ADMINISTRATIVE LAW 24 Semester SY 2018-2019 DEAN SALVADOR T. CARLO! DEAN TA I-A PROF. MICHAEL T. TIU, JR. u-D * I HISTORICAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL CONSIDERATIONS A. Development of Administrative Law as a distinct field of public law. |. Factors responsible for the emergence of administrative agencies 2. The doctrine of separation of powers and the constitutional position of administr agencies. B. Definition of Terms - Administrative Law and Administrative Agency; Types of Agencies C. Cases: ~ Pangasinan, Transportation Co., Inc., v. The Public Service Commission 70 Phil. 221 (1940) ~ Manila Electric Co., v. Pasay Transportation Co., 57 Phil. 600 (1932) - Noblejas v. Teehankee, 23 SCRA 405 (1968) ~ Garcia v. Macaraig, 39 SCRA 106 (1972) - In Re: Rodolfo v. Manzano, 166 SCRA 246 (1988) - Puyat v. De Guzman Jr., 113 SCRA 31 (1982) - Chiongbian v. Orbos, 245 SCRA 253 (1995) - Funa v, Duque III, 766 SCRA 742 (2014) - Efraim C. Genuino, Erwin F. Genuino and Sheryl G. See v. Hon. Leila M. De Lima - G.R. No. 197930, April 17, 2018 n CONTROL OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION A. Administrative agencies and the executive power of the President ~ Art, VII, Ses. 1, 17, Const B. Congressional Oversight Power = Macalintal v. Comelee 405 SCRA 693-733 (concurring and dis - Abakads Guro Party List, et. al. v. Purisima, et.al. cnting opinion of Justice Puno) R. No, 166715, August 14, 2008. istrative Decision-making. C. Carlota, Legislative and Judicial Control of Adaand visibility amidst bureaucratic abuse ¢ Ombudsman: Its effectivity Phil. L. J. 12 (1990) D. Carlota, Th and irregular me ~ Concerned-Officials of the MWSS v. Vasquez, 240 SCRA 502 (1995) i 2 995) = Lastimosa v. Vasquez, 243 SCRA 497 (1 oo * bin Ofhce ofthe Ombudsman, G.R. No. | 15103, April 11, 2002 089 - Office of the Ombudsman v. ENOC, et. al., G.R. Nos. 145957-08, January 25, 2002 «Fuentes v, Office of the Ombudsman - Mindanao - G.R. No. 124295, October 23, 2001 = Ledesman v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No, 161629, July 29, 2005 - Estarija v. Ranada, 492 SCRA 652 (2006) - Office of the Ombudsman vs. Masing - 452 SCRA 253 (2008) ~ Samson vs. Restrivera, 646 SCRA 481 (2011) Wm POWERS AND FUNCTIONS OF ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCIES A. Legislative Funetion 1. Non delegation doctrine Cases: * Compania General de Tabacco v. Board of Public Utility Commission, 34 Phil. 136 (1916) - U.S. v. Ang Tang Ho 43 Phil. 1 (1922) - People v. Vera, 65 Phil 56 (1937) ~ Pelacz v. Auditor General G.R. No. 23825, Dec. 24, 1965, 15 SCRA 569 - Edu v. Ericta 35 SCRA 481 (1970) ~ Agustin v. Edu, No. L-49112, Feb. 2, 1979; 88 SCRA 195 _ Free Telephone Workers Union v. Minister of Labor and Employment, 108 SCRA 757 (1981) ~ Philippine Communications Satellite Corporation, v. Aleuaz, 190 SCRA 218 (1980) ~ Santiago v. COMELEC - 270 SCRA 106 (1997) (Read only the part concerning the non delegation issue.) ~ Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan, 293 U.S. 388 (1935) - Abakada Guro Party List, etc, et al. v. v - Federal Energy Administration v. Al Gonquin SNG, Inc., 426 U.S. S48, 40 L, Ed, 2d 49 94 96 SCT 2295 (1976) - White v. Roughton, $30 F2d 750 (CA 71976) 2. Permissible Delegation a. Ascertainment of Fact~ Panama Refining Co. Ryan, supra - Lovina v. Moreno G.R. No. L178221, Nov. 29, 1963; 9 SCRA 557 (1963) b. Filing in of details, = Alegre v. Collector of Customs, $3 Phil. 394 (1920) ¢. Administrative Rulemaking 1. Book VII, Administrative Procedure, Secs. 1-9, Administrative Code of 1987 1. Limits on Rule-Making Power - Olsen & Co., Inc. v, Aldanese, 43 Phil. 259 (1922) ~ Syman v. Jacinto, 93 Phil 1093 (1953) - People v. Maceren, No. L-32166, Oct. 18, 1977; 79 SCRA 450 - Toledo v. Civil Service Commission, 202 SCRA 507 (1991) - Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Court of Appeals, 240 SCRA 368 (1995) + Land Bank of the Philippines v. Court of Appeals, 249 SCRA 149 (1995) - GMCR, Ine, v, Bell Telecommunications Phil., Inc.,-271 SCRA 790 (1997) - Association of Phil. Coconut Desiccators vs. Phil. Coconut Authority-286 SCRA 109 (1998) - Ople vs. Torres - 293 SCRA 141 (1998) - Phil, Bank of Communications v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue 302 SCRA 241 (1999) - China Banking Corp., v. Members of the Board of Trustees, Home Development Mutual fund - 307 SCRA 443 (1999) - GMA Network, Inc. v, COMELEC, G.R. No. 205357, September 2, 2014. - Maxima Realty Management and Development Corp. v. Parkway Real Estate Development Corp. - 442 SCRA 572 (2004) = Lokin, Jr. v. COMELEG, 621 SCRA 385 (2010) - Bartolome v. Social Security System, 78 SCRA 740 (2014) 2. Put ation and affectivity - People v. Que Po Lay, 94, Phil. 640 «Philippine Blooming Mills v. SSS, G.R. No. 21223, August 31, 1966, 17 SCR L077 - Tafiada v. Tuvera 146 SCRA 446 Phil, Association of Service Exporters, Ine, v. Torres, 212 SCRA 298 (1992) = De Jesus vs. Commission on Audit - 294 SCRA 152 (1998) = Republic of the Philippines v, EXPRESS Telecommunications Co., (2002) - National Association of Electricity Consumers for Reforms (NASECORE) vs. ERO, 481 SCRA 480 (2006) - GMA Network, Inc, vs. MPRCB - 514 SCRA 191 (2007) ; = Republic vs. Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corporation - 550 SCRA 680 2008) = The Board of Trustees of the GSIS v. Velasco, O41 SCRA 372 COLD) - Book VII, Secs. 3-8, Adininistrative Code of 1987 S73 SCRA S10sgulations phil 640 (1954) s Lay, 94 Phil 640 ( +P 1977; 79 SCRA 450 = People v. Que Po nie 32166, Oct. = People v. Maceren, No. L- 4. Interpretative Rules phil. 288 (1956) 00 Phil. 288 (1950) 704, March 17, 1962; 114 Phil. = Hillado v. Collector, 1 Hillado v. Collector, 2 an GR. No. 16 - Victorias Co. v. Social Security Com 555 (1962) - Peralta v. Ci SCRA 425 (1992) Service Commission, 2 5. Examples of rule-making in various agencies = Director of Forestry v. Muitoz, G.R. No.-24796, June 28, 23 SCRA 1183 Sand ¥. Abad Santos Educational Institution, G.R. No. L-30918, July 19,1974; 58 SCRA 33 (1974) A 287 ‘Tobacco Co. v. Director of Patents, L-26803, Oct. 14, 1975; 67 ion, 244 SCRA 614 (1995) - The Conference of Maritime Manning Agencies, Inc. v. POEA, 243 SCRA 666 (1995) - Realty Exchange Venture Corporation v. Sendino, 233 SCRA 665 (1994) - GSIS v, Board of Commissioners (Second Division), HLURB, 620 SCRA 249 (2010) - Kabataan Party List v. COMELEC, G.R. No. 221318, December 16, 2015. - Americ - Rabor v. Civil Service Commi d. Fixing of Rates, Wages, Prices - Administrative Code of 1987 See. 9, Book VIL - Panay Autobus Co. v. Phil. Railway Co., 57 Phil 172 (1933) - KMU Labor Center v. Garcia, 239 SCRA 386 (1994) - Ynchausti 5.8. Co. v. Public Utility Commission, 42 Phil 621 (1922 - Vigan Electric Co. v. PSC, G. R. No. L-19850, Jan. 30, 1964, 10 SCRA 46 - Phil. Communications Satellite Corp. v. Aleuaz, 180 SCRA 218 (1989) - Manila International Airport Authority v. Airspan Corp. - 445 SCRA 471 (2004) e. Licensing Funetion = Secs. 17-18, Book VII, Administrative Code of 1987 - Gonzalo Sy Trading v. Central Bank of the Phil. G.R. No, 41480, April 30, 1976, 70 SCRA 570 (1976) B. Judicial Function 1, - Secs. 10-15, Book VII, Administrative Code of 1987 -Civil Service Commission v. Magoyag, 777 SCRA 196 (2015) a, Power to issue subpoena, declare contempt, 13, Book VII, Administrative Code of 1987 1. General statutory provision S2. Special Statutory Grant ~P.D.902-A ~ Evangelista v, Jarencio, L-29274, Nov. 27, 1975, 68 SCRA 99 7 Guevarra v. Commission on Elections, G.R. No, 12596, July 31, 1958 ~ Catura v. CLR, 37 SCRA 303 (1971) ~ Tolentino v. Inciong, G.R. No, L-36385, July 25, 1979 b. Warrants of arrest, Administrative searches ~ Art. IIL, See. 2, 1987 Constitution as compared with Art, IV, Sec. 3, 1973 Constitution 7 Que Che Gan v. Deportation Board, G. R. No. 10280, Sept. 30, 1963, 9 SCRA 27 ~ Vivo v. Montesa G. R. No. 24576, July 29, 1968, 29 SCRA 155 Santos v. Commissioner, 74 SCRA 96 (1976) + Harvey v. Defensor-Santiago, 162 SCRA 840 (1988) > Lucien Tran Van Nghia v. Liwag, 175 SCRA 318 (1989) Salazar v. Achacoso, 183 SCRA 145 (1990) ~ Board of Commissioners (CID) v. De la Rosa, 197 SCRA 853 (1991) > Camara v. Municipal Court, 387 U.S. 523, 87 8. Ct. 1727, 18 L. Ed. 2930 (1967) ~ See v, Seattle, 387 U.S. 541, 87S. Ct. 1737, 18 LEd. 2d 943, ¢. Imposition of Fines and Penalties > Oceanic Steam Navigation Co. v, Stranahan, 214 U.S, 320 (1908) ~ Civil Aeronautics Board v. Philippine Air Lines, Inc., L-40245, April 30, 1975: 63 SCRA 524 (1975) ~ Scoty's Dept. Store v. Micaller, 99 Phil. 762 (1956) ~ U.S. v. Barrias, 11 Phil. 327 (1908) ~ RCPI v. Board of Communications, No. L-43653, Nov. 29, 1977 ~ Perez vs. LPG Refillers Association of the Philippines, Ine., 492 SCRA 638 (2006) ~ Public Hearing Committee of the LLDA v. $.M. Prime Holdings, Inc. 631 SCRA 73 (2010) C. Judicial Determination of Sufficiency of Standards 1. Interest of Law and Order ~ Rubi v. the Prov. Board of Mindoro, 39 Phil 661 (1919) 2. Public Interest - People v. Rosenthal & Osmeiia, 68 Phil 328 (1939) 5. What is sacrilegious?S. 495 (1952) = Burstyn v. Wilson, 343 U.S . Adequate and efficient instruction = PACU v, Secretary, 97 Phil 806 (1955) 7. Reasonableness as an implied standard - Wisconsin inspection Bureau v. Whitman 196 Wis. 427, 220 M.W. 929 (1928) sconomy or elliciene, (1 8. To promote simplici ~ Cervantes v. Auditor General, 91 Phil 3 9. Maintain monetary stability, promote rising level of production and real Income ~ People v. Joliffe, 105 Phil 177 (1959) IV ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE, A. Book VII, Administrative Procedure, Sec. 1-26, Administrative Code of 1987 B. In Rule-Making, Price, Wage, or rate fixing C.In Adjudication of Cases 1. Rules of Procedure 2. Due process a. Cardinal primary rights > Ang Tibay v. Court of Industrial Relations, 69 Phil 635 (1980) 7 Aspree v. Ichon, G.R. No. 21685, April 30, 1966, 15 SCRA 921 > Vinta Maritime Co,, Inc. VS. NLRC - 284 SCRA 656 (1998) ~ Bachrach Motor Co., vs. CIR, G.R. No. L-26136, October 30, 1978; 86 SCRA 27 > UP. Board of Regents v. Court of Appeals 313 SCRA 404 (1999) Zambales Chromite Mining Co. v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No L-49711, November ion, 240 SCRA 43 (1995) 7 American Inter-Fashion Corp. v. Office of the President, 197 SCRA 409 (1991) ~ _ Pefianco v. Moral 322 SCRA 439 (2000) ~ NAPOLCOM, National Appellate Board and PNP v, Police Chief Inspector Leonardo Bernabe, G.R. No. 129914, May 12, 2000 > Montemayor v. Bundalian, G.R. 149335, July 1, 2003 Shoppes Manila, Inc., v. NLRC 419 SCRA 354 (2004) Autencio v. Manara, 449 SCRA 46 (2005) - Samalio v. Court of Appeals, 454 SCRA 462 (2005) Medina vs. COA - 543 SCRA 684 (2008)"rm S64 SCRA 90 (2008) lly. Inc... v. Office of the President 624 SCRA 494 (2010) 649, SCRA $94 (2011) Moradas ~ 713 SCRA 475 (2014) Aguilar v. O'Pallick ~ 702 SCRA 455 (2013) > Vivo v. Phil. Amusement and Gaming Corp. (PAGCOR) ~ 709 SCRA 276 (2013) > Ebdane, Jr. v, Aporillo — 777 SCRA 324 (2015) — = Galindo and c - Erwin L. Mageamit v. Internal A(Tairs Service ~ Phil. Drug Enforcement Agency — G.R.No. 198140, Jan, 25, 2016 + Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 42 L. Ed. 2d 725, 95 S. Ct. 729 (1975) + Mathews v, Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 47 L. Bd. 2d 18, 96 S. Ct, 893 b. Notice and Hearing 1, When required + National Development Co., v. Collector G.R. No. L-19180, Oct. 31, 1963, 9 SCRA (19% ~ Bautista v. Workmen's Compensation Commission, No, L-43027, January 31, 1979, 88 SCRA 121 - Equitable Banking Corp. v. NLRC - 273 SCRA 352 (1997) + Felix Uy et. al., v. COA et. al, G.R. No. 130685, March 21, 2000 2, When Not required = Suntay v, People, 101 Phil 833 (1957) - Bishop v. Galang, G.R. No. 18365, May 31, 1963, 8 SCRA 244 = Pollution Adjudication Board v. Court of Appeals, 195 SCRA 112 (1991) ¢. Form of and Promulgation of Judgment = Indias v. Phil. Iron Mines, 107 Phil 297 (1957). = Serrano v. PSC, G.R. No. 24165, Aug. 30, 1968, 24 SCRA 867 - Solid Homes, Inc. vs. Laserna - $50 SCRA 613 (2008) - Department of Health v, Camposano, 457 SCRA 438 (2005) ~ American Tobacco Co. v. Director of patents, L-26803, Oct.14, 1975 SCRA 287 = Albert v. Gangan - 353 SCRA 673 (2001) - Arocha v. Vivo, G.R. No. 2484, Oct. 26, 1967, 21 SCRA S32 - Neria v. Com. of Immigration, G.R, No. 24800, May 27, L908 (1968) = Go Yu Tak Wai v. Vivo, No. | = Sichangco v. The Board of Com 1979 = Realty Exchange Venture Corp, vs, Sendino, © 23 SCRA S06 17, May 23, 1977, 77 SCRA SS Joners of Lanmnigtation, GAR. L-23545, Now. 7, 233 SCRA 065 (1994) 3, Jurisdictionee , No. L-23846, Sept. 9, 1977; 70 SCRA 17 yy, ) Go Tek v, Deportation Boar - Guy v. Ignacio, 622 SCRA 678 2010) - Go ys — 598 SCRA 266 (2 yen, cues ite 1-33693-94, May 31, 1979; 90 SCRA 379 (1979) De la Fuente v, De Veyra, 120 SCRA 451 (1983) = Carito v. Commission on Human Rights, 204 SCRA 483 (1991) = Simon, Jr. vs, Commission on Human Ri 9 SCRA 117 (1994) = Laguna Lake Development Authorit "A, 231 SCRA 292 (1994) Union Bank of the Philippines v. HLURB, 210 SCRA 558 (1992) = Osea vs. Ambrosio, 486 SCRA 599 (2006) = Geronimo v. Calderon, 564 SCRA 744 (2014) - Mateo v. Court of Appeals 247 SCRA 284 (1995) = Philippine Airlines, Inc. v. CAB, 270 SCRA 538 (1997) = Eristingeol vs. C.A CRA 139 (2009) s Inc., v, Cabato - 327 SCRA 521 (2000) al, GR. No. 131683, June = Cooperative Development Authority v, Dolefil Agrarian Beneficiaries Coop, et al, G.R. No. 137489, May 29, 2002 = De Jesus v. Commission on Audit, 403 SCRA 666 (2003) = CSC ys. Alfonso, 589 SCRA 88 (2009) = Shell Philippines Exploration B.V.V. v. Jalos, 630 SCRA 399 (2010) - Machado v. Gatdula 612 SCRA 546 (2010) - Vda. De Herrera v. Bernardo, 650 SCRA 87 (2011) + Pat-og, Sr. v. Civil Service Commission — 697 SCRA 567 (2013) + Funa v. Manila Economic and Cultural Office ~ 715 SCRA 247 (2014) - Department of Agrarian Reform v. Trinidad Valley Realty and Development Corporation — 715 SCRA 650 (2014) 4, Administrative and Judicial Proceedings Arising from the same Facts Galang v. Court of Appeals, G.R. No. 15569, May 30, 1961, 2 SCRA 234 Co San v. Director of Patents, G.R. No. 10563, Feb. 23, 1961 Villanos v. Subido, G.R. No. L-23169, May 31, 1971, 45 SCRA 142 - PNR v. Domingo, G.R. No. L-30772 Oct. 29, 1971, 42 SCRA 142 Tan v, COMELEC, 237 SCRA 353 (1994) Ocampo v. Office of the Ombudsman, 322 SCRA 17 (2000) Mirales v. Go- 349 SCRA 596 (2001) Ferrer, Jr. vs. Sandiganbayan - 548 SCRA 460 (2008) Acuzar v. Jorolan, 617 SCRA 519 (2010)- 5. Rules of Fv JUDICIAL RI A, Factors Affecting Fi vidence Philippine Movie Pictures Workers Assi. v, Premier Production 92 Phil, 844 (1953) te of Florencio Buan v. Pambusco, 99 Phil 373 (1956) I Light Co. v. Mun. of Rizal, G.R. No. 20993, Sept. 28, 1968 (Omit the corporation law part), 24 SCRA 285 Borja v. Moreno, G.R. No. L-16487, July 31, 1964, 11 SCRA 568, Maceda v. Energy Regulatory Board, 1999 SCRA 454 (1991) Bantolino v. Coca-Cola Bottlers Phils, Inc. 403 SCRA 6999 (2003) Civil Service Commission vs. Colangco - 553 SCRA 640 (2008) v. PIVE DECISIONS ‘W OF ADMINIST! ity of Administrative Decisions Switchmen's Union of North America v. National Mediation Board, 320 U.S.297 (1943) Chevron U.S.A. Inc., v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. 467 US. 837, 81 Ed. 2" 694, 104 S ct 2778 (1984) 316 SCRA 56 B. Exhaustion of Fortich vs. Corona - 289 SCRA 624 (1998) Antique Sawmill Inc. v. Zayco, G.R. No. 20051, May 30, 1966, 17 SCRA Sotto v. Ruiz, 41 Phil 468 (1921) Uy v. Palomar, G.R. No. 2448, Feb, 28, 1969; 27 SCRA 287 (1969) Manuel v. Villena, G.R. No. 28218, Feb. 27, 1971; 37 SCRA 745 (1971) San Miguel Corporation v. Secretary of Labor L-39195, May 16, 1975, 64 UCPB v. E. Guanzon, Inc., 591 SCRA 321 (2009) Administrative Remedies Pascual v. Prov. Board, 106 Phil 446 (1959) Alzate v. Aldana, G.R. No. 14407, Feb. 29, 1960, 107 Phil 298 (1900) Cipriano v. Marcelino, G.R. No, L-27793, Feb, 28, 197. CRA 291 Corpuz v. Cuaderno, G.R. No. L-17860, March 30, 1962 De Lara v. Clorivel, G.R. No. L-21653, May 13, 1965, 14 SCRA 209 Paredes v. C.A. 253 SCRA 126 (1996) Quasha v. No. L-475: ay 31,1978; 83 S Republic v. Sandiganbayan, 255 SCRA 438 (1996) PAAT v. CA. 266 SCRA 167 (1997) S57CRA 448 (1999) Board, and Grajeda - G.R. No. 100579, June 6, = Lopez v. City of Manila 303 5 Garcia v. C.A., PCA Governing on of Agrarian Reform v. Apex Investment and Financing Corp. 401 SCRA 23 (2003) . . Smart Communications, Inc., v. N TC, 408 SCRA 678 (2003) X Estrada v. CA. - 442 SCRA 117 (2004) CSC v. Dept. of Budget and Management, 464 SCRA 115 (2005) Obiasca v. Basallote, 613 SCRA 110 (2010) Republic of the Philippines v. Michelle Soriano Gallo —G.R. No. 207074, Jan. 17, 2018 C. Primary Jurisdiction or Preliminary Resort Texas & Pac. Railway Co. v. Abilene, 204 U.S. 426 (1907) + Phil. Global Communications, Inc. v. Relova, L-52819, Oct. 2, 1980 + Viadad v. RTC of Negras Occidental, Br. 42,227 SCRA 271 (1993) Industrial Enterprises, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 184 SCRA 426 (1990) + Conrad and Co,, Inc., ¥. Court of Appeals, 246 SCRA 691 (1995) ~ Philippine Veterans Bank v. C.A., 322 SCRA 139 (2000) = Crusaders Broadcasting System, Inc. v. NTC ~ 332 SCRA 819 (2000) - Lim v. Gamosa ~ 775 SCRA 646 (2015) = Mateo v. DAR, LBP and Rodriguez, et. al, G.R. No. 186339, February 15, 2017 - Ursal v. CTA, 101 Phil 209 (1957) Lozada v. Commission on Elections, 120 SCRA 337 (1983) = Oposa v. Factoran, Ir., 224 SCRA 792 (1993) Joya v. Presidential Commission on Good Government, 225 SCRA 568 (1993) Kilos bayan, Inc. v. Guingona, 232 SCRA 110 (1994) Kilos Bayan, Inc. v. Morato, 246 SCRA 540 (1995) ~ Domingo v. Carague, 456 SCRA 450 (2005) Funa v. Manila Economic and Cultural Office ~ 715 SCRA 247 (2014) = Ass'n of Data Processing Service Organization y. Camp, 397 U.S. 130, 90 $ Ct 827, 25 L. Ed. 2d 184 (1970) Sierra Club v. Morton, 405 U.S. 727, 31 L. Ed. 2 63 CT, 1361 (1972) Simon y, Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights Organization, 426 US. 26, 48 L. Ed. 2d 450, 96 8. Ct. 1917 (1976) ional Wildlife Federation, 497 US 871, 111 L. Bd. 2" 695, 110 SCT = Lujan v. N: 3177 (1990) = Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife = 119 L. = Resident Marine Mammals of the protect Angelo Reyes, et. al. - 756 SCRA S13 (2015) 1, 112 SCT. 130 (1992) “al. v, Secretary ad Seascape Tanon Stat, 10~~ serene, / / Pipes ~ Abbot Laboratories v. Gardner, 387 U.S. 136 (1967) ~ National Automatic Laundry SI Pepe indry and Cleaning Council v, Shultz, 448 F 2d 689 Vi. MODES OF JUDICIAL REVIEW. Art. IX, A. Common Provisions, Sec. 7 1987 Constitution .P. See. 9, as amended by R.A. No. 7902 (1995) Book VII, Sec. 25 Administrative Code of 1987 Rule 43, Revised Rules of Civil Procedure B. Certiorari - St. Martin Funeral Homes v. NLRC - 295 SCRA 494 (1998) = Purefoods Corporation v. NLRC, 171 SCRA 415 (1989) = Azores v. SEC., 252 SCRA 387 (1996) - Villaruel vs. NLRC - 284 SCRA 399 (1998) Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. General Foods (Phils.), Inc., 40] SCRA 5. (2003) - Cruz v. Gangan, 395 SCRA 711 (2003) - Hadji-Sirad vs, CSC, 597 SCRA 475 (2009) = INC Shipmanagement, Inc. v. Moradas ~ 713 SCRA 475 (2014) - Tze Sun Wong v. Wong, 743 SCRA 567 (2014) = Republic of the Philippines v. Michelle Soriano Gallo ~ G.R. 2018 = Galindo and Pinto v. COA — G.R. No, 210788, Jan. 10, 2017 207074, Jan. 17, C. Prohibition = Chua Hiong v. Deportation Board, 96 Phil. 665 (1955) = Cov. The Deportation Board, 78 SCRA 104 (1977) ~ Simon, Jr. v, Commission on Human Rights, 229 SCRA 117 (1994) Paredes v. Court of Appeals, 253 SCRA 126 (1996) D. Mandamus i+ Blanco v. Board of Examiners, 46 Phil 190 (1924) | Ne Giloc Liu v. Secretary of Foreign Affairs, 85 Phil 842 (1950) + Policarpio v. Phil. Veterans Board., 99 Phil. 797 (1956) _ - Tan v. Veterans Backpay Commission, 105 Phil 377 (1959) Province of Pangasinan v. Reparations Commission, No. L-27448, Nov. 29, 1977; 80 SCRA 376 Meralco Securities Corporation v. Savellano, 117 SCRA 804 (1982) - Cruz v. Court of Appeals, 252 SCRA 599 (1996) ~ PRC v. De Gusman - 432 SCRA 505 (2004) E, Declaratory Relief Avajar v. Ardalles, 97 Phil 851 (1955) + De Borja v. Villadolid, 85 Phil 36 (1949) ~ National Dental Supply Co. v. Meer, 90 Phils 265 (1951) ~ Mirando v. Wellington Ty & Bros. Ine, No. L-44062 Feb. 16, 1978, 81 SCRA 506 F, Habeas Corpus ~ Mejoff'v, Director of Prisons, 90 Phil 70 (1951) - Co v. the Deportation Board 78 SCRA 194 (1977) - Lucien Tran Van Nghia v. Liwag, 175 SCRA 318 (1989) G. Injunction as provisional remedy - Collector v. Reyes, 100 Phil 822 (1957) Pineda v. Lantin, G.R. No. 15350, Nov. 30, 1962, 6 SCRA 757 Lemi v. Valencia, G.R. No. L-20768, Nov. 29, 1968 Honda v. San Diego, G.R. No. L-22756, March 18, 1966 Noenoe v. Vera, No. L -37737, Feb. 27, 1979, 88 SCRA 529 VII EXTENT OF JUDICIAL REVIEW A. The Law-Fact distinction Dauan v. Sec. G.R. No, 19547 May 18, 1959,105 Phil 1317 (1959) Reyes Vda. De Santiago v. Reyes, G.R. No. 13115, Feb. 29, 1960, 107 Phil 210 (1960) ‘Aboitiz Shipping Corp. v. Pepeti, G.R. No, L-21335, Dec. 17, 1966, 18 SCRA 1028 12Question of Law Ortua v. Vicente Ys Mejia v. Mana 50 Ee People v Santos, 63 Phil 300(1! + Japanese War Notes Claimants > Ysmael v, CIR. G.R. No. 142 ry ¥. Brown P, O'Keeffe v. Smith ‘armacion, $9 Phil 440 (19 507 (1954) 934) 936) v. Sec. G.R. No. 8987, May 23, . 80, May 3D, 1960, 108 Phil 407 ‘acific-maxon, Ine. 340, U.S, 504 (1960) (1951) Associates; 380 U.S. 359 (1965) , 1987, 101 Phil $40 (1957) C. Question of Fact ~ Gonzales v. Victory Labor Union, G.R. No, 23256, Oct. 31, 1969, 30 SCRA 47 ~ Suarnaba v. WCC, GR. No, L-42337, Oct 9, 1978 Acting Commissioner of Customs v. Manila Electric Company; No. 1.23623, June 30, 1977; 77 SCRA 469 Banco Filipino Savings and Mortgage Bank y. Monetary Board, Central Bank of the 204 SCRA 767 (1991) ippine Airli . vs. Confessor, 231 SCRA 767 (1994) - Manila Electric Co. v. NLRC, 198 SCRA 681 (1991) = Lameyra v. Pangilinan, 322 SCRA 117 (2000) = German Marine Agencies, Ine. v. NLRC - 350 SCRA 629 (2001) = Velasquez v. Hernandez - 437 SCRA 357 (2004) = Civil Service Commission v. Cayobit, G.R. No. 145737, Sept. 3, 2003 ~ Office of the Ombudsman vs, Santos, 486 SCRA 463 (2006) = Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474 (1951) D. Questions of Discretion = Laguna Tayabas Bus. Co. v. PSC, G.R. No. 10903, Jan. 18, 1957 = Manila Trading v. Zulueta, 69 Phil 485 (1940) : Kapisanan ng mga Manggagawa sa La Suerte-POITAF v. Noriel; No. L-4$ 1977, SCRA 414 _ Federation of Free Workers (Bisig ng Manggagawa sa UTEX) v. Noti 47182-83, Oct. 30, 1978; 86 SCRA 132 (1978) oo _ PLDTv. National Telecommunications Commission, 241 SCRA 486 (1995) vu ENFORCEMENT OF AGENCY ACTION ‘A. Res Judicata; Finality of Judgment 13= Ipekdiian Merchandising v.CTA, G-R. No. 15430, Sept. 30, 1963, 9 SCRA 72 (1963) Nasipit Lumber Co., Inc. v. NLRC 177 SCRA 93 (1989) - Dulay v, Minister of Natural Resources, 218 SCRA 562 (1993) ~ Phil. American General Insurance Company, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, 2: 155 (1993) Manila Electric Co. v. Phil. Consumers Foundation, et. al., G. R, No. 101783, January 23, 2002 - Facura v. C.A., 643 SCRA 428 (2011) Heirs of Maximo Derla v. Heirs of Catalina Derla vda. De Hipolito, 648 SCRA 638 (2011) Emerald Garment Manufacturing Corporation v. H.D. Lee Company, Inc. - G.R. 210693, June 7, 2017 B, Writ of Execution; Mandamus - Apolega y. Hizon, G.R. No, L-23832, Sept. 28, 1968, 25 SCRA 336 (1988) Vda. De Corpuz v. The Commanding General, Phil. Army, G.R. No.L-44077, Sept. 30, 1978 + Ambrosio v. Salvador, G.R. No. L-47651, Dec. 11, 1978 = Merano v. Tutaan, 15 SCRA 343 (1982) + GSIS v, Civil Service Commission, 202 SCRA 799 (1991) = Clavano v, HLURB, G.R. No. 143781, Feb. 27, 2002 14