Professional Documents
Culture Documents
AOMNo. :2020-001-8136
Date . January 28,2A20
We have audited the disbursement transactions of the 2Ao/o Development Fund of the
barangay for calendar year (CYs) 2Ol2to 2018 and observed the following:
a. Disbursements for ineligible expenses totalling P1,121,481.00 from CYs 2012 to 2018
were charged against the 20o/o Development Fund (DF) due to formulation of budget
that is not in accordance with Section 3.0 of DILG-DBM JMC No. 2011-1. thus
resulted to improper utilization of the funds.
Section 3.0 of the DILG-DBM Joint Memorandum Circular (IMC) No. 201 1 -1 erpresslv
provides:
The 20o/o of the IRA intended for developrnent projects may be utilized lbr the
following priority programs and projects:
3. 3 Environmental Management
Review of transactions revealed that the barangay has utilized the 20Ya DF for programs,
projects and activities (PPAs) totalling P1,121,481.00 which is not in accordance with
DILG-DBM Joint Memorandum Circular No. 2011-1. Audit disclosed that the root cause
identified is the fact that the approved budget included those items in the 20% DF PPAs,
though not in accordance with Section 3.0 of DILG - DBM JMC NO. 2011-1. However, it
was noted that some of the PPAs amounting to P134,900.00 may be charged to the
Barangay Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Fund (BDRRMF) instead of the 20%
DF. Details are as follows:
The above-mentioned PPAs are not among those enumerated under Item no 3 of the
JMC, thus, it defeated the purpose for which the fund was created.
b. Ensure that the 20% DF shall be utilized to finance only those development
PPAs as enumerated under Section 3.0 of DILG-DBM JMC No.20ll-1; and
c. Require the City Accountant to transfer the amount of P134,900.00 under
the Trust Liability - BDRMMF account to the 20% DF and made it available
for re-appropriation in the succeeding budgeting period.
b. Unexpended balance of P275,396.00 and P72,408.60 for CYs 2Ol7 and 2018,
respectively' were not re-appropriated in the ensuing years contrary to Section II.4
of DILG Memorandum Circular No. 974A.
Section II.4 of DILG Memorandum Circular No. 97-30 states that. "Any reverted
unexpended balance of the 20Yo Development Fund during the year shall be re-
appropriated to finance only those development programs, projects or activities (PPAs)
identi{ied to be funded under the 200% Development Fund for the ensuing year."
Verification showed that the unutilized balance for CYs 2018 and 2017 amounting to
P72,408.6A andP275,396.00, respectively, were not re-appropriated in the ensuing years
as required under Section II.4 of DILG Memorandum Circular No. 97-30. This affected
the realization of development projects that could have been implemented with the
amount and thus, deprived the constituents oi the benefits that could have been derived
therefrom
May we have your comments andlor action taken on the foregoing audit observations r,,,ithin
five (5) calendar days from receipt hereof
C. BERNARDINO
OIC Supervising Auditor
Wbt"L' 1-
Republic of the PhilipPines
COMMISSION ON AUDIT
Office of the City Auditor
Pasay City
AOMNo 2020-002-8136
Date January 17,2020
We have audited the cash advances of the baranga-v- for CYs 2012to 2018 and obsen'ed
the fol lowing defi ciencies :
J.2. t "The cash adyance shall be eclual to the net amount of the paloll
.fnr a pay period.
5.B "All cash adyantces shall be liquidated at the end of each year.
fiilly
Except fctr petfit ca,sh.fund., the ao shall refuld any lnexpended
batinci to- the Cashier.,Collection Officer who tt'ill issze the
nece.ssary ffi cial receiPt. "
The non-liquidation of the cash advances resulted to the overstatement of assets and
net income and understatement of the equity account and erpense account. Further,
the delay in the liquidation of the cash advances gives rise to the presumption that the
filone-v lias been rrrisappropriated for the personal benefit olthe accountable officer.
b. CA granted was greater than the net amount of pavroll contrary to Section 4.2.1
of the same circular, hence. resulted to misappropriation of funds.
Further, audit disclosed that \,{s. Geraldine Camo, the then Barangay Treasurer,
requested cash advance for 50% Cash Gift and Year-End Bonus for CY 2017 in the
amount of P59,000 as per attached Payroll No.l7-l l-026 and 17-i 1-027. How-ever,
the amount released to her through disbursement voucher (DV) number 17-ll-058
and check number 448091 dated llll5ll7 was P62,350 00 which was in excess by
P3,350 00. Ms. Camo liquidated the amount of P59,000 00 but the excess cash
adr.ance was not refunded as of this date of audit.
b. Send demand letters to the officials with cash advances, who are no
longer in the service, at their last known residential address and study the
possibility of filing appropriate charges to enforce settlement; and
May we have your comments andlor action taken on the foregoing audit obsen'ations
within five (5) calendar days frorn receipt hereof.
C. nio
OIC Supervising Auditor
Punong
Date: 0 thn
Barangav Treasurer
Date:
UW 1/
Republic of the Philippines
COMMISSION ON AUDIT
Office of the City Auditor
Pasay Citl'
AOM No 2020-003-B136
Date January 17.2020
We have audited the Cash in Bank (CB) account of the barangay for CYs 2012 to 2018 and
observed the following.
Validity of Cash in Bank (CB) account balances for CYs 20\2 to 2018 is doubtful due
to (a) unrecorded/unadjusted reconciling items since CY 2012 as deductions and
non-cancellation of stale check amounting toP239,944.57 and P30,800.00, respectively;
and (b) non-submission of the Bank Reconciliation Statement for CYs 2012 to 20L3 and
Bank Statements for CYs 2At4 fi 2015.
Itenr 3.3 of COA Circular No. 96-01 I dated October 2. 1996 provides that
"The accotmtant shall drav, journal vouchers to record all valid reconciling
items that require adjustment and correction in the GL."
Section 59. Volume I of the NGAS Manual for LGUs state that:
For checks y.'hich became qtoiled or stale in the hands of the payee and which
require replacement, a nevt check may be isyed upon stbmission of the spoiled
or stale check tct the Treastrer. A certified copy of the [)I' shall be requested
from the Auditor .for presentatiort to the Administrator,'Local Chie.f Executive
who shall cotnfiersign the check. The cancelled check shall be reportetl and
attached to the RCI prepared at lhe period of cancellation. The replacement
check shall also be reported chronologically in the RCI.
"At the close of each month, depositories shall report to the Agency Head, in mch
form as he may direct, the condition of the agency account standing in thetr
bool<s. The Agency Head shall see to it that reconciliation is made between the
balance shown in the reports and the balance found in the books of the Agency. "
The Accounting System Manual for Barangay, Volume IV specifically requires the
preparation of the Bank Reconciliation Statement (BRS) by the City Aecountant for
submission to the COA Auditor on or before the 20th of the following month. The BRS shali
be certified correct by the City Accountant and prepared in three (3) copies to be distributed
as follows:
The Cash in Bank account for CYs 2012-2018 had a reported book balances of the following:
The Barangay maintains a current account (CA) with the Landbank of the Philippines (LBP).
Masagana Branch, Pasay City under CA No. 2212-1016-24.
Verifrcation of the BRS for CYs 2012 to 2018 disclosed that there were reconciling items
since CY 2012 with an aggregate amount of P239,944"57 not recorded in the books as
deductions. These remained unrecorded/ unadjusted in the books as at December 31, 2018,
thus, the adjusted balance CIB account showed a negative balance of P72,561.94, details as
follows:
2018
Year
Book Bank Remarks
Unadiusted balance 167.382.63 19.798.76
Reconciling items:
Less: Outstanding Checks 7"700.00 chk# 448088. t01301t7
7.700.00 chk# 448100^ 12127117
7.700.00 chk# 448126.3126118
7,700.00 chk# t41. 5t22n8
,148
Audit revealed that the nature of these reconciling items could no longer be identified since
they were not provided with detailed description in the BRS and not duly supported u'iti;
necessary documents.
ihe unrecorded reconciline items had been brought to management's attention in previous
vears' Barangay Annual Audit Report, however, the barangay Officials did not address the
same, thus, the reliability and validity of the CIB account is unreliable.
Moreover, review of the BRS as of December 31, 2018 disclosed that stale check amounting
to P30,800.00 was not cancelled, thus, the CIB account and Liability account \\'ere
understated.
b. Non-submission of the BRS for CYs 2012 to 2013 and Bank Statements for
CYs 2014 to 2015
Verification of the submitted documents disclosed that for CYs 2012 to 2013, the monthlv
BRSs were not submitted by the Barangay Bookkeeper (BB) to the Office of the City
Auditor. Likewise, the BB submitted the monthly BRSs for CYs 2014 to 201 5. hower.er, the
bank statements were not attached thereto.
it should be noted that the non-preparation of the BRS and non-submission of bank
statements. the reconciling items could not be identified and the adjustments could not be
effected to reflect the correct balance of the CIB-LCCA for the CYs 2012 to 2018.
we recommend the Management to require the Barangay Bookkeeper:
o prepare and submit the BRS duly supported with Bank Statements, debit and
credit memoranda and ensure that all reconciling items are provided with
detailed description as to its nature in order to easily facilitate verification and
reconciliation of the accountsl
o Strictly observe Section 59, Volume I of the NGAS Manual for Local
Government Units for stale checks; and
Furthermore, the Barangay Treasurer closely coordinates with the Office of the Citv
Accountant to identify the nature of the unrecorded/unadjusted reconciling items and
effect the necessary adjustments in the books of accounts'
fuIay we have your comments and/or action taken on the foregoing audit observations
within
five (5) calendar days from receipt hereof.
C
OI Auditor
Punong Barangal'
Date:
Barangav Treasurer
Date
Crn'Accountanl
Date:
lLw'3
Republic of the Phiiippines
COM}IISSTON ON AUDIT
Office of the Citl' Auditor
Pasav Citl
\\-e ha,.'e audited the Due to BIR account of the barangay for calendar years (CYs) 2012 to
lr,,i S :,rd obsen'ed the following:
The Due to BIR amounting to P342,636.42 were not remitted in full and on time
contral.r' to Revenue Regulation No. 2-98 which may result to possible
misappropriation of funds and continuous incurrence of surcharges and penalties due
to late remittances.
Se.:r,-,r.is I
57 3(C) and 2.58(a) of BIR Revenue Regulation No. 2-98 requires all government
:t]:;es desienated as withholding agents to remit withholding taxes within ten (10) days after
ihe er:d of each month except for taxes withheld for December which shall be filed on or
:eil::e ,Ianuan, 25 of the following year.
Secrirr: I Stl of the same Revenue Regulation holds the employee responsible for the
..,.irnh..,iing and remrttance of taxes personally liable forthe surcharge and interest that may
':e
Lr:inosed tor the delayed remittance of taxes withheld.
F.,r C\-s lt-t1l to 2018, the Due to BIR account of Barangay 136 showed the balances which
retresents the unremitted taxes withheld from various suppliers and contractors by the
laranqa\'. details as follows.
Further, audit disclosed that the correct amount of Due to BIR for CY 2012 should be
P118,282.77 instead of P116,836.77 as reflected in the Statement of Financial Position
(SFPo). Thus, the Due to BIR account is understated by P1,446.00 as of to date, detailed as
follows:
This condition exists due to lack of reconciliation of balance between the barangay and
accountin-q records. In addition, the continuous increase of unremitted taxes only showed the
barangav did not able to remit the taxes withheld in fulI to BIR within the prescribed period
contran, to Sections 2 57.3(C\ and 2.58(a) of BIR Revenue Regulation No. 2-98.
1. l'-ails or causes the failure to deduct and withhold any internal revenue tox
covered by these regulations;
2. Fails or causes the failure to remit the tmes dedacted and withheld v,ithin
the tirue prescribed therein;
3. Iiails or causes the-failure tofile the return or is,sue certificate required."
'r\ e recommend that the:
a. The city Accountant to recognize in the books the unrecorded Due to BIR
amounting to P1,446.00;
amount of
b. Barangay Treasurer and the city Accountant to remit the total
P344.082.42 to BIR immediatety ano ensure that taxes
withheld are remitted in
full within the Prescribed Period;
c. Require the payment try the responsible Barangay officials of any penalties and
..rr"h".g., that may be imposed by the BIR; and
May u,e have your comments and/or action taken on the foregoing audit
observations
witt,ln hve (5) calendar days from receipt hereof'
C.
OIC Supervising Auditor
Punong Barangal'
Datc.
Barangar- Treasurer
Datc -___=___=--
Cin'Accountant
Date :
4
Republic of the Philippines
COMMISSION ON AUDIT
Office of the City Auditor
Pasa-v Crty
AOM No 2020-005-8136
Date January' 17 ^2024
We have revierved the transactions of the Barangal' pertaining to its Baranga-v Disaster
Risk Reduction and Management Fund (BDRRMF) for calendar 1'ears (CYs) 2012 to
20i8 and noted that:
The unexpended balance totaling P159,812.27 for CYs 2015 to 2018 was not
transferred to the Trust Liability-DRRMF account at 1'ear-end.
RA 10121 requires that the unerpended balance of the LDRRM Fund shall "accrue to a
special trust fund solelv for the purpose of supportrng disaster risk reduction and
management activities of the LDRRMCs rrithin thl nert fir'e {5) 1'ear." {Section 21 (3'd
par ))
Further. COA Circular No 2012-002. rn settrng the accounting and reporting guiCelines
for the LDRRN,I Furd. proi rdes that "ali unerpendedrunobligated balance of the QRF and
the LDRR\'1F-N'IOOE shali be transf'erred to the Special Trust Fund under the account
''Trust Liabilin'-DRR\{" (Code -1381 rn the Trust Fund books" (Section 5.1.10).
N{oreover. the unerpended balance of the LDRRM Fund for Capital Outlal, "shall be
made contrnuing rn the Generai Fund books r.mtri the projects funded therefore are
completed and anr sa\ rngs shall be ar arlable for use rn the disaster risk reduction and
management actr\rties as prorided rr the LDRRMFIP." (Section 5.1.11)
Per verification with the accounting records, the Trust Liability-DRRMF account
baiance has only the balance of P47-l11.79 as of December 31, 2018, thus leaving the
balance amounting to P159,872.27 w-hich remained unrecorded in the books under
trust liabilities as required in the above Circular. Hence, the amount $.as not made
available to pursue the purpose of supporting disaster risk reduction and management
activities of the Barangav Disaster Risk Reduction Management Council.
We recommend that the Accounting Office adopt the requirements under COA
Circular No. 2012-002 in accounting for and in recording transactions pertaining
to the unexpended balance of the BDRRM Funds.
Mav rr'e have r-our cornrnents on the foregoing audit observation x'ithin fir,e (5) <ia)'s
from receipt hereol
C.
OIC - Auditor
Punong Baraoga,v
Date:
City Accormtant
Date:
Republic of the Philippines
tr Lb
CONIMISSION ON AUDIT
Office of the City Auditor
Pasay City
AOMNo 2019-006-8146
Date January 17,202A
We have audited the expenses of the barangay for caiendar years (CYs) 2Ol2to 2018 and
observed that:
Section 305 (a) of RA 7160, otherwise known as the Local Governmenl Code of 1991
provides:
"No money shall be paid out of the local treasury except in pursuance of an
appropriations ordinance or law."
Review of the transactions and utilization of budget from CYs 2Ol2to 2018 disclosed thar
the barangay made disbursements of funds totaling P1,716,000.00 for various expenditures
despite the absence of corresponding appropriations, details as follows.
The audit disclosed that no ordinance for supplemental budget, realignment or au*qment&tlora
had been passed or enacted to cover the above disbursements. Thus, this is not
in accordance
with Section 305 (a) of RA 7rc0
It should be noted that the responsibility to monitor the policies and procedures regarding the
approved appropriations and the corresponding utilization, as provided under the Systems
ard procedures Manual on the Management of Barangay Funds and Property, Volume
1, was
entrusted to the Committee on Appropriations. The inability to carry out such responsibility
resulted in disbursements with no corresponding appropriations totaling P1,716,000'00'
May we have your comments andlor action taken on the foregoing audit observations within
five (5) calendar days from receipt hereol
C. BERNARDINO
Auditor
hrnong Barangal'
Date:
AOM No 2020-007-8136
Date Januan,17.202(\
(AOM)
AUDIT OBSERVATION MEMORANDUM
Equipment
The accuracy, existence and completeness of the Propertl'. Plant and
from cYs 2012 to
(PPE) u".o,rrrt, balance of P2,590*846.0? as at December 31. 2018
and non-
2018 could not be ascertained due to (a) absence of physical inventory
submission of Report on Physical Count of Property, Plant
and Equipment
Plant and Equipment Register
(RPCPPEX (b) non-maintenance of the Propert)"
(ppER) by the Barangay and Equipment l-edger cards (ELCs) by the office of the
bity.l..r.rntant (OCA); and (c) non-proYision of depreciation for PPE Manual on
amounting
to irt,SIZB46.07 depreciation contrarT to the S1'stems and Procedures
the Management of Barangay Funds and Propertl'(SPMMBFP)'
at least
a. A ph.vsical inventory o./-all barangq'property shall be conducted
in
once a year cmcl iltb r)esttlt of fue pht'stccrl tnventorl' -sltall be reported
theReportonthePhl5i,olCoutlto./.Proper?''PlantandEquipment
(RP(',PPE).
b.ACommitteeheadedbl,theBarangavTreasurerorhisautharized
b'v the
represetltative shaLl cori'lucr fue pl't1:'sical comtt o'f PPE ownecl
baranga,v: and
Paragraph 4-6 of the Accountrng for PPE of the SPMMBFP, Volume [V, provide that:
All PPE, except lcntcl, shall be subject to cleprectatiotl. ct residual value eEtivalent
rc 1a?5 o-l-the cost slnll be set a.gicle in computitxg depreciation using the straight
line method.
The computation o.f depreciation expense slull start on tlxe monthfollowing the date
of purchase,'completion o.f the prolect. The estimated useful ltfe of PPE x x x sltall
be used in computing rhe rate o.f cleprecianon.
Full.v c{epreciated PPE whrch are sttll used in operatian shall remain as PPE for
ba lanc e she et pr e s enlat i ot't.
Revierv of the financial statements of the barangar.from CYs 2012to 2018 disclosed the
balances of the Propeg'. Plant and Equipment (PPE). details as follou's.
Verification of records revealed that Barangal- 136 did not submit Report on the Physical
Count of Property,, Plant and Equipment (RPCPPE) for CYs 2012 to 2018 contrary to
Section 124 of the Manual on the Ne'rv Govemment Accounhng Sr:stems (MNGAS) for
LGUs. Volume I
The Reconciliation of barangay records for its PPE with accounting records is not
possible since there was no RCPPE available for reconciliation. The vear-end book
balances of the PPE in the amount could not be validated as to their correctness and
actual existence due to this deflciencv.
Non-mnintenance oJ'the PPER by the Barangay ancl ELCs b.v rhe OCA
There was no PPE Register marntained and submitted showing the properties owned b1'
the barangay including their location for further verification. The barangay s,as not able
to account for the existence of their properties as recorded in the barangay books,
Also. the Barangay' Bookkeeper has not maintained ELCs for the Baranga-.vs recorded
PPE.
q
The Barangay and the Offrce of the Accountant should strictly comply rvith the basic
policies and operating procedures in recording and reporting of barangay property and
prepare the RCPPE, PPER and ELC so that the reconciliation can be facilitated.
Revieu, of the Schedule of Fixed Assets for CY 2018 shou,'ed the list of PPE that u,ere
subjected to depreciation. Out of the total PPE accounts of P2"590,846.07 as of
December 31. 2018. 71.32 o/o thereof or Pl.847.846.07 u,ere not provided depreciation as
follou,s:
PPE 2018
Land Improvements 187,7$.74
Office Building 362,036.17
Office Equipment 794,526.24
Military and Police Equipment 60,000.00
Other PPE 443,540.00
Total 1,847,846.07
Veriflcation of the PPE account disclosed *rat the Communication Equiprnent amounting
to P331,195 was classified as Other PPE.
Further anal-vsis of the above data disclosed that the depreciation for CYs 2012 to 2018 of
the PPE account amounting to P332,095 can be computed since the data needed were
available. details as follows:
CommuDication
F.quipment
CCT\i Camera 23 1.280.00 8,673.00 ?0.815.20 20,81 5.20 2{_},81 i.20 20.815 20 20.81 5.20 20,8i 5.20 I 33,564.20
CCTV Camera 99.915.00 { )4\ it R qq. 1s 8.992.3i R AO' 1S R qq, 15 I OO' 15 50.207 29
'fotal 331,195.00 8,673.00 74 29.807.55 29.807.55 29,807.55 29.807.55 2S.807.S5 1A3.771.49
Office
Equipment
Erecutirc table 900.00 337.50 162.00 16:.00 161 00 162 00 162.00 162.00 i,309.50
md Charr
TOT,TI, 332.095.00 9,010.50 26222.71 29,969.55 29.969.55 29.969.55 29.969.55 185,080.99
The above data shorved the understatement of the Depreciation Erpense and the
Accumulated Depreciation yearlv for CYs 20i2-2018. The aggregate amount of the
understatement for the accumulated depreciation is Pl85"080.99, thus. the Government
Equih, is overstated b1'the same amount.
The PPE amounting to P1,515.751.07 u,ere acquired on CY 2011 and prior lears and
have no propert], records, rvhich are supposed to be maintained b-v the Accounting Offrce.
The information reflected in these records, such as date of acquisition. classification and
propefi). descriptron are significant in computrng the correct depreciation for a particular
asset.
r Maintain ELCs for each PPtr and to update the same as necessary"
and prepare the schedule of PPE to support fire respective acccount
balancs in &e financial statements'
May we have your c.omments andlor action taken on the foregoing audit
observations
wrtfun five (5) calendar days from receipthereof'
C. BERNARDINO
OIC - Auditor
Punong Barangar-
Date.
Barangav Treasurer
Date:
Cit]'Accountant
Date:
la
v,vJv
Republic of the Plllipprnes
COMMISSION ON AUDIT
Office of the City Auditor
Pasal'Cin-
[1 Prepare and submit to the local Sanggunian through the LDRRMC and the
LIX rhe annual LDRRMO Plan and budget, the proposed programming of
rhe LDRR\IF. other dedicated disaster risk reduction and mflnagement
resourcei itnLl other regular -futtdutg source .s and budgetar.v sltpport o.f the
LDRR\{O BDRP.\{C. '
The LDRRMFIP for CYs 2012 and 2018 $,ere not sutrmiued. Likewise, the required
Report on the Sources and Utilization of LDRRMF for CYs 2A12 to 2018 as required
under COA Circular No. 2012-A02 $,ere not also submitted. Thus, the plans and
programs of the barangav on DRRM for CYs 2012 to 2018 rvere not revierved and
evaluated s'hether or not the Barangav has effectir,ell'managed the appropriated funds
thereon.
We recommend that the Barangay prepare and submit its LDRRMFIP and the
Report on Sources and Utilization of LDRRMF in compliance with COA Circular
No. 2012-0A2, to enable proper monitoring and evaluation of the utilization of the
LDRRMF.
Mav u'e have vour comments and/or action taken on the foregoing audit observations
uithin fir,e (5) calendar da1.s 1o* receipt hereof
C. BERNARDINO
OIC Supervising Auditor
Punong Barangay
Date:
City Accountant
Date:
Republic ol' the Phrlippines
COMNIISSION ON ATIDIT
d
OfTice of the City Auditor
Pasar.Citl.
AOM No 2020-009-8136
Date January, 28.2020
We have audited the disbursement transactions of the Barangal' Council for the Protection
of Children (BCPC) Fund of the Baranga-v for the calendar 1.ears (CYs) 2012to 2018 and
obserr,ed the follorving:
For CYs 2014 to 20i8. the Sangguniang Barangay appropriated the total amount of
P259.260.52 for the i% BCPC Fund. Revier.r, of the utilization thereof disclosed the
folloir,ing:
a Disbursements for ineligible expenses totaling P2S6r200.00 were charged against the
BCPC Fund for CY 2014 to 2018 due to forrnulation of budget that is not in
accordance with DILG Memorandum Circular No. 2Ol2-12O, thus. rcsulted to
improper utilization of the funds.
Rerjerr, of transactions rerealed that pwchases of school supphes frorn CY 2t-tI-l to lt,tlE
u,ere made totaling P256.200.00 Hos'ever. these purchases u'ere considered rneligrble
expenses and could not be appropnatelr' charged against the BCPC Fund as ther are not
u,rthin the coverage of allou,able erpenses enumerated and defined in the N{emorandum
Circular 2012-120. Audrt disclosed that the root cause identified is the fact that the
trudget was not in accordance rvith Section II of the DILG Memorandum Circular \o.
20t2-t20
In effect. the BCPC Fund rvas improperlv utilized insofar as the procured ineligible items
totaling P256,200.00 is concemed. The amount could have been used to finance other
prioriq,. projects. programs and activities that are larr fulll' chargeable against the BCPC
Fund, to promote the rights and protection of the children in the barangal'.
Section 305 (a) of RA 7160. othenvise knoun as the Local Gor.ernment Code of 1991
provides:
"No monev shall be paid out of the local treasury e\cept in pursuance
of an appropriations ordrnance or lalr- "
As shou,n in the table above, the commitment erceeded the appror,ed appropriation b-v
P4.756.90 in CY 2015. Based on our analvsis, the e\cess pertained to the
commitments/erpenses u-hich u'ere not cor,ered b-v an appropnation ordinance. This is
not in accordance rvith Section 305 (a) of RA 7160. The audit also disclosed that no
supplemental budget or augrnentation had been passed or enacted to cor,er the
commitments not covered b1'an appropriation ordinance.
It should be noted that the responsibilitl'to monitor the policies and procedures regarding
the approved appropriations and the corresponding utilization as provided under the
Sl.stems and Procedures Manual on the Management of Baranga--v Funds and Proper['.
Volume l. rr'as entrusted to the Committee on Appropriations. The inabilitt, to carn out
such responsibilitl resulted in commrtments/expenses u,ith no corresponding
appropriatrons rn the amounl of P4.756.90
C. BERNARDINO
OIC Supervising Auditor
Pmong Barangay
Date:
Citl' of Pasai'
We har,e audited the transactrons of the Bara-ngar' lbr the calendar -vears (CYs\ 2AD b
2018 and obserr,ed the follouing deficiencris 3lrtrI:
ltem B, Section 37" Rule VI of the Implemenung Rules and Regulations QRR) of RA
9710 othenvise knoun as the "Masra Carta r-,f \\'omen" requires all LGUs to pass a
GAD Code to support their efforts in recoonrzrns. respecting. protecting. fulfilling and
promoting women's human nghts tosards the attarnment of u,omen's empowerment
gender equalitv in their localiq' rn accordance urth the guidelines issued b1' the
Philippine Commission on Women (PC\\') The GAD Code shall be the basis for
identif ing programs, activities and prolects on GAD
As of audit date- the Barangal, has not prepared rts GAD Code as required under the
above- cited law from CY 2012 to 2018 \onetheless. an annual GAD Plan x,as
prepared outlining. among others. the prograrrs,'pro.lects/actir,ities (PPA) the target
benef,rciaries and the corresponding budget
While u,e appreciate the effort of the Barangal rn comrng up n ith their GAD Plan, the
identification of the PPAs could not be established if indeed such are the essentials for
the attainment of $,omen's empo\\'errnent to\\ ards gender equality' in the localitf in the
absence of the GAD Code.
b. Disbursements for ineligible expenses totating P189B00.00 were charged against the
GAD Fund from CY 2014 to 2018 due to emneous formulation of budget that is
not in accordance with , thus, rsulted to improper utilization of the funds.
Likewise, therrc was low percentage of budget utilization ranging from 29.24Y" to
48.3OVo which resulted to lack of commitment to GAD responsiveness govemance.
The Barangav appropriated for its GAD Program representing five (5) percent of its total
budget for CYs 2014 to 2018 respectivelv. Rer,ierv of the GAD Plan and GAD Budget
disclosed the utilization from CYs 2014 to 2018 such as fbllons:
Revie*, of transactions revealed purchases of monoblock tables and chairs for CYs 2014
to 2018 rvere made totaling P}89,900.00 . This rvere considered ineligible expenses and
could not be appropriately charged against the GAD Fund as they are not r.rithin the
coverage of allorvable expenses enumerated in Section 4.C)4) of PWC-DILG-DBM-
NEDA Joint Memorandum Circular No. 2013-01.
In etTect, the GAD Fund r,r,as improperll'utilized insofar as the procured ineligible items
totaling P189.900.00 is concemed. The amount could have been used to finance other
prioritv projects. programs and actir,itres that are laufulh'chargeable against the GAD
Fund. to promote the rights and protection of the \\.omen and children in the barangal'.
Relien of the transactions of the Barangav inr oli ing GAD disclosed that no portion of
the budget for CYs 201-l to 2018 har e been utrlized and the balance for the appropriation
remaur the same at the end of each vear rrhrle a ven loq, percentage of utilization
ransrnc tiom 19 1-loo to -18 30oo for C\. lttl-1 to 2018. As aresult, the Barangay shorved
lack ol comnltmenr to G{.D responsr\eness go\-ernance and has deprived lts
constltuents to ar arl the PP {s that should have been implemented to address gender
lssues and concerns panrcularlr on gender equalrtv and rvomen's empowerment. Further.
the attarnment of the ob.lectir e of the GAD Plan to protect and fulfill $,omen's human
nghts rr as not aclxe\.ed
c. Ensure that GAD Funds should be optimally utilized for the attainment of the
objective of the GAD Plan to protect and fulfillwomen's human rights.
Ma-y rre have -vour comments on the lbregoing audit observation within five (5) da1,'s
from receipt hereof.
T
o
- Supenising Auditor
Punong Barangay'
Date:
Chairman on Appropriations
Date: