Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Investigation on the Relationship between Test Anxiety and Sleep Quality in College Students
Sari Kripke
Miami University
TEST ANXIETY AND SLEEP QUALITY IN COLLEGE STUDENTS 2
Abstract
A plethora of past research looked at the relationship between variables such as sleep
quality, GPA, anxiety, stress, and test performance. Many found these relationships were based
on moderators and mediators such as aggression and coping styles. We decided to simplify
previous research by looking at the relationship between only two variables within the college
age range. Our research question asked, what is the relationship between test anxiety and sleep
quality in college students? We hypothesized that the two variables would have a negative
correlation. Those with a lower sleep quality would be expected to have higher levels of test
Participants were between the ages of 18-23 and self-reported demographics such as race, age,
grade, gender, GPA, and credit hours before answering questions about sleep and test anxiety.
We ran a Pearson correlation test on our data and found that test anxiety and sleep quality did, in
fact, have a negative relationship. In simpler terms, participants who reported to have higher
testing anxiety on the survey tended to report having poorer sleep quality as well.
TEST ANXIETY AND SLEEP QUALITY IN COLLEGE STUDENTS 3
Introduction
living, challenging classes, and late nights spent preparing for exams and finals. Managing all the
academic demands that come with being a college student can be difficult while still trying to
maintain a social life and a normal sleep schedule. Such demands may result in individualized
performance deficiencies in either one or many facets of a college student’s life. The two facets
that we are particularly interested in studying the relationship between are academics and sleep.
This is because as college students, these are the two main aspects of life that we need to stay on
top of to succeed. So, our research question is, what is the relationship between testing anxiety
For our research, test anxiety is defined as feeling an increased sense of physiological
arousal (sweating, “butterflies” in stomach, muscle tension, need to urinate), worry, and
nervousness up to three days before a college exam (Cerbin, 2011). Our conceptual definition for
quality of sleep is how satisfied a person is with their night of sleep. To do this, their sleep
duration, subjective sleep satisfaction, disturbances, timing, and efficiency will be measured in
comparison to periods of time when they are not experiencing test anxiety. Their duration is how
long they sleep, while subjective sleep satisfaction is how happy they are with the sleep they got.
Sleep disturbances are how many times they wake up during the night. Timing is how late they
go to sleep and efficiency is how easy it is for them to fall asleep and stay asleep (Buysee, 2014).
surveys to psychology undergraduate students between the ages of 18-42 asking about their sleep
duration and GPA. Sleepers were divided into three categories: short, average, and long sleepers.
Sleeping 6 hours or less qualified participants as short sleepers, 7-8 hours for average, and 9 or
TEST ANXIETY AND SLEEP QUALITY IN COLLEGE STUDENTS 4
more for long. These researchers hypothesized that longer sleep duration would be positively
associated with a higher GPA, and that shorter sleepers would be positively associated with
lower GPAs. After conducting a one-way analysis of variance, or ANOVA, they found further
evidence to support their hypothesis that longer sleepers would relate to higher GPAs (K. Kelly,
W. Kelly, & Clanton, 2001). Their research findings suggest that receiving a good night sleep
could be important for academic performance, and that those with higher GPAs typically receive
a better night’s sleep. While this research found a relationship between sleep and GPA, ours will
Other research conducted by Castillo (2013) aimed to discover whether test anxiety was
associated with sleep duration and, if so, if aggressiveness could be a possible third variable to
help explain the relationship. She hypothesized that test anxiety and sleep duration would be
associated. She also hypothesized that aggressiveness would be associated with reduced amounts
of sleep and increased levels of test anxiety. Castillo surveyed 137 undergraduate students right
before taking a college exam. The major findings from this research supported Castillo’s first
hypotheses and found that there is an association between sleep duration and test anxiety. She
also found a significant relationship between aggressiveness and test anxiety. But, her research
showed no correlation between sleep duration and aggressiveness (Castillo, 2013). Castillo’s
research looked at how sleep duration was related to test anxiety and how aggressiveness
impacted this relationship. We, however, will not be researching third variables such as
aggression. Also, Castillo only looked at sleep duration while we will be looking at additional
Lund, Reider, Whiting, and Prichard (2009) investigated sleep patterns and predictors of
poor sleep in college students. They administered an online cross-sectional survey to 1,125
TEST ANXIETY AND SLEEP QUALITY IN COLLEGE STUDENTS 5
