Calculation Cover Sheet

Calc no DOC NO. File DOC NO.

Elec file location
Project title GN INFILL PROJECT Phase/CTR
Client MAJOR OIL Deliverable
Calculation title Pipeline Stability & Weight Coating Calculations Page 3
Calculation objective
1. To determine the on-bottom stability of various GN Ubie phase 2 pipelines in the liquefied swampy terrain and in a typical water crossing
2. If required, calculate the thickness of concrete weight coating (of density 3040 Kg/m3) to give the pipeline a negative buoyancy factor of 1.3
3. Analysis based on the worst case scenario of "decommissioned case corroded pipe empty".

Calculation method
The calculations are performed in accordance with the following general equation:
Wpipe
>= 1.3
Wbuoy
Where Wpipe = Total weight of pipe in air
Wbuoy = Weight of water/mud displaced
Method of analysis is based on in-house spread sheet detailed in the section Method of Analysis

Basic Data & Assumptions

The following basic data and assumptions were applied:-
Safety Factor = 1.3 - MAJOR OIL Requirement (Ref. 2)
Specific Gravity of swamp water = 1.02 - Typical for Niger Delta (from Ref. 2)

Specific Gravity of river bed = 1.442 - Assumed (from Ref. 2)

water/mud
Density of concrete = 3040 Kg/m3

Concrete coating of less than 25mm is practically not achivable. Therefore a minimum concrete thickness of 25mm will apply where required.

Further Assumptions
1)) Effect of marine g g
growth has not been considered as there is little evidence of significant marine g pp
growth in the applicable p and water swamp
swamp p or water
conditions.
2) Stability analysis and weight coating calculations for river crossings have been based solely on forces due to buoyancy of the river water. Forces (lift and
drag) due to river current and tidal velocities have not been considered, because the pipelines will be trenched.
3) Calculated wall thickness less corrosion allowance has been used for the weight coating analysis.

References
1 GN Ubie Phase II Pipeline Mechanical Design Report
2 MAJOR OIL Standard Pipeline and Flowline Design Manual March 2002

Conclusions
1) On-bottom stability analysis has been carried out for the various GN Ubie phase 2A Pipelines and weight coating thicknesses have been determined
where required. Analysis and results are presented in the individual work sheets, while the recommended coating thicknesses are in the summary sheet.
2) The required Safety Factor of 1.3 - with the determined weight coating thickness - is very adequate to ensure on-bottom stability of the Pipeline under
buoyancy conditions.
3) A minimum concrete thicknessof 25mm will always be applied for all submerged pipeline river crossings as mechanical impact protection.

C01 12-Apr-11 Approved For Construction SH ET KLA

A02 16-Feb-11 Issued for Approval SH ET KLA
A01 13-Jan-11 Issued for Review SH ET KLA
R01 13-Dec-10 Issued for Interdisciplinary Check SH ET KLA
REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY CHECKED APPROVED

Page 1 of 4 STABILITY AND WEIGHT COATING CALCULATIONS

 Calculation Checklist

Calc no DOC NO. File DOC NO.

Elec file location
Project title GN INFILL PROJECT Phase/CTR
Client MAJOR OIL Deliverable
Calculation title Pipeline Stability & Weight Coating Calculations Page 4
Please check boxes for all applicable items checked or delete if not appropriate:
Calculations:

Calculation number assigned and registered

Project title shown.
Calculation title shown.
Revision history box complete and signed.
Index.
Appropriate stamp for preliminary issues.
Calculation objectives (aims) stated.
Calculation method defined or described (including formulae if relevant).
Reference made to text, standard or code. Check version/edition with that required for project.

Source of input data stated (with revision number and date if relevant).
Assumptions stated.
Summary of results or conclusions if appropriate.
For software based calculations, reference to software verification if available.
Method clear and easy to follow.
Input data correct.
Calculation arithmetically correct OR software previously verified and reference to verification checked.

Calculation result within expected limits.

