Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I. Jurisdiction
- Commission on indigeneous groups will only have jurisdiction if between disputing tribes
- Threshold amounts
- Exceeding 300k, 400k in MM: RTC
- Exceeding 20k, 50k in MM: assessed value involves title to, possession, interest
in RP
- Accion publiciana, jd determined by assessed value of the property
- Jd of courts in petition for Certiorari
- SC, CA, RTC have concurrent jurisdiction
- Tribunal whose action is being questioned are only nominal parties and need not
participate in the proceedings unless required by the Court
- S4, R65: from resolution of quasi-judicial agency (ex. PDIC) go to CA
- If appeal from QJA (CAB, DAR,OP), remedy is petition for review before
CA
- Summary procedure: Not exceeding 100k, 200k in MM
- Small claims: 400k (purely money claim)
- Civil aspect arising from delict not included
- Barangay conciliation
- Only cases involving parties residing within same barangay/city, or adjoning
barangay/city
- Not required if includes prayer for provisional remedy
- Certification issued by barangay to show there was prior barangay conciliation is
waivable
- Special Jurisdiction
- If case assigned to regular court (instead of special court), case will be re-raffled
R12, MBP filed anytime before answer R116,S9 MBP filed before
arraignment
Civil Criminal
Mediation before pre-trial proper then RGCT: pre-trial proper will have to
JDR commence so issues will be identified,
only if PT unsuccessful or after
termination will they proceed to
mediation; no JDR
- Intervention R19
- Anytime before rendition of judgment in trial court
- Allowed after judgment if intervenor is indispensable party
- Dismissal of principal action will result to dismissal of complaint/answer-in-
intervention
- Subpoena
- S4 how to quash subpoena ad testificandum
- Not bound thereby
- Failure to tender kilometrage (witness must be within 100km from where
hearing conducted)
- Failure to tender witness fees
- Subpoena duces tecum
- Irrelevant
- Unnreasonable
- Oppressive
- No suffiicient description
- No tender of kilometrage/witness fees
- Court can compel appearance by contempt/issuance of bench warrant
- Deposition
- Can be applied for after pre-trial/after judgment (as long as action is pending)
- How to apply?
- If action filed but before answer, file MOTION
- If after answer, file NOTICE (cf. amendment <->)
- KNOW USES OF DEPOSITION
- To impeach
- Any purpose If deponent is dead, sick, infirm, in prison, appearance
cannot be obtained by subpoena, other analogous circumstances
- Is there deposition in criminal cases
- R S12,13,15 R119 (conditional examination of witnesses) before
court where action is pending
- For accused, his witness is sick/infirm/lives more than
100km from where hearing conducted before any judge in
PH or member of bar in good standing or any inferior court
as directed by superior court
- Note: provision applies only if action has been filed in
court; if in Ombudsman/DOJ/prosecutor, this provision
does not apply
- Any substitution of parties will not affect deposition previously taken
- Before whom deposition given
- In PH: before any judge, notary public, any person authorized to
administer oath and stipulated upon by parties
- Outside PH: before consul, VC, secretary of legation, letters
rogatory/commission, any person authorized to administer oath and
stipulated upon by parties
- Letters rogatory vs Commission: LR communication from one
judicial authority to another (foreign law on taking deposition
applies); C: appointment of person outside Ph before whom
deposition is taken (Ph law applies)
- Non-compliance with deposition:
- If plaintiff: dismissed, judgment by default, allegations stricken off
- If defendant: case should not be dismissed; court should order deponent
to comply; only if not complied with will consequence apply??
- Limit taking of deposition (grounds for objection) ??