Midwestern University students between the ages of 17-24. Their survey included five different
sleep scales: Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, Horne-Ostberg
Morningness-Eveningness Scale, Profile of Mood States, and the Subjective Units of Distress
Scale. Findings indicated that those with poorer sleep tended to have more reports of physical
and mental health problems than better sleepers did. They also found that stress had a negative
correlation to sleep quality. This research shows that insufficient sleep is not just present in
younger children, but it is also evident at the college level (Lund, Reider, Whiting & Prichard,
2009). This research set a foundation for how we plan to survey sleep quality among college
students. They found evidence to establish that sleep issues occur in college and can negatively
relate to other aspects of college life. We will add to this study by researching how these sleep
Sadeh, Keinan, and Daon (2004) hypothesized that the relationship between stress and
sleep would be moderated by a person’s coping style. Their research specifically focused on
what was called emotional focused coping, or EFC. This type of coping mechanism focuses on
regulating emotional responses to problems. After surveying students on stress and objectively
monitoring their sleep levels during high and low stress weeks, researchers concluded that
coping styles are, in fact, a moderating variable between stress and sleep. Those with high EFC
reported poorer sleep quality during high stress weeks than low stress weeks. The opposite was
found for people with low EFC. Despite the coping mechanism of the participants, they found
that there are significant changes in sleep periods due to stress; higher stress levels are associated
with decreased sleep quality. Our research will be examining test anxiety instead of stress level.
Additionally, all our data will be collected through subjective self-report surveys. Our group is
TEST ANXIETY AND SLEEP QUALITY IN COLLEGE STUDENTS 6
also focusing solely on the relationship between test anxiety and sleep quality without including
moderating factors.
The purpose of our study is to examine the relationship between sleep quality and test
anxiety in college students. Ultimately, we hope to find evidence to support arguments that sleep
is a facet of college life that should not be compromised. We wanted to focus our research on
undergraduate college students since we are a part of this population. Discovering relevant data
to those our age will allow us to apply results to college life at Miami. If executed properly, our
findings could also be generalized to larger populations such as college students across the
United States. At Miami on days leading up to final exams, King Library is packed 24 hours per
day. Students are compromising their sleep time to cram before taking their exams. But if they
were aware that this style of studying could possibly relate to higher levels of test anxiety, they
may find a more effective way to prepare for exams such as studying in increments. Previous
studies found that sleep is related to mental and physical health, GPA, aggression, and stress; but
no past research studied test anxiety specifically in relation to sleep. We hypothesized that levels
of test anxiety are negatively correlated with sleep quality in college students. In other words, we
predict that increased levels of testing anxiety will be related to lower levels and quality of sleep,
Methods
We used a website called Qualtrics to write and administer our survey. There were three
exclusion criteria: did not consent, not between the ages of 18-23, and did not answer at least two
of the questions. The survey immediately ended and closed for those who did not consent. Each
participant who met the inclusion criteria contributed to our collected data and total N. The
Participants
All group members recruited participants by posting the survey on Facebook. Two
members also sent the link to sorority Groupme’s. Participants were undergraduate college
students between the ages of 18-23. They all happened to attend Miami University for
undergraduate school and they were are all friends with at least one of our group members on
Facebook or Groupme. Originally, 279 people opened the survey. After excluding those not in
the age range, those who did not complete the survey, and those who did not consent, there were
70 participants total. Of those, 58 were female and 12 were male. From the surveyed
participants, 56 were white, 12 were Asian, 1 was African American, and 1 was of another race
or ethnicity. Most participants were freshmen in college with a mean age was 19.36 with a
standard deviation of 1.33. Their GPAs ranged from a 2.79-4.0 and they took between 8-24
credit hours with most people’s credit hours ranging between 15-18. There was no compensation
Design
Our design was a non-experimental, correlational study to find the association between
test anxiety and sleep quality. Both variables were measured using previously accredited Likert
scales. Test anxiety was measured by the Cognitive and Westside Test Anxiety Scales. Sleep
Quality was measured using the SATED, Epworth, and Pittsburg Sleep Scales. These scales are
made up of various questions and statements that participants had to self-report on the survey.
Measures
To measure testing anxiety, we used the Cognitive Test Anxiety Scale followed by the
Westside Test Anxiety Scale. The Cognitive scale by Cerbin (2011), is a 14 questions scale that
measures test anxiety in college students. The scale was reliable with a Cronbach’s Alpha of
0.775. An example of a statement on this scale is “I lose sleep over worrying about
examinations”. Participants rate statements like these from 0-4, where 0 is not at all typical of me
and 4 is very typical of me. Higher scores on this scale reflect higher test anxiety, and lower
scores reflect lower test anxiety (Cerbin, 2011). The Westside Test Anxiety Scale is composed of
7 statements that describe feelings and thoughts during exams. This scale was very reliable with
a Cronbach’s Alpha of 0.847. The answer options were on a Likert scale from 1-5 where 1 meant
not at all, never true and 5 meant extremely, always true. An example of a statement from this
scale is “The closer I am to a major exam, the harder it is for me to concentrate on the material”.
Higher scores on this scale reflect higher levels of text anxiety (Driscoll, 2004).
We measured sleep using the SATED Scale, Epworth Sleep Scale, and then the Pittsburg
Sleep Quality Scale. SATED stands for sleep satisfaction, alertness, timing, efficiency, and
duration. This scale was composed of 5 statements about sleep during weeks with both high and
TEST ANXIETY AND SLEEP QUALITY IN COLLEGE STUDENTS 9
low test anxiety. The SATED Scale had a reliable Cronbach’s Alpha of 0.746. Each statement
required a response ranging from 0, meaning rarely or never, all the way to 2, meaning usually or
always. An example of a statement from the SATED scale is “Are you satisfied with your sleep”.
Since higher scores on this scale were associated with better quality of sleep, we had to reverse
code the numbers before analysis (Buysee, 2014). The Epworth Scale had 8 statements for
participants to rate their chance of dozing off in a variety of situations. The scale was 0-3 where
0 is would never doze and 3 is a high chance of dozing. Higher scores from this scale are related
to poorer sleep quality. Although this scale had a smaller Cronbach’s Alpha than all the other
scales used in our research, 0.631 was still high enough for it to be reliable. Included in this scale
are statements such as “Choose the most appropriate number for when you are sitting and
reading or watching TV” (Johns, 1997). Finally, The Pittsburg Scale is composed of 15
statements about sleeping at night. Participants were asked to rate each statement on a Likert
scale of 0-3 where 0 is not during the past month and 3 is three or more times a week. Higher
scores on this scale are associated with poorer sleep quality. It had high reliability with a
Cronbach’s Alpha of 0.708. This scale contains statements such as “During the past month, how
often have you had trouble sleeping because you cannot get to sleep within 30 minutes” (Buysse,
Procedure
demographics, testing anxiety, sleep, and a debrief. Before individuals could participate in our
survey, they were asked if they were 18+ and in college. If they answered no, they were not
directed to the consent form because they did not meet the age requirements to participate. If
TEST ANXIETY AND SLEEP QUALITY IN COLLEGE STUDENTS 10
participants did meet the age requirements, they were directed to a consent form that they had to
give their consent to before the survey questions began. The consent form first explained the
study was created by psychology 293 students to explore the relationship between test anxiety
and sleep quality. It listed the survey blocks they would be completing and how long the survey
would take. The consent also included that participating in the study would not be risky or
harmful and responses would be kept confidential. Finally, we provided our names and emails
before the consent was agreed to or not in case participants had further questions. If they did
consent, the survey immediately ended for them on Qualtrics and they were unable to answer any
of the survey questions. We did not factor the 4 participants who did not consent into our data
collection and analysis. Following consent, participants provided demographic information such
as their age, race, gender, GPA, year in school, credit hours, and their majors. There were two
main blocks in the survey composed of various scales within each. The first block was for test
anxiety with statements from, first, the Cognitive Scale and then the Westside Scale. The
following block was for sleep. Statements started with the SATED Scale, then moved onto the
Epworth Scale, and ended with the Pittsburg Scale. At the end of the survey, participants were
debriefed. The debrief first thanked them for participating and repeated the purpose of the study.
We also included the results we predicted. Then, we reminded participants that their answers
were confidential and included our names and emails again in case they had questions. Since
there were no forced answers during the survey, participants could skip questions if they felt
uncomfortable answering. They could also end the survey at any point if they decided they did
not want to participate in the study anymore. After we closed the survey and applied our
Results
In our study, we ran six Pearson’s correlation tests between our different scales for test
anxiety and sleep quality to find an r correlation. This test is used to explain the magnitude and
direction of the relationship between two variables. We found all six correlations to be
statistically significant and to be in support of our hypothesis. First, we ran correlations with the
Pittsburg Sleep Scale. Sleep quality (M= 2.03, SD= 0.43) measured by the Pittsburg Sleep Scale
had a moderate negative correlation to test anxiety (M=2.75, SD=0.46) measured by the
Cognitive Test Anxiety Scale, r(68) = -.428, p<0.001, two-tailed. In other words, those who
reported higher levels of test anxiety tended to also report poorer sleep quality. The effect size
was 0.18. The Cronbach’s alpha for the Pittsburg scale was 0.708 and it was 0.775 for the
Cognitive scale, meaning our findings are reliably significant. Similarly, sleep quality (M=2.03,
SD=0.43) measured by the Pittsburg Sleep Scale also has a moderate negative correlation to test
anxiety (M=3.00, SD=0.83) measured by the Westside Test Anxiety Scale, r(68) = -.338,
p=0.004, two-tailed. The effect size was 0.11. This result is reliable because the Cronbach’s
alpha for Pittsburg, as mentioned above, was 0.708 and it was 0.847 for Westside. Next, we ran
correlations for the SATED Sleep Scale. Sleep quality (M=1.95, SD=0.40) measured by the
SATED Sleep Scale has a moderate negative correlation to test anxiety (M=3.00, SD=0.83)
measured by the Westside Test Anxiety Scale, r(68) = -.261, p=0.029, two-tailed. The effect size
was 0.07. The Cronbach’s alpha for the SATED scale was 0.746 and it was 0.847 for the
Westside scale, so these findings are reliably significant. Also, sleep quality (M=1.95, SD=0.40)
measured by the SATED Sleep Scale has a moderate negative correlation to test anxiety
(M=2.75, SD=0.46) measured by the Cognitive Test Anxiety Scale, r(68) = -.279, p=0.020, two-
tailed. The effect size was 0.08. The Cronbach’s alpha for the SATED scale was 0.746 and it was
TEST ANXIETY AND SLEEP QUALITY IN COLLEGE STUDENTS 12
0.847 for the Westside scale, so these findings are reliably significant. Finally, we ran
correlations for the Epworth Sleep Scale. Sleep quality (M=2.19, SD=0.45) measured by the
Epworth Sleep Scale has a moderate negative correlation to test anxiety (M=2.75, SD=0.46)
measured by the Cognitive Test Anxiety Scale, r(68) = -.225, p=.061, two-tailed. The effect size
was 0.05. The Cronbach’s alpha for the Epworth scale and it was 0.631 for the Cognitive scale,
meaning our findings are reliable. Sleep quality (M=2.19, SD=0.45) measured by the Epworth
Sleep Scale has a weak negative correlation to test anxiety (M=3.00, SD=0.83) measured by the
Westside Test Anxiety Scale, r(68) = -.156, p=.197, two-tailed. The effect size was 0.02. The
Cronbach’s alpha for the Epworth scale and it was 0.847 for the Westside scale, meaning our
findings are reliably statistically significant. All six correlations can be interpreted in the same
way. Participants who reported having more test anxiety on the questionnaires tended to have a
lower quality of sleep as well. In other words, as test anxiety increases, sleep quality decreases,
and vice versa. These findings supported our hypothesis that there is an association between
Discussion
Based on the survey our group conducted, we ran a correlational analysis to examine if
test anxiety and sleep quality have an association in college students. Our purpose in running this
correlation was to discover the simple relationship between these two facets of daily college life
without factoring in third variables. We hoped that college students could potentially benefit
from our discoveries if our results supported our hypothesis. Again, we hypothesized that there
would be a negative correlation between test anxiety and sleep quality. In other words, we
predicted that test anxiety would increase as sleep quality decreased, and vice versa. After
running the correlations, we found our results to be statistically significant and in support of our
hypothesis. Sleep quality had a moderate negative relationship with test anxiety in five out of the
six correlations we ran. One out of the six correlations had a weak negative relationship. Despite
Our research found a moderate, negative relationship between sleep quality and test
anxiety in college students specifically. Previous research examined similar variables among a
variety of demographics. Our findings added to this previous research by solely researching our
two chosen variables: test anxiety and sleep quality. We also found a relationship between these
variables in college students, and not just in adolescents like in previous research. The study by
K. Kelly, W. Kelly, and Clanton (2001) found that longer duration of sleep was associated with
higher GPAs. Their research findings suggest that receiving a good night sleep could be
important for academic performance, and that those with higher GPAs typically receive a better
night’s sleep (K. Kelly, W. Kelly & Clanton, 2001). Our research expanded upon this finding by
examining whether a better night’s sleep could also affect test anxiety and not just test
performance. Other research conducted by Castillo (2013) found that there is an association
TEST ANXIETY AND SLEEP QUALITY IN COLLEGE STUDENTS 14
between sleep duration and test anxiety. This study established a relationship between test
anxiety and sleep, but they only examined sleep duration. We looked at four additional aspects of
sleep including satisfaction, efficiency, timing, and alertness. Lund, Reider, Whiting, and
Prichard (2009) also investigated sleep patterns in college students. Findings indicated that those
with poorer sleep quality tended to have more reports of physical and mental health problems
than better sleepers did. They also found that stress had a negative correlation to sleep quality
(Lund, Reider, Whiting & Prichard, 2009). Their research established the relationship between
stress and sleep quality in college students, but no previous studies had been conducted on test
anxiety and sleep quality in college students. Sadeh, Keinan, and Daon (2004) also looked at the
relationship between stress and sleep. As opposed to other studies, they found that this
relationship was moderated by a person’s emotional coping mechanisms. Despite the coping
mechanism of the participants, they found that there are significant changes in sleep periods due
to stress; higher stress levels are associated with decreased sleep quality (Sadeh, Keinan & Daon,
2004).
Our research is especially relevant for college students today because sleep is often the
aspect of life that they choose to give up to stay caught up with school, friends, extracurricular
activities, etc. Experiencing poor sleep could relate to more anxiety before exams. Research like
ours which is supported by previous research is important because it reminds college students of
the importance of sleep. Staying up all night, even if it is to study, is not the way to succeed in
college. Make sure to get plenty of rest every night, especially before exams; this can relieve
your anxiety before taking important tests. Taking a simple mental break to relieve test anxiety
could keep your sleep quality in check. Take care of yourselves both physically and mentally.
TEST ANXIETY AND SLEEP QUALITY IN COLLEGE STUDENTS 15
Test anxiety is a part of college and it is okay up to a certain point. But before that point
hits, find a way to cope with it. Since test anxiety and sleep quality are correlated, overwhelming
feelings of test anxiety can negatively relate to your sleep quality. While our research did not
prove a causal relationship between test anxiety and sleep quality, it did suggest that test anxiety
Besides having a small sample size of 70 participants, there were additional limitations in
our study. To begin, we collected our data through administered surveys. While surveys are
useful when variables are difficult to manipulate, they also can come with self-report bias. To
prevent this in future research, we would reverse code some of the questions. We administered
these surveys using convenience sampling. This gave us a group of participants who were mostly
19-years-old, white, female undergraduates at Miami University. There were significantly more
girls than boys who participated in the survey which could have potentially influenced our
findings. Typically, girls are more known to report feelings of test anxiety than boys are because
mental instability is generally not considered “manly”. To ensure our sample is representative of
the population in future research, we should use a different sampling method. Also, we could
release the survey to different schools across the US. Another limitation we faced was the short
amount of time opened for the survey so we could complete the research paper before the end of
the semester. If it had been available longer, we would have gotten a much larger sample size.
With the survey being taken closer to the end of the semester, participants could have been
feeling more test anxiety than usual. Also, maybe students who were extremely consumed with
feelings of testing anxiety did not partake in the survey because of this. Both situations could
have affected our findings. To correct this, we could give the survey in the beginning, middle,
and end of the year to see if the timing of the survey affected the results.
TEST ANXIETY AND SLEEP QUALITY IN COLLEGE STUDENTS 16
If we had more time and resources, we would like our future research to examine the
campus. There is a possibility that domestic students feel more test anxiety because they are not
as competent with the English language. They, additionally, may have more external pressures
from family that is sending them to receive their education far outside their native country.
Another interesting continuation of our study would be to examine the correlations between the
variables at different college prestige levels. For example, we could administer surveys to
students from IV League schools, public universities, and community colleges. Analyzing all this
data together would probably produce results that would have generalizability. Future research
References
Buysse D.J. (2014). Sleep health: can we define it? does it matter? SLEEP, 37(1), 9-17. doi:
10.5665/sleep.3298
Buysse, D.J., Reynolds III, C.F., Monk, T.H., Berman, S.R., & Kupfer, D.J. (1989). The
for psychiatric practice and research. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 28(2), 193-213.
Cassady, J. C. & Johnson, R. E. (2002). Cognitive test anxiety and academic performance.
Cerbin, B. (2011). Reducing test anxiety. Advancing Teaching and Learning, 2-3. Retrieved
20Test%20Anxiety%20Scale.pdf
Driscoll, R., Ph.D. (2004). Westside test anxiety scale validation. American Test Anxiety
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltest/ED495968.pdf
Fernández-Castillo, Antonio; Ansiedad y Estrés, Vol 19(1), 2013 pp. 71-82. Publisher: Sociedad
Gaultney, J. F., Ph.D. (2010). The prevalence of sleep disorders in college students: Impact on
doi: 10.1080/07448481.2010.483708.
Kelly, W. E., Kelly, K. E., & Clinton, R. C. (2001). The relationship between sleep length and
Lund, H.G., Reider, B.D., Whiting, A.B., & Prichard, R., Ph.D. (2010). Sleep patterns and
Sadeh, A., Keinan, G., & Daon, K. (2004). Effects of stress on sleep: the moderating role
Appendix A
Figure 1. Scatterplot showing the correlation between the SATED Sleep Scale and the Westside
Test Anxiety Scale.
Figure 2. Scatterplot showing the correlation between the Pittsburg Sleep Scale and the Westside
Test Anxiety Scale.
TEST ANXIETY AND SLEEP QUALITY IN COLLEGE STUDENTS 20
Figure 3. Scatterplot showing the correlation between the Epworth Sleep Scale and the Westside
Test Anxiety Scale.
Figure 4. Scatterplot showing the correlation between the SATED Sleep Scale and the Cognitive
Test Anxiety Scale.
TEST ANXIETY AND SLEEP QUALITY IN COLLEGE STUDENTS 21
Figure 5. Scatterplot showing the correlation between the Pittsburg Sleep Scale and the
Cognitive Test Anxiety Scale.
Figure 6. Scatterplot showing the correlation between the Epworth Sleep Scale and the Cognitive
Test Anxiety Scale.