Professional Documents
Culture Documents
By using
this website, you agree to the use of cookies on your device.
Accept
Menu
21 May 2002
By Emma Young
But critics say past experience with feather-free chickens resulting from random
genetic mutation shows they suffer more than normal birds. Males have been unable
to mate, because they cannot flap their wings, and “naked” chickens of both sexes
are more susceptible to parasites, mosquito attacks and sunburn.
“Ugly beast”
Broiler chickens have been bred to gain weight rapidly. But in the process they
generate a lot of heat. Farmed chickens are kept at about 20°C – the optimum
temperature for weight gain. But in warm countries, expensive air conditioning is
necessary to keep to this temperature – and this cannot be afforded by poorer
farmers, Cahaner says.
The chicken is “an ugly little beast”, says Acamovic. “But there are obvious
potential benefits of not having feathers. Nutrients wouldn’t go into producing
feathers, and there would be no feathers to get rid of at the end.”
The chicken’s lack of feathers would make it quicker to process and more
environmentally friendly, says Cahaner. “Feathers are a waste. The chickens are
using feed to produce something that has to be dumped and the farmers have to waste
electricity to overcome the fact,” he said. Plucking also requires the use of large
amounts of water, he says.
The cross-bred bird is currently smaller than regular broilers. Cahaner says
further breeding should help increase its height.
TRENDINGLATESTVIDEOFREE
Turkey is getting military drones armed with machine gunsOne in 16 US women were
forced into having sex for the first timeGoogle’s quantum supremacy algorithm has
found its first practical useQuantum computer sets new record for finding prime
number factorsPeople in Japan are wearing exoskeletons to keep working as they age
FOLLOW US
Back to top