RollNo Name Section Gender Stream Education TermV GPA TermVI GPA Training_Expense

FB01 ABC1 A Male MKTG Btech 7.2 7.6 5000

FB02 ABC2 A Female BA BBA 7.1 7.5 4000
FB03 ABC3 B Male FIN Bcom 6.9 7.1 6000
FB04 ABC4 B Male HR Bsc 8.1 9 10000
FB05 ABC5 C Female OPS Btech 5 5.3 4000
FB06 ABC6 A Female MKTG Btech 8.1 7.5 12000
FB07 ABC7 A Male MKTG Bcom 7.6 7.7 3000
FB08 ABC8 B Male BA Bcom 7.6 7.1 8000
FB09 ABC9 B Male BA Bcom 8.9 8 7000
FB10 ABC10 C Male FIN Bsc 9 9.7 2000
FB11 ABC11 C Female FIN Btech 5.6 7.6 1000
FB12 ABC12 C Male HR Btech 7 7.6 7000
FB13 ABC13 A Female HR Btech 7.2 8.9 5000
FB14 ABC14 A Female OPS Bcom 7.1 9 4000
FB15 ABC15 C Female MKTG Bcom 6.9 5.6 6000
FB16 ABC16 C Male BA BBA 8.1 8.5 10000
FB17 ABC17 C Female BA BBA 7.6 8.6 4000
FB18 ABC18 B Female BA Bsc 7.6 8.2 12000
FB19 ABC19 A Male OPS BBA 8.9 9.2 3000
FB20 ABC20 B Male MKTG Btech 9 9.5 5000
FB21 ABC21 B Female HR Btech 5.6 5.9 4000
FB22 ABC22 B Female FIN Bcom 7 7.5 6000
FB23 ABC23 C Female OPS Bcom 9 9.2 10000
FB24 ABC24 B Male MKTG Bsc 5.6 7.1 4000
FB25 ABC25 A Male BA Btech 7 8 12000
Section wise
Section Count - Stream
A 8
B 9
C 8
(empty)
Total Result 25

Education back ground

Education Count - Stream
BBA 4
Bcom 8
Bsc 4
Btech 9
(empty)
Total Result 25

Stream wise
Stream Count - Stream
BA 7
FIN 4
HR 4
MKTG 6
OPS 4
(empty)
Total Result 25

Genderwise and stream wise

Stream Gender Count - Stream
BA 7
Female 3
Male 4
FIN 4
Female 2
Male 2
HR 4
Female 2
Male 2
MKTG 6
Female 2
Male 4
OPS 4
Female 3
Male 1
(empty)
(empty)
Total Result 25

Average of Team 5 average of team 6

Data
Stream Average - TermV GPA Average - TermVI GPA
BA 7.7 7.9857142857
FIN 7.125 7.975
HR 6.975 7.85
MKTG 7.4 7.5
OPS 7.5 8.175
(empty)
Total Result 7.388 7.876
Training expenses of Section A
Section Sum - Training_Expense
A 48000
Total Result 48000

Average term 5 GPA for MKTG student with B tech

Stream Education Average - TermV GPA
MKTG 8.1
Btech 8.1
Total Result 8.1

NO of BA Female students in BA
Stream Count - Stream
BA 7
Total Result 7

Section wise stream wise training expenses

Stream Section Sum - Training_Expense
BA 57000
A 16000
B 27000
C 14000
FIN 15000
B 12000
C 3000
HR 26000
A 5000
B 14000
C 7000
MKTG 35000
A 20000
B 9000
C 6000
OPS 21000
A 7000
C 14000
(empty)
(empty)
Total Result 154000

