M4E
COLEMAN: ISOTOPIC IDENTIFICATION 95°
nen
Isotopic Identification of Landfill Methane
DENNIS D. COLEMAN,” CHAO-LI LIU, KEITH C. HACKLEY,+
and STEVEN R. PELPHREY*
‘tstech Laboratories, In, 1208 Parkland Cour, Champolgn, 1L 618211826
Sitinos Stote Geological Survey, 615 East Peabody Drive Chompuien, IL 1820-6964
7 r i
ABSTRACT @ offers, Hutchinson (1993) has pointed out that landfills
‘Analysis of stable and radiogenic isotopes of earboo and
hhydrogen in methane provides
‘natural gas, coalbed gas, and glacial
where stable sotope analysis is not definitive,
the radiogenic isotopes, radiocarbon (C),
GD generally is defiitive. Methane formed from the
microbial decomposition of recent organic materials such
‘as wood, paper, yard waste, and food scraps contains
clevated "°C concentrations that reflect the above-normal
Landfill gasis| typically 40% carbon dioxide and 60%
methane, The potential changes in global climate caused
by increased carbon dioxide have been well publicized, but
thousands of ears play bas lower“ concettions th potential eet of amosphere methane hve recived
duct radiusive der Mebane formed alongwith col
INTRODUCTION @
Landfill methane has:
tion not only because
cerns but also because
Etta See Smtr a 8 landfill gas.vo
°56 ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCES
microbial methane are present in ocean sediments. Rice
and Claypool (1981) have estimated that more than 20%
of the world’s known natural gas deposits were at least
Sources of Methane
‘mogenic origin (Rice and Claypool, 1981), and this type
of gas predominates in natural gas pipelines and storage
reservoirs throughout the country. Thermogenic natural
25 deposits are commonly associated with ol, but meth-
ane is also formed as a pat ofthe coaification process.
In some coals, this gas became trapped within the pores
‘gas has been produced from coalbeds for mé
tially as a means of degassing the coal pr
changes tht have occurred
‘or mixing with gases from other
Xeameta = ((Ranple ~ Raandard)/Ruanaw) » 1000 (1)
where
BX = the isotope of interest (8C, 8D, 80, ete)
R = the ratio of "C/"C, *A/'H, or "0/0, ete.
ing its isotopic ratio on a ratio mass-spectrometer.COLEMAN: ISOTOPIC IDENTIFICATION 97”
‘ported by the Inara Nise Eney Agen AEA: AR 9,
ine iso, Bas my
Using standard nomenclature, '“C concentrations are
unit (TU) is equal to one
atoms. Because both
concentrations, or radicactivities, can be measured in ¢i-
ther liquid scintillation or gas proportional counters.
DISTINGUISHING GASES FROM
DIFFERENT SOURCES
of subsurface gas, gases from different
do not have identical compositions. The
chemical and isotopic composit
provide information on the ori
‘timescan even provide insights
‘a gasis not of microbial origin (and thus not
because bacteria and other microbes prod
‘amounts of these components (Bernard,
is apparent from these data that concen-
100 ppm are quite common in landfill gas.
‘San Francisco Bay sediments, and levels an order of mag
nitude higher than this were generated in laboratory cul-
tures. Therefore, the presence or absence of trace amounts,
a0
Ethane (ppm)
FIGURE 2 Eihane and propane cocennston ia ea eames
of these components does not conclusively indicate
‘gas mixture can change as it migrates. Higher molecular
‘weight hydrocarbons such as ethane, propane, and butane
can be removed during migration (Coleman et al, 1977),
and itis probable that removal can occur with other vola-
tile organic compounds frequently used to identify land-
fil gas (eg. ketones and halogenated hydrocarbons). As
the presence of high concentrations of
centration increased, thus making a thermogenic ga look
‘more like a microbial gas.°98 ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCES
Identifying Gases Using Stable-Isotope
ful information for distinguishing gases from different
sources, Other work, more specifically related to the study
‘of methane formed by microbial processes, has shown that
hydrogen isotope analysis of methane can even help to 50,000 years old, the drift gases formed from organic
‘materials in these deposits would be expected not to con-
tain detectable “C.°T00 ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCES
‘upon the average age of the org
it was formed. Only limited
available, and these are m
from swamps and thus are biased towards higher “Ccon-
centrations; subsurface samples would be expected to have
as from other types
Figure 5 does not show sewer
gas is defined as that formed
ied by human activities, such
aping operations). Data for these two gases were
Sewer gas would be expected to have a *C
very similar to that of landfill gases. Com-
fill and that in the compost.
