LOGINSUBSCRIBE

TOP STORIES
 NEWS UPDATES
 COLUMNS
 INTERVIEWS
 FOREIGN/INTERNATIONAL
 ENVIRONMENT
 RTI
 KNOW THE LAW
 VIDEOS


 LAW SCHOOL CORNER

 JOB UPDATES
 BOOK REVIEWS
 EVENTS CORNER
 LAWYERS & LAW FIRMS
 लाइव लॉ ह िंदी








Support Independent Journalism, Support Live Law. Plans

starting from ₹ 599 + GST
SUBSCRIBE NOW
X

 Home
 /
 News Updates
 /
 Exorbitant Enrolment...

NEWS UPDATES

"Exorbitant Enrolment Fee By Bar

Council": Delhi HC Issues Notice To BCI
and BCD [Read Petition]
AKSHITA SAXENA

29 Jan 2020 12:15 PM

The Delhi High Court has issued notices on a plea challenging the levy of

exorbitant enrollment and other fees by the Bar Council of Delhi and the

Bar Council of India.

The plea filed by Ankit Gupta, a student at NLIU Bhopal states that Section

24(1)(f) of the Advocates Act, 1961 provides that for being admitted as an
advocate, a person belonging to the General category has to pay Rs. 600

to the State Bar Council and Rs. 150 to the Bar Council of India.

However, contrary to the aforesaid legislative mandate, the Bar Council of

Delhi charges an additional fee of Rs. 8,350 (excluding Rs. 1,000 towards

enrollment form) and an additional amount of Rs. 3,000 towards circulation

fee, in case, an applicant wishes to expedite the process of his enrolment.

Issuing notices on the petition, Justice Navin Chawla posted the matter

for 13th May, 2020.

Levy of exorbitant enrollment and circulation fees illegal

The Petitioner has contended that in addition to the prohibition as

prescribed by the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961, even the Bar

Council of India Rules do not permit State Bar Councils to levy such an

additional fees towards enrolment and circulation. Hence, such an

additional and exorbitant levy of additional enrolment and circulation fees is

illegal, arbitrary and de hors the provisions of the Advocates Act, 1961.

Reliance was placed on the Supreme Court ruling in Ahmedabad Urban

Development Authority v. Sharadkumar Jayantikumar Pasawalla and

Ors., (1992) 3 SCC 285, whereby it was held that

"…It has been consistently held by this Court that whenever there is

compulsory exaction of any money, there should be specific provision for

the same and there is no room for intendment. Nothing is to be read and

nothing is to be implied and one should look fairly to the language used…"

The Petitioner also referred to a ruling of the Kerala High Court in Koshy

T. v. Bar Council of Kerala and Ors., ILR 2017 (3) Kerala 201, wherein it

was stated,

"since, the Parliament has consistently enunciated its clear objective and

policy by engrafting a specific provision under Sec. 24(1)(f) for enrolment

fee chargeable shall be limited to ' 750 as stated above, subject to demand

of any valid stamp duty that may be chargeable under the provisions of the

Indian Stamp Act, 1989, neither the Bar Council of India by resort to its rule

making power under Sec. 49(1) nor the State Bar Council by virtue of its

rule making powers under Sec. 28(2) of the Act can have the competence

and jurisdiction to frame any rule prescribed for enrolment fee which is at

variance with the one already engrafted by the Parliament in Sec. 24(1)(f)."

Levy of fee for transfer from one state roll to another is illegal

He has further challenged the vires of the levy of fees towards transfer of

name of an advocate from one state roll to another. He submitted that

Section 18 of the Advocates Act, 1961 is crystal clear that transfer of name

from one state roll to another is to be done without payment of any fee.

However, the Bar Council of India charges Rs. 2000 as process fee and

similarly Bar Council of Delhi charges Rs. 1000 towards granting NOC for
such transfer. Therefore, an advocate ends up paying Rs. 3000 for such

transfer which is totally ultra vires Section 18 of the Advocates Act, 1961.

