. Mr. X is an officer of specialized agency damages to the victim. (Salvacion VS Banko
of the United Nations. He committed Sentral ng Pilipinas, August 1997)
against a 12 – year old child. A case
was filed against him. According to him,
he cannot be prosecuted in the B. In Private International Law what is:
Philippines because he enjoys a. Cognovit?
immunity from suit in the discharge of b. A borrowing statute
his official duties in the Philippines. To
prosecute him would run counter to the
privilege granted to him as a Under the law, a cognovits is a
specialized agent. confession of a judgment where a
portion of the complaint is confessed by
a. Rule on his contentions. the defendant and as for the other
b. Assuming that he was portions he shall deny thereof. It may
prosecuted and found guilty of also refer to the written authority of the
rape and was made to pay debtor and his direction to the Clerk of
damages but his only property Court or Judge to enter judgment against
is a bank deposit in foreign the debtor as stated in the case. Where,
currency. Can he invoke the the debtor acknowledges his
bank secrecy deposit law to undertaking and promise, as what the
escape payment of damages in plaintiff alleges, and that the debtor
favor of his victim? cannot deny that he owes and unjustly
detains from the plaintiff the sum
claimed by him, the defendant consents
As Judge, I would dismiss his defense of that judgment be entered against the
immunity. The mere invocation of State defendant for a certain sum.
Immunity does not, by the fact itself
result in the dropping of the prosecution -0-
of the offender. The immunity mentioned
therein is not absolute but subject to Under the law, a borrowing statute,
exception. The offender invoking it must directs the State of the Forum to apply
prove that the act done was in official the foreign statute of limitations to the
capacity or directly related to his duties. pending claims that is based on a foreign
The argument of the offender is law. A borrowing statute is not applied if
untenable. He is liable under the it is prejudicial to the Constitution or
principle where the law of the place obnoxious to the Court’s policies
where the offense was done shall
control.

-0-
C. Q, a writer, copied almost entirely the
Under the Philippine Foreign Deposit literary works of R who died later. The
Law, general is the rule that foreign heirs of R filed a copyright infringement
currency deposits are exempt from case against Q. Q moved for the
attachment, garnishment, or any other dismissal of the case contending that
order of any court. However, in the the heirs are not the proper party to
pursuance of justice and other equitable this case but the State. Is Q correct?
grounds, the garnishment of a foreign Why or why not?
currency deposit should be allowed. The
exemption from garnishment of the
No a) Rights and obligations between
Under the law, general is the rule that in husband and wife;
the absence of any signed treaty, b) Property relations between
copyrights protecting any literary work is husband and wife;
granted upon it by the Law of the State c) The family, which embraces the
where the copyright to the work was family as an institution and the
accorded. family home;
The heirs are the proper party because d) Adoption; and
under the law, any intellectual property e) Support
right owner, or anyone possession
interest under claim of ownership in any
intellectual property right, whose right Discuss the concept of Depecage
may have been violated, may file an
action. The argument of Q is improper
because the State, in the instant case, Under the law, depecage is where
only grants copyright protection over the different aspects of a case involving a
work. It has no legal interest over the foreign element may be governed by
work, to which, infringement thereon different systems of law. where the
may prejudice the interests of the State. process of characterization by the court
of proper jurisdiction at the beginning of
the choice of law process assigns a
Discuss the Manalo Doctrine (April 2018 case) disputed question to the proper area in
applying the Divorce judgment obtained substantive law.
abroad.

Discuss the basic concepts of Renvoi


Because the Family Code of the
Philippines stated, where a marriage
between a Filipino citizen and a foreigner Under the Doctrine of Renvoi, it is where
is validly celebrated and a divorce is a legal matter is presented by the conflict
validly obtained abroad by the alien of laws of the forum to refer to a foreign
spouse capacitating him or her to State and its laws, the conflict of laws
remarry, the Filipino spouse shall have rule of which, in turn refers the matter
capacity to remarry under Philippine back to the law of the forum or a third
Law. In Republic versus Manalo, the state. However, the renvoi doctrine does
Supreme Court ruled that Philippine not apply when the referred foreign law
courts are to extend the effect of a does not have a conflict of law rule on the
foreign divorce decree to a Filipino same subject matter. The referral to the
spouse without undergoing trial to foreign law shall immediately pertain to
determine the validity of the dissolution the internal laws of the foreign state.
of the marriage. Because to do so, would
be tantamount to trying a divorce case,
where Philippine public policy does not Discuss some current updates in Conflict of
recognize divorce. Laws

What are the consequences of marriage? One such update is that the Supreme
Courts adopts the view that a divorce
decree obtained abroad by Filipinos
The following are some of the against foreigner spouses. Since divorce
consequences of marriage: is not allowed in the Philippines. The
Family Code states that, a marriage
between a Filipino Citizen and a
foreigner is validly celebrated and a
divorce is thereafter validly obtained
abroad by the alien spouse capacitating
him or her to remarry, the Filipino spouse
shall have capacity to remarry under
Philippine law. The Supreme Court laid
the following requisites for such to
succeed: a) there is a valid marriage that
has been celebrated between a Filipino
and a foreigner; and b) A valid divorce is
obtained abroad by the alien spouse
capacitating him or her to remarry. The
reckoning point is the citizenship of the
divorcing couple at the time a valid
divorce is obtained abroad by the
foreigner spouse capacitating the
Filipino spouse to remarry.

You might also like