Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Julianna Saez
Mr. Werner
28 October, 2019
Saez 2
The word “parasite” has always been assigned a negative connotation wherever it is
mentioned. This is mostly due to the fact that parasites survive by living off of other organisms
and taking all of their nutrients for their benefit. Interestingly, marine parasites are not brought
into attention as much as their terrestrial counterparts since they are native to an area that not
many people come into contact with: the ocean. For a definitive reference, the term “parasite”
will be defined as “all natural enemies that exploit only one victim in a single life stage and that
rely upon infectious processes to find new hosts” (Wood, Lafferty, and Micheli). Unfortunately,
both aquatic parasites and their impact on the marine ecosystem are usually overlooked by the
Marine parasites have a profound place in the marine food web (which will be elaborated
on later in this paper) and if their population were to ever decline or increase, one could imagine
the large repercussions that would occur as a result. Unfortunately, such scenarios have a
possibility to become a reality. Multiple studies have concluded that due to certain pressures
placed on the oceans, the population of parasites will potentially change in both size and
diversity. Then begs the question: what could cause such a large disruption in the abundance of
marine parasites?
A common occurrence that many would not view as being detrimental for parasites is
excessive fishing. Marine parasites thrive and spread by being transmitted among multiple fishes,
so when the amount of possible hosts becomes reduced, parasites lose their source of nutrients
for growth—this scenario is what occurs as a result of intensive fishing, especially those of
commercial. Particular fish species tend to be targeted more than others mostly due to demand on
the market, and when a great amount of a specific population is taken from a natural habitat, it
Saez 3
influences the transmission of their parasites (Wood, Lafferty, and Micheli). This is
exceptionally alarming knowing that “[i]f the density of a host population falls below the
threshold level necessary for successful transmission, the result may be a complete failure of
transmission and local extinction of the parasite” (MacKenzie and Pert). Becoming aware of the
damaging effects intensive fishing has on parasites is only part of truly understanding the entire
parasites within the Pacific Ocean’s Line Islands. Taking samples of seven fish species, Wood
analyzed whether there was a significant difference in what parasites inhabited each host
depending on their location (out of the six islands, half experience consistent fishing, while the
other half did not). The study concluded on the fact that there was a lack of parasitic diversity in
fish collected from fished locations compared to those that were taken from unfished islands by
more than 50% (Wood et al.). The results of this study can be seen in Figure 1. Interestingly,
there was not a major significant difference in the abundance of parasites between the islands,
which Wood hypothesized was due to the form of transmission certain parasites species utilize;
however, she also acknowledges that this area of study would not be able to compare to the
grand scale of fishing that occurs in other parts of the globe: “Though there are marked
differences in the sh community between our shed and unshed islands, shing pressure on
Teraina, Tabuaeran, and Kiritimati is probably relatively light when compared to intensely shed
orovershed coral reef ecosystems globally” (Wood et al.). Despite the small range and lighter
fishing pressure that took place within the Line Islands that were studied, the change in parasitic
diversity was still able to be detected. The overall effect that commercial fishing would have on
Saez 4
marine parasites as a whole is too grand to be analyzed in one study; yet, at the very least, the
consequences of such can be hypothesized through previous observations. It is worth noting that
this outcome may appear to be beneficial as a whole for both consumers and fisheries themselves
since parasites only cause issues with the quality of the fish caught, but this outlook neglects the
Parasites play a significant part in the marine web cycle; although they are often
overlooked in food chains, their presence can alter the way energy is transferred between aquatic
organisms. A study conducted by researchers in 2004 compared a specific food web in Company
Bay, New Zealand in order to determine a difference structure in the web when marine parasites
were, and were not, incorporated (Thompson, Mouristen, and Poulin). What they concluded was
that the inclusion of parasites caused the food chain to grow longer and an increased linkage
density, which can be seen in Figure 2 and Figure 3, both of which showing the effectiveness
Logically, the inclusion of parasites affected the number of top species by relegating
some top predators to an intermediate status. As the parasite definitive hosts were also
top predators, parasite species with a large number of definitive hosts had the greatest
It is clear that parasitic influence in marine communities is imperative for the functionality of the
ecosystem, and their possible removal would cause the structure to falter.
