Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 25-1-5 CADIZ & OLAGUERA Supreme Court Doctrines

    Uploaded by

    Jose Antonio Barroso
    2 views8 pages

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views8 pages

    25-1-5 CADIZ & OLAGUERA Supreme Court Doctrines

    Uploaded by

    Jose Antonio Barroso

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 8
    Ne esome suet to tae P90! — ¥5IR.0R ‘Tux due oa Ui! Tae Cra (6 x P25) oo ‘oo ax tl ae P % reIORe sax ge tat whe A dn ed Hy Te ‘he fares eed are fr Strato pups only To arrive amore reali Tigre sail stat cold be resorted to Tis “Soul lay the fear of Chmminer Pans that an ieraae fm pre ‘nl ad sional exemptions would «rod the tax base st tat Sino cnaequene loan afrevenun, the goverment ape resort to {ing by the lft wha wa gven by the right hand ‘Te same tax ereit sytem recommended paragraph () sme ah be ued assy te Seat fate fs ed ‘alc expen At peta a pe a the Sermiing the numberof exemptions muiged Wy 4 fed aunt ‘Mon tt of P1200 PED, 1) gall, the etatatious delay of wells by some gorers. ‘eat fia a wel Bs the nnocmney expen the overs ‘et should be avolded, This would peeve the normal tendency of ‘alt tS pra nd al nae he toy ohn SUPREME COURT DOCTRINES Compiled by DANTE MIGUEL V. CADIZ, UB. 81 JOSE VICTOR V. OLAGUERA, 118. Be avi taw AUTHORRY OF DIRECTOR OF LANDS TO EXTER INTO A CONTRACT OF LEASE ‘The Diwtor of Lands actal within hit power and authority ‘a brad of the Divison of Landod Eatates when he entered into Retna of tose for ertod of 10 years renewable fora Tk prio tthe Insc’ options ‘the Dirctor of ane was oot acting merely sa” sgsot in tho ae tat he oil nosed n special power of atlorey 10 Ieee ARE eY'jenuety to coother penn fr more than ope sear uh oak (eof the Civil Gode After the war, administration ot ‘Ae Ghatatono Batae wa turned over tothe Rural Progres Ad eee y Adminitrative Order No. 3B inued y Prosicen Titach Ronan and thereafter, ox Novomber 28, 1690, admisste Uae Sera tothe Bureau of Landa partclariy 19 he iater's on fetsated ivion of Landed states, When the Director cf Kind thereore, eased the property to defendant, te did 6 8 ‘HME efcer an be repressed the goverment and stud fori Tan om atthe states, eased by wrt of an authority vested Tr Eis bp haw and nosed ne further dlgaton of power. He wea ‘Sotho in some part atthe soverognty of the alate. He acted SEES peop” defied ar "one verted with the etre man agement, contra, and supervision of a parteular woth to te doe, {0 5 to say, ot only whe! shall be done, ut how shall be done ands fll power and authority to mand the men under Bie in the work, Sd the work in dr he praca deren tad cm trol, eave and except at he may receiv discos from Ge to tie from his employer, and chore rdiaty no soe ee pres! land authored to sperttend nd diet the work of the men, He then represents the employer sandy forthe employer When foreman uf a gang of mente invested with sich control Be i 9 ee principal” Directly empowered to Rani the ‘varbue Phase Df thority (qrescrly) undertaken by the Rar Progress Ada stration, It Nas his duty to adnnister the Crane Estate 2s fey Do and" eptiewDan GH. No. 138086. Aug (CANCELLATION OF AN ENTEY IN A CIVIL REGISTRY Long att isthe rue that the erors which ean be coret ‘or eae ander the summary procedure contemplated In Arle 417 ofthe Cl Code, a8 Inplomented in Hale 108. refer to cen front ct harmless apd lnsocuus changes nt otto seta a Since the entry sought to be cancel conesrae the satan of seid as legate or iltinate tne te cv Mat of the pe fests ag marred or unmarend the aloged eror refers to 4 eh tanta abd vil matter eancllatn te not cnered al 408. (Repu x, Haters, Ge Ne, LAS, October 9, 170) POSSESSION IN GOOD FAITHE er so satin nt mer dt i ite to te trate fore the" passion legal interred Poscsin in good falth ener ot aly itr fromthe Irmet defets ithe te are made lnown tothe pesswor, xtra eine or by fling wf ton fn San bythe eu treet fr the recovery of the papery Hen the ete tat (he posesor may ress fromthe tien wc Iu ‘when be avers the complaint, um be delivered pad Uy imo the owner or lawil premaor (Ost v Kayanan GR No Tete, Sly 30, S07) PROPERTY ACQUIKED DURING TH MAREIAGE, PRESUMED TO BE CONIUGAL Petters chm that nee the ot in quetion wat reyiatered in the name of Folimon Tarts, marie to Gru. Galego, it rut be presumed oe the conjugal property of Fedimon and Gra. lana that one half therst shold be adjoieatd to them a8 ‘hal eritance from thle moter Wie tro that all property of the marrage is presamed fo be conjugal shove sat nonetolas the party wD It Yokes the presamptnn must Bist prove that the propery wa > {ule ung the marriage ‘The prot le contin ine gus mom fle the application of the presumption. nthe lst’ se thee Sa nag tn he record to show that the fou te guration waa toquinel daring the mariage of Felon ‘Poela and Graco Glee, ‘The circumstance tht Decree No, A087 ofthe CFL of Negro COcciental which confirmed the ownerablp of Plinon Terla over he land in question described in az mario to Gracia, Gallego Wren erly Geerptve of hs cil seston that time and cannot te taken to poof thatthe led fas eoqied during their cower fine The further cncamstaee thatthe asd was registered uring the marrage cannot itil consiate prof that Ik wat auld "bg ther marsage for nd eeltravon under Act 449 as amend oor sot confer tle; t-mersiy confirms te already exiting hd whch i epnterabl, (Tor. Toes, GR Na LTO, Oct ter 12, 197) Quastpenicr 1, Petitioner's eae of ston aginst Tinbul in the evil case ‘a based on quiet Chests, responder jae commited feveriie etre mhen be damisod the lll wut gait tok ‘Gener. at sid caue tay proied indepndealy of the exinnal pe (lng na regarom othe reaut of the ater (Arte 3, New 1 Chi Cas No, S060 fs not barred By the fant eat potiiner hud to revere, im the eimial ction, le ight tle on ede feodent ii neton tasod on abet (Mendoua WA, Sasi, Tne 8,107) ARANSPER OF OWNERSIUP, PRECUTION SALES 1 When the gle and wen jabsic In queton ere de ovot an said inthe land peas Celtel Dame the ot Mee Otsernip ent transcend by perfecin of the eo TRS by dllery ther atom sp contuctive. TAs Is Ur ee ae prchate’ ne, hen ade on credit a8 x th case at ar Paymett ofthe purease pie not cst 0 the trate ownership a one ae the property rll has ben Selves Owner up's cadet from the moment the tng eld was devered oe ‘2 he items in question were iegaly vied upon ace they do a Dilong to the sudgeent deter. The power of the court 1 ton udgment ened oly 0 yopertin unqustiosbie eee the fatgment dear, The fact at Capt deidot seen inde the purchase price of the items levied upon did Torey the euneler of awerahi to Capitol The compan “esdepaguta to uly the aber leis weLfounded and about SESS" Bneeuton Sls affect the hte of judgment debtor only a he pareheer inthe sation le nouies only the right a te erst ia he Ue ofthese” Sine the ems eben eng te Sinpagut tnd not to Capital, the judgment dele, the ly ‘Sat aucon ate are ascordingly nll apd volo. Tei well att Jnvtaisjredition thatthe serfs no ahora to atach prox eey 08 elnging to the Jodpmest debtor, (Sempagulta Plo Rone ine ve dalwndor Manufsturen, Ga. No, 4800, October itis USING NAMBS OF DECEASED PARTNERS IN {Tite PALENERSIIP NAME, PROMIRITED I aa much a¢“Syeip, Salar, Feliao, Homandez and Cs tuo nad “Oeets mle, de Leon, Mabants and Reyes” af Fal tai the se in ther prtoerahip name of the names of the ‘Secesndpareners wl um counter t Arle 185 af the Gui Code ‘this provides that “every partnership shal operate unde =f fame, Hhlch way or may ba lcd the mame of one or more of ‘he parnern howe wx not beng tomers of the partners Inia their eames tho fron ame, all be mubjet to the Ti ty of the porte: tet aly pa inthe above provi that namics frm cae oe eerily must eter We thowe of lg partners or wae tana ronpurinere, should Bing persons who cat a ee Tanti, (Petition for Authority to, Continue Use of sabi ogyip Slane, Horanes so Casto” Joby we) {yey APPLICANT MAY NOT REGISTER BECAUSE THE CONTRACT I MEIELY A MORTGAGE hn appeant tor rgtaion of tle ea prove is We ant co amt oer or weaken ofthe eee ote a peer, the pe Sh onentor Caetia gmccaon a he gop Ca oe sewn cit by ne or he equa of owner. a ey acre pened. tg 3: ie ea the geo toe morgage sce THY crate go” Whos pan essed te i tan ye cupca now Fgh is sought to be cat ne re acing aod ees pe rat te ey Teen rf elec to pte thal ‘Apleat fale Mpc poprtys The trl court's is Chet cee Tf noe hd ben eatin psig aly soe agpteattt tueeongcroorting eon o 0 se, en” aes nt cory uth weigh Me leans ne Fo my tice doen waran acon (te Tne nh On gr nT that Ce a aor dvs ot ate conte eu spe of et Sous Nov -2858, Oetober 16 17) ‘commenciat taW INSURANCE: EFFECT OF NON-PAYMENT OF PitEaTU Insurances “x contictwhrchy one undertakes fora conse ration to indemnify another agit len damage or ably ane from an unkown or content even.” The eeseraton othe "pr ‘sae pe pte tn eh ny et ‘anne sf in the pley abd, ts pa, the ply il lpee “hd freed bye own ca Pane Phas Sey and Iurance Cv. Wonbort, Ine, GR. No. 2317 August 21D) PIERCING TH: VEN. OF CORPORATE FICTION Were we to sustain the theory of peidoners that the trial our acted in excss of aration ov abuse of datton tae Ingo lek of frton in deciding Cl Came No, a cae for partion when the dofendant thr, Tang ing and Potton {Company Tne. us restr owner aertedcwmeahip ofthe sabe tnd properties fovolves fn the iigtion which tory st pees> ‘arly be based on the asunplon tht i8 ames and proerin of ‘Tang Millag and Plantation Company ne, ow appearing under the time of FL. Ceo Plantation Compeny as truce tre dtinet and separate from tho estate of Foret Le Coze to which pttlonrs| {nd respondents as legal Bre of suit Foret Le Cae ate equally ‘ted share and share aie the the legal Fetion of sperte ca borate personaly shall have been usc to ely and tinately de ‘rte and defraud the rrpondntsof tel acesoal igh to ho fteate of thde deceased father Hor Tong Millng and Platting {Company shall have boon able to extend tx coromte existence yond the pred of le charer wich laond oe, 1958 ude the fuse and eover of FP", Coa Plantation Company Isat tretee hich would be again the lav, and said trator shall have Baer The toe the aseets am aropertin fr te Dene of the petoner {othe rst prejudice i! defnudaton of private napondent= Hence, Somes ‘ees 3 and Ipettve fo ere the rorporae sal (Gotn wv CA, No, LARD Ocaber 18, 1978) (CRIMINAL LAW CONVICTION UNDER PD NO. 8 ere one of tore eed by the Present to urbe tae ta or ch arta wan ere hat to pe, oF Se ree te wend af tli meron ins SAE alice smiling sad pb dora to ober Tec ene ete for 2 6 pam need wih the pt TED et wh rotation Nor Hst es rossi th ets et sais een a itn Seid is conection withthe cae 8 subversion, reli, ‘Tibco, inves vlece nina, thaon, tnd publ dlorder ‘Mebuoncd i Proanation No MSL Absent this eels een itis ctse on nual must folow. (ermues¥. CA, C- R oar aug 3, 1519) Arle 325 ofthe RPC. as amended, imposes the death penalty seh by senor on the ova of the Tape 8 Romie co steer sro el ee eno pun rape aeumpenyings robbery) whe the rape was cont See ceason of the mir, tet i to a, when he female We tim of s mundo ant war st dethrdor, se Was Tae since the vein hercn was steady atthe thrsbo of death st oe vat Hiya reared «fr Pigeominycamingdugace crs frm oferty whieh gar Recah under borne Ras unneoanry to the common Treats wee a manfst outrage oe he watin's pra, Cope Wbgandte GAN Leela, tober 25, 17D) RORBERY WOTH HOMICIDE ‘The rulo is that whire he orignal design comprehend rob. tery t's dreling, and boli fe perpetrated with view tot ‘onmunation of the robbery, the erine commited ls the compe ‘tons of robbery with homie eves though homicide prcedes the foobury by en eppesiale tine ifthe orga design vas not (0 oma reery fut robimry was commited afte the ome 25 [vaftethoupit, the ernina ete shauld be viewed as conatine (to dint often and not ap single son offenge. (Pog Seong, Gi No. L286, July 13, 1979) LT tasor Law JURISDICTION OF THE BUREAU OF LABOR RELATIONS The eso i whether It was legal and proper for the dietor of Lator Relations to eter to the Trade Un, Congress of tho Prilplnes (TUG —« foserstion of abr non) the appeal of the ‘ivodated itor tnioos in erifeton elation ex, ‘Wo hol that therefor ofthe appeal to the TUCP i gtacingty ‘ga and void The Labor Code never Intended that th Director Of Labor Retitons aboot shets, delegate, abd Flags nr Ditratonal presogaties in favor of a pate person or entity or ‘ova federation of trate unions” Such & surrender of ofc fie ton san sbomaloun deplorabc and eesurbleresuciaton ofthe Direct's adjudentary jreton in representation eaten (Uns st Bubd ng Mangagnva ©. Dietor of Labie Relations, GAR Ne aso, Jay 161078) RIGHT OF DEPUTY MINISTER OF LABOR TO DECIDE, ON APPEAL QUESTION OF MORAL AND FXEMPLARY DAMAGES ‘he ele at where scour aaa obfaned and ie exe ising radinion overs controversy fran to posed the ina determination othe ease in ot affected by new lege. Son pacing redition over eb prossding In another tn ‘The amp tothe re were toe natuleexpremly proves, or i construed to the effect hati Intended to operate ts 10 ‘cus pending etre a eonetmet. Were staat changing te Sinton of court has no retrcatie eect Weanot be appl {on cae that was pending prior tothe enacinent of the nate We ond the pine spall tothe case at bar To eegure pe Toner tos peat alt for damages he soglar curs wel te to “ncn apt jure, wich in prejua to tho onery istration of aie” (Note: Tis cauetavotves the sends? st Arte 21 of the Labor Coe by PD, 161) CBengaon ¥ nin ‘asa, ine 21000 Deon Isone [RIGHT OF FOREMAN TO PARTICIPATE IN CEREEIFICATION ELECTION scam thatthe intgry ofthe clestive barging pro es must be matted, Inna democracy rogues thn the ‘workers td he workers aloe, shoal chose wick labor onan ton shold be the excasvetarganing representative ln cet {Ebon selon cntced cording tow That i of tee, ‘Syaen, ot necrany, Rony ment, 1 dow appear ‘lac to ase that fremen cao longer be considered. i [Goat unte of tne labor fore Ie nt beamed tht the powers ‘Gey caer are islanded to boot the ramagemet inthe ene Ge Tosuring erenterefieey, Ie dee bat fw by any means, Sat Sh performiag the tok soe fo them, they Mave forfeled their edt bo eoutad