‘Tritium analysis of methane provides another method
of identifying landfill gas and also has potential for dis
tinguishing sewer gas and compost gas from lan
‘The hydrogen in methane generated by acetate fe
all of the water in
precipitation in the early 1960s when at
of tritium were at a maximum, radioactive decay would
hhave decreased the level to below what was observed for
some samples. One source maybe tracers in biochemical
|uminous paints, used on some watch and instrument dials
and “glow-in-the-dark” signs, are the most probable source
of tritium in a municipal landfill. The authors are not
proposed that tritium analysis
ishing landfill gas from sewer gas on
Tandfil gas would reflect the tiiumCOLEMAN: ISOTOPIC IDENTIFICATION IOI”
Light hydrocerbons in marine sed
issertation, Texas A&M University, Col-
Bogner, J. E. (1990). Energy potential of modern landfill
In Proceedings of the Minois energy conference. Chicago,
sis of methane generally requires at least 5
‘methane,
SUMMARY @
Conventional molecular (chemical) analyses are very
Iie! Reports ofthe Deep Sea Dring Pro
579-884,
>. D. (1979). The origin of drifts deposits as
ters of gas, can generally allow landfill gas to be
distinguished from thermogenic gas (such as natural gas
‘and coalbed gas) and glacial-drift gas. However, this anal-
ysis does not allow differentiating landfill gas from
will sometimes indicate whe
‘Although it generally
gas (these thermogenic gases contain no "*C
analyses will also generally allow distinguish- subsurface. In Proceedings of the
ual landfill gas symposium (pp.
is of methane may be a particularly use-
, and Further research in this area is warranted.
REFERENCES @
Alperin, M. J, Reebargh, W.S, and Whiticar, M, J. (1988)
fractionation resulting from‘Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency Technical
Report Series No. 96.
IAEA (1910), Environmental Sotope dota #2: World survey
of isotope concentration in precipitation (1964-1965).
‘Vienna: Inernational Atomic Energy Agency Technical
Report Series No. 117
IAEA (1971), Environmental isotope data #3: World survey
of isotope concentration in precipitation (1966-1967).
‘Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency Technical
Report Series No. 129.
IABA (1973), Environmental isotope deta #4: World survey
‘of isotope concentration In precipitation (1968-1968).
‘Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency Technical
of isotope concentration in precipitation (9797.
Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency Technical
dota #6: World survey
Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency Technical
Report Series No, 226.
IAEA. (1986). Environmental isotope data #8: World survey
‘of tsotope concentration in precipitation (1980-1983).
Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency Technical
‘Atomic Energy Agency Technical
1. R, (1986), Comparison of
TOX ENVIRONMENTAL GEOSCIENCES
(1981), Source and migration of light hydrocarbons indi-
cated by carbon isotopic ratios. Am Assoc Petrot Geol
Bull, 65, 1536-1842.COLEMAN: ISOTOPIC IDENTIFICATION 103”
gins of methane in the
igi of methane in the
UNSCEAR. (1977). Sources and effects of ionizing radia-
tion. United Nations sciemific committe on the effects of
atomic radiation 1977 report to the General Assembly,
‘ith annexes, United Nations Publication Sales No.
ELTTAX., pp. 98-99.
Wahlen J, Tanaka, N., Henry, R., Deck, BL, Zeglen, J,
‘Vogel, JS, Southon, J, Shemesh, A., Fairbanks, T, and
Broeker, W. (1989). Carbon-14 in metha
atmospheric methane: The contribution
Science, 245, 286-280.
iticar, M. J. (1990). A geochemical perspect
ane in shallow feeshwater lake, Limnot Oceanogr, 29,
985-992.