Dec 15, 2010 | Carpio-Morales, J i. 1. It is a mere mathematical operation by the addition of the value of donations made by the testator to the Digest maker: Alex value of the hereditary estate SUMMARY: Angel donated to his sibling Amelia land. When Angel died, the ii. 2. It is the return to the hereditary estate of the property other 2 heirs, also siblings, wanted the land to be subject to collation. SC said disposed of by lucrative title by the testator during his that collation only applies if there are compulsory heirs. As siblings, they are lifetime. collateral relatives and are therefore not entitled to any legitime. b. The purposes of collation are to secure equality among the compulsory heirs in so far as is possible, and to determine the free DOCTRINE: Collation takes place when there are compulsory heirs. If there is portion, after finding the legitime, so that inofficious donations no compulsory heir, there is no legitime to be safeguarded. may be reduced. c. Collation takes place when there are compulsory heirs. If there is Compulsory heirs may be classified into (1) primary, (2) secondary, and (3) no compulsory heir, there is no legitime to be safeguarded. concurring. The primary compulsory heirs are those who ave precedence d. The records do not show that the decedent left any primary, over and exclude other compulsory heirs; legitimate children and secondary or concurring compulsory heirs. He was only survived descendants. The secondary compulsory heirs are those who succeed only by his siblings, who are his collateral relatives, and therefore, are in the absence of primary heirs; the legitimate parents and ascendants. The not entitled to any legitime –that part of the testator’s property concurring compulsory heirs are those who succeed together with primary which he cannot dispose of because the law has reserved it for or secondary; the illegitimate children and surviving spouse. compulsory heirs. i. Compulsory heirs may be classified into (1) primary, (2) secondary, and (3) concurring. The primary FACTS: compulsory heirs are those who ave precedence over ➢ Angel N. Pascual Jr died intestate in 1999. His heirs were his siblings: and exclude other compulsory heirs; legitimate Petitioner Amelia, who is represented by her daughters Agnes and Nona, children and descendants. The secondary compulsory and Respondents Francisco and Miguel. heirs are those who succeed only in the absence of ➢ In a petition for judicial settlement filed by the respondents, it was alleged primary heirs; the legitimate parents and ascendants. that a parcel of land located in Teresa Village Makati was donated by a The concurring compulsory heirs are those who Deed of Donation and transferred by the decedent to Amelia, may be succeed together with primary or secondary; the considered as advanced legitime of Amelia. illegitimate children and surviving spouse. ➢ The RTC, respecting the donated property, posited that it is considered e. The decedent not having any compulsory heris who is entitled to advanced legitime, provisionally passing upon the question of title to the any legitime, he was at liberty to donate all his property, even if donated property only for the purpose of detrermining whether it formed nothing was left for his sibling-collateral relatives to inherit. His part of the decedent’s estate. The probate court found the deed of donation is deemed a donation made to a stranger chargeable donation valid and held that it is subject to collation following Art 1061 of against the free portion of the estate. NCC f. There being no compulsory heir, the donated property is NOT o Every compulsory heir who succeeds with other compulsory heirs subject to collation. must bring into the mass of the estate any property or right which g. The remaining estate should thus be partitioned equally. he may have received from the decedent, during the lifetime of DISPOSITIVE: Petition granted. No collation. the latter, by way of donation, or any other gratuitous title in order that it may be computed in the dertermiantion of the legitime of each heir, and in the account of partition. ➢ The Estate was partitioned, giving the respondents real properties also, to equalize the property given to Amelia, and the remaining property divided equally between them up to the extent that each of their share have been equalized with the actual value of the property donated to Amelia at the time of donation. ➢ CA sustained that the property subject to donation inter vivos in favor of Amelia is subject to collation. However, the case was remanded with respect to the shares of sctocks not included in inventory. ISSUE/S & RATIO: 1. WON the donated property shall be collated -- NO
CHURCHES UNITED WITH ISRAEL, INC., A Texas nonprofit Corporation; and MICHAEL EVANS, an Individual; and FREE CHAPEL WORSHIP CENTER, INC., a Georgia nonprofit corporation, Defendants. United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Gainesville Divion. Civil action file No. 2:20-CV-00156-RWS