Levy of additional fee towards funds is illegal

The Petitioner has also challenged the levy of additional enrolment fee

towards various funds constituted by the Bar Council of Delhi. He submitted

that an applicant cannot be compelled to contribute for the funds since no

provision of the Advocate's Act empowers the State Bar Council to seek

contribution towards these funds from an applicant and more so by making

it a condition precedent for enrolment.

A similar petition challenging the enrolment fee prescribed by the Bar

Council of Kerala is pending in the High Court of Kerala.

Click Here To Download Petition

Read Petition

TAGS #BAR COUNCIL OF DELHI #BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA #ENROLLMENT FEE #DELHI HIGH
COURT #JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
SIMILAR POSTS
+ VIEW MORE
LAW FIRMS
+ MORE
Arbitrability Of Competition Disputes In The Indian Context
LATEST NEWS
+ MORE

1There Can Be No Review Of Order Passed In Review Petition: SC

Dismisses NGO Lok Prahari's Application [Read Order]

2NRI Tax : Kerala Assembly Passes Resolution Against Budget Proposal

To Amend Section 6 Income Tax Act

3[Sabarimala Reference] "Lay Down The Law Only When Facts Come In":
Fali Nariman Tells Nine Judge Bench

4Internship For Law Students Will Be Arranged By BCI & Law Schools:
BCI Before Delhi HC [Read Order]

5Beneficiaries Of Insurance Policy Are 'Consumers' Even If They Are Not

Parties To Contract Of Insurance: SC [Read Judgment]

6EC Files Affidavit Before SC Stating That It Has Received Details Of

Political Donations Received Through Electoral Bonds [Read Affidavit]

7No Plans To Move 'Water' To Union/ Concurrent List From State List,
Centre Says In Lok Sabha

8Second National Judicial Pay Commission Recommends Hike In Pay,

Pension & Allowances Of Judicial Officers Across The Country
लाइव लॉ ह िंदी
+ MORE
INTERNATIONAL
+ MORE
1International Court Of Justice Directs Myanmar To Take Measures To
Prevent Rohingya Genocide [Read Judgment]

2Satire Has No Power To Undermine Religious Values: Brazil SC Allows

Screening Of Controversial Film On Jesus In Netflix [Read Order]

3Canada Supreme Court Upholds Citizenship Claim Of Russian Spies'

Son [Read Judgment]

4'Automatic' Loss Of Citizenship Rule Unconstitutional: Supreme Court of

Liberia [Read Judgment]
ENVIRONMENT
+ MORE

1Allahabad HC Issues Contempt Notices To SEIAA & SEAC For Not

Implementing Environmental Guidelines [Read Orders]

2Uttarakhand HC Directs District Magistrate To Survey The Land At The

Public Ganga Ghat Of The River Ganges [Read Order]

3Recover Compensation From Polluting Stone Crushing And Mining Units

Affecting Health Of Patients At Nearby Hospital : NGT To APSPCB [Read
Order]

4Strictly Adhere To SWM Rules While Running Micro Compost Plant

Inside Burial Ground : Madras HC Directs Salem Corporation [Read Order]
JOB UPDATES

1. Junior Grade Of MLS (Law Officer) Vacancy At Mizoram Public Service

Commission
2. Dean (Legal) & Professor (Legal) Vacancy At National Institute Of Securities
Markets
3. Associate Professor (Legal) Vacancy At National Institute Of Securities Markets
4. MP High Court HJS Recruitment 2020
5. Assistant Law Officer Vacancy At National Commission For Women
+ VIEW MORE

 TOP STORIES
 NEWS UPDATE
 COLUMNS
 INTERVIEWS
 INTERNATIONAL
 RTI UPDATES

 KNOW THE LAW

 LAW FIRMS
 JOB UPDATES
 BOOK REVIEWS
 EVENTS CORNER
 COVER STORY

 EDITOR'S PICK
 LAW SCHOOL CORNER
 ARTICLES
 CALL FOR PAPERS
 COMPETITIONS
 INTERNSHIPS

 PLACEMENTS
 SCHOLARSHIPS
 SEMINARS
 ENVIRONMENT
 BOOK REVIEWS

© All Rights Reserved @LiveLawPowered By Hocalwire

 Who We Are
 Careers
 Advertise With Us
 Contact Us
 Privacy Policy
 Terms And Conditions