Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Task 2 201
Task 2 201
Workers and employers are the groups most directly affected by national policy
on work health and safety and workers’ compensation developed by Safe Work
Australia. Safe Work Australia works closely with unions and employer
associations to ensure the valuable insight and perspective of employers and
workers are taken into consideration in the development of national policy.
One way to differentiate Unions and Associations is through the tax code. Unions
are part of what the IRS labels a “Labor Organization” in section 501c5 of the tax
code and have these features:
• An association of workers
• Who have combined to protect or promote the interests of the members
• By bargaining collectively with their employers
• To secure better working conditions, wages, and similar benefits.
Many associations exist which serve the role of a Union in various fields, from
sports to medicine to education. As well, there are trade union federations, that
is, a national association made up of Unions. The largest of these is the American
Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO). By trade
unions joining together as a federation or confederation, they gain many of the
advantages of professional associations, with the most obvious advantage being
able to engage in direct political advocacy.
Several associations are commonly called Unions in the media, such as the
National Education Association (NEA). While the NEA has adopted many roles
traditionally held by Unions, such as contract negotiations, it is first and foremost
a trade association. Chartered by the federal government in 1906, the NEA only
began adopting union roles in the 1960’s in response to multiple states demands
for the services normally handled by Unions. This was further pushed when the
NEA partnered with the American Federation of Teachers, a Union Federation.
Several states NEA affiliates have merged with AFT unions as well, notably in
Florida, Minnessotta, Montana and New York, further muddling the issue due to
these hybrid entities. The NEA affiliates with Union components have joined
Union Federations at times, such as the AFL-CIO.
Unions enable employers to save overhead through the Unions ability to share
insurance and pension costs, training programs, and quality inspections. When
employers work with Unions, this results in a significant reduction in the cost to
run a business, a major factor in being competitive in the increasingly worldwide
marketplace. The increased cost of the workers themselves results in more
business as consumption increases.
Associations do offer services for the workers in the field in which they cover, but
not to the same extent as the Union can. Unlike the more democratic Unions,
Associations tend to elect to committee or council. The NEA, for instance, has its
members elect only to what is called the Representative Assembly (RA). The
senior NEA leadership is selected not from its membership, but by the RA, many
times outside management to serve in the same manner as a corporations board
of directors. By comparison, Unions such as the AFL-CIO and Teamsters use a
more direct election process, with the AFL-CIO doing proportional electors and
the Teamsters having direct elections. As a result of this direct link between
worker and leadership, the Unions tend to more closely represent the workers
they represent.
Many on the right will argue against unions, arguing that union wages take away
from the wages of the ununionized, or that they disrupt commerce, even that the
cost of the union labor makes a business unprofitable. This is of course blatantly
false. For example, despite the oft-pointed to Milton Friedman and his claims in
“Free to Choose” that the percentage of wage to GDP is 85% with the result that
unionized labor takes money away from ununionized, in truth, today it is 44%,
but even in 1979 when he made his claim, the percentage was only 49%. He used
bad math based on numbers given to him not from the Bureau of Labor Statistics,
but from the Heritage Foundation think tank founded in 1973. In the computer
industry we call this “Garbage In, Garbage Out.” The erosion of union labor, if his
claim were to be true, would result in the percentage of wage to GDP to stay
constant.
Instead, the erosion mirrors the reduction in this percent. As union jobs
dissapeared, rather than the money being redistributed to the ununionized, the
money simply fled the labor pool entirely. From 1980 to today, the percentage of
union membership dropped from roughly 20% in 1979 to just over 11%. This
would fit perfectly with the identical drop in wages. At 50% of wages, the union
percentage of that would cover roughly 10%. Drop that portion to 11%, and it
would drop to just under 41%, exactly as we have witnessed. And remember that
even at this point, in 1979, the percent had dropped from its 1969 peak of 53%.