Professional Documents
Culture Documents
-0-
C. Q, a writer, copied almost entirely the
Under the Philippine Foreign Deposit literary works of R who died later. The
Law, general is the rule that foreign heirs of R filed a copyright infringement
currency deposits are exempt from case against Q. Q moved for the
attachment, garnishment, or any other dismissal of the case contending that
order of any court. However, in the the heirs are not the proper party to
pursuance of justice and other equitable this case but the State. Is Q correct?
grounds, the garnishment of a foreign Why or why not?
currency deposit should be allowed. The
exemption from garnishment of the
No a) Rights and obligations between
Under the law, general is the rule that in husband and wife;
the absence of any signed treaty, b) Property relations between
copyrights protecting any literary work is husband and wife;
granted upon it by the Law of the State c) The family, which embraces the
where the copyright to the work was family as an institution and the
accorded. family home;
The heirs are the proper party because d) Adoption; and
under the law, any intellectual property e) Support
right owner, or anyone possession
interest under claim of ownership in any
intellectual property right, whose right Discuss the concept of Depecage
may have been violated, may file an
action. The argument of Q is improper
because the State, in the instant case, Under the law, depecage is where
only grants copyright protection over the different aspects of a case involving a
work. It has no legal interest over the foreign element may be governed by
work, to which, infringement thereon different systems of law. where the
may prejudice the interests of the State. process of characterization by the court
of proper jurisdiction at the beginning of
the choice of law process assigns a
Discuss the Manalo Doctrine (April 2018 case) disputed question to the proper area in
applying the Divorce judgment obtained substantive law.
abroad.
What are the consequences of marriage? One such update is that the Supreme
Courts adopts the view that a divorce
decree obtained abroad by Filipinos
The following are some of the against foreigner spouses. Since divorce
consequences of marriage: is not allowed in the Philippines. The
Family Code states that, a marriage
between a Filipino Citizen and a
foreigner is validly celebrated and a
divorce is thereafter validly obtained
abroad by the alien spouse capacitating
him or her to remarry, the Filipino spouse
shall have capacity to remarry under
Philippine law. The Supreme Court laid
the following requisites for such to
succeed: a) there is a valid marriage that
has been celebrated between a Filipino
and a foreigner; and b) A valid divorce is
obtained abroad by the alien spouse
capacitating him or her to remarry. The
reckoning point is the citizenship of the
divorcing couple at the time a valid
divorce is obtained abroad by the
foreigner spouse capacitating the
Filipino spouse to remarry.