Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MATH461HW9
MATH461HW9
Aiden Cullo
February 9, 2020
Section 26: 7
Section 27: 2, 6
there is a distance > 0 s.t. d(x, a) < ∀a ∈ A, but this contradicts our assumption that
(<=) Suppose x ∈ Ā. Then all nbhds N of x intersect A. Now assume d(x, A) = γ for
some γ > 0. But we can find a nbhds of x Bd (x, ) s.t. 0 < < γ and since every nbhd of x
intersects A, ∃ an a ∈ A s.t. d(x, a) < which contradicts our assumption that d(x, A) = γ.
Thus, d(x, A) = 0.
d(y, z) + d(z, a) =⇒ d(y, a) − d(z, a) ≤ d(z, y) and d(z, a) ≤ d(z, y) + d(y, a) =⇒ d(z, a) −
d(y, a) ≤ d(z, y), thus |f (z) − f (z)| = |d(z, a) − d(y, a)| ≤ d(z, y). Then, d(z, y) < δ =
=⇒ |f (z) − f (z)| < , proving f (a) = d(x, a) is continuous. Since f is continuous and since
1
A is compact, there exists a value f (b) of f (A), s.t. f (b) ≤ f (a) ∀a ∈ A by the extreme
value theorem.
Show that U (A, ) equals the union of the open balls Bd (a, ) for a ∈ A
S
1. NTS: {x|d(x, A) < } = a∈A Bd (a, ). (” ⊂ ”) Suppose y ∈ {x|d(x, A) < }, then d(y, A) <
and equivalently inf {d(y, a)} < ∀a ∈ A. And from the definition of inf , d(y, A) ≤ d(y, a)
of d(y, a) so d(y, a) < for at least one a ∈ A. Thus, Bd (a, ) for some a ∈ A and
S S
{x|d(x, A) < } ⊂ a∈A Bd (a, ). (” ⊃ ”) Suppose y ∈ a∈A Bd (a, ) then y ∈ Bd (a, ) for
some a ∈ A. If y is in multiple epsilon balls, then choose the ball s.t. d(y, a) is the smallest,
if y is equally close to more than 1 a then we can just choose one a, call it a0 . Now, d(y, a0 )
is a lower bound for d(y, a) ∀a ∈ A. Since we chose a0 such that d(y, a0 ) was smaller or
the same size as all d(y, a)’s. Further, there are no lower bounds of {d(y, a)|a ∈ A} larger
than d(y, a0 ) so it is the greatest lower bound and since d(y, a0 ) < (since y ∈ Bd (a0 , )),
S
y ∈ {x|d(x, A) < } so a∈A Bd (a, ) ⊂ {x|d(x, A) < }.
(d) Assume that A is compact, let U be an open set containing A. Show that some -neighborhood
of A is contained in U .
1. To avoid confusion, we call the open set containing A, V . For each ai ∈ A, define the -ball
Bd (ai , i ) where Bd (ai , i ) ⊂ V since V is open. Now consider the open cover Bd (ai , 2i ) of
A. Since A is compact, ∃ a finite subcover, C = {Bd (a1 , 21 ), ..., Bd (an , 2n )}, that still covers
a
A. We can find the minimum radius of -balls in C, call it 2. Consider the -neighborhood
U (A, 2a ). We want to show U (A, 2a ) ⊂ V . Let x ∈ U (A, 2a ). By (c), x ∈ a
S
a∈A Bd (a, 2 ).
2
So x ∈ Bd (aj , 2a ) for some aj ∈ A. Since aj ∈ A, and C covers A, aj ∈ Bd (ai , 2i ) for some
and x ∈ Bd (ai , i ). From earlier in the proof, Bd (ai , i ) ⊂ V , so x ∈ V and U (A, 2a ) ⊂ V as
desired.
(e) Show the result in (d) need not hold if A is closed but not compact.
1. Let A = R × {0} which is closed since it is the complement of a union of open sets R ×
−1
((−∞, 0) ∪ (0, ∞)) now consider the open set V = {(x, y) | − x1 < y < x1 }. x and 1
x tend to
0 so d(x, R2 − V ) = 0. Suppose ∃ an -neighborhood U (A, ), but then for some x ∈ U (A, )
6. Let A0 be the closed interval [0, 1] in R. Let A1 be the set obtained from A0 by deleting its ”middle
1 2 1 2 7 8
third” 3, 3 . Let A2 be the set obtained from A1 by deleting its ”middle thirds” 9, 9 and 9, 9 .
1. Take two points x 6= y ∈ C. Suppose x and y are in the same connected subspace B ⊂ C.
1 1
Since x 6= y, d(x, y) > 0. Further, we can find 3n s.t. d(x, y) > 3n . Since x, y ∈ C, then
1
x, y ∈ An . Since An only contains closed intervals of size 3n so x and y cannot be in the
6∈ B)then the open sets (−∞, z) ∩ B and B ∩ (z, ∞) form a separation of B hence so x and
y are not in a connected subspace E. Since x and y were arbitrary, C is totally disconnected.
3
1. By (c), An is a finite union of closed intervals, thus it is closed. Further C is an intersection
of An ’s so it is also closed. Also, notice C ⊂ [0, 1], so it is bound. Since C is a closed and
(c) Show that each set An is a union of finitely many disjoint closed intervals of length 1/3n ; and
show that the end points of these intervals lie in C. We will show this by induction. Consider
base cases n = 0 and n = 1. For n = 0, A0 is a single (thus a finite number of) closed interval
1
for length 30
= 1. For n = 1, A1 is [0, 1] − ( 13 , 23 ) = [0, 31 ] ∪ [ 23 , 1] a two (thus a finite number of)
1
closed interval with length 31
= 13 . Assume An is a finite union of closed intervals of length 1
3n .
S∞ 1+3k 2+3k
Then An+1 = An − k=0 ,
3n+1 3n+1
which is equivalent to deleting the open middle third of
each closed set in An , leaving twice the number of closed sets as in An , but two times a finite
number is finite, so An+1 is a union of a finite number of open sets. Notice that in each step of
the induction proof, endpoints of all closed sets are not removed, thus endpoints of each closed
(d) Show that C has no isolated points. Suppose C does have an isolated point x, then ∃ an open
set U containing only x. Open sets on the subspace [0, 1] are of the form U = (a, b) ∩ [0, 1] where
1
a < b. Now, consider c = min(x − a, x − b). We can always find an n such that 3n < c Thus we
can fit a closed interval in U . Since the endpoints of closed intervals are in C, there must be a
point y ∈ C s.t. y ∈ U . Thus, no open set in C contains only one point (x), i.e. singletons are
Hausdorff. From (b), C is compact and because 0, 1 are the endpoints of A0 = [0, 1] and (by
4
Section 28: 2, 5, 7a
for all x, y ∈ X with x 6= y, then f is called a shrinking map. If there is a number α < 1 such that
for all x, y ∈ X, then f is called a contraction. A fixed point of f is a point x such that f (x) = x
(a) If f is a contraction and X is compact, show f has a unique fixed point. [Hint: Define f 1 = f
T∞
(i) First, we show i=1 An is nonempty where An = f n (X). We see f is continuous because
∀ > 0 ∀x ∈ X, ∃δ > 0 s.t. ∀y ∈ X, d(x, y) < δ =⇒ d(f (x), f (y)) < , namely ∀x ∈ X,
we take δ = and d(f (x), f (y)) < αd(x, y) < d(x, y) < . Now we show by induction that
is cts and X is compact, A1 = f (X) is compact. Now, assume f n (X) is compact, then
f n+1 (X) = f (f n (X)) is compact since f is cts. Thus, every An is compact. Since every
metric space is Hausdorff, every An is a compact subset of a Hausdorff space and is therefore
f (x) ∈ f (X) so A1 is nonempty. Now, assume f n (X) is nonempty, then x ∈ f n (X)) implies
the finite intersection property, and since {Ai } is a collection of closed sets in X a compact
T∞
metric space then having the finite intersection property implies i=1 Ai is nonempty. First,
5
we show An+1 ⊂ An ∀n ∈ Z+ by induction. Since f is defined as f : X → X, it is clear
and thus f n−1 (f (y)) ∈ f n−1 (X). Now, since x = f n (y) = f n−1 (f (y)), x ∈ f n−1 (X) so
{Ai } will form nested sequences with one Aj ∈ {Ai } being a subset of all {Ai }, thus the
intersection of a finite number of Ai ’s will be one of the Ai ’s and since we proved each Ai
is a compact metric space, it is bounded, i.e. ∀x, y ∈ X, d(x, y) ≤ M for some number
M . Since f is a contracting function, d(f (x), f (y)) ≤ αM and d(f n (x), f n (y)) ≤ αn M ,
thus diam(f n (X)) → 0 where diam(f n (X)) = sup{d(p, q)} ∀p, q ∈ f n (X) since distance
can never be negative and it if we suppose it was some > 0 we can always find an n s.t.
