AQUINAS UNIVERSITY OF LEGAZPI COLLEGE OF LAW . | ‘COURSE OUTLINE EVIDENCE |. INTRODUCTIO! ule 128. Section 1 ~ Evidence Defined, Cases: ‘Ong Chia v, Republic (826 SCRA 749) People v. Ador (432 SCRA 1) People v. Domingcil (419 SCRA 291) Custodio v. Sandiganbayan (453 SCRA 24) |. Basie concepts: ‘Admissibility: Relevancy, Judicial Notice; Sudicial Admissions, Kinds of Evidence, Factum probandum and Factum probans meaaoge ‘Related readings: Article Il, Section 2, 3, 12 (1)(2\3) 1987 Constituion; b. Rules 128-130 (Sec. 1; Sec. 2; Sec. 20 of Rule 130 ) Rules of Court ©. Pats. (9), (hy, and (k) of Riles on Electronic Evidence. Cases: 1. Bill of Ri People v. Domontay (307 SCRA 1 1999]) 2. Rule 129 Section 1, 2 & 3. Judicial Notice State Prosecutors v. Muro (263 SCRA 508 [1994)) People v. Pugal (215 SGRA 247 [1994)) People v. Lintang (126 SCRA 511[1983)) Strategic Aliance v. Radstock Securties Inc. (G.R. No, 178158, December 4, 2009) People v. Reanzares (344 SCRA 624 (2000) People v. Tundag (342 SCRA 704 [2000)) Laureano v. Court of Appeals (324 SCRA 414) People v. kulais (282 SCRA 551) 3. Rule 129 Section 4. Judicial Admissions ‘Agueza v. Metropolitan Bank & Trust Co. (271 SCRA 1 (1997), PHILAMGEN v. Sweet Lines inc. (212 SGRA 194 (1992) Republic v. Court of Appeals (296 SCRA 171 [1898]) ‘Asano v. Court of Appeals (283 SCRA 260 {1297} = People v. Solayao (262 SCRA 255 (1996)) 4, Factum probandum and Factum probans ‘Tantuica Jr. v. Republic, G.R. No. 89114, December 2, 1991 Far East Marble (Phils. Inc. v. CA, G.R. No, 94093, August 10, 1993, Salta v. Magtolis, G.R. No. 106429, June 13, 1994 Baltaan v. Court of First instance of Batangas. 201 Phil. 311, July 30, 1982 Paranaque Kings Enterprises, Inc. v. Court of Appeals, February 26, 1997 De Gala v. De Gala, 42 Phil. 771 Ill, Rule 130 (Secs, 20-25; Secs. 36-42) Rules of Court. Testimony, Wanesses, Qualifications of Witnesses, Disqualification of Witnesses; Parental and Fikat Privilege; Hearsay,9 Exceptions to Hearsay. 1. Rule 130 Section 20. - Wiinesses foe ve "ane (218 SCRA 494 (1993)) ¥ Balanon (G.R No. 85248-49, People v. Baid (G.R. No. 120667, eae aa Ordofie v. Daquigan (62 SCRA 270 (1975)) People v. Francisco (G.R. No. 568, July 16, 1947) Axroyo v. Court of Appeals (203 SGRA 76010011) 'y. Jacoba (484 SCRA 206) People v. Carlos (47 Phil 626) US v Concepcion, GR. 10396, July 29, 1915, 31 Phil 182 Lezama v Rodriguez, G.R. L-26843, June 27, 1968, 23 SCRA 1166 People v Castaneda, G.R, L-48306, February 27, 1079, 89 SCRA Sez 3, Rule 130 Section 23 ~ Dead Man Statute Guerrero v St. Claires Realty, G.R. L-58164, Sept 2, 1983, 124 SCRA 563 Goni v Court of Appeals, G.R. L-27434, Sept 23. 1986, 144 SCRA 222, Razon vAC, GR. 74306, March 16, 1992, 207 SCRA 234 4. Rule 130 Section 24 — Disqualification by Reason of Privileged Communication US v. Antipolo (G.R. 13109, March 6, 1918) Fortich v. Court of Appeals (G R. 120789, February 12, 1997) ‘Lezama v. Rodriguez (23 SCRA 1166) Alvarez v. Ramirez (473 SCRA 72) Genato v. Silapan (Adm. Case No. 4078, July 14, 2003) Lim v. Court of Appeals (214 SCRA 273) Krohn v. Court of Appeals (GR. No. 108864 [1994)) 5. Rule 130 Section 36 - Hearsay Rule People v. Valero (112 SCRA 660 (1982)) People v, Damaso (272 SCRA 547 [1992)) ‘Agcaoilo v. Molina (AM 84-879, October 25, 1995) People v. Briosa (37 SCRA 336 [1971]) People v. Mongado (28 SCRA 642 [1960)) People v. Quidato (297 SCRA 1 (1998) People v. Cloud (265 SCRA 472 (1895}) Fena v. Court of Appeals (325 SCRA 825 [2000)) 6. Rule 130 Section 37 - Dying Declaration People v. De Joya (203 SCRA 343 [1951)) People v. Dunig (215 SCRA 469 [1992)) People v. Amaca (G.R. No. 110129 (1997). People ¥. Sison (GR. No. 108617, August 11, 1987) Za = = e 8 g 8 ; g Z i i a F é Cf ff " ££ Ee eset se 7. Rule 130, Section 38 — Declaration Against interest Peopie v, Bermat (June 19, 1997) 130 Section 42 ~ Part of the Res Gestae FA cone fimaca (OR. No. 110420, August 124 People v. tozon (188 SCRA 236 (1991) People v. Naranja (G.R. No. 12268, June 30, 1 People v. Palomones (336 SCRA 80 [2000)) 3Peapie v. Sisan (G.8. Mo. 109614, August 13) 1997) ‘Exceptions: , 2 Ree eee gst te tee Pedpile v, zen (198 SCRA 236 [1951 Pogple v, Naranjs (G.n. No,13288, June 20, 1960) fo Peaple v. Palomones (3386 SCA 8d (7000) * imeruansucnen gap ee 4 Pesple ¥, Raquel (265 SCRA 24012996) IV. ile 130-(Sees, 26-98; See. 418+ 51); Rules of Court 8. Admissions; b, Ofer of Compromise ©. Ganfessions: ior Distinguisted from adnission d. Riss tater Allos Acta Rule; ‘a. Eceptions = Similar Acts; f. Opinion; 1g. Character Evidences . Rule 130'Se People v. Lat August 19, People vtBest Evidence Rule, Secondary Evidence, Parol Evidence Rule, Interpretation of Writings; Hearsay: Exception to Hearsay; and ‘Object Evidence Read with: Rule 14 (Sec. 1), Rules on Electronic Evidence Cases. 4, Rule 130 Section 1 ~ Object as evidence 1996) People v. Manalo (219 SCRA 656 {1995]) People v. Mapan Le (GR. No. 188976, prom. June 29, 2010) People v. Solar (G.R. No. 181494, prom. March 17, 2009) 20” Century Fox Film Corporation v. Gourt of Appeals (164 SCRA 655 [1988}) Columbia Pictures Inc. v. Court of Appeals (G.R. No 111267 September 20, People v. Choi (G.R. No. 152950, August 3, 2006) * People v. Malimit (264 SCRA 167 [1996)) People v. Jumamoy (221 SCRA 333 [1993)) People v. Flores (828 SCRA 461 [2000)) People v. Peniaso (326 SCRA 311 (2000)) People v Adoviso (309 SCRA 1 [1999)) allan v. Court of Appeals (265 SCRA 456 [1996)) People v. Rugay (291 SCRA 692 [1998)) 2. Rule 130 Section 3— Best Evidence Rule Heirs of Gabatan v. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 150206, prom. March 13, 2008) ‘Manila Mining Corporation v. Tan (G.R. No. 171702, prom. February 12, 2009) Edsa Shangri-la Hotel v. BF Corp. (G.R. No. 148842, prom. June 27, 2008) Boxje v. Sandiganbayan (125 SCRA 736 (1983)) WIDORA v. Court of Appeals (212 SCRA 360 [1992]) People v, Tandoy (192 SCRA 28 (1990) ‘Security Bank v. Triumph Lumber (301 SCRA 837 [1999) 3. Rule 130 Section 5 ~Secondary Evidence De Vera v. Aguilar (218 SCRA 602 [1998]) Heirs of dela Cruz v. Court of Appeals (298 SCRA 172 [1996)) 4, Rule 130 Section 9 ~ Paral Evidence Rite Inciong v. Court of Appeals (257 SCRA $78 [1996)) NIAv. GAMIT (215 SCRA 436 [1992) ‘Gurango v. IAC (272 SCRA 333 [1992)) (CKH Industrial & Development Corp. v. CA (272 SCRA 333 [1997]) Camacho v. Mun. of Baliuag (28 SCRA 456 (1914)) Pasuyuin v. IAC (193 SCRA 547 (1881), Sarming ¥. Dy (383 SCRA 131 [2002)) ‘Mactan Cebu Int v. Court of Appeats (263 SCRA 736 [1996)) Cruz v. Court of Appeals (192 SCRA 209) Mauiini v Serrano (7 SCRA 750) 5. Rule 130 Section 43 - Entries in the Course of Business PAL v. Ramos (Match 23, 1992) 6. Rule 130 Section 44 — Entvies of Official Records. People v. Bemaldez (294 SCRA 317 (1998), People v. Divina (221 SCRA 209 [1993)) People v. Leones (117 SCRA 382 (1882) Rule 130 People v. Grisostomo (160 SCRA 47 [1996)) Heirs of Cabats v. Court of Appeals (316 SCRA 936 [1993)) People v. San Gabriel (253 SCRA 184 {1896}) Feria v Court of Appeals (325 525 [2000)) ‘Section 45 - Commercial Lists Meralco v Quisumbing (336 SCRA 172)8. /Rite't50 Seton 342 by Ragga pn 4 Sp nt eae te ' |y. ate $90 Sec ‘| inn 48 — Opinion ute | lim ¥ Court of Appeals (214 suka 279 {19931 Pearlav: Gateas (asl ScHADEL LISGE | 8. Rule ection 4% - Oninich of Expert wit ELAS Mina OOP SRN Tides) 9. Ruble 130) Section 81 ~ Character evidence People v. Soliman (101 scaa 767) V, Rute 130 (Sees, 1-19; 43-47). Rules of Cours, Docuirnentary Evidence; Best Evidance Rule; © Secondary fvidence 9. Paro! evidence Rule, Interpretation Rule: Hearsay; 9g: Exception to Hearsay; and A. Object Evidence: Yaqui tans sand cotantestel D pataatent be te 4a Sano sie be oi sleet : Road with: Rule 11/(See, 1). Rules on Electronic Evidence, People v. Soler 3 So cctury rs (fe ksa Sena __ Uses) j Es Dap again! slf-neriinthion Colurnbra Peau 5 tt wctsc, ZOE beseine ore 28 ‘People v. Chol “People v. Malirrit People v. Jumemn Peapie v. Flores People v. Penase Peopie v. Adovis vmallari v. Cou