Calculation tolerances stated if significant.
Units used as required by client.
Abbreviations correct.
Appropriate cross-references.
Sketches included and clearly labelled, where required.
bility a Attachments included and referenced, as required.
Any precedent calculations updated
Checking records:
Checked and annotated copy of calculation filed (use "Check Print" stamp).
Corrections made as required and calculation dated and signed on cover sheet by checker.
Revisions:
Changes clouded.
Revision history block updated.
Calculation re-checked if required.

C01 12-Apr-11 Approved For Construction SH ET KLA

A02 16-Feb-11 Issued for Approval SH ET KLA
A01 13-Jan-11 Issued for Review SH ET KLA
R01 13-Dec-10 Issued for Interdisciplinary Check SH ET KLA
REV DATE DESCRIPTION BY CHECK APPROVED

Page 2 of 4 STABILITY AND WEIGHT COATING CALCULATIONS

 Calculation Sheet

Proj No
Phase/CTR Calc No. DOC NO.
Project GN INFILL PROJECT Deliverable
Subject Pipeline Stability and Weight Coating Calculations Client MAJOR OIL
Pipeline Sheet 5
REV DATE BY CHK APP
C01 4/12/2011 SH ET KLA

PIPELINE WEIGHT COATING AND STABILITY ANALYSIS

DESCRIPTION SYMBOLS UNIT Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 Case 4 Case 5 Case "n"

INPUT PIPE OUTSIDE DIAMETER ODpipe in/m

DATA WALL THICKNESS WTpipe mm/m
INTERNAL CORROSION ALLOWANCE WTcorr mm
FBE PRIMER THICKNESS WT FBE mm
PE ADHESIVE COATING THICKNESS WT Adh mm
PE 3-LAYER COATING THICKNESS WT3LPE mm
CONCRETE COATING THICKNESS WTconc mm Values for Concrete Coating thickness obtained using Goal Seek with SG >= 1.3
MARINE GROWTH THICKNESS WTmar mm
PIPE DENSITY pipe Kg/m
3

FBE DENSITY fbe Kg/m3

3
ADHESIVE COATING DENSITY rAdh Kg/m
COATING 3 LAYER PE DENSITY 3 LPE Kg/m3
conc
3
CONCRETE COATING DENSITY Kg/m
MARINE GROWTH DENSITY mar Kg/m
3

PRODUCT DENSITY cont Kg/m3

SWAMP MUD DENSITY mud Kg/m
3

RIVER BED WATER/MUD DENSITY water Kg/m3

FORMULAE /METHOD OF ANALYSIS

OUTPUT INTERNAL DIAMETER IDpipe m IDpipe = ODpipe - 2 x WTpipe
DATA OVERALL DIAMETER ODtotal m ODtotal = ODpipe + 2 x WT FBE + 2 x WT Adh + 2 x WT 3LPE + 2 x WTconc
INT. X-SECTION AREA Apipe m 2
Apipe = /4 x (IDpipe)2
PIPE X-SECTION AREA Asteel m
2
Apipe = /4 x ((ODpipe)2 -(IDpipe)2)
PIPE WEIGHT Wpipe Kg/m Wpipe =Apipe x Ppipe
N/m
FBE COAT WEIGHT W FBE Kg/m W Fbe = /4 ((ODpipe + 2 x WT FBE)2 -(ODpipe)2) x Fbe
N/m

ADHEHSIVE COATING WEIGHT W Adh Kg/m W Adh = /4 x ((ODpipe + 2 x WT FBE + 2 x WT Adh)2 - (ODpipe + 2 x WT FBE)2) x Adh
N/m
COATING 3 LAYER PE WEIGHT W 3 LPE Kg/m W3LPE = /4 ((ODpipe + 2 x WT FBE + 2 x WT Adh + 2 x WT3LPE)2 - (ODpipe + 2 x WT
N/m FBE + 2 x WT Adh)2) x 3LPE
CONCRETE COATING WEIGHT Wconcrete Kg/m Wconc =P/4 x ((ODpipe + 2 x WT FBE + 2 x WT Adh + 2 x WT3LPE + 2 x WTconc)2 -
N/m (ODpipe + 2 x WT FBE + 2 x WT Adh + 2 x WT 3LPE)2) x conc
MARINE GROWTH WEIGHT Wmarine Kg/m Wmar = /4 ((ODpipe + 2 x WT FBE + 2 x WT Adh + 2 x WT3LPE + 2 x Wtconc+ 2 x
N/m WTmar )2 - (ODpipe + 2 x WT FBE + 2 x WT Adh + 2 x WT 3LPE + WTconc)2) x mar
PRODUCT WEIGHT Wproduct Kg/m
Wcont = Apipe x cont
N/m
TOTAL WEIGHT IN AIR Wdry Kg/m
Wdry = Wpipe + WFBE + WAdh + W3LPE + Wconc + Wmar + Wcont

WEIGHT OF DISPLACED WATER Wbuoy Kg/m

Wbuoy = /4(ODtotal)2 x water
N/m
WEIGHT OF DISPLACED MUD Wmud Kg/m
Wmud = /4(ODtotal)2 x mud
N/m
WEIGHT OF PIPE IN WATER Wsuba Kg/m
Wsuba = Wdry - Wbuoy
N/m
WATER FILLED SUBMERGED WEIGHT Wsubw Kg/m
Wsubw = Wdry - (Wbuoy - Apipe x Pwater)
N/m
PRODUCT FILLED SUBMERGED WEIGHT Wsubp Kg/m
Wsubp = Wdry - (Wbuoy - Apipe x Pproduct
N/m
SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF PIPELINE IN WATER SGwater 1.3 SGwater = Wdry / Wbuoy
SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF PIPELINE IN MUD SGmud 1.3 SGmud = Wdry / Wmud (Set to a 1.3 factor in Goal Seek as per MAJOR OIL requirement)
CONCRETE WEIGHT COATING REQ. (WATER CRO YES/NO IF SGwater >= 1.3, NO, otherwise, YES
CONCRETE WEIGHT COATING REQ. (SWAMP)? YES/NO IF SGmud >= 1.3, NO, otherwise, YES

CONCRETE COATING THICKNESS (WATER CROSS WTconc mm Recommended Concrete Coating thickness from values in Row 21 rounded to the nearest 5mm

CONCRETE COATING THICKNESS (SWAMP) WTconc mm Recommended Concrete Coating thickness from values in Row 21 rounded to the nearest 5mm

Page 3 of 4 STABILITY AND WEIGHT COATING CALCULATIONS

 Calculation Sheet

Proj No
Phase/CTR Calc No. DOC NO.
Project GN INFILL PROJECT File
Subject Pipeline Stability and Weight Coating Calculations Client MAJOR OIL
Pipeline 12" Koroama - CPF NAG Bulkline - CS Sheet 9

REV DATE BY CHK APP

C01 4/12/2011 SH ET KLA

PIPELINE WEIGHT COATING CALCULATIONS

Case 1 Case 2 Case3 Case4 Case3 Case4
Installed '12" Corroded 12"+ Installed '12" Corroded '12" Installed '12" Corroded '12"
DESCRIPTION SYMBOLS UNIT
+3LPE df 0.72 3LPE DF 0.72 +3LPE DF 0.6 +3LPE DF 0.6 +3LPE DF 0.5 +3LPE DF 0.5
SWAMP SWAMP RIVER X RIVER X RIVER X RIVER X
INPUT PIPE OUTSIDE DIAMETER ODsteel m 0.3239 0.3239 0.3239 0.3239 0.3239 0.3239
DATA WALL THICKNESS WTsteel m #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
INTERNAL CORROSION ALLOWANCE WTcorr mm #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
FBE EXTERNAL THICKNESS WT FBE mm 0.5000 0.5000 0.5000 0.5000 0.5000 0.5000
ADHESIVE COATING THICKNESS WT FBE mm 0.5000 0.5000 0.5000 0.5000 0.5000 0.5000
COATING 3 LAYER PE THICKNESS WT 3 Layer PE mm 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000 3.0000
CONCRETE COATING THICKNESS WTconc mm 4.8393 20.9921 0.0000 3.0000 0.0000 0.0000
MARINE GROWTH THICKNESS WTmar mm 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
STEEL DENSITY pipe Kg/m 3
7850.0000 7850.0000 7850.0000 7850.0000 7850.0000 7850.0000
FBE DENSITY fbe Kg/m
3
1950.0000 1950.0000 1950.0000 1950.0000 1950.0000 1950.0000
fbe
3
ADHESIVE COATING DENSITY Kg/m 1400.0000 1400.0000 1400.0000 1400.0000 1400.0000 1400.0000
COATING 3 LAYER PE DENSITY coat 3 LPE Kg/m3 940.0000 940.0000 940.0000 940.0000 940.0000 940.0000
CONCRETE COATING DENSITY conc Kg/m 3
3040.0000 3040.0000 3040.0000 3040.0000 3040.0000 3040.0000
MARINE GROWTH DENSITY mar Kg/m3 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
PRODUCT DENSITY cont Kg/m3 1.2000 1.2000 1.2000 1.2000 1.2000 1.2000
MUD DENSITY mud Kg/m3 1442.0000 1442.0000 1442.0000 1442.0000 1442.0000 1442.0000
SWAMP WATER DENSITY water Kg/m
3
1020.0000 1020.0000 1020.0000 1020.0000 1020.0000 1020.0000
Pipeline Stability and Weight Coating Calculations
OUTPUT INTERNAL DIAMETER IDsteel m #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
DATA OVERALL DIAMETER ODtotal m 0.3405 0.3728 0.3309 0.3369 0.3309 0.3309
2
INT. X-SECTION AREA Apipe m #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
2
STEEL X-SECTION AREA Asteel m #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
PIPE WEIGHT Wsteel Kg/m #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
N/m #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
FBE COAT WEIGHT W FBE Kg/m 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99
N/m 9.74 9.74 9.74 9.74 9.74 9.74
ADHEHSIVE COATING WEIGHT W FBE Kg/m 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72
N/m 7.02 7.02 7.02 7.02 7.02 7.02
COATING 3 LAYER PE WEIGHT W 3 LPE Kg/m 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.91 2.91
N/m 28.57 28.57 28.57 28.57 28.57 28.57
CONCRETE COATING WEIGHT Wconc Kg/m 15.56 70.74 0.00 9.59 0.00 0.00
N/m 152.61 693.74 0.00 94.09 0.00 0.00
MARINE GROWTH WEIGHT Wmar Kg/m 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
N/m 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
PRODUCT WEIGHT Wcont Kg/m #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
N/m #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
TOTAL WEIGHT IN AIR Wdry Kg/m #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
N/m #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
WEIGHT OF DISPLACED WATER Kg/m 92.90 111.36 87.69 90.90 87.69 87.69
N/m 911.31 1092.42 860.24 891.73 860.24 860.24
WEIGHT OF DISPLACED MUD Wmud Kg/m 131.33 157.43 123.97 128.51 123.97 123.97
N/m 1288.34 1544.39 1216.15 1260.66 1216.15 1216.15
WEIGHT OF PIPE IN WATER Wsuba Kg/m #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
N/m #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
WATER FILLED SUBMERGED WEIGHT Wsubw Kg/m #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
N/m #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
PRODUCT FILLED SUBMERGED WEIGHT Wsubp Kg/m #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
N/m #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF PIPELINE IN WATER SG Water #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF PIPELINE IN MUD SG Mud #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!
Is Wsubp >0.25*Wdry (for River Crossings)? (RE #REF! #REF! #REF! #REF!

Page 4 of 4 STABILITY AND WEIGHT COATING CALCULATIONS