You are on page 1of 1

ARELLANO v Pascual a.

Collation has 2 distinct concepts:


Dec 15, 2010 | Carpio-Morales, J i. 1. It is a mere mathematical operation by the addition
of the value of donations made by the testator to the
Digest maker: Alex value of the hereditary estate
SUMMARY: Angel donated to his sibling Amelia land. When Angel died, the ii. 2. It is the return to the hereditary estate of the property
other 2 heirs, also siblings, wanted the land to be subject to collation. SC said disposed of by lucrative title by the testator during his
that collation only applies if there are compulsory heirs. As siblings, they are lifetime.
collateral relatives and are therefore not entitled to any legitime. b. The purposes of collation are to secure equality among the
compulsory heirs in so far as is possible, and to determine the free
DOCTRINE: Collation takes place when there are compulsory heirs. If there is portion, after finding the legitime, so that inofficious donations
no compulsory heir, there is no legitime to be safeguarded. may be reduced.
c. Collation takes place when there are compulsory heirs. If there is
Compulsory heirs may be classified into (1) primary, (2) secondary, and (3) no compulsory heir, there is no legitime to be safeguarded.
concurring. The primary compulsory heirs are those who ave precedence d. The records do not show that the decedent left any primary,
over and exclude other compulsory heirs; legitimate children and secondary or concurring compulsory heirs. He was only survived
descendants. The secondary compulsory heirs are those who succeed only by his siblings, who are his collateral relatives, and therefore, are
in the absence of primary heirs; the legitimate parents and ascendants. The not entitled to any legitime –that part of the testator’s property
concurring compulsory heirs are those who succeed together with primary which he cannot dispose of because the law has reserved it for
or secondary; the illegitimate children and surviving spouse. compulsory heirs.
i. Compulsory heirs may be classified into (1) primary, (2)
secondary, and (3) concurring. The primary
FACTS: compulsory heirs are those who ave precedence over
➢ Angel N. Pascual Jr died intestate in 1999. His heirs were his siblings: and exclude other compulsory heirs; legitimate
Petitioner Amelia, who is represented by her daughters Agnes and Nona, children and descendants. The secondary compulsory
and Respondents Francisco and Miguel. heirs are those who succeed only in the absence of
➢ In a petition for judicial settlement filed by the respondents, it was alleged primary heirs; the legitimate parents and ascendants.
that a parcel of land located in Teresa Village Makati was donated by a The concurring compulsory heirs are those who
Deed of Donation and transferred by the decedent to Amelia, may be succeed together with primary or secondary; the
considered as advanced legitime of Amelia. illegitimate children and surviving spouse.
➢ The RTC, respecting the donated property, posited that it is considered e. The decedent not having any compulsory heris who is entitled to
advanced legitime, provisionally passing upon the question of title to the any legitime, he was at liberty to donate all his property, even if
donated property only for the purpose of detrermining whether it formed nothing was left for his sibling-collateral relatives to inherit. His
part of the decedent’s estate. The probate court found the deed of donation is deemed a donation made to a stranger chargeable
donation valid and held that it is subject to collation following Art 1061 of against the free portion of the estate.
NCC f. There being no compulsory heir, the donated property is NOT
o Every compulsory heir who succeeds with other compulsory heirs subject to collation.
must bring into the mass of the estate any property or right which g. The remaining estate should thus be partitioned equally.
he may have received from the decedent, during the lifetime of DISPOSITIVE: Petition granted. No collation.
the latter, by way of donation, or any other gratuitous title in
order that it may be computed in the dertermiantion of the
legitime of each heir, and in the account of partition.
➢ The Estate was partitioned, giving the respondents real properties also, to
equalize the property given to Amelia, and the remaining property
divided equally between them up to the extent that each of their share
have been equalized with the actual value of the property donated to
Amelia at the time of donation.
➢ CA sustained that the property subject to donation inter vivos in favor of
Amelia is subject to collation. However, the case was remanded with
respect to the shares of sctocks not included in inventory.
ISSUE/S & RATIO:
1. WON the donated property shall be collated -- NO

You might also like