Average of term 5 and term 6 GPA for all OPS students

Data
Stream Average - TermV GPA Average - TermVI GPA
OPS 7.5 8.175
Total Result 7.5 8.175
NESTED IF
Name Section Stream Education TermV GPATermVI GPTermV GPA GPA VI Term
ABC1 A MKTG Btech 7.2 7.6 A A
ABC2 A BA BBA 7.1 7.5 A A
ABC3 B FIN Bcom 6.9 7.1 B+ A
ABC4 B HR Bsc 8.1 9 A+ A+
ABC5 C OPS Btech 5 5.3 C B
ABC6 A MKTG Btech 8.1 7.5 A+ A
ABC7 A MKTG Bcom 7.6 7.7 A A
ABC8 B BA Bcom 7.6 7.1 A A
ABC9 B BA Bcom 8.9 8 A+ A+
ABC10 C FIN Bsc 9 9.7 A+ A+
ABC11 C FIN Btech 5.6 7.6 B A
ABC12 C HR Btech 7 7.6 A A
ABC13 A HR Btech 7.2 8.9 A A+
ABC14 A OPS Bcom 7.1 9A A+
ABC15 C MKTG Bcom 6.9 5.6 B+ B
ABC16 C BA BBA 8.1 8.5 A+ A+
ABC17 C BA BBA 7.6 8.6 A A+
ABC18 B BA Bsc 7.6 8.2 A A+
ABC19 A OPS BBA 8.9 9.2 A+ A+
ABC20 B MKTG Btech 9 9.5 A+ A+
ABC21 B HR Btech 5.6 5.9 B B
ABC22 B FIN Bcom 7 7.5 A A
ABC23 C OPS Bcom 9 9.2 A+ A+
ABC24 B MKTG Bsc 5.6 7.1 B A
ABC25 A BA Btech 7 8A A+
 Name Section Stream
ABC10 C FIN
ABC20 B MKTG
TERM 5 ABC23 C OPS
ABC19 A OPS
LOOKUP TABLE ABC9 B BA
Result TermV GPA ABC4 B HR
A+ 7.9 ABC16 C BA
A 7 to 7.9 ABC6 A MKTG
B+ 6 to 6.9 ABC17 C BA
B 5 ABC18 B BA
C <5 ABC7 A MKTG
ABC8 B BA
Using countif ABC13 A HR
A+ 8 ABC1 A MKTG
A 11 ABC14 A OPS
B+ 2 ABC2 A BA
B 3 ABC25 A BA
C 1 ABC12 C HR
ABC22 B FIN
ABC3 B FIN
ABC15 C MKTG
ABC11 C FIN
ABC24 B MKTG
ABC21 B HR
ABC5 C OPS
Education TermV GPA TermVI GPA TermV GPA GPA VI Term
Bsc 9 9.7 A+ A+
Btech 9 9.5 A+ A+ No of students
Bcom 9 9.2 A+ A+
BBA 8.9 9.2 A+ A+
Bcom 8.9 8 A+ A+ LOOKUP TABLE
Bsc 8.1 9 A+ A+ Result
BBA 8.1 8.5 A+ A+ A+
Btech 8.1 7.5 A+ A A
BBA 7.6 8.6 A A+ B+
Bsc 7.6 8.2 A A+ B
Bcom 7.6 7.7 A A C
Bcom 7.6 7.1 A A
Btech 7.2 8.9 A A+ Using countif
Btech 7.2 7.6 A A A+
Bcom 7.1 9A A+ A
BBA 7.1 7.5 A A B+
Btech 7 8A A+ B
Btech 7 7.6 A A C
Bcom 7 7.5 A A
Bcom 6.9 7.1 B+ A
Bcom 6.9 5.6 B+ B
Btech 5.6 7.6 B A
Bsc 5.6 7.1 B A
Btech 5.6 5.9 B B
Btech 5 5.3 C B
OOKUP TABLE
TermV GPA
7.9
7 to 7.9
6 to 6.9
5
<5

Using countif
12
10
0
3
0
TermV GPA TermVI GPA
7.2 7.6
7.1 7.5
6.9 7.1
8.1 9
5 5.3
8.1 7.5
7.6 7.7
7.6 7.1 SUMMARY OUTPUT
8.9 8
9 9.7 Regression Statistics
5.6 7.6 Multiple R 0.757332
7 7.6 R Square 0.573552
7.2 8.9 Adjusted R Square 0.55501
7.1 9 Standard Error 0.773942
6.9 5.6 Observations 25
8.1 8.5
7.6 8.6 ANOVA
7.6 8.2 df SS
8.9 9.2 Regression 1 18.52893
9 9.5 Residual 23 13.77667
5.6 5.9 Total 24 32.3056
7 7.5
9 9.2 Coefficients
Standard Error
5.6 7.1 Intercept 2.120086 1.046409
7 8 X Variable 1 0.77909 0.140078
 Prediction of term 6 GPA
IF term V GPA is
8.3 8.58663
9.7 9.67737

