Professional Documents
Culture Documents
© ioKinetic, LLC
Any information contained in this document is copyrighted, proprietary, and confidential in nature belonging exclusively to ioKinetic, LLC.
Any reproduction, circulation, or redistribution is strictly prohibited without explicit written permission of ioKinetic, LLC.
Process safety is an ongoing challenge for most
companies
Peace of
OSHA/PSM OSHA/NFPA
mind
Chemical Combustible Better
reactivity dust understanding
characterization characterization Lower risk
© ioKinetic, LLC. 2
Reactive chemicals are regulated under multiple
government agencies and industry groups
© ioKinetic, LLC 3
Chemical reactivity is addressed throughout OSHA’s PSM
Standard
Process Safety Information
Replacement in kind
Training
Accident/Incident
Management Of Change Investigation Maintenance
Auditing
© ioKinetic, LLC.
The U.S. CSB gathered information from 40 databases
about incidents in chemical plants (October 2002)
There are large holes in the current PSM regulation and the
guidance provided in PSM is not specific to reactive chemicals
© ioKinetic, LLC 5
Major incidents continue to occur at chemical companies
with deficient process safety management systems
© ioKinetic, LLC 6
“A chemical reactivity hazard…is a situation with the
potential for an uncontrolled chemical reaction…”
CCPS, 2003. Essential Practices for Managing Chemical Reactivity Hazards, AIChE, p.1.
Temperature increase
Pressure increase
Heat Generation/Transfer
Heat Generation Curve
Gas evolution
Cooling Curve
Sample T
© ioKinetic, LLC. 7
Chemical reactivity incidents can be initiated by various
process upsets
Unintentional interaction
Self-reactivity
Accumulation of reactants
Loss of cooling
Catalyst mischarge
Fire
Source: 2007 Chemical Safety Board www.csb.gov, T2 Laboratories Explosion.
© ioKinetic, LLC. 8
Unintentional chemical reactions are hazardous
Materials reactive with common substances
Spontaneously combustible
Peroxide-forming
Water-reactive
Oxidizing
Self-reactive materials
Polymerizing
Decomposing
Rearranging
Reactive interactions
Incompatibilities
Abnormal conditions
© ioKinetic, LLC 9
Management of chemical reactivity should be done in steps
Approach Result Reference/Test
Computational Initial information on • Literature review (SDSs, Bretherick’s Handbook,
Screening chemical reactivity from NFPA, CAMEO)
available sources and • Chemical structural evaluation (NIST WebBook)
computational tools • Reactivity evaluation (estimated heats of
formation, reaction, decomposition, solution,
CART, oxygen balance)
Experimental Basic information on the • Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)
Screening chemical reactivity of • Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC)
material/mixture • Reactive Systems Screening Tool (RSST)
• Basic tests (flame, gram-scale heating, drop
weight)
Experimental Detailed information on • Adiabatic calorimetry (ARC®, APTAC™, VSP2™)
Testing the chemical reactivity of • Isothermal storage (ARC)
the material/mixture • Reaction calorimetry (RC1)
(reaction onset temps, rates
of temp and press rise,
reaction kinetics)
© ioKinetic, LLC. 10
Computational screening is a theoretical evaluation of
potential reactive hazards
Unstable functional group decomposition
© ioKinetic, LLC 11
Experimental screening allows for more detailed
evaluation of reactive hazards
Screening test method Property tested
DSC, TGA, ARSST, rapid screening device (RSD), Reaction/decomposition initiating temperature
thermal screening unit (TSU) and heat of reaction
Burn rate, combustibility, spark ignition test Ignitability and burning properties
© ioKinetic, LLC 12
Experimental testing characterizes highly hazardous
materials and provides data for scale-up
Test method Property tested
ARC, Adiabatic Dewar calorimeter High phi – Onset of exotherm, heat of reaction,
adiabatic temperature rise, max. temperature and