onthe nd of tab ad ha thereby become mare oe of management. Tore maybe lances where uch = Uiporbie sition may ext, Te eamaot te assumed, though. Tt mane powel Such poo lacking inthis gation Te ex Sob conte. therefor, that the Intutin of oleetve ae ning nw an instrument f suring potetion to labor mindated Fp'tne contin had therty breome Snel ce weakened by vitae of long th formes to participate in te certfeation eee Mow (UUGWP v. Novi LABGH26S, dune 18, 187) POUTICAL LAW. JUSMICLABILETY OF AN ELECTORAL PROTEST ae a egy et nro oes genteel mie eae sien eh ne al Sour el oe eis tee sete ek Se reteria sade sli er ee Se apecteecmne a ig ce an eran ta pe re Soper aati es rota amazed cd ‘Ba sty of te new costae, the naar of he afore ty ce ater a insite arch Sareea EQUISEIE FOR THE VALADETY OF AN ORDINAN ‘WHEN A CRIMINAL PROSHCUTION MAY BE ENJOINED 1, An een route for «vad ordnance i among others, ‘oat un contravene the suite fore 4 Tudamenal ee Sle ht msi sian in i at and nba to the les of the State Foiowing tha eer Tus wheaeret there st confit betmoen an erdanot abd aati the ordanss mut ve sh" 2. On the ie of et he fm of whether await of uncon ea restrain che ceedings in Criminal Cane No, 81401 the general tle that or ‘inary, viminal preston may bo Hock hy court proton or inion "tino hon ar wed tthe flowing 1 for the ody adiletraton of jstie; 1 to proven the ube of the strong stm of the a La Sgresive and inte mane to avold multiply of ations 4 to afford adequate protection to constitutional rights; and 1 n poper caso, beause the sitter "upon unconsitnal wa el avai, etal te ese Bolger astra ethees ss REMEDIAL LAW ACOION PURLICIANA WHEN PROPER Petitioners correctly fe their acon publican before the lower ert es aginst repondet’ cai that they shoud ised fave fist immary actin for elaine Sn be munis xr Having bien lly apprised of resondessceume to surrender fostsion and thoi contrary claim or ownersip of the me rover, plone propery fod their accion puns withthe Gout ef Fiat tnstatee to avoid geting enmeched in hat wuld ‘tainly nave been another Juredtinal dupe, nce they wl eamnnbiy force that i inde they have ied ¢ summary et for logs! etsiner inetead inthe munpl out, repondnts wt fave contend, contrary to their present cai, Sat the mal our withow Jaradetion ower the dain ease by rte of ‘het anray lain of oes of te (eyes. Se ‘ara S43, June 29, 1079), rere owe DISOISSAL OF SPFCIAL. PROCEEDINGS FOR JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION WHEN PROPER ‘tne propre ofthe Gaia a termination ofthe pl po: ceotings or fal adinntrtin muse be affirmed inate of te Teen tn another rtd carn woew of the enable IS Nuesce which favre. pertton when joel ministration = ims enaretery, Ascher by the Cestt of Appeal, the d= ‘ale oe gunce io wrong forthe reason tht what wae actully feard was Oil Case No. 6296. "The cals comune, however, ie far foe importance then the reason behind he doi rae Sextet ping se ete under sinistral. Jule rings con ‘Eten ht ihe view that wen partion ix posi, eltber Jule rows the esate sab ot be burdened witha adn ation preceding without ood and cingling tenon. When th tse nan ao evaitore or pending obigatons tobe yl the ben ficarce in interest are not bound to subi the property to Jil ‘Miinstrtion wich Ia nay tng and cosy, or fo appl for tke Sopsntment of an edncatrator tho creat expel when ud [earns oumnecetary and wuperios. (Came ¥.CA, GR No. te38172, Oetaber 18, 1979) JURISDICTION: RES JUDICATA ‘the ony uration deawn in inue before the Court of peas sutqa'n COT No Sa80-0 wus ete ater a te 200 