Another purpose that marine parasites have is their ability to serve as bioindicators,
which are organisms that indicate a range of factors, via their population size. Something as
simple as too much zinc in the water is enough to alter the larval stage of multiple different
Saez 5
parasites and decrease their adult numbers as a result (Nachev and Sures). If marine parasites
were to diminish as a population, the effect it would have for the marine ecosystems would be
detrimental, and their purpose of serving as bioindicators would lessen due to their inconsistent
community numbers. However, what if the opposite scenario were true, and parasites were
A contrast for the negative effects of intensive fishing on marine parasites are those
brought by the issue of global climate change. An increase in water temperature would be
enough to alter the dynamic between parasites and their hosts, either by directly changing the life
cycle of parasites or indirectly affecting the behavior of the hosts. The rate of parasitic
transmissions can be linked to the outbreak of aquatic diseases. For example, bitter crab disease,
which affects snow crabs by Newfoundland and is caused by parasitic dinoflagellates, has
increased greatly in its spreading amongst crabs ever since in was first reported in 1990. It is
easy to correlate the growing rates with rising seas temperatures since “[g]lobal warming may
extend the transmission season and increase prevalence in crab populations” (Marcogliese).
Marcogliese’s paper on the effects of high temperatures on parasites include: rapid growth,
increased annual parasitic generations, and earlier time frames of transmission. Of course, it is
necessary to acknowledge that global warming alone will not serve as only factor behind the
population growth of marine parasites. Alterations in habitat loss, pollution, and introductions to
foreign species are also expected to vary along with climate change (Marcogliese).
To properly assess the possible effects climate change would have on marine parasites, a
series of experiments were conducted in a laboratory in order to study the effects of temperature
Studer and his fellow researchers. They found that increasing the water’s temperature would also
raise the emergence rate of parasitic larvae. However, the rate also began to steadily decrease the
more the temperature went up, showing that beyond the optimal range, warmer water would lose
its effectiveness and instead create unsuitable conditions for the parasites to grow in.
The overall results of the study can be seen in Figure 4. The researchers state that due to their
experiments, they predict: “the parasite will find such optimal conditions more often and for
longer periods of time with global warming. Under such conditions, the impact of the parasite on
a host population could be substantial, as massive infection events” (Studer, Thieltges, and
Poulin). Considering that the majority of parasitic species would react in the same fashion as
Maritrema novaezealandensis u nder similar conditions, then the effects of global climate change
will also cause them to transmit among hosts more quickly and spread more than when the
Taking into account the consequences pointed out previously in this paper on what would
happen if parasites where to decrease in population size, the opposite results can be hypothesized
for an increase in population. Their place in the marine ecosystem would negatively influence
those at the top of the food chain, specifically by causing an excessive mortality rate in predators
that would disrupt the overall flow of the web. As for their role as bioindicators, their population
would be too oversaturated to serve as proper detectors of foreign metals in aquatic environments
and would alternatively cause the most harm to the system they are in themselves. Because of the
contrasting situations that each positively and negatively affect the population of marine
parasites, there is no definitive conclusion on whether the parasites are truly declining or
increasing in size or abundance. With the inevitable threats of global warming and the
Saez 7
continuous act of the commercialization of fisheries, only time and future studies will be able to
determine the direction marine parasites as a whole species will take in terms of population.
Appendix
Figure 1: Results for Wood’s study depicting the difference in diversity of parasite taxon
depending of if the island their host was collected from was either fished or unfished.
Saez 8
Figure 2: Marine food web collected from Company Bay, New Zealand with the inclusion of
parasites.
Figure 3: Marine food web collected from Company Bay, New Zealand excluding marine
parasites. The amount of lines within the web are visibly greater than the one shown in
Figure 2.
Saez 9
Figure 4: Overall results of A. Studer’s experiments with increasing temperature and its effects
Works Cited
MacKenzie, Ken, and Campbell Pert. “Evidence for the Decline and Possible Extinction of
a Marine Parasite Species Caused by Intensive Fishing.” Fisheries Research, vol. 198, 5
www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165783617302898.
Marcogliese , D.J. “The Impact of Climate Change on the Parasites and Infectious Diseases of
Aquatic Animals.” Rev Sci Tech, vol. 27, Aug. 2008, pp. 467–484.,
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18819673.
Bioindicators in the Marine Environment.” Journal of Sea Research, vol. 113, 22 Dec.
Studer, A., et al. “Evidence for the Decline and Possible Extinction of a Marine Parasite Species
Thompson, Ross M, et al. “Blackwell Publishing, Ltd. Importance of Parasites and Their Life
Wood, Chelsea L, et al. “Fishing out Marine Parasites? Impacts of Fishing on Rates of Parasitism
in the Ocean.” Ecology Letters, vol. 13, no. 6, 18 May 2010, pp. 761–775.,
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01467.x.
Wood, Chelsea, et al. “Fishing Drives Declines in Fish Parasite Diversity and Has Variable