- To annoy, embarass, oppress
- Relevancy
- Privileged
- Deposition before action (perpetuation of testimony)
- Special rule on venue: place where prospective adverse party resides
- Request for admission: after issues are joined after answer is filed
- Contents: request to admit material/relevant facts,
genuineness/due execution of document attached to request
- Failure to respond to request for admission: implied admission
- If fact was subject of a previous denial in answer, need not be
subject of request of admission
- cannot be subject of request for admission: Irrelevant matters;
matters of law; matters of opinion; matters not previously denied
or admitted
- If party who has knowledge of document blatantly denied it, he will
shoulder expenses
- R25 Interrogatories to parties: (cf. written interrogatories under R23)
uses -same-
Civil Criminal
- Period to file leave: 5 days (non-extendible) ; file DTE within 10 days from order
- RGCT: leave of court can be made orally; resolution can be made orally
- If DTE denied, cannot be appealed from/subject of petition for certiorari
MEMORIZE
Judgment on the pleadings Summary judgment
Attachment Replevin
Period of redemption: 1
year for both obligor and
redemptioner
(creditor/lienholder)
Mode of appeal
- From MTC in criminal cases (penalty does not exceed 6 years)
- To RTC by notice of appeal (OA)
- From RTC
- To CA by notice of appeal (OA)
- From RTC in exercise of appellate jurisdiction
- To CA by petition for review
- Note: above is same in civil cases
- Record on appeal on special proceedings/cases of multiple
appeals, period is 30 days
- Only mode of appeal to SC is Rule 45
- In civil cases
- in criminal cases, XPT if penalty is death, life imprisonment,
reclusion perpetua, mode of appeal is not a petition for review on
certiorari
- If RTC finds death penalty, subject to automatic review to
CA; CA will render but not ENTER judgment and certify to
SC
- If RTC finds RP/life, NA required, if CA affirms, mode of
appeal to SC is NA (R124, S13)
- If CA reduces penalty to RT, mode of appeal to SC is R45
- Sandiganbayan
- Decisions of Sandiganbayan in exercise of OJ, mode of appeal is
through NA (regardless of penalty)
- Appealed cases decided by SB, appeal to SC under R45
- If SB imposes death, subject of automatic review to CA
- If civil case, SB has jurisdiction (forfeiture, recovery of ill-gotten
wealth), review of decision of SB is R45
- Rule 50 Grounds for dismissal of appeal in CA
- Failure to file NA/RA/pay filing fees within reglementary period
- Failure to file appellant’s brief
- Failure of appellant’s brief to state assignment of errors
- Failure of appellant’s brief to state page reference on record/table of contents
Provisional remedies
- Attachment
- Grounds for issuance (IMPT) Sec. 1- not simply fraud
- embezzlement /misappropriation in relation to abuse of trust
- Defendant about to depart with intent to defraud and subject of
action arises from obligation
- Fraud in contracting obligation/performance thereof
- If ground for attachment is fraud in contracting
obligation/performance and is cause of action, only way to
discharge is upon posting of counterbond
- “Service of summons prior to or contemporaneous with”
- If complaint filed with prayer for ex parte application for
attachment, court need not acquire jurisdiction over person of
defendant
- If court issues order and require posting of bond, court need not
acquire jurisdiction over person of defendant
- If court enforces order including writ of attachment, jd over person
of dt required
- Contents of an affidavit of attachment:
- Ground under S1
- Cause of action
- No sufficient security
- Amount of order based on money claim/value of property above
all legal counterclaims
- How is attachment served
- If PP, court will take custodia legis
- If RP, annotation on dorsal portion of title of RD
- Shares of stock, writ of garnishment served upon
president/managing agent
- Discharging attachment
- Through counterbond
- If attachment is regular
- No grounds to support
- Excessive attachment
- Insufficiency of bond
- How attached properties are applied after judgment becomes final
- If perishable goods previously sold, payment therefor will be
applied. If insufficient, levy of RP/PP subject to execution sale
- How to claim damages
- Applies to A, PI, Receivership, replevin
- Claim damages on bond for as long as action is pending
- Preliminary Injunction
- PI cannot be issued ex-parte, always with notice and hearing
- Period of TRO in TC is 20 days; it expires without order granting PI
- CA: period of 60 days
- SC: until further orders of the court
- Requisites:
- Clear and unmistakable right
- Substantial injury/irreparable damage (damage not ascertainable)
- Urgent necessity
- TRO can be issued ex parte by executive judge in multiple sala court or
presiding judge in single sala court (72 hours) for grave and irreparable
injury
- Can be issued by regular court judge for period of 20 days if GII
- Bond required for TRO
- How to discharge a preliminary injunction TRO
- Upon affidavits based on personal knowledge
- Damage suffered is far greater than the applicant and
posting of counterbond
- Garnishee by reason of preliminary attachment need not be party to
action; upon service of writ of garnishment, garnishee becomes virtual
party/forced intervenor by operation of law
- TRO/WPI cannot enjoin final and executory judgment
- TRO cannot be issued for indefinite period of time
- Receivership
- Grounds:
- Property is subject of material injury in danger of being
wasted/dissipated (memorize)
- Stipulated in mortgage agreement
- Security in mortgage has depreciated in value; not enough to
support obligation
- Only provisional remedy that can be applied for even after final
judgment/after it has become final and executory; purpose to aid in
execution and preserve property
- How to dissolve receivership
- By counterbond or there is no reason for receivership
- Duty of nature of receiver is administrator; manage properties and affairs;
court approval required to dispose
- Action for accounting cannot be basis for receivership
- Replevin
- Contents: IMPT
- Who can apply: registered owner or possessor
- Unlawful deprivation (replevin will not lie if deprivation is lawful)
- FMV of property: basis of bond which is double the value
