Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Training - Evaluating
Training - Evaluating
This checklist provides ideas and key points for line managers to build into their employees'
training programmes and to help assess the effectiveness of training. It should be read in
conjunction with the Checklist on Training Needs Analysis. It is not written for trainers
themselves.
Virtually all training events end with the participant completing a `happy sheet' on which
they record their feelings about the course or the instructor. Happy sheets may fail to
indicate, however, whether anything useful was learned or how that knowledge will be
transferred to the workplace.
The training evaluation process is a continuous cycle of defining the objectives of training,
identifying training needs, delivering training to meet those needs and objectives, assessing
trainees' reactions to the training (happy sheets), seeking evidence of skills or knowledge
learned and of their implementation in the workplace, and measuring the effects of training
on bottom-line results.
It is not always possible to carry out such in-depth evaluation, but that is not to say that
nothing should be done at all. The key is to have a training objective and have some
indicator(s) in place to see if that objective has been met. In this way it should be possible
to get some idea of the return on investment.
MCI Standards
This checklist has relevance for the MCI Management Standards: Key Role C - Manage
People.
Definition
Evaluation is an analytical process of assessing the value of something. In the case of
training, it focuses on whether the time and money spent on training have achieved the
required results.
Action checklist
Remember the evaluation process starts as soon as you begin constructing a training plan.
1. Define what you want training to achieve
Remember the evaluation process starts as soon as you begin constructing a training plan
Having identified needs, quantify as specifically as possible what results and outcomes you
expect. In many processes this can be relatively easy to define, for example:
operate a machine safely
use a graphics package
set up a World Wide Web site
construct widgets using new technology.
In many cases, these outcomes can be specified and measured by occupational,
organisational or national standards.
It is much harder to set measurable targets when it comes to events designed to contribute
to continuing learning and changes in behaviour,. Building up knowledge and experience in
a specific area is fundamental to development but difficult to quantify. It is essential to work
with the trainee to specify expected outcomes - for example, a more effective selling
behaviour.
2. Turn targets into objectives
Objectives tell you what is to be achieved, by when. They should be SMART:
Specific - Measurable - Achievable - Realistic - Time limited
A training objective specifies what you realistically can expect the trainee to be able to do or
to know as a result of the training.
If it is a skill that is to be achieved, the measurability aspect could be, for example, that
within six weeks of the end of training, the trainee will be able to type a ten-page report
with no more than six mistakes within an hour.
In the case of knowledge, avoid the word `understand' because it is not measurable.
Replace it with something like `state', `explain' or `describe', because they are checkable
and the trainee will need to have absorbed the knowledge in order to meet the objective.
3. Make sure everyone knows the objectives from the start
This includes:
the trainees, in the information they receive in advance - both via personal
briefings from their manager and from any materials they get as joining instructions
their managers (if you are arranging the training on behalf of other departments),
so they know what their staff should be able to do as a result of the training
the trainers - this may sound obvious, but they need to design the training based
on what it should achieve, rather than the areas in which they can train others
(which may be different). Where the training is to be provided by an external
organisation, check that the provider can meet the objectives you specify.
4. Design methods for comparing results with objectives
The best way to do this is to get people together to come up with one agreed and consistent
approach. It may involve a post-training action plan, a debriefing session on return to the
workplace, forms, questionnaires, observation checklists, feedback meetings or statistical
data, but the key point is that you must design the assessment procedures early on.
Immediate feedback is important, but do assess performance improvements over a realistic
time span, often weeks and sometimes months. This allows time for the training to be
applied and practised, leading to the actual outcomes you want to evaluate.
5. Evaluate the input
Remind trainees to keep their objectives in mind throughout the training and to raise the
matter with the trainer if their needs are not being met. If the training is provided by an
external organisation, ask the trainees to give you a summary of their reactions to the
course at a debriefing session on their return. Encourage them to be honest in their opinion
of the worth of the training.
6. Use the results
The information gained from evaluation is critical in starting the training cycle again, and
planning what needs to be tackled next year, and how. Evaluation sets out key facts and
measures of progress more clearly than any sort of gut reaction or guesswork.
Useful reading
Evaluating training,
Sharon Bartram and Brenda Gibson
Aldershot: Gower, 1999
How to measure training effectiveness,
3rd ed, Leslie Rae
Aldershot: Gower, 1997
Evaluating training,
Peter Bramley
London: Institute of Personnel and Development, 1996
Measuring the impact of training and development on the bottom line,
Paul Kearns and Tony Miller
Hitchin: Technical Communications, 1996
bu library
The bu library stocks a range of materials which will provide further information on this
subject. Tel: 01483 704757 or Clearway 2159 4757.