Violence and Care in Three Billboards Outside

Ebbing, Missouri
Abigail G. H. Manzella
Volume 42, Issue 3: Reviews, 2018
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/fc.13761232.0042.302 [http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/fc.13761232.0042.302]
[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/]

[/f/fc/images/13761232.0042.302-00000001.jpg]

Figure 1: Mildred Hayes (Frances McDormand) stands alone, unable to convince the ineffectual police
department to help her find closure regarding her daughter’s murder in Three Billboards Outside
Ebbing, Missouri.

I first encountered Martin McDonagh’s work from just outside the blood “splash zone.” [1] [#N1] In this
2002 production of The Lieutenant of Inishmore, audience members near the stage were given
ponchos to avoid getting blood on their clothes, but the smell permeated the air while actors trudged
through the fake blood that coated the floor. It was palpable, grotesque, and incredibly affecting.
McDonagh has continued in that vein with his film work, including Seven Psychopaths and In Bruges,
and now in Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri.
McDonagh shuns gratuitous violence, and his work is far from the standard fare of the good guys
against the bad guys. As film and cultural scholar Susan Sontag has discussed in Regarding the Pain
of Others, when we see violence we often don’t see its abhorrence but instead start taking sides. We
justify force based on someone else’s opposing violence. Sontag states, “To those who are sure that
right is on one side, oppression and injustice on the other, and that the fighting must go on, what
matters is precisely who is killed and by whom.” [2] [#N2]
McDonagh’s work reveals this tendency in us all and shows how this approach leads to an unending
escalation of violence. He also presents an alternative view where we might instead seek to understand
and support each other, a philosophy of care instead of pain. These common elements enhance his
work because they indicate an underlying philosophical purpose. At the same time, Three Billboards
could be stronger in how it deals with our current cultural moment in the U.S. His work indicates the
extreme aggression toward those outside the dominant group, most pronouncedly African Americans.
McDonagh highlights the problems of an authoritarian exaction of punishment in an ever more
polarized society without fully characterizing those punished or coming to a resolution about the issue
of racial violence.
Three Billboards follows Mildred Hayes (Frances McDormand) as she tries to get justice (and
vengeance) for her daughter Angela’s (Kathryn Newton) rape and murder. Angela plays a stereotypical
“woman in a refrigerator” role, meaning that she exists as a character who is brutalized to motivate the
protagonist, but some of the gendered implications of this stereotype are diminished by having the
protagonist be a woman and by not showing Angela’s death scene. With the absence of this particular
visual representation, McDonagh demonstrates that he isn’t interested in voyeuristic titillation.
Mildred starts her quest for retaliation through purchasing space on the titular billboards to challenge
local police chief Bill Willoughby (Woody Harrelson) to solve Angela’s case. As commonly happens in
McDonagh’s narratives, things quickly get out of control as the embers of rage ignite into a blaze. This
fiery world quickly destroys objects as well as bodies. A vial of blood escalates to the coughing of
blood, to the bloodied and scarred bodies that litter this film. Instead of merely an eye for an eye, in
McDonagh’s world, we see how violence becomes flesh for flesh and blood for blood.
Not all presentations of blood, though, are only about violence; some begin to suggest how an ethic of
care can correct ideas of vengeance. In a defining scene between Mildred and Chief Willoughby, we
watch some subtle play with blood that leads to a realignment of power. The Chief inappropriately
uses his position to threaten Mildred in order to convince her to take down the billboards, leaning over
her to assert his dominance through size and official authority. When suddenly blood splatter appears
on Mildred’s face from off screen, we realize that the Chief has coughed. The power dynamics and
anger of the moment shift to fear on Bill’s part as he realizes what this blood says about his
deteriorating health—his vulnerability—while Mildred shifts to a position of caretaker, responding “I
know, baby” to his plea that the blood was “an accident.” She immediately goes to get help.
 [/f/fc/images/13761232.0042.302-00000002.jpg]

Figure 2: The power of authority shifts to caring between Mildred and Chief Willoughby (Woody
Harrelson) in Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri.

This scene reminds us that blood is a person’s life source. When it is spilled it is a loss, but it also
enables individuals to admit the care that they feel for each other; once blood is spilt, it isn’t just about
who is winning. There is a cost but there is also a potential for change. This film shows how much we
care for each other, from the simple offering of orange juice to perhaps even gaining closure with those
who have hurt us the most. That potential is always within our grasp in McDonagh’s films.
As a pre-Ferguson transplant to Missouri, I would have liked to have seen more of the nuances of the
state reflected in the film. Even so, I appreciate how the Missouri setting enables us to ask questions
about police brutality and racial violence. Ferguson and the death of Michael Brown should continue
to serve as lessons as we try to realign the way that governmental power works. This movie both is and
isn’t about Missouri. After all, that state isn’t alone in having trouble with “persons of color torture.”
This phrase is what Officer Jason Dixon (Sam Rockwell in an unforgettable performance) re-brands
some of his activities as a police officer. He’s proud that he avoids the racial slur by using the term
“persons of color” without understanding that the fact of the torture is the larger problem.
Unfortunately, the early attention to police brutality drops out of the conclusion, as do the non-white
characters, when Three Billboards returns to the main concerns of the “fridged” girl. Once Dixon
decides to try to solve her case, his racist behavior is no longer discussed, and he is granted a
problematic redemption through physical suffering. As he and Mildred contemplate murder, though,
we know that this is not the end. For true transformation to occur, they must not just accept care from
others but also care for others themselves. We shouldn’t cause the pain of others, let alone disregard it,
as happens when the directly stated race problems fall away without much resolution.
A film dealing with such subject matter should be more engaged with racial politics, but beyond this
major shortcoming, McDonagh’s striking movie leaves you with the overwhelming feeling that we
could better our systems of power, that there is a way other than antagonisms and oppositions. Three
Billboards suggests that we might arrive at a place of care for each other, though it will require more
than a trial by fire to get there.
Author Biography:
Abigail G. H. Manzella is the author of Migrating Fictions: Gender, Race, and Citizenship in U.S.
Internal Migrations. Currently a Visiting Scholar at Tufts University, she specializes in American
literature and film especially as they relate to race and gender studies.

Notes
1. Thanks go to Michael Cadden for my early exposure to Martin McDonagh’s work. [#N1-ptr1]
2. Susan Sontag, Regarding the Pain of Others (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2003), 9-10.
[#N2-ptr1]

Hosted by Michigan Publishing, a division of the University of Michigan Library.

For more information please contact mpub-help@umich.edu.
Print ISSN: 0163-5069 • Online ISSN: 2471-4364
Copyright of Film Criticism is the property of Film Criticism and its content may not be
copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's
express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for
individual use.