- When to apply for it: anytime before an answer (but you can apply for
attachment if there’s ground; you cannot recover the very personal
property)
- Redelivery bond:
- Sheriff should hold onto PP for period of 5 days
- If counterbond not posted, it will be delivered to applicant. But if
redelivery bond posted, property will be returned
Special Civil Actions
- Interpleader
- To prevent party filing action from being vexed/harassed
- Filed by party having no interest, or having interest but not inconsistent
with claim of others ? for courts to determine their rights
- Declaratory relief
- Court of original jurisdiction is RTC
- REMEMBER Sec. 1, before breach has taken place
- Will, deed, writen instrument, law, gov’tal regulation, ordinance - for court
to interpret/determine validity
- If there’s a breach, action converted from special civil action to ordinary
civil action
- Declaratory relief proper even for interpretation of internal administrative
rule
- Action for Quieting of Title/Removal of Cloud
- Removal of cloud (remain to be in possession, holder of title): action
instituted in RTC
- Reformation (mutual mistake) RTC
- Consolidation by reason of pacto de retro sale: RTC (judicial
consolidation)
- R64 Review of Decisions of COA and COMELEC
- File petition for Certiorari before SC
- But period is only 30 days
- Certiorari
- Can be used to question judicial/quasi-judicial/ministerial actions of
government
- Executive order not subject to petition for certiorari; should be
subject of declaratory relief
- Prohibition
- Not available if action sought to be enjoined has already been performed
(fait accompli)
- Will only lie if no appeal or any plain, speedy, adequate remedy
- Mandamus
- For ministerial acts; required by law to be performed
- Will not lie if act requires discretion
- Quo Warranto
- Grounds:
- Usurpation
- Deemed to have forfeited office by reason of an act (ex. General
of PH military who pledges allegiance to US)
- Association that represents to be a corporation when in fact it is
not duly incorporated
- QW is remedy to non-use of legislative franchise
- Who can file at the first instance? Government, solicitor general if directed
by the President, solicitor general upon a sufficient complaint, solicitor
general upon the relation of another person; or aggreived party can
institute action against usurper (S5) but case will be dismissed if it
appears that petitioner is not entitled to the office
- Expropriation (R67)
- Two stages: expropriation and determination of just compensation
- Who can file; government/any instrumentality/local government
- owner/lawful possessor can be defendant in an action
- Government can not proceed with expropriation before order of
expropriation issued; or if there is no longer public use for the
expropriation
- RTC has original jurisdiction, whether real/personal property
- If there are multiple claimants over property, expropriation can proceed
for purpose of determining who is entitled to just compensation
(preliminary determination) but not to determine ownership
- Court can take immediate possession; REMEMBER:
- If under R67, not government infrastructure project: deposit with
depositary bank the assessed value (S2)
- If gov’t infrastructure project: government should pay full/proferred
value=zonal valuation; but court will proceed with determining just
compensation
- If local gov’t effecting expropriation: deposit 15% of FMV; can only
expropriate based on ordinance. However, gov’t cannot acquire
property by way of just passing an ordinance
- Order of expropriation subject to appeal; record on appeal 30 days
- Partition
- All co-owners are indispensable parties; failure to implead an IP renders jt
null and void
- Venue is dictated by nature of property (if real property, where located)
- If some heirs excluded from partition, they have a remedy because
“paramount rights cannot be prejudiced”
- Distinguish from extrajudicial partition/settlement: no action;
requisites: no will, no debts, guardians ad litem if there are minor;
excluded heir can file a claim within period of 2 years from
distribution or 1 year from removal of disability (if under civil
interdiction/insane)
- If there is a stipulation in action for partition (parties agree), there is a
need for publication (bec already equivalent to extrajudicial partition)
- Mortgage
- Equity of redemption: period of not less than 90 days nor more than 120
days
- For judicial foreclosure: award of court is to pay, and only if you
cannot pay within 90-120 days will there be foreclosure (aka
equity of redemption)
- If law provides for longer period, longer period will prevail (ex.
Lender is a bank and borrower is a natural person, redemption
period is 1 year; if borrower is a juridical entity, 90 days or
registration of certificate of sale, whichever comes first)
- Ejectment R70
- Judgment of ejectment is appealable by Notice of Appeal; MR is
prohibited pleading
- In action for unlawful detainer, demand letter (to vacate) is required. If no
demand letter, complaint will be dismissed
- Most impt allegation in forcible entry: prior physical possession, force,
intimidation, strategy, stealth
- Period to file UD: 1 year from dispossession (or from last demand in UD)
- There is a provisional determination of ownership to determine who is
entitled to possession
- Contempt
- Direct
- Act of disrespect of court in presence of court or so near a judge
- Summary; no notice and hearing
- Remedy is certiorari or prohibition
- Bond required because immediately executory
- Indirect
- Remedy is an appeal
- How to initiate:
- Verified complaint filed and docketed separately
- Upon court’s formal charge, motu proprio
- Note: You cannot file motion for indirect contempt in same
court
- Grounds for indirect contempt (S3, IMPT)
- Failure to comply with writ, order, process of court
- Civil and Criminal
- Civil: violation of the rights of parties
- Criminal: offense against state
- Administrative contempt: rule on contempt in the administrative agency;
ROC has suppletory application; action will be instituted in RTC where
contemptuous act was committed
- Other notes:
- ROC will not strictly apply in administrative cases; thus there is no reason to
compel use of deposition/written interrogatories