pressure rise rates, maximum pressure
APTAC, VSP2 Low phi – Onset of exotherm, heat of reaction,
adiabatic temperature rise, max. temperature and
pressure rise rates, maximum pressure
Reaction calorimeter Optimization of processing condition
Explosion severity test Characterizing explosion behavior of dust
Minimum explosive concentration (MEC) Minimum concentration for a dust cloud to burn
Minimum ignition energy (MIE) Minimum energy that can ignite a dust cloud
Flammability test (LFL/UFL) Flammability characteristic
© ioKinetic, LLC 13
Costs increase with increased complexity of reactive
hazard characterization
$10,000
$1,000
ARC
APTAC/VSP2
TGA RC1
$100 SDS DSC Explosion Severity
Chemical Compatibility Flame Test MEC
Structure Heating test (g) MIE
∆Hrxn/CART Drop Weight
∆Hf, Literature
$10
Theoretical Experimental Experimental
Screening Screening Testing
© ioKinetic, LLC 14
For unknown materials, experimental screening
instruments (like TGA and DSC) help identify potential
reactivity hazards
© ioKinetic, LLC. 15
In experimental testing, calorimeters measure reactive
characteristics
Thermodynamic properties
Reaction energy
Adiabatic temperature rise
Specific volume of gas developed
Maximum pressure after reaction
Kinetic properties
Reaction rate
Rate of heat generation
Decomposition temperature
Rate of pressure rise
Apparent activation energies
© ioKinetic, LLC 16
Data from an ARC Test can provide invaluable guidance in
managing process safety
Top heater
Sample vessel
© ioKinetic, LLC. 17
Important ARC test results include heat of reaction and
calculated Arrhenius parameters
Test Parameters Closed ARC test
System Φ factor 3.28
Onset (ºC) 95.5
dT/dtmax (ºC/min) 4.3
dP/dtmax (psi/min) 17.2
Temperature at dP/dtmax (ºC) 169.8
ΔT (ºC) 92
ΔTad (ºC) 302
ΔHr (J/g dicumyl peroxide) 1024
Activation energy (cal/gmol) 34,773
Pre-exponential factor (s-1) 1.0E+015
Cool down pressure (psia) 150
Total weight loss (%) 8.2
© ioKinetic, LLC 18
An important aspect of chemical reactivity data analysis
and scale-up is accurate thermo-physical, transport, and
VLE properties
Structure of reacting mixture components
© ioKinetic, LLC 19
The investigation of chemical reactivity hazards ideally
should involve multiple tests
Each component
Reaction mixture
Potential variables
© ioKinetic, LLC. 20
Evaluating each component can uncover hidden hazards
© ioKinetic, LLC. 21
Evaluating the reaction mixture provides additional
information on potential hazards
Pressure level relationships between a vessel and relief device
Runaway reactions
© ioKinetic, LLC. 22
Other reactivity hazards can be evaluated in the safety of
the laboratory
Charging rates
Chemical incompatibilities
Contaminant effects
Corrosion effects
Initiator effects
Catalyst addition
© ioKinetic, LLC. 23
Safe Upper and Lower Limits can be determined from
calorimetry data
Unit U-100
Procedure # 2550
Process Product XYZ
Step React Reagent 1 and Reagent 2
© ioKinetic, LLC. 24
Software can simplify the process of evaluating chemical
reactivity hazards
Binary interaction matrices
Data analysis
Estimate Arrhenius parameters
Phi factor corrections
Modeling
Conduct process simulation
Complete pressure relief design using DIERS methodology
Define cooling needed
© ioKinetic, LLC. 25
Preventing chemical reactivity events requires many tools
Computational screening
Experimental screening
Experimental testing
© ioKinetic, LLC 26
Controlling reactive chemicals starts at the research stage
and continues throughout the process lifecycle
Anticipate chemical reactivity hazards during R&D
Our experts not only provide you with timely, reliable and reproducible data, but we will also
only recommend the services that are ‘right’ for your company’s safety efforts. Time and again
our clients have acknowledged that we ‘go the extra mile’ with regard to our service. We
provide more than laboratory testing services, we provide peace of mind.
© ioKinetic, LLC. 28