INTERN: Deanna Ceathem EVALUATOR: Gavin Dake with Deal Farms patgorevatuanion:_II/26/204 ‘Use the scale below to evaluat the inten. Check the appropriate response fr each af the following exiteron. 5 (Very Good) = Coveredall elements well, 4 (Good) = Minor improvements needed 3 Fait) Some major things missing 2 (oon) Very, very weak; more practice needed 1 (oiled) = Failed element oF information not included in presentation ‘OVERALL EVALUATION OF THE DIETETIC INTERN ‘CRITERIA, (COMMENTS Components: + nied conic or anned appropiate nan oF aac sie panning project 7 Took atv for the laning and aameniaon oe projet 7 Sayed on nk and Towed ogi wit al comes + Pat forth effort to go above and beyond the minimum of what was expecied Presented ideas for projee Slealy and accopiedconstrusive criticism feedback for improvements 7 Presented hinvberslf with composure troughow Sonat and ‘implementation of project + Showed skill in dealing with Sal demanding Wuatons SSNS ‘Professional auributes during leadership projec: + Lookedlacted professional + Self coniident & at ese V1 7 Good speaking lineation sls iW Toad sO 5 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: What did you fel were the inte’ greet strengths? SHE. Comm WIcaT 5 AWD PREPGRED HER PRoSect with US very WELL, Wha sgaesions orresommendatons fr improvenent can you provides isting? Saye Diy £ yERYTH ME veny Wea T Pw See wHete BTU CAN BE Tm%oED, Revised Aust 2017 2