Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MEQ
MEQ
and Applications
Gregg Nordquist
Chevron
Gregg Nordquist
z Other
Conventional Geothermal
z Salak Field, Java, Indonesia
z Improvement of locations
z Velocity tomography
z S-Wave Splitting
Costs to implement
and
Water/steam flood
management
Hydrofrac monitoring
Primary production
monitoring
Mining
Rock bursts
EGS (Engineered Geothermal systems)
Conventional Geothermal
© Chevron 2005 DOC ID 5
z Displacements: mm – cm
Fracture
Microseisms
Fault mapping
Compaction strains
Thermal fronts
Fluid injection
© Chevron 2005 DOC ID 9
z Hydrofrac monitoring
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Energy is produced by
extracting heat from deeply
buried hot rocks by circulating
water or other working fluid
through an engineered,
artificial reservoir or
underground heat exchanger.
Reservoir is stimulated to
improve permeability. Passive
seismic monitoring is used to
map the extent of stimulated
volume.
z Mature technology
and
Conventional Geothermal
z Improvement of locations
z Velocity tomography
z S-Wave Splitting
injection management
Production
distribution of reservoir
permeability
resource boundaries
civic responsibility
Recent advances
• 24-bit digital recording
• Stand-alone recording
systems operate
unattended for months
without radio telemetry
Telemetry or Hardwire
Plus
z Real time processing
z One part time person can process
z Costly
Negative
z Station deployment can be difficult
z Line of site issue
Digital stand alone
Plus
z Station deployment easy/flexible
z Easy to maintain
z Relatively low cost
Negative
z No real time processing
z Requires more manpower
Fracture stressed but locked Increase in pore pressure Fracture surfaces slip until
by asperities drives fracture surfaces apart stopped by asperities
© Chevron 2005 DOC ID from Stark 2007 after Mossop and Segall 2004 23
Fracture stressed but Increase in pore pressure Fracture surfaces slip until
locked by asperities drives fracture surfaces apart stopped by asperities
a)
Salak Corridor for plotting
N
9256
UTM (km)
Majority of MEQ
9254
A9
activity can be
A14
500
over an interpreted 0
Elevation (m asl)
permeability is -2000
expected -2500
-3000
-3500
-4000
b)
-4500
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Distance (km)
In press Stimac et al. Geothermics
© Chevron 2005 DOC ID 27
Injection monitoring
Eastern Area
150
Cumulative
Cumulative MEQMEQ and Injection
and Cumulative Awi 14 Injection
100
Injection
rate changes 2.01E+07
75
Cumulative Injection
50
1.01E+07
MEQ rate
25
changes
0 8.00E+04
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
4/1/2005
5/1/2005
6/1/2005
7/1/2005
8/1/2005
9/1/2005
10/1/2005
11/1/2005
12/2/2005
1/1/2006
2/1/2006
3/4/2006
Month
Eastern Area
150
Cumulative MEQ
Cumulative MEQ and
and Awi 1-7Chloride
and 1-8 Chloride
10500
Cum MEQ Cumulative #MEQ’s
Awi 1-7
Well 1 Chloride
Cumulative MEQ Count
125
Well1-8
Awi 2 Chloride
Inj Move 10000
Chloride (ppm)
100 MEQ rate increase
75 9500
50 Cl increase
9000
25
0 8500
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
4/1/2005
5/1/2005
6/1/2005
7/1/2005
8/1/2005
9/1/2005
10/1/2005
11/1/2005
12/2/2005
1/1/2006
2/1/2006
3/4/2006
Month
Conventional Geothermal
Passive Seismic Monitoring Example
Loch Loch
Lomond Lomond
Hobergs Hobergs
Cobb Cobb
Forest Forest
Lakes Lakes
Whispering Whispering
Pines Pines
Anderson Anderson
Springs Springs
1978 1990
B'
Injection Well
Microearthquake
Depth Range:
0 -- 2.7 km subsea
2.7 -- 5.2 km subsea
0 0.5 1.0 2.0
Scale (km)
A'
Reservoir Limit Outside of Production defined by Well Pressure and
MEQ Distribution (pers comm. M. Stark, Cal Pine, 2007)
© Chevron 2005 DOC ID Courtesy M. Stark, 2007 33
Pressure observation data confirm that pressure drawdown extends to areas of well located MEQs.
z Cluster analysis
S-wave splitting
z Fracture trends and density
24 bit instruments
z Costs coming down, easy to operate and maintain
Surface Borehole (245 m)
1 min
Same small event M~1
Station located near a road. Down hole instrument not as impacted
by surface noise. Easier to identify and more accurately pick event
1 minute phases. Able to further amplify signal from the downhole instrument
to lower detection level. But going downhole adds expense.
Asanuma et al 2007
© Chevron 2005 DOC ID 41
The Geysers is an excellent “laboratory” for testing and perfecting how tomographic
imaging can be applied in Geothermal. Researchers are working with field operators to
test if changes with time can reliably resolve and detect saturation changes related to
increased injection and help with field management decisions.
© Chevron 2005 DOC ID 43
After Romero, et al, 1995
NW Geysers
Rose Diagrams
2.25 km
Summary
Conventional geothermal companies are monitoring MEQ data to track injection and to
infer reservoir boundaries and structures.
MEQ monitoring in the Oil and Gas industry is increasing. The geothermal industry can
benefit from their lesson’s learned.
But must be realistic: Hot water is not as valuable as oil. Budgets for application and
testing are lower
z Need to be creative to get the data and stay in budget
f Stand alone recording systems for example
Data – The more the better
z Continuous or long term monitoring
z Improve the sensitivity with optimized deployment of instruments and sensors
f Balance of costs vs benefits (for example: number of stations and surface
vs borehole sensors)
f Temperature limitations of sensors
z A well constrained and well distributed data set of MEQ data improves the
chances of success of applying such techniques as time difference velocity
tomography and S-wave splitting
Interpretation - Integrate with other available data and “ground truth” results