T∞
αn M < . Given this, suppose x, y ∈ i=1 Ai then x, y ∈ f i (X) for every i, but this implies
T∞
diam(f n (X)) > 0 for every i, E. Thus, only one point can be in i=1 Ai . Now, we must show
T∞ T∞
that x ∈ i=1 Ai is the unique fixed point. We will show x is a fixed point iff x ∈ i=1 Ai .
T∞
which will imply that x ∈ i=1 Ai is the unique fixed point since we proved there is only one
T∞
point in i=1 Ai . ”=>” Suppose f (x) = x, the x ∈ X, x = f (x) ∈ f (X) and by induction
T∞ T∞
x = f n (x) ∈ f n (X), i.e. x ∈ f n (X) ∀n so x ∈ i=1 Ai . ”<=” x ∈ i=1 Ai , so x ∈ f n (X)
T∞ T∞
∀n so f (x) ∈ f n + 1(X), ∀n + 1 so f (x) ∈ i=1 Ai since there is only one element in i=1 Ai ,
x = f (x) .
Section 29: 1, 5, 8
8. Show that the one-point compactification of Z+ is homeomorphic with the subspace {0}∪{1/n|n ∈ Z+ }
of R.
6
1. Z+ is locally compact since for every point x ∈ Z+ , there is a compact subspace {x} (all single-
tons/finite sets are compact) containing x that also contains an open nbhd of x, namely {x} since Z+
has the discrete topology in R. Also, note that Z+ is hausdorff as we can easily create disjoint -balls
around distinct integers. Since Z+ is locally compact hausdorff it has a unique (up to a homeomor-
1
phism) 1-pt compactification. Further, Z+ is homeomorphic to K via the homeomorphism f (n) = n
which is clearly 1 − 1 and onto, and hence bijective. Singletons in K and Z+ are open so open sets
in K will be unions of singletons and hence will be mapped to by unions of singletons in Z+ which
will be open, i.e. if U is open in K f −1 (K) is open, thus f is cts. Similarly, any open set in Z+ will
cts and f is a homeomorphism from Z+ to K. Now, we show that {0} ∪ { n1 | n ∈ Z+ } is the 1-pt
compactification of K. First, {0} ∪ K is compact since any open cover will have one open set (a, b)
1 1
covering {0} and all n < b leaving only a finite number of n ’s that can be covered by finitely many
1 1
open sets giving us a finite subcover. Further, {0} ∪ K is hausdorff since for any n and k where k 6= n
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
we can find a x ∈ R s.t. k <x< n if k < n or k >x> n if k > n and create disjoint open sets
1 1
around n and k respectively (we already used this to say only singletons in K are open), note we can
1
do the same for 0 and any n. Thus, {0} ∪ K is compact hausdorff, K ⊂ {0} ∪ K and K̄ = {0} ∪ K.
Thus, {0} ∪ K is the 1-pt compactification of K and since Z+ is homeomorphic to K and Z+ locally