Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5 8 11 13 15
Encourage enterprise Tax system changes Environmental Towards a Smart A caring and
and innovation protection Nation/Digitalisation inclusive society
The mergers and acquisitions (M&A) allowance scheme should be Cash-strapped start-ups and smaller companies often resort to
enhanced in the following ways: share option and stock award schemes to attract talent and reward
entrepreneurship and ownership. The Government should consider
• Extend the scope to include instruments (e.g. preference shares, re-introducing an incentive for share option and stock award schemes
bonds) that are convertible into ordinary shares to give investors (similar to the employee equity-based remuneration incentive scheme
1
greater flexibility. that was previously available under sections 13J and 13M of the ITA).
This could be restricted to employees of start-ups or SMEs. These
• Allow the M&A allowance to be claimed on a group basis rather schemes can also be enhanced to provide for deferral of taxation
than solely by the acquiring company. This will give groups in specific cases to the time of share disposal e.g. in the case of
more flexibility in structuring their acquisitions and planning any start-ups where there may not be a ready market for their shares. In
subsequent restructuring. If the intention is to impose a cap on the addition, the value of equity-based remuneration schemes should be
allowance, the value of qualifying acquisitions and the cap on the taken into consideration by the Ministry of Manpower when evaluating
M&A allowance could be computed on a group basis to prevent whether minimum salary requirements are met for the purpose of
groups inadvertently claiming in excess of the cap. employment pass applications.
Singapore should also consider measures (such as a participation Liberalise requirements for carry back of losses
exemption regime) to clearly differentiate itself as a favourable
holding company location. The current tax rules, although favourable The cap on the amount of unutilised loss items a company is allowed
are complex and lack certainty, unlike countries such as Ireland, to carry back should be removed altogether and companies should
Switzerland and Hong Kong. be allowed to carry back losses to any year of assessment that has
not been time-barred. This is of particular relevance to insurers with
To provide greater certainty of treatment, the sunset clause in section exposure to natural catastrophe risks as they typically find themselves
13Z of the ITA should be removed as companies need to plan on a in cycles of profitable years and when a significant disaster occurs, in
longer term basis, and the five-year time frame is too short a time to significant loss positions. The current carry-back loss relief system is
give certainty. grossly inadequate in view of the cyclical nature of writing natural
catastrophe risks. The offshore and marine sector is also facing a
Liberalise deductions for borrowing costs downturn which is expected to last several years. The ability to carry
back losses would also provide some relief to these companies.
In today’s uncertain economic climate, businesses may take up
standby credit and similar facilities to better manage financial costs In addition, section 34AA of the ITA, which provides for the tax
and cash flow in order to ensure they can sustain business operations. treatment of financial instruments under Financial Reporting Standard
The upfront cost of securing these standby facilities could be viewed 109 – Financial Instruments (FRS 109) does not give taxpayers a choice
as capital in nature and hence not deductible. As such, the list of to opt out of FRS 109 tax treatment (unlike under FRS 39). The ability to
prescribed borrowing costs should be expanded to cover such carry back losses could help to mitigate the tax impact of the transition
borrowing costs regardless of whether the facilities are drawn down. from the realisation basis of taxation to FRS 109 tax treatment.
The ability to apply losses to offset unrealised gains is of particular
Alternatively, a “fixed ratio rule” akin to that proposed in the BEPS relevance today, given the increase in volatility of business cycles.
Action 4 Report (Limiting Base Erosion Involving Interest Deductions
and Other Financial Payments) may be considered.
Support caregivers
We suggest that the foreign maid levy relief be extended to all
taxpayers, regardless of marital status and gender, who employ foreign
domestic workers to care for their elderly parents or parents in law and/
or young children.