AGAINST WOMEN REGARDING INHERITANCE ARE VOID? It is humbly submitted before the Hon’ble Court that the laws of Shia and Sunni discriminating against women regarding inheritance are void. Such discrimination is contrary to Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution of India and cannot seek protection enshrined by Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution. It must be noted that despite the guarantees conferred by the constitution, muslim women are subject to discrimination. It is pleaded before the Hon’ble Court that the issues related to the inheritance of muslim women are not merely related to a policy matter but to fundamental rights of women under Articles 14, 15 and 21 of the Constitution. In the case of denial Latifi vs Union of India1, although the constitution bench did not address the said issue but the court held that Article 21 included right to live with dignity which supports the plea that a muslim woman could invoke fundamental rights in such matters. Then in the case of John Vallamattom vs Union of India2 that laws dealing with marriage and succession are not part of religion. Law has to change with time. In Charu Khurana vs Union of India3, this Court considered the issue of gender discrimination in the matter of denial of membership of “Cine Costume Make-up Artists and Hair Dressers Association” in film industry. It was held that such discrimination violates basic constitutional rights. In the case of mohammad Ahmad Khan vs Shah Bano4 the discriminatory rights of muslim women was challenged and the judgement created some relief from the muslim hegemonic culture. Muslim societies discriminate against women from cradle to grave. 5 Muslim personal law is not only a form of discrimination, but it also seemingly disadvantages women in many areas. The unequal rights become the main source of subordination of women, and such social constructions are maintained as a tool for women’s oppression.6 Hence it is pleaded before the Hon’ble Court to declare that the provisions of Sunni and Shia laws discriminate against females in their share as compared to males of the same status and thus such provisions must be declared void as discriminating against females only on the grounds of sex.