eae ight of eminent domain, The quetlon regarding YTS Eh Soe ne expen rented bythe Cort Uae amount Heitor fo dcermige, Perforce, between te it Sara th leant errr a the second case Wherein SR Jldcent i invoked, hor is Went of pstes but ere it no sack ee ao seen, in auch stoi, the Sademet i ‘Senin the eeond cose only to those matters actly aed coe oqeted and determined, and not as fo males merely ete etna ty onan ros jeata,the ight troll tno host rest upon the sae question which! ese ant ‘Bietanc’ was Hated ad determina the frst ut “Where a Coutt of Fst Ista i ied into several braschos act the branches not out dite and separate from the cee etait inested inthe curt, not inthe Jes that Sheree formation fl ere ean Jee S2RBton ace ot ntach to maid rane or Judge above, 2 NiSon ofthe ete, Twat may be had or provedings Mey ‘ea by and before soother ranch or judge. (act v. CA, GR fo tessa, October 18.1979) el PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION Jnges of Pest Instance are vested with authority to conde pecliminnryinvetigaion of = case for Ibe dec ied with ‘he court see "the lnwmaking body, ty means of he est (GLA Ate) never intended to Lake away the juradicton ete oper Court of Prt stance to conduct = prtminary iver in Ml eas,” and thatthe “asedmeat rerly sug to ep ‘he omnary nical cour aot the manip cout of the pre iol eapitl or the ety court) of is power fo old petiminay Investigation of welten efamatins” acl. Began, Lio, sium 1970) PRELIMINARY IWESTIGATION OF CASES COGNIZARLE, [BY CITY AND MUNICIPAL, COURTS ‘Ta contention of pliner that th procedure tht should be fotowed by ety and municipal court ik oneating ponnay Yestgations of cscs cognsbie by them In the exer of thee Grigha!Juradton or eenrrentiy with Courts of Ft nstaaee 1 that precerited by PD. Tr aiended by PD, Ens egal apport Tie very law ian. Tas amended ‘by PD. eh ‘ales that i aplceony to preliminary lvetgrtina conducted by faeae and sate prsediors, "The afore dare do het ppl to cae fed aod tbe togaabe by chy and mia eos he ie agplenbe thereto beng Sec. 10, ee 412 ot the Revised Files of Gourt"Cantrng the ald proviso, we ave Bld thet ‘he essed in ¢eriminal aoe fot etly and within the pre ‘ction of the ty muna! courts nit ented fo pre, ‘sury investigation, the conta ofthe preliminary examietior pot {© the lnuncr ou waren for his arr. ar shows by the eae ation and avorn statement of te complainant and he wtseacy, ‘ei sient toetsh wether “hee bt tected to Betee that an oer has bees commited and the acesed roa ity hrc a tht wera of aes hay te ad Sd the aun eld for til The reat i tha the eng Sal 1 the merits aes the ple of the peiinay inveaiaton wt ‘2 eals waste ordupiation of Une and efor. (TU. ON GnNe Laerrs, Sy 6, 1870) WIEN CEETIOKAR WOULD Nor 1k 5, ts ae i ested by appiston tothe Res of Court, Rae 5, Seeuon 1 proven interal that wh ny trina, exec ‘ela neti acted wiht o nero ho rect, ‘in speedy, and adequate remedy in the erin pou afi 2 peronaggrleed thereby may fe verified pelo fr err ‘thon thee are two condos at matte agaiat the grant of Athen tere a pl, speny and adequate remedy avoids ie.” Sine ini cane cero ws en appeal Wy te plato of Fu 69 (), cera cannot be granted "(Eaigues =. vers ‘ss, June #0 160 WHEN EVIDENCE FOR THE PrOSECUTION {TO DE PRESENTE ‘Te tril court committed an lregulaty In promulgting Sggment onthe tr aces in pen court needy afer the Saf pended uty and ten Ini’ on rung the prinetion to owoves tat ogy don not Jay the ting aie o the op etnies whined pth fant ‘Sei sn fh eed by te tee

    You might also like