Professional Documents
Culture Documents
After dust is formed, control systems are used to Why Dust Control?
reduce dust emissions. Although installing a dust
control system does not assure total prevention of dust
emissions, a well-designed dust control system can
protect workers and often provide other benefits,
such as-
Preventing or reducing risk of dust explosion or
fire
33
34 Dust Control Handbook
0 Dust collection
0 Wet dust suppression
a Airborne dust capture
Dust collection systems use ventilation principles to
capture the dust-filled airstream and carry it away
from the source through ductwork to the collector.
The dust collection system, also known as the local Dust CollectionSystems
exhaust ventilation system, is one of the most effec-
tive ways to reduce dust emissions.
0 A dust collector to remove the dust from the air Corn onents of
Dust Col Pection System
l A fan and motor to provide the necessary exhaust
volume and energy
Q = AV
where:
0 Static pressure
0 Velocity pressure
0 Total pressure
()
2
VP = v direction of airflow, and is always positive in sign. VP
4005
is also commonly measured in inches of water.
Total pressure is the algebraic sum of SF and VF. It is Total Pressure (TP)
the pressure required to start and maintain the air- TP = SP + VP
flow. Total pressure = Static pressure + Velocity pressure
1.91" 1.11" 0.80"
'\'hen air enters a suction opening, the airstream Vens Con trscts
gradually contracts a short distance downstream and, Vena contracta plane
as a result, a portion of the static pressure is con-
verted into velocity pressure. The plane where the
diameter of the jet is the smallest is known as the
vena contracta. After the vena contracta, the air-
stream gradually expands to fill the duct and, conse-
quently, a portion of the velocity pressure is converted
into static pressure. Both of these pressure conver- VP
sions are accompanied by losses, which reduce the
airflow. The amount of airflow reduction can be TP
SP
defined by a factor known as the coefficient of entry,
",.. "
'-e. Note: The VP increases gradually to reach highest value at vena
contracta plane, while the SP decreases gradually and
reaches lowest value at the same plane.
Vena Contracta
This represents the percentage of flow that will occur "Ce", Coeffieient of Entry
into a given exhaust hood based on the static pressure
developed by the hood. It is defined as the actual rate c = Actual airflow
of flow caused by a given static pressure compared to e Theoretical airflow
the theoretical flow that would result if there were no
losses due to pressure conversions.
Related to the Ce is the term "hood entry loss" or "h " Hood Ent ry Loss
e ,
The exhaust hood is the point where dust-filled air Exhaust Hood
enters a dust collection system. Its importance in a
dust collection system cannot be overestimated. It
must capture dust emissions efficiently to prevent or
reduce worker exposure to dusts. The exhaust hood-
Downdraft Hood
I I
Canopy Hood
0 Air induction
0 Control velocity
Qind = 10 x Au x ;t~
V~
where:
QE
where:
Exhaust
Control Velocity -In the control-velocity approach,
the exhaust hood is designed before exhaust volumes
Capture hood are computed. This approach is based on the principle
Source that, by creating sufficient airflow past a dust source,
the dusty air can be directed into an exhaust hood.
Control-Velocity Approach The air velocity required to overcome the opposing air
Dust Control Systems 41
Q = v x (10X2 + A)
where:
0 50 100
% of diameter
Unflanged opening--
7.5% of velocity "reaches" out to
approximately 95% of duct diameter distance.
<::
0 50 100
% of diameter
Flanged opening--
7.5% of velocity "reaches" out to
approximately 125% of duct diameter distance.
Ductwork Design
0 Material buildup
0 Duct damage
0 Corrosion of ductwork
l Duct leakage
I-
PI&lDuct
Hood-Entry Losses - A loss in pressure occurs when
C, -
End
0.72
air enters a suction or hood opening. This loss is
indicated by the coefficient of entry for the hood fCe).
Several examples of entry coefficients are illustrated.
I
Mnct Bnnch
D- I=+
Flmqd
CO .
