Professional Documents
Culture Documents
United Kingdom.
12.412 + 26.420 + 06.472 + 14.832 + 08.000 + 04.696 + 15.000 = 87.832
87/.832 = 104.567
16 x 6.472 = 103.552
104.5673-103.552 = 1.0153
100.776/.776 = 129.865
100/.776 = 128.865
490/45 = 10.888
11.888 - 10.888 = 1.0
535/532 = 1.0056
103.552/64 = 1.618
64/103.552 = .618
558-72 = 486
355/113 or 3.1415929
Spacial distances of paired ancestral names at 6.472. near ‘type writer’ spacing at that time
Norman @ 9 x 6.472 = 58.248, Janet @ 11 x 6.472 = 71.192, Robert @13 x 6.472 = 84.136,
J = 1 + 0 = Note A
R = Note F
K = 1 + 1 = 2 Note B
A = 1 = Note A
C = 1 + 1 + 1 = Note C
D = 4 = Note D
J=1+0=A
A = 1 = Note A
1
2
4,1,3
I N D M OFFICE 234
PYTHAGOREAN COMMA
If you divide an octave by a perfect fifth, (13/20), you get the golden ratio. If you divide a perfect fifth by
an octave, (8/13),
you get the golden ratio. If you divide a perfect fourth by a major sixth, (6/10), you get the golden ratio.
And if you divide a major third by a perfect fifth, (5/8), you get the golden ratio.
Names in Skye and pair them with same names from Kinglassie duplicates
and the result is same three numbers in combination… 235
(32)+(06)+(01)+(51)+(51)+(06)+(06)+(06)+(06) = 165
96 + 77 + 51 = 224/7 = 32
(165) + (70) = 235
(06)+(13)+(13)+(19)+(25)+(32)+(57)+(70) = 235
another combination of the paired duplicate names, Skye + Kinglassie
(57) + (57) + (57) + (57) + (64) + (64) + (77) + (39) + (51) = 523
(57)+(57)+(57)+(57)+(57)+(19)+(25)+(32)+(70)+(06)+(70)+(25) = 532
paired… Norman. Alex. Janet. Cathy. Robert. Donald. John. Mary.
(19)+(25)+(32)+(57)+(70)+(57)+(57)+(57)+(57)+(06) = 437…437 is a
number part of the
‘70 weeks’ of Daniels prophesy
255 is that number added together from the office in the Court of
Session,
490 is the Daniels Prophesy number of 70 weeks and 490 – 255 = 235
437 – 255 = 182 and 235 – 182 = 53
33 x pi = 103.686/1.618 = 64.08
pairing the duplicate names at about type writer setting/spacing
this is approximate to the phi number 1.618 x 4 = 6.472mm
16 x 6.472 = 103.552
square root of 5 + 1 divided by 2
and 5 = 2.23606798 + 1 = 3.23606 divided by 2
= 1.618 this is a phi number
also writen as: (n power 2 = n + 1 or 1/n = n - 1)
1.616 = 3.236
3.236 = 6.472
6.472 = 12.944
12.944 = 25.888
25.888 = 51.776
starting at:
1 - 02 = 6.472mm
1 - 03 = 13
1 - 04 = 19
1 - 05 = 25
1 - 06 = 32
1 - 07 = 39
1 - 08 = 45
1 - 09 = 51
1 - 10 = 57
1 - 11 = 64
1 - 12 = 70
1 - 13 = 77
1 - 14 = 84
1 - 15 = 90
1 - 16 = 97
example
The old process number we find is 1 Innes Durie a2/1. to convert,
either use the "toblerone"
1 Innes Durie becomes CS 234. you retain everything else. so, the
process call number is CS 234/a2/1.
Example
Here, although it may seem very strange, you enter as the process call
number
CS 239/processes not previously entered in any index/2/56. in other
words, you
only drop the old office reference.
As can be seen from the above examples, converting the old reference
numbers is
quite easy; but processes from about the mid-19th century have
reference numbers
which require a little more work to convert, note that, if the process
number
commences "2...", or is a second division process, then you convert
both halves
of the old number; if it commences
"1...", or is a first division process, then you need only convert the
first half of the number.
example
Using the conversion table, you convert 2 currie in the usual way to
CS 242.
but you must now convert the other half of the old number as well.
look on
the open shelves for the index covering CS 242 only. the processes are
arranged
alphabetically in the volume, and there are 3 tabs marking the place
of each
letter in the volume. in the old number, 1/4 means bundle 1
item 4. find that entry. on the right hand side of the page, you will
find running
numbers beside each process. it is the relevant number that becomes
the second half of the process
call number. so, 2 Currie f1/4 converts to CS 242/591.
donald = d
alex = a d
robert = r r = drysdale
kathy = k m
cathy = c n
janet = j j
john = j
norman = n
n+r+a+j+k+c+d+j+m=84-52 = 32
r+n = 32
c+k+j+a = 25
k+c+r = 32
a+c+j+k+c+d = 32
r+a+d=23+a+r+j=29=52+a = 53
m+k+a = 25
m+j = 23
j+j+c = 23
j+k+d = 25
r+m+a = 32
m+a+j+k+r = 53
j+m = 23
n+c+r = 35
About the clerks of the Court of Session Edinburgh where some ‘pen
marks’ are found thereon covering page on a marriage of ‘Alexander
Mackenzie of Tarbat and Catherine Nicholson from the Isle of Skye’.
