You are on page 1of 2

12 IN RE: KAY VILLEGAS KAMI, INC. 4.

alters the legal rules of evidence, and authorizes conviction upon less
G.R. No. L-32485 | 22 October 1970 | J. Makasiar | TIGLAO or different testimony than the law required at the time of the
TOPIC: Ex Post Facto Law commission of the offense;
5. assuming to regulate civil rights and remedies only, in effect imposes
DOCTRINE: An ex post facto law is one which: penalty or deprivation of a right for something which when done was
1. makes criminal an act done before the passage of the law and which lawful; and
was innocent when done, and punishes such an act; 6. deprives a person accused of a crime of some lawful protection to
2. aggravates a crime, or makes it greater than it was, when committed; which he has become entitled, such as the protection of a former
3. changes the punishment and inflicts a greater punishment than the law conviction or acquittal, or a proclamation of amnesty.
annexed to the crime when committed;
4. alters the legal rules of evidence, and authorizes conviction upon less While it is true that Sec. 18 penalizes a violation of any provision of R.A. No. 6132
or different testimony than the law required at the time of the including Sec. 8(a) thereof, the penalty is imposed only for acts committed after
commission of the offense; the approval of the law and not those perpetrated prior thereto.
5. assuming to regulate civil rights and remedies only, in effect imposes
penalty or deprivation of a right for something which when done was Sec. 23 directs that the entire law shall be effective upon its approval. It was
lawful; and approved on August 24, 1970.
6. deprives a person accused of a crime of some lawful protection to
which he has become entitled, such as the protection of a former N.B. You may choose to stop reading at this point. I have explained in the ER
conviction or acquittal, or a proclamation of amnesty. what is the gist of Sections 8(a) and 18. However, if you want to have a full grasp
of what the provisions are, please proceed he he he
ER: The constitutionality of Sec. 8(a) of R.A. No. 6132 is being challenged for
allegedly being an ex post facto law. Basically, Sec. 8(a) prohibits candidate- Section 8. Prohibited Acts. In addition to and supplementing prohibited acts
delegates to represent himself as a candidate of a political party or other provided for in the Revised Election Code, in the election of delegates:
related group under Section 8. If they do, they will be subject to the penalty
under Section 18. However, this shall only apply prospectively and shall not (a) No candidate for delegate to the Convention shall represent or allow
retroact prior to the enactment of RA 6132; hence, it is not ex post facto. himself to be represented as being a candidate of any political party or any
other organization, and no political party, political group, political committee,
civic, religious, professional, or other organization or organized group of
FACTS: whatever nature shall intervene in the nomination of any such candidate or in
1. Kay Villegas Kami filed a petition for declaratory relief asking the Court the filing of his certificate of candidacy or give aid or support, directly or
to determine the validity of Sec. 8 of RA No. 6132. indirectly, material or otherwise, favorable to or against his campaign for
2. Petitioner alleges that the assailed provision violates the due process election: Provided, That this provision shall not apply to the members of the
clause, right of association, and freedom of expression and that it is an family of a candidate within the fourth civil degree of consanguinity or affinity,
ex post facto law. nor to the personal campaign staff of the candidate, which shall not be more
than one for every ten precincts in his district: Provided, further, That without
ISSUE/S: W/N Sec. 8(a) of RA No. 6132 is unconstitutional for being an ex post prejudice to any liability that may be incurred, no permit to hold a public
facto law. – NO meeting shall be denied on the ground that the provisions of this paragraph
may or will be violated: and Provided, finally, That nothing contained herein
HELD/RULING: Petition denied. shall be construed to impair or abridge the freedom of civic, political, religious,
professionals, trade organization or organized groups of whatever nature to
An ex post facto law is one which: disseminate information about, or arouse public interest in, the forthcoming
1. makes criminal an act done before the passage of the law and which Constitutional Convention or to advocate constitutional reforms, programs,
was innocent when done, and punishes such an act; policies, or proposals for amendment of the present Constitution, and no
2. aggravates a crime, or makes it greater than it was, when committed; prohibition contained herein shall limit or curtail the right of their members, as
3. changes the punishment and inflicts a greater punishment than the law long as they act individually, to support or oppose any candidate for delegate
annexed to the crime when committed; to the Constitutional Convention.
Likewise, no head of any executive department, bureau or office, official or
officer nominated or appointed by the President of the Philippines, head or
appointing officer of any government-owned or controlled corporation, shall
intervene in the nomination of any such candidate, or in the filing of his
certificate of candidacy or give aid or support, directly or indirectly, material or
otherwise, in favor of or against his campaign for election.

Section 18. Penalty Clause. A violation of any of the provisions of this Act shall
be considered a serious election offense carrying a penalty of imprisonment of
not less than one year and one day but not more than five years.

The offender shall be further sentenced to suffer disqualifications to hold any


public office and deprivation of the rights of suffrage for not less than one year
but not more than nine years; and, if he is a foreigner, he shall be deported
immediately after service of his prison term. Should the violation be committed
by a political party or any organized group hereinbefore prohibited, the
individuals who induced, ordered, directly participated, or indispensably
cooperated in the commission of the same shall be equally liable, and shall
suffer the penalties herein provided.

You might also like