Duct
End
0.02
Losses from Special Duct Fittings - When air travels
through the various duct fittings, such as elbows, “y”
Booth branches, enlargements, or contractions (tapers), pres-
C, - 0.02
sure losses occur. Pressure loss across these fittings is
ira-
expressed in one of two ways:
Orifka Plu*
Flmwd Duct 0 As a fraction of the velocity pressure
IMmlv slot Typnl
Booth Plus Aound,d
C, - 0.00 khan duct
wk&~do1 wbdtyl
c,
EIIII~IWX
= 0.97
0 In terms of equivalent feet of straight duct (of
the same diameter) that will produce the same
Hood-Entry Losses pressure loss as the fitting
Dust Control Systems 47
A‘
P ; :_
:
A
pJ I, OOLIO’M‘“I ‘SSOl NOUOIY,
OP owr
•~INOIPLES
I OESHN
Example Problem
This example, which illustrates the balancing of ductwork, is provided to aid understanding of
the detailed ductwork design procedure. In the example, the balancing of ductwork is based on
the air balance without blast gate method, and the resistances are based on the equivalent foot
basis. This approach is one of several available for balancing ductwork; however, an
understanding of this approach should facilitate understanding of other approaches. Information
on other approaches can be obtained from the sources provided in the references.
The Problem
Information Provided
%
machine
hood
Process Flowsheet
Dust Control Systems 51
Details of Operation
Minimum Exhaust
Description Number Volume (cfm)
Bag Machine Hood 1 800
Conveyor Transfer Point 2 300
Fan 4
Descriptionof Nlaterial
b-c 1,100 50 -- I.
c-d 1,100 0 l-9o” --
d-e 1,100 30 -- --
52 Dust Control Handbook
After gathering the above information you can start to fill in the worksheet table:
Repeat this procedure for each branch circuit, when you reach a junction of two branch circuits the
balanced pressure method requires that the governing static pressure at the junction be within S?fi of one
another. If this is not the case, as in our example, then design parameters must be altered to achieve
balance. Several things might be done:
- lower the resistance in branch 2-b by increasing duct size, or reducing air volume
- increase the resistance in branch l-b by decreasing duct size or increasing air volume
Engineering and economic judgment should be used to make this decision; for instance, whether you can
use additional air volume or your fan cannot handle the static pressure may dictate the way in which you
choose to balance your system. In the example we -chose to increase the resistance in branch l-b to
achieve balance. This step may require several trial. and error attempts until you become familiar with
the process.
Continue filling in the work sheet using the governing static pressure column to keep a running total of
pressure (note that pressures in series circuits are additive; in parallel circuits they are not). The
governing pressure in that branch is used.
Finally, as the air exits the exhaust stack of the fan, the velocity pressure of the air is converted back to
static pressure and results in the recovery of that energy which is subtracted from the governing static
pressure of the system.
WORKSHEET
Example Problem
r
I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18, 19
From From Co1 7 From Cd 10 From From 100 co113 co1 12
Sect. Fig. + Fig. Co1 6 Fig. + At junction
5 4 co1 9 3 Co~ll tt 1 Co114 Co:15 Co;16
100 Fig.
i 2
l-b 6.5 .27 800 - 3500 30 14 44 2.7 1.19 .77 .5 1.5 1.16 2.35
2-b 4 .08 300 - 3750 35 x 12 47 4.25 2.0 .88 .4 1.4 1.23 3.23 3.23
Note: Column 17, resistance of branch l-b is less than 2-b; this will cause more air than required at the bag machine hood, and less than required al
the conveyor transfer point. To balance the flows, recalculate branch l-b using smaller duct diameter. (Or, alternatively, reduce resistance in 2-1:
provided duct velocities do not drop below design criteria.)
l-b 6.0 .196 800 - 4681 30 2 - 14 44 4.2 1.85 1.61 .5 l.s i.52 -3.37 3.37 809
Branches l-b and 2-b are now within +5% and are considered balanced.
b-c 7.5 .31 1100 1100 3548 50 - 1 7 57 2.3 1.31 .78 - - - -4.68
3 Collector resistance from manufacture 2.9 -6.68
c-d 7.5 .31 1100 1100 3548 3: k 0 10 :: 2.3 .23 .78 - - - -6.91
d-e 7.5 .31 1100 1100 3548 0 0 2.3 .69 .78 - - - +7.60
Fan SP = sum of resistarks to fan - VP (VP converted to SP)
= 7.60 ~78
= 6.82” WG Q 1100 cfm
64 Dust Control Handbook
Wet Dust Suppression Wet dust suppression systems wet the entire product
stream so that it generates less dust. This also
Systems prevents dust from becoming airborne. Effective
wetting of the material can be achieved by-
Impact Velocity
Wet suppression systems fall into three categories: Types of Wet Dust
SuppressionSystems
Plain Water Sprays - This method uses plain
water to wet the material. However, it is diffi-
cult to wet most surfaces with plain water due to
its high surface tension.
Advantages Disadvantages
l It is probably the least expensive method l Water sprays cannot be used for products
of dust control. that cannot tolerate excessive moisture.
l The system is simple to design and l Water sprays cannot be used when tem-
operate. peratures fall below freezing.
l When good mixing of water and material l Freeze protection of all hardware is
can be achieved, dust generation can be necessary.
reduced effectively.
l Careful application at transfer points that
l Enclosure tightness is not essential. precede a screen is required to prevent
blinding.
l This method is used when surfac- 0 Capital and operating costs are higher
tants are tolerated but excessive mois- than water-spray systems.
ture is not acceptable.
0 Careful application at transfer points that
l In some cases, dust control efficiency is precede a screen is required to prevent
higher than with plain water sprays. blinding.
l Equivalent efficiency is possible 0 Equipment such as the pump and the pro-
with less water. portioning equipment used to meter the
flow of surfactant require maintenance.
Foam
l When good mixing of foam and product 0 Operating costs are higher than with fine-
stream can be achieved, dust control ly atomized water-spray systems.
efficiency is greater than water with
surfactants. 0 The product is contaminated with
surfactants.
l Moisture addition is usually less than
0.1% of the material weight. 0 Careful application at transfer points that
precede a screen is required to prevent
blinding.
Dust Control Systems 57
The collision between dust particles and water drop Factors Affecting Collision
lets occurs due to the following three factors:
0 Impaction/interception
0 Droplet size/particle size
0 Electrostatic forces
Impaction/Interception
-G?
._5 -.
Pnl”:*wh ,___--_.;, , ._;
dust particle may strike the droplet directly, or barely *____--_/
Particle Trajectories
Droplets and particles that are similar in size have the
best chance of colliding. Droplets smaller than dust Around a Water Droplet
particles or vice versa may never collide but just be
swept around one another.
Electrostatic Forces
Types of Airborne Dust Airborne dust capture systems can be simple or quite
Capture Systems complex. Basically, they fall into two broad groups:
Advantapes Disadvantages
Water requirements are low-typically 5 0 Tight enclosures are needed for effective
to 20 gal/h per nozzle. system operation.
Moisture addition to the product is quite 0 The system may not be effective either in
low-typically less than 0.1% of the highly turbulent environments or when the
material weight. dust dispersion rate is more than
200 ft/min.
The material is not chemically contami-
nated. 0 Requires good droplet to particle size
match for effective control.
The system can be economical.
Electrostatic fogs can be effective if the 0 These systems are not recommended for
dust cloud carries predominantly positive underground coal mines or other gassy
or negative charges. applications where explosions can be trig-
gered by sparks.
The material does not become chemi-
cally contaminated. 0 Capital costs are high.
Once the nozzle is selected, its spray pattern and area Water Flow and Compressed
of coverage can be used to determine water flow rate
and/or compressed airflow rates and pressure require- Airflow Rates
ments. This information is normally published by the
nozzle manufacturer. These must be carefully coordi-
nated with the maximum allowable water usage.
Water flow rates will be highly variable depending on
the size and type of material, the type of machinery,
and the throughput of material.
Pump HP = 1.40 x p x q
m
where: