The Many
Flavors of
Memories
We recall events in a multisensory way—
and we distort those recollections just as
creatively. Chemistry causes those errors,
ut chemistry might fix them too
By Micuagz D. LeMonick
{IKEJUST ABOUT EVERY ONE OF MY
contemporaries, I still remember
exactly where I was and what Las
doing when John F. Kennedy was
shot. I's so vivid, it’s almost like
‘watching a movie. Iwas home sick
from fifth grade, lyingon the couch
in the living room. My mother had
a talicradio station playing. Sud-
denly a newscaster broke in with
the news that shots had been fired in Dallas and the
President had been rushed to ahospital. Then a few min-
tutes later came these precise words, spoken in just the
tone you would imagine: “Ladies and gentlemen, the
President is dead,” followed immediately by funereal
music, My mother burst into tears, and I, profoundly
embarrassed, fled the room.
“That scene, which I have replayed in my mind many
times since 1965, perfectly illustrates two crucial facts
that neurologists have come to understand in the past
few years about the workings of human memory. The
first is that, despite its movie ike clarity, my memory
of [K's assassination is almost certainly wrong in
Soine details. That's because Fm not simply calling up
the original memory laid down in November 1963, =
recalling the last rime I thought about it. Bach time we
retrieve and re-store a memory it can be subtly altered
8
‘What goes back into our brainsislike the new version of
4 text document, overwriting the od.
The second fact: memory and emotion are intimately
linked biochemically, with hormones like adrenaline
actively involved in both. "Any kind ofemotional experi
tence will create astronger memory than otherwise would
‘recreated, says James McGaugh, a neurobiologistat the
University of California at Irvine, “We remember our
embarrassments, ou failures, our fender benders.”
‘On the face oft, that doesn't seem especially surpris
ing: we fel strong emotion at important events, which
are obviously more memorable. But the connection is
such deeper than that and dates back to our evolution~
ry past. "The major purpose of memory,” observes
‘MeGaugh, “is to predict the future.” An animal that can
remember the significance ofthat large, nasty-looking
thing with the big teeth and sharp claws will survive
longer and produce more offspring.
‘What happens biochemically, says MeGaugh, is that
when faced with an emotionally changed situation, our
bodies release the stess hormones adrenaline and cor-
tisol, Among other things, these signal the amygdala, a
tiny neuron-rich structure nestled inside the brain'sme:
dial eemporal lobes, which responds by leasing another
hormone, norepinephrine. Norepinephrine does two
important things. First, it kicks the body's autonomic
nervous system into overdrive: the heart beats fas‘YoUR BRAIN: MEMORY
respiration quickens, and the muscles tense in anticipa-
tion ofa buss of physical exertion.
Second, even ast’ kick-starting the body, the amyg-
dala sends out acracke of signalsto the rest ofthe brain.
‘Among other things, these signals tell the neurons that
any memories recorded in the next few minutes need
to be especially robust. One piece of evidence for this,
scenario: Lawrence Cahill, a colleague of MeGaugh’s
at Irvine, showed subjects emotionally arousing film
clips, simultaneously gaug-
ing the activity of their
amygdalae using positron-
emission tomography (PET)
scans, Three weeks later, he
gave the subjects a surprise
memory quiz. The amount of
amygdala activity predicted
with unexpected accuracy
hhow well they remembered
the film cps
Imaging studies also
make cléar that it isnt just
dangers or tragic events that
cement memory formation.
Positive emotions, which are
also mediated through the
amygdala, have the same ef
fect. Again, that’s a perfectly
reasonable evolutionary de-
velopment. If eating or ha.
ing sex makes you happy,
youll remember that and
do ic again, keeping yourself
healthy and passing on your
genes as wel
This is an oversimplifica-
tion, of course, Other neuro
transmitters and even plain
tlucose—the sugar the brain
uses for energy—may also
play a part Al ofthese things work in tandem, which
neans their complexity multiplies, And then there's the
peculiar case ofthe woman who contacted MeGaugh be
fause she remembers absolutely everything, The stress-
hormone model does not seem to apply in her case. Says
MeGaugh: “At some point, asked ifshe knew whe Bing
Crosby was. She's 40,30 Bing Crosby doesn’tloom large
inher life, but she knew he died on a golfcoursein Spain,
and she gave me the date justike tha.” Researchers are
‘Working to determine ifthe woman's brain is structur-
ally different from everyone else's.
‘Butaside from such odd cases, virtually no one doubts
80
Positive emotions cement
memories, and that
makes sense. If eating and
having sex make you happy,
you'll remember to do them
again, keeping yourself: fed
and passing on your genes
the connection between emotions and memories—and
nobody doubts that memory could be enhanced artifi-
Cially, That's not likely to work out too well, however.
Give someone a shot of adrenaline, and memory may
temporarily improve. But the chemical also drives up
the heart rate dangerously. Other memory enbancers,
like Ritalin or amphetamines, which are used by college
students to cram for exams, are highly addictive
For people who want to modify bad memories, there
‘may be hope. Roger Pitman,
a professor of psychiatry at
Harvard Medical School,
is working fo understand
post-traumatic stress disor
der (PTSD). The syndrome,
he believes, is the result of
brain chemicals reinforc
ing themselves in cerebral
vicious circle, “In the afte
rath of a traumatic event,
‘you tend to think
rmore about it, and the more
you think about it, the more
likely you are to release fur
er stress hormones, and
the more likely they are to
act to make the memory of
* thar event even stronge!