Sir Walter Scott was the 1st Earl of Buccleuch his daughter Margaret
Scott born 1776 married John Pringle
Their son Sir Robert Pringle of Stichell,1667-1736, Writer to the
Signet, married Margaret Hope daughter of Sir John Hope KT died 1654,
Margaret Hope’s son known as Lord Edgefield, (Robert Pringle) died
1764, his son John Pringle, 1741-1811. Margaret Hopes father John Hope
of Craighall 2nd Baronet who married Margaret Murray, John Hope’s
father Thomas Hope of Craighall 1st Baronet. Margaret Hope’s son Sir
Robert Pringle of Stichell 2nd Baronet son also known as Robert Pringle
3rd Baronet of Stichell 1690-1779, his brother known as John Pringle
born 10.04.1707 died 18.01.1782, the son of the 3rd Baronet known as
Sir James Pringle of Stichell, 4th Baronet, 1726-1809, this James
married Elizabeth MacLeod, 1745-1826, daughter of Norman MacLeod born
1705-1772 St Andrews Fife and was 19th of Macleod, Chief of clan, he
married ANN MARTIN daughter of William Martin of Inchfure died 1733,
he married Elizabeth Mackenzie.
Norman MaLeod 18th of MacLeod had 2 wifes Ann Fraser of Lovat 1689-
1734, her third husband was 2nd Earl of Cromarty, her father Hugh
Fraser who married Amelia Murry daughter of the Marquis John Murray of
Athol.
Ann Fraser was the 1st wife to Norman MacLeod 18th of Macleod, Normans
2nd wife was Janet Macdonald, daughter of the Macdonalds from the SLEAT
Isle of Skye, her father Donald MacLeod of Sleat 4th Baronet, and her
grandfather Sir James Macdonald of Sleat 2nd Baronet. Sir James Pringle
of Stichell 4th Baronet
Son was known as Sr John Pringle of Stichell 5th Baronet, 1784-1869, he
married Amilia Ann MacLeod, 1786-1830, he also married Elizabeth
Maitland Campbell,1791-1878.
Joseph Gordon SF
Joseph Gordon born 1777 writer to the signet, and Court session clerk
Edinburgh, married Ann Clunes,his father John married Isabell Macleod
who's grandfather was Donald Macleod of Genies he was clerk in the
Court of Session, Edinburgh his pen mark can be found on the marriage
he also was appointed commissioner to Alexander Mackenzie, his special
powers at law were to produce Brieves for serving him 'Heir General'
to his ancestors and his pen writers in Sheriff Court Burgh Tain were
John Anderson and John Mackenzie.
The Carroll Gordons are descended from the first Earl of Huntly, whose
son, Adam, became Dean of Caithness, while his grandson, also Adam,
married Elizabeth, Countess of Sutherland in her own right, and thus
changed the family name from Sutherland to Gordon.
Sir Adam Gordon, 5th and last Baronet of the baronetcy of Invergordon
and having been baronet for ten years died unmarried at St Keverne in
1850.Other heirs apparent to the baronetcy, yet lay dormant.Sir
William Fraser,("Earl of Cromartie" I.cclviii ,) reports that the heir
male was " supposed "
to be Joseph Gordon of Carroll, who was a Writer to the Signet, and
died in 1855,the heirs are probably the son or grandsons of John
Gordon,who is the uncle of the last baronet.
Rev Hugh Rose, parish minister of Creich (1759-70) and of Tain (1770-
74) and his wife, Mary MacCulloch, had six sons, one of them James
Rose (1763-1821) a clerk on the marriage of Alexander Mackenzie ( who
had plantations in the west Indies, St Vincent, James Rose was a
lawyer who became Depute Clerk of Session Edinburgh. In September
1822, in Edinburgh, his daughter Mary married Colin Campbell Esq of
Demerara [Scots Magazine, 1821]; and in the same month his daughter
Harriet died in Demerara [Blackwoods Magazine, 1821]James Roses's
brother Hugh Rose (1767-1846) married Arabella Phipps, the daughter of
Isaac Phipps, who had been paymaster general in the West Indies, Hugh
Rose was based in Demerara.
9 Reg. Mag. Sig., lib. xiv. no. 263. Reg. Sec. Sig., 2 Reg. Mag. Sig.,
lib. xxxii. no. 597. Reg. Sec. Sig., vol. iii. fol. 81. vol. xxxi.
fol. 79.
10 Reg. Sec. Sig., vol. iii. fol. 122. n Reg. Mag. Sig., lib. xxii.
no. 170.
4 Reg. Sec. Sig., vol. xxxviii. fol. 72; vol. xlv. fol.
12 Reg. Mag. Sig., lib. xxiv. no. 65. Reg. Sec. Sig.,
118; vol. 1. fol. 111. 5 Retours. 6 Ibid. 7 Reg. Mag. Sig., lib. vi.
no. 17. vol. ix. fol. 11.
13 Reg. Mag. Sig., lib. xxv. no. 173. i* Reg. Mag. Sig., lib. xxv. no.
245. 15 Reg. Sec. Sig., vol. xviii. fol. 33.
8 Ibid.6 Reg. Mag. Sig., lib. xxxii. no. 597. Reg. Sec. Sig., lib.
xxix. no. 419. vol. xxxi. no. 79.
a Reg. Sec. Sig., vol. xxi. fol. 30. 3 Reg. Sec. Sig., vol. xxi. fol.
33. Reg. Sec. Sig., vol. xxvii. fol. 37.
7 Reg. Sec. Sig., vol. xxxviii. fol. 72. 8 Reg. Sec. Sig., vol. xlv.
fol. 118. 9 Reg. Sec. Sig., voL xlix. fol. 7. 10 Reg. Sec. Sig., vol.
1. fol. 111.
6 Reg. Mag. Sig., lib. xxxi. no. 337. Reg. Sec. Sig., vol. xxviii.
fol. 36.