Chapter 2: Nonlinear Analysis of a 2-D Hyperelas'
Rezoning
ic Seal Using
This example problem is a nonlinear analysis of a 2-D hyperelastic seal assembly using rezoning via the
element-splitting method. The problem shows how multiple vertical rezoning steps can be used to
ensure convergence and completion of an analysis
Topics related to this example problem follow:
2.1.Introduetion
2.2.Problem Description
23.Modeling
2.4. Material Properties
2..Boundary Conditions and Loading
2.6. Analysis and Solution Controls
2.7. Results and Discussion
2.8. Recommendations
29.References
2.10. Input Files
2.1. Introduction
Seals create a mating region between two connecting parts so that the complete assembly can transfer
forces and motion without separation. For typical seals, the seal material must:
+ Conform to all irregularities of the mating surface and prevent any fluid passage or leakage
+ Adapt to the clearance gap changes in the gland in response to loads
+ Resist extrusion (caused by shear forces) due to pressure differential between the pressured and nonpressured
sides of the seal
The most common sealing applications are rotating-shaft sealing, elastomeric compressive sealing, and
flange sealing, Sealing applications can be classified into two types: static and dynamic sealing. This.
problem focuses on a static elastomeric sealing application modeled as a 2-D nonlinear finite-element
problem.
Static elastomeric seals are characterized by a fixed mating surface, a moving mating surface, and the
bead (seal material). The bead is typically compressed between the mating surfaces, providing a fluid-
tight interface between them, as shown:
FETE SS TET OG TCO GST OT TOTES TTT
‘of ANS, Inc andi abuses and alte "Nonlinear Analysis of a 2-D Hyperelastic Seal Using Rezoning
Figure 2.1: Schematic of a Static Elastomeric Seal Assembly [1]
Moves downward duet
applied deformation
Mowing mating pa
Applied fd
pressure oad
statemating Part
sealbead!
2.2. Problem Description
The following static elastomeric seal assembly is considered for analysis:
Figure 2.2: Schematic of Finite-Element Static Elastomeric Seal Assembly with Dimensions
Seal molded inthe groove
cof static rigid mating part Notch
VT L owe
Moving rigid mating part
Chemically Bonded
2.2.1. Understanding Requirements and Physical Behaviors
The following requirements and physical behaviors are considered in the finite-element model and
solution procedure for this problem (1)
TIE TED- OSA ETRE Ts ODI ana ATTA TOTES
2 "OfANSYS ne adits sabres and afteProblem Description
+ The coefficient of friction (between the bead and the mating surface) is not critical for static seals.
The coefficient is therefore not modeled here.
+ A fluid pressure of 4000 psi is applied.
The pressure improves seal integrity, but can also create extrusions of the bead. The extrusions are
due to shear stresses (caused by differential axial pressure created by the fluid, as an extrusion gap
is provided)
+ As fluid pressure increases, sealing capacity improves but bead extrusion can occur.
The fluid pressure on the seal surfaces tends to compress the seal axially, forcing the deformed bead
further into the gland thus improving contact. As the fluid pressure increases, the seal's internal shear
stresses also increase slowly, driving the seal material into the extrusion gap.
The degree and severity of the extrusion depends on the operating pressures, operating temperatures,
geometry of the clearance gap, and seal shape and material
+ Itis of critical importance for the model to predict any bead extrusion.
This type of extrusion typically causes nibbling damage [2] to the seal, caused by large tensile stresses
close to the free surface of the extruded material
The following figure illustrates the progression of seal deformation, showing the seal gland being filled
and the corresponding bead extrusion as fluid pressure is applied:
Figure 2.
: Progression of Seal Deformation
Pressurization gap
with ld pressure . + i
tT __ eg L-
\ 4 { Clearance gepinseal gland
aT tobe filledby seal bead
|
Extrusion gep
@)
7" 7. Material extrusion
a kk
y ) Filled up
l a clearance gop
9 “ (°)
2.2.2. Using Rezoning to Repair Mesh Distortions
The action of the seal assembly and functional loads on the seal can cause large deformations and
strains, in turn causing severe mesh distortions and leading to convergence failure in the nonlinear
analysis. In such situations, rezoning can repair the mesh, map results from the old (distorted) mesh to
the new mesh, and allow the analysis to continue.
Convergence failure caused by material or geometric instability cannot be remedied by rezoning,
FETE SS TET OG TCO GST OT TOTES TTT
‘of ANS, Inc andi abuses and alte 3Nonlinear Analysis of a 2-D Hyperelastic Seal Using Rezoning
2.2.2.1. Horizontal vs. Vertical Rezoning
Rezoning can occur on the entire domain or on specific regions within the domain
If one or more regions are selected for rezoning at the same time during the analysis, the process is
alled horizontal rezoning,
If one or more rezoning operations are performed at different times during the analysis, the process is
called vertical rezoning,
2.2.2.2. Understanding the Rezoning Process
Following are the general steps in the rezoning process:
1. Within a given load step, select the substep at which rezoning should be initiated.
2. Select the region(s) to be rezoned,
3. Remesh the selected region(s), replacing the old (distorted) mesh with a new mesh.
After remeshing has occurred, boundary conditions and loading from the old mesh are mapped to
the new mesh.
4, Map state variables from the old mesh to the new mesh.
This step establishes equilibrium in the new mesh by balancing residual forces.
5. Continue the analysis with the new mesh via a restart.
2.2.2.3. Understanding the Remeshing Phase of the Rezoning Operation
During the remeshing phase of a rezoning operation, a new mesh is created in the distorted geometry
and replaces the old mesh.
Remeshing can occur by reading in a generated mesh or a genetic third-party mesh (CDB file), or by
using element-splitting refinement of selected regions of the distorted mesh
In this example, remeshing via the element-splitting method is used because splitting increases the
number of degrees of freedom in a given region without changing mesh topology. This remeshing
method is especially useful for modeling material flow through confined cavities (the primary physical
behavior of hyperelastic seals).
With element splitting, the mesh topology does not change in the interior of the selected regions where
elements are simply split evenly. In the transition region between the refined (new mesh) and the old
mesh, however, layers of transition of elements are generated, changing the mesh topology in these
regions. The transitions can be all quadrilateral or can be composed of degenerate quadrilaterals.
Typically, an all-quadrilateral transition requires more than one element layer to create a compatible
mesh between the split and unsplit regions. The degenerate elements can do the same in just one
element layer; however, a degenerate element transition is more prone to locking than a quadrilateral
element transition zone.
FETE SS TET OG TCO GST OT TOTES TTT
4 ‘of ANS, Inc andi abuses and alteModeling
2.3. Modeling
This example is modeled as a plane strain problem.
The moving and static mating parts are considered to be rigid. The seal bead is modeled as a hypere-
lastic material
The seal is chemically bonded (zero applied displacement) to the static rigid mating part, as shown in
Figure 2.2: Schematic of Finite-Element Static Elastomeric Seal Assembly with Dimensions (p. 12)
The pressurization gap is the location for the fluid insertion. The moving rigid mating part moves
downward, reducing the 0.02-inch gap to a 0.002-inch gap, at which an extrusion may form.
The notch indicates the region where self-contact in the seal bead is expected to occur.
Three load steps are applied to secure the seal:
1. The top of the seal is compressed first by moving the rigid part downward by 0.018 inches, leaving a small