12

R Square 0.573552
10

f(x) = 0.7790895749x + 2.1200862205

8 R² = 0.573551692

MS F Significance F
0
18.52893 30.93385 1.17E-05 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7
0.598986

t Stat P-value Lower 95%Upper 95%

Lower 95.0%
Upper 95.0%
2.026059 0.05451 -0.04458 4.284748 -0.04458 4.284748
5.561821 1.17E-05 0.489316 1.068863 0.489316 1.068863
 Chart Title

0895749x + 2.1200862205
51692

6 6.5 7 7.5 8 8.5 9 9.5

price demand
10 440 R command
10.8 420
12.2 380 > price=read.csv(file.choose())
12.6 320 > price
13.2 300 price demand
14 260 1 10.0 440
14.5 250 2 10.8 420
15 200 3 12.2 380
15.4 180 4 12.6 320
16.1 120 5 13.2 300
6 14.0 260
7 14.5 250
8 15.0 200
9 15.4 180
10 16.1 120
> price.lm=lm(demand~price,data=price)
> price.lm

Call:
lm(formula = demand ~ price, data = price)

Coefficients:
(Intercept) price
983.91 -52.09

> plot(price)
> abline(price.lm)
> cor(price)
price demand
price 1.0000000 -0.9862369
demand -0.9862369 1.0000000
> summary(price.lm)

Call:
lm(formula = demand ~ price, data = price)

Residuals:
Min 1Q Median 3Q Max
-25.326 -6.375 -1.584 4.876 31.538

Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 983.912 41.719 23.58 1.11e-08 ***
price -52.086 3.087 -16.87 1.54e-07 ***
---
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1

Residual standard error: 18.49 on 8 degrees of freedom

Multiple R-squared: 0.9727, Adjusted R-squared: 0.9692
F-statistic: 284.6 on 1 and 8 DF, p-value: 1.544e-07

> price=data.frame(price=c(9))
> predict(price.lm,price)
1
515.1372
>
uared: 0.9692
1. False
2. True
3. True
4. True
5. False
6.
7. Business information
8. Real data base management system
9. Multilinear regression
10.
1. Good IT processes particularlythose that need to kick in during a disaster situation,
are also critical. Most important, these need to be in place before and not after, they are
needed. For example, go back to feb 2007, when JetBlue Air ways was forced to cancel
1000 flights after an ice storm
In the middle of the crisi, JetBlue's IT department developed a data base that allowed
airlines scheduleing team to improve multitasking. They were receiving tons of phone
calls from crew members, and we created a database to enter in the where abouts of
crew members. Then that information would sync up with the information about crew
members that was in the main system, " brinker said. "now, during a weather situation,
our flight crews and flight hands can call us and give us the location of where they are,
and we can start to rebuild the airlines immedietly using this tool. We do that by cross
refrencing wherethe crew members say they are versus where the computer says they
are, which weren't always in sync.

2. There was a lot of attention on the signs and symtoms of the problem and very little
attention on what is very often that first step you have in triging an IT incident, which is,
what was the last thing that got change in this environment? "Director Eric Raffin Said.
The affected medical facilities has implemented their local contingency
plans, which consisit of theree levels; The first of those is a fail over the sacramento
data centre to the denver data centre, according to Brayan D.
Volpp associate chief of staff and clinical informatics. Volpp assumed that the data
centre in sacramento would move into the first level of backup - switching over to the
denver data centre. Itdidnt happen.

3.According to Volpp, the disruption severly intercted with our normal operation,
particularly with inpatient and outpatient care and pharmacy. The lack of electronic
records prevented residents on their rounds from accesing patient charts to review the
prior days results or add orders. Nursescouldn't hand off them one shift to another
through vista, as they were accustomsed. Discharges had too be written out by hand, so
patients didnt receive the normal lists of instructions or medications, which were usually
produced electronically.
Most users began to record their documentation on paper" including prescreptions. lab
orders, consent forms, and vital signs and screenings. Cardiologists couldnt read EKGs,
since those were usually reviewed online, nor could they order,update,or respond to
consultations.