‘That's consistent with
McGaugh's ideas, but there
are only a few bits of evi
dence so far to support it.
One bit comes from Isa,
where researchers found
that of people who showed
up at emergency rooms af
ter traumatic events, those
admitted with the fastest
heartbeats had the high-
est risk of later developing
PTSD. Additionally, investigators have discovered the
surprising fact that after a paralyzing accident, there's
4 much higher rate of PTSD in people suffering from
paraplegia (paralysis ofthe lower body) chan in those
‘eho suffer quadriplegia (paralysis of al four limbs), at
Jeast partly because quadriplegia severs the ink benween
the brain and the adrenal glands.
‘To test his theory, Pitman went to the emergency
room at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston and
jnntercepted patients who had suffered serious traumas.
He gave some ofthem propranolol, a
igthatinterferes
‘with adrenaline uptake, The test got placebos. He alsohhad them tape-record accounts of the traumas. When
he played back the tapes eight months later, eight of 14
placebo patients developed higher heart rates, sweaty
‘palms and other signs of PTSD. None ofthe patients on
propranolol had such responses.
Encouraged by his findings, Pitman undertook a
much larger trial of the same technique for erasing
‘memories of traumatic events, but the study stirred
some controversy. The President's Council on Bioethics
condemned the work as unethical, saying that tinker-
ing with memories risks undermining a person's true
identity. Pitman rejects such notions as showing bias
against psychiatry. Afterall, he argues, no one suggests
that doctors should withhold morphine from people
in acute pain on the grounds that it may erase part of
their experience
(Other researchers arelookingat PTSD aswell. Michael
Davis, a professor of psychiatry at Emory University in
Atlanta, has studied soldiers returning from Iraq to see
whether a drug called D-cycloserine could help prevent
PTSD. This compound activates a protein that helps
the mind form new, less emotional associations with
the original trauma. Studies in rats and humans have
- shown thatt can workand, says Davis, “psychologists
are very excited by it”
‘That's because the theory behind D-cyeloserine’s ac
tion is consistent with old-fashioned talk therapy and
especially with cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), cur
rently the most effective nondrug technique for dealing
with phobias, PTSD and obsessive-compulsive disorder.
‘Theidea behind CBT is that the patient examines upset
ting ideas and consciously assigns new, more positive
associations to them. Even traditional Freudian ther-
apy might achieve something similar, by unearthing
‘ld memories and exposing them to the daylight of the
doctor’ office.
D-cycloserine may simply streamline thetalk-driven,
process Indeed, says Davis, at least one study showed p-
tients on D-cyeloserine getting as much benefit from two
sessions as atypical patient would from eight. “That's ex
actly what they're finding in obsessive-compulsive trials
100," he says, There are, moreover, a number of other
brain receptors and chemicals that show promise in ac-
celerating the formation of new associations. Says Davis:
“What we have now could be the tip ofthe iceberg
‘That's hardly surprising. Even without anything
approaching a complete understanding of the human
‘brain, neurologists and psychopharmacologists have
come up with dozens of medications to treat schizophre-
nia, depression and other illnesses, The next batch of
psychoactive drugs could provide ammunition against
the even more mysterious disorders of memory.
BEEN HERE BEFORE?
MAYBE IT’S JUST DEJA VU
has had: you walk into @ room or find yourself In
[2 conversation, and suddenly you have the over
whelming sense that you've lived this moment al
reody, Psychologists call it aij vw—"aready seen.”
in Frenon-—but despite the phenomenon's familiar,
no one had offered a carwincng explanation fori
‘The mystery may have been solved, thanks to @
team of neuroscientists at MIT's Pcower Institute for
Learning and Memory, Neuroscientsts already know
memories are actualy groups of brain cels linked by
Strong chemical connections, h's important for the
I 's an eerie experience that just about everyone
brain to know that same memories are similar to each
other, out i's alg important to distinguish memories
that are simiar but not identical. This ability is known
185 patter separation.
Researcher Thomas McHugh and senior colleague
ssusumy Tonegawa engineered a type of mouse thet
lacked what thay believed was the gone responsible
for pattern separation and devised an experiment to
test the theory, Mice were guided inte @ box where
they would get mild foot shock; they would react by
freezing. Then they were guided into a similar box but
not shocked. The altered mice would treeze there too.
Normal mice figured tings out pretty quickly. |
“Tis seme circuit and this same gene may explain
46ja vu, Every s0 often, the scientists lieve, the
pattern-separation system misfires, and anew experi
tence that's similar to an olcer one seems identical. "it
‘doesn't happen very often to most people," Tonegawa
says. But when foes, fs unmistakable, Mat
&‘The Many Flavors of Memory
1, Why did the author think the memory of JFK is certainly wrong in some
detail, especially over time?
2. How are memory and emotion linked?
3. Therefore what are we more likely to remember?
4. According to the author, what is the major purpose of memory?
5. What does the amount of amygdala activity have to do with memory?
6. What 2 types of emotional things are you most likely to remember?
7. How does the author suggest memories can be enhanced artificially?
8. Which patients at emergency rooms had the highest risk of developing
PTSD?
9, What effect did propranolol haye on PTSD.
10. How do some researchers believe D-cycloserine could help prevent PTSD?
11, How can CBT help with Phobias and other disorders, in relation to memory?
12.Explain how the author suggests Déj yu works.