Reliability of Financial Information Score Remarks
1. Audit Opinion rendered (20 points unqualified, zero for other opinions) 20 Adequacy of Internal control 2. Internal control survey indicated adequate control environment (5 points 5 adequate) 3. Ethical awareness seminars are conducted and have been attended by 75% of 1 all staff surveyed. (1 point) 4. Risk assessment is being performed to identify risks and responses to these 7 risks. (7 points) 5. Control activities including forms and reports required in the Internal Control 10 Policies, Procedures and Practices are in place (10 points) 6. An internal audit unit exists. (1 point if yes) 1 7. The internal audit unit reviews the internal control of the agency based on 5 reports received. (5 points if yes) Compliance with Management Representation in the Engagement Letter 8. The requirements in the engagement letter were complied with by the agency. 15 - Submission of complete FS within the deadline set (5 points) - Audit queries and request for documents were addressed on time (5 points) - Submission of written representations required on time and near the date of audit report (5 points) Adjustments required by the Auditor 9. All audit adjustments were considered by the agency and were taken up 10 during the audit period. (0-10 points) Audit observations and recommendations 10. Observations and recommendations as a result of the audit were considered 2 and management has provided a time plan for implementing the recommendations. (2 points) 11. Prior period recommendations were implemented during the current year. (0- 10 10 points) Quality of financial statements furnished for audit 12. The Financial Statements were prepared in accordance with the prescribed 7 reporting framework. 13. The Accounting team that prepared the FS is composed of qualified accounting 2 staff. 14. Cooperation extended to the audit team 5 15. Total Score—perfect score 100 16. Indications of fraud and intentional errors (25) REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COMMISSION ON AUDIT Commonwealth Avenue, Quezon City, Philippines
90 to 100% of all applicable criteria Excellent
85 to 89% Very Satisfactory 75% to 84% of total applicable criteria Satisfactory Below 75% Poor
Group Assessment of the Agency’s Financial Management Performance
We are giving a joint performance score of _______ %.
__(Signature over printed name)__ __(Signature over printed name)__
Supervising Auditor/Regional Supervising Auditor Cluster/Regional Director Date: Date: