Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Master
production schedule
Inventory Bills of
data material
Material
requirements Planning
planning factors
4-2
Principal Functions of MRP
– Plans and controls inventories
– Plans and controls order releases
– Provides accurate planned order loading for CRP
4-3
Design Characteristic of MRP
– Planning Horizon
– Time buckets
– Replanning Frequency
– Firmed Planned Orders
– Pegging
4-4
Why Measure?
– Set objectives
– Allocate resources
– Assign responsibility
– Measure performance
– Correct causes of problems
– Reward and learn from successes
4-5
Performance Characteristics of MRP
• Orders
– Without shortages
– Released on time
– Due dates met
– Late start dates
– Waiting for material
– Rescheduled
– Lead time
• Actual versus planned
– Number of expedites
– Action message trend
– Stock issues
• Actual versus planned
4-6
Operational Characteristics of MRP
– Easy to use
– Fewest keystrokes per transaction
– No redundancy of data entry
– Barcoding
– Client/server
– Education and training
4-7
MRP Mechanics
– Master production schedule
– Material balance needs
• What
• When
• How much
– Material and capacity planning
– Maintaining the plan
– Manual MRP
4-8
MRP Grid
Technique
Order Quantity
Safety Stock
Allocated Qty.
Low-Level Code
Lead Time PERIODS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Gross Requirements
Scheduled Receipts
Projected Available 25
A
Net Requirements
Planned Order Receipts
Planned Order Releases
4-9
A—Bill of Material
Level
A
0 LEAD TIME
TWO WEEKS
B C D
QTY. PER: 1 QTY. PER: 2 QTY. PER: 2
1 LEAD TIME LEAD TIME LEAD TIME
ONE WEEK TWO WEEKS ONE WEEK
C E
2 QTY. PER: 2 QTY. PER: 3
LEAD TIME LEAD TIME
TWO WEEKS ONE WEEK
4-10
F—Bill of Material
Level
F
0 LEAD TIME
ONE WEEK
B D E
QTY PER: 1 QTY PER: 1 QTY PER: 1
1 LEAD TIME LEAD TIME LEAD TIME
ONE WEEK ONE WEEK ONE WEEK
C E
2 QTY PER: 2 QTY PER: 3
LEAD TIME LEAD TIME
TWO WEEKS ONE WEEK
4-11
Bill of
Low-Level Code Low-Level
Material Code
Level
0 Product A Product B 0
1 1 2 1 10 1
2 3 4 11 9 2
3 5 6 3
4 7 8 4
5 9 9 5
The lowest level in the bill of Part ‘9’ will not be reviewed by
material structure among all MRP with parts ‘3’, ‘4’, and ‘11’
uses for a part determines its since they are at a low-level
low-level code (e.g., 5 in this code of 2. Part ‘9’ will be
case considering Products A reviewed after parts ‘7’ and ‘8’.
and B)
4-12
Capacity
•The capability of a worker, machine, work center, plant,
or organization to produce output per period.
– Capacity required represents the system capability needed
to make a given product mix.
– As a planning function, both capacity available and capacity
required can be measured
• Short term (capacity requirements plan)
• Intermediate term (rough-cut capacity plan)
• Long term (resource requirements plan).
6-13
Capacity Planning
•The process of determining the amount of
capacity required to produce in the future.
– Aggregate or product-line level (resource
requirements planning)
– Master scheduling level (rough-cut capacity
planning)
– Material requirements planning level (capacity
requirements planning)
6-14
Planning and Execution Hierarchy
Priority Planning Validates Capacity Planning
Sales and operations Resource planning
Execution
6-15
Load
– The amount of planned work scheduled
– The amount of actual work released for a specific
span of time to:
• a facility
• work center
• operation
– Standard hours of work
– When items consume similar resources at the
same rate, units of production.
Syn: workload.
Source: APICS Dictionary, 9th ed., 1998.
6-17
Objectives of Capacity Planning
⚫ High service level, short delivery times, high delivery
reliability rate, and at the same time, adaptation to
customer requests
⚫ Low invested capital
⚫ Efficient use of available capacity
⚫ Flexibility and adaptability of capacity to changing
conditions
⚫ Minimal fixed costs in production administration and in
production itself.
6-18
Routing Data
6-24
Lead-Time Elements
Lead-Time Components
Queue Wait
—time waiting before operation —time waiting after operation ends
begins
Setup Move
—time getting ready for operation —time physically moving between
operations
Run
—time performing operation
Visual
5-17
6-25
Operation vs. Interoperation Times
{
Operation time Operation time Operation time
6-26
Typical Lead Time Element Sources
6-27
Work Center Data Elements
– Identification and description
– Number of shifts scheduled
– Number of machines or work stations or operators
(whichever is the capacity limiter)
– Hours scheduled per shift
– Workdays per period
– Utilization factor
– Efficiency factor
– Planned queue time
6-28
Capacity Measurement
• Theoretical Capacity
6-29
Capacity Measurement (continued)
•Demonstrated Capacity
6-30
Capacity Measurement (continued)
•Rated Capacity
6-31
Utilization and Efficiency
6-32
Rated Capacity Formula
•Shifts per Day
•x
•Machines or Work Stations or Operators
•x
•Hours per Shift
•x
•Days per Period
•x
•Utilization
•x
•Efficiency
•= Standard Hours per Period
6-33
CRP Model
Schedule of planned
Production Order Status manufacturing order releases
Routing data
Capacity
requirements Workcenter data
planning
7-29
Workcenter Load Report
Total Required: Total Available: Net over # of period over
Util With tolerance for daily overtime Net under # of period under
Eff Without tolerance for daily overtime
OVER OVER
OVER
Capacity
(120 hrs)
# of orders on operations
# of orders that can be delayed 1 period without affecting end-item schedule
Recommended plan for balancing
7-30
Work Center Load Output Examples
Workcenter 208 Capacity: 120.0 hours per week
7-31
Cumulative Overload—Balanced
150
Load
750
Capacity
150
7-32
Cumulative Underload—Balanced
150
750
Capacity
Load
150
7-33
Cumulative Overload—Unbalanced
150
Load
750
Capacity
150
7-34
Cumulative Load—Balanced
150
Load
750
Capacity
150
7-35
Bills of Material:
• Planning BOM:
It is an artificial grouping of items or events in bill of material format, used to
facilitate master scheduling and material planning.
BOM Users:
Sigle Level
BoM
Real /
Buildable
Multi Level
BoM
BoM Modular
BoM
Planning
Pseudo BoM
Common Parts
BoM
Phantom
BoM
Super
BoM
Modular BOM:
Wall Clock
• Modules assist the ordering and planning process because the customer selects
the specific module or combination of modules desired.
• Easier to manage because they need small number of bills
(2*10*12*4*1 = 960 Vs 2+10+12+4+1 = 29)
• The use of Modular BOM –
- reduces the number of end items to be scheduled
- Facilitates order entry
- permits more efficient computer storage and system maintenance.
Common Parts BOM:
• The Common Parts Bill, or Kit, groups common components for a product or
family into one BOM or one section of the BOM.
• Kitting is the commonly used adaptation of the common parts BOM. It is
represented by the same diagram as the common parts BOM.
• The Key difference between Common Parts BOM and Kit:
- Common Parts BOM involves major components of the item, while kit would be
defined for smaller parts, often those used for installation or variable assembly
situations.
Thus kits would likely involve installation parts, which would be thrown away or
saved for subsequent use.
Common Parts BOM:
• Super BOM exists at the highest level of the product structure and ties together
several modular or common parts bills to define an entire product family.
• The quantity-per relationship of the super bill represents the forecasted
percentage of the demand of each module.
• The master scheduled quantities of super bill explode to create requirements for
the modules that are also master scheduled.
Super BOM:
Silver Bicycle
• For the transient item, lead time is set to zero and the order quantity to lot-for-
lot.
• It represents an item that is physically built, but rarely stocked, before being used
in the next step or level of manufacturing.
IC Diode
•Chassis
•Front Panel Chassis Assembly
•Chassis Assembly
•Power Supply
•Meter Final Assembly
Model ‘Z’
Instrument
Flattening the BOMs
Revised Material Flow:
Vendors Point-of-Use Storage Mfg. Areas
•IC
•Diode PCB Assembly
•Chassis
Chassis Assembly
•Front Panel
•Power Supply
Final Assembly
•Meter
How will the BOM will look like NOW? Model ‘Z’
Instrument
Flattening the BOMs
Model ‘Z’
Instrument
Chassis
Phantoms! PCB Assembly
Assembly
Important points:
53
Introduction
54
Introduction
Function Goal
55
Techniques
56
Development
Techniques
• Conventional BOM
• Planning BOMs
57
Development
Techniques
Capacity
Capacity
59
Development
Techniques
Period 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Forecasted 20 22 21 25 21 23 21 21 25
Sales
Customer 19 17 15 11 22 5 2 1 0
Orders
PAB
ATP
MPS
DTF PTF
60
Development
Techniques
Period 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Forecasted 20 22 21 25 21 23 21 21 25
Sales
Customer 19 17 15 11 22 5 2 1 0
Orders
PAB 50 31 14 49 24 2 29 8 37 12
ATP
MPS 50 50 50
DTF PTF
61
Development
Techniques
Period 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Forecasted 20 22 21 25 21 23 21 21 25
Sales
Customer 19 17 15 11 22 5 2 1 0
Orders
PAB 50 31 14 49 24 2 29 8 37 12
ATP 14 2 43 49
MPS 50 50 50
DTF PTF
62
Development
Techniques
63
Development
Techniques
• Adjust
- Load
- Capacity
• For work centers which
- Are bottlenecked
- Experience turbulent requirements
- Involve high cost labor
- Are underutilized
• Load adjustment through
- Rescheduling
- Lot Splitting
• Capacity adjustment through
- Overtime / Undertime
- Additional shift
- Hiring / layoff
- adjusting outsourced volume 64
Development
Techniques
65
Development
Techniques
Steps Involved:
• Stage 1:
“Free Float” the system with computer generated planned orders
• Stage 2:
At PTF, Compare FPO with Production rate
- Production Rate < Summed FPO…
Advice the team responsible for production rate to match.
- Production Rate > Summed FPO…
Pull in planned orders so that Summed MPS equals the production rate.
• Stage 3:
- At DTF, assure balanced demand and release the order
66
Development
Techniques
Computer Generated
Firm Zone Slushy Zone Liquid Zone Planned Orders
Firm planned
Capacity orders
• Pegging:
Pegging displays, for a given item, the identity of the sources of its gross
requirements and/or allocations.
It is ‘live where used’ information
• Bottom-up replanning:
It is the process of using pegging data to solve material availability problems.
Potential solutions involve:
- Compress lead time
- Cut order quantity
- Substitute material….
68
Maintenance
Techniques
69
Maintenance
Techniques
B C
B1 0.6
B2 0.4
• Volume Hedge:
Volume hedge set increments for the total number of products by a certain
amount or proportion.
B C
B1 0.6
B2 0.4
Forecasted demand for A = 200
Qty. planned: 200 + 50
Hedge qty.: 50
Beyond Hedging time fence, no major resources are committed to the hedge qty.
If this quantity rolls over the hedging time fence, major items will be in the action
bucket, hence will require resource commitment to be made. 71
Maintenance
Techniques
• CAUTION:
This technique creates ‘over planning’ of requirements.
Although it provides greater safety, it also can overstate the schedule, thus should
be used with caution and should always be visible.
72
Maintenance
Techniques
• Two level master scheduling involves scheduling at two different levels of product
structure using:
- either a FAS and MPS or
- two separate MPS.
• Primarily used in A-T-O environment since it provides more control over the
complex assembly process
• Two level master scheduling may involve the use of a ‘Production Forecast’ and a
different computation of the PAB.
• Production Forecast:
It is defined as a predicted level of customer demand for an option, feature, and
so forth of an A-T-O product.
It is computed by-
1. Netting the customer backlog against an overall family or product line MPS
2. Factoring this product ‘available to promise’ by the option % in the planning
BOM
73
Maintenance
Techniques
Instrument Panel
0.5 0.5
Option 1 Option 2
74
Maintenance
Techniques
Customer Orders 0 20 0 14 0 0
PAB 10 10 10 10 16 6 16
ATP 10 0 6 20
MPS 20 20 20
MPS 10 10 10 75
Technique 9: Defining Time-Fence Management Policies:
A LT=1
B LT=1 C LT=2
D LT=2 E LT=3
D
B
A
C
76
Technique 9: Defining Time-Fence Management Policies:
Action Bucket
E E E
D D D
B B B
A A A
C C C
MPS
DTF
77
Technique 9: Defining Time-Fence Management Policies:
E E
E D
D D B
B B A
A A C
C C
E
E D
B
D A
E B C
D A
B C
A
C
Capacity
79
FAS & MPS
• Definition:
FAS is defined as the schedule of end items to finish the product for specific
customer orders in M-T-O or A-T-O environment.
It is prepared only upon the receipt of a customer order.
It is constrained by the availability of material (MPS) and Capacity (Assembly).
It is responsible for scheduling operations from the stocking / Master scheduled
level to the end-item level.
80
FAS & MPS
81
FAS & MPS
82
FAS & MPS
Example:
• MPS Extract:
WEEK 1:
Transmissions: Engines:
Standard 30 Six-cylinder 50
Automatic 60 Eight-cylinder 40
Total 90 Total 90
• FAS
Trans. Engine M T W T F ST AT 6C 8C Total
Std. 6 Cyl 3 3 4 2 1 13 -- 13 -- 13
Std 8 Cyl 3 3 3 4 4 17 -- -- -- 17
Auto 6 Cyl 8 7 7 7 8 -- 37 37 -- 37
Auto 8 Cyl 4 5 4 5 5 -- 23 -- 23 23
Total 18 18 18 18 18 30 60 50 40 90
83