Professional Documents
Culture Documents
M.V. Deepa
Graduate School of Business (GSB), University Sains Malaysia
Gandhinathan Annamalai
Northern Corridor Implementation Authority
© The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access by Taylor’s Press.
Abstract: Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) play an important role in the economic
growth of nations. Despite the increasing number of SMEs, many firms find it difficult to
survive beyond the first five years. New venture firms face many challenges in today’s
globalized world. The purpose of this research is understood the internal drivers for new
venture growth in Malaysian Manufacturing SMEs. The findings of this empirical study show
that less innovation strategy and market disorientation were negatively influencing the new
venture growth in Malaysian manufacturing SMEs. While companies have no control over
the external factors, by focusing on the internal factors that enhance growth, companies can
work towards surviving, sustaining and enhancing firm performance.
1. INTRODUCTION
In the 21st Century, industrialization plays a key role in the economic growth of
nations. Globalisation and rapid growth of technology have paved way of many
entrepreneurial ventures and start-up companies(Kirkley & Kirkley, 2016). Small
and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) provide employment opportunities, lead
innovation and propel economic growth (Ipinnaiye, Dineen, & Lenihan, 2017;
Rigtering, Kraus, Eggers, & Jensen, 2014). Ninety-seven percent of business
establishments in Malaysia are small and medium enterprises (SMEs). SMEs are
responsible for nearly 36% of the country’s GDP, 65% of the country’s employment,
and nearly 18% of Malaysia’s exports. As the pillar of Malaysian economy SMEs
will accelerate economic growth and propel Malaysia into a developed high income
nation by 2020 (Dai, Maksimov, Gilbert, & Fernhaber, 2014). The Government’s
goal is for SMEs to contribute to 41% of Malaysia’s GDP and 23% exports by 2020
(Worldbank, 2016).
Table 1. Number of companies that have closed down from 2012 to 2014
Year 2014 2013 2012
Companies wound up 1,744 2,581 2,419
Companies struck off
29,180 23,849 14,673
(Section 308)
Source: (SSM, 2014)
affecting new venture survival (Larrañeta, Zahra, & Galán González, 2014). The
purpose of the current study is to understand the influence of internal drivers on
new venture growth in Malaysian manufacturing companies.
2. LITERATURE REVIEW
Radzi, Shamsuddin, and Wahab (2017) have highlighted lack of financial capital,
inadequate human resources, pace of technological advancement, difficulty to
penetrate potential markets and competition from across the globe as some of the
main challenges faced by Malaysian SMEs. Aziz, Rahim, and Bukhari (2017) in their
research, emphasised the need to understand measures that paved way for small
businesses to sustain and lead to new venture success. In studying a sample of small
rural entrepreneurs in Malaysia, the external factors are more dominant than the
internal ones in contributing to the business success (Kader, Mohamad, & Ibrahim,
2009). However, the scope of this study will focus on other internal factor prevalent
in literature in related settings, as these are controllable by the firms. While the SMEs
do not have any means to influence the external factors, it is vital for Malaysian
SMEs to understand the internal factors that influence business growth (Moorthy
et al., 2012). New venture SMEs play a major role in economic growth by creating
jobs, triggering innovation and encouraging entrepreneurial skills (Ipinnaiye et al.,
2017). Despite the economic contribution of SMEs and new ventures, the
probability to wind up within first few years of operation is high. We must admit
that young companies are fragile and the failure rate of start-ups remains high over
time (Coad, Frankish, Roberts, & Storey, 2016). Most often than not, new ventures
face difficulties in adopting to market conditions and managing their resources
(Täuscher & Abdelkafi, 2017). When compared with established firms, new
ventures face more uncertainties and their survival becomes questionable in the
absence of growth (Larrañeta et al., 2014). While established businesses focus on
sustaining their growth, new venture businesses primarily focus on survival and
avenues for growth (Glowik & Sadowski, 2014). The new venture growth literature
has primarily discussed why some ventures grow while others fail. However, the
literature has largely disregarded the manner in which the growth has been attained
(Kirkley & Kirkley, 2016). Surviving, registering growth and staying competitive is
a big challenge to both SMEs and established firms (Wang, Thornhill, & De Castro,
2017). The decisions entrepreneurs make in the venture’s early years have profound
long-lasting implications for performance (Yamakawa, Peng, & Deeds, 2015).
Growth can occur in many different aspects of a firm’s operations, such as its cash
flow, net income, customer base, sales, employment, and market share (Umrani,
Johl, & Ibrahim, 2017). Different new venture businesses measure growth in varied
ways. However, most research studies have sales, market share and number of
employees to measure growth in new venture firms (Gilbert et al., 2006).
An increasing number of new venture firms are internationalizing their
business operations early in their life cycles (Fernhaber, 2013). Internationalization
is a major element of a firm’s growth (Dangi, Ismail, Johari, & Noor, 2017). Schulz,
Borghoff, and Kraus (2009) argued that most of the SMEs involved in
internationalization generate their earnings more in global markets rather than in
their home countries. In recent years, attention has begun to shift towards better
understanding of the implications for new venture internationalization on
performance (Love & Roper, 2015). Multiple studies have concluded a positive
relationship between internationalization and performance (Khavul, Pérez-
Nordtvedt, & Wood, 2010). A study by Coeurderoy, Cowling, Licht, and Murray
(2012) found a positive, linear relationship between new venture internationalization
and survival. According to Sleuwaegen and Onkelinx (2014), firms starting to
internationalize early show superior growth rates in international markets. Running
a business without any external capital (financing) shows that the business is in a
good financial condition. External financing may increase the risk of bankruptcy
due to inability to settle the debt within agreed period. Capital is the key element in
both strength and weakness among SMEs. Running the business without any
external capital (loan) reduces the financial risk of the business. Research also
revealed capital insufficiency is the crucial problem among SMEs, which might be
due to the difficulties to obtain external fund. Although the results should be taken
with caution, nevertheless financial management is vital in order to face new
business challenges as well as for the survival of the business in the future (Salikin,
Ab Wahab, & Muhammad, 2014).
Start-ups traditionally rely on insider finance as it is harder to obtain external
finance (Fraser, Bhaumik, & Wright, 2015). Carpenter and Petersen (2002)
examined a large panel containing over 1600 small manufacturing firms and results
indicate that the growth of most small firms is constrained by the availability of
internal finance. Financial capital provides the flexibility needed to support the
firm’s strategic endeavours (Love & Roper, 2015). The growth rate of small firms
depends upon the availability of internal finance. Lack of financial support and
access to internal finance is a major problem to low new firm creation, survival and
growth (Olawale & Garwe, 2010). Studies for smaller firms also suggest that internal
funding was more important for growth in smaller firms than for larger companies
(Brinckmann, Salomo, & Gemuenden, 2011). New venture team attributes have
been identified as critical resources for new venture growth and success (Unger,
Rauch, Frese, & Rosenbusch, 2011). The competencies of entrepreneurial team are
a unique, valuable, and difficult to imitate resource that can provide the basis for
new ventures’ competitive advantages and enables new ventures to discover and
exploit opportunities, plan strategies, and acquire additional resources. The
education, experience, knowledge, and skills of new venture team is likely to
positively affect new venture performance (Jin et al., 2016). Prior industry
experience provides new venture teams with knowledge of markets, suppliers, and
industry conditions, and it has been found to have a significant relationship with
new venture success (Rauch & Rijsdijk, 2013). Literatures revealed that competency
are positively related to venture growth (Jin et al., 2017).
An important factor contributing to the success of new ventures is the level
of their innovativeness (Taghizadeh, Rahman, & Ramayah, 2017). Because of the
extreme international competition, demanding and fragmented markets, and fast
changing technologies, innovation has been considered as one of the utmost factors
of new venture firms’ success (Shapiro, Tang, Wang, & Zhang, 2015). Innovation
has been considered as the most critical source of strategic change within the
business environment, which helps firms to sustain in the marketplace. SMEs have
a positive relationship with innovation and firm performance (Sun & Du, 2011).
According to Umrani et al. (2017) new venture enterprises need innovation to
create new markets, to increase product quality, expand product range, reduce
labour costs, improve production processes and materials; reduce environmental
damage and energy consumption; and replace products or services. The positive
role of firm innovativeness on firm performance has been supported by many
theoretical and empirical studies of new product developments, technology
adoption and diffusion, process improvement, and innovation (Keskin, 2006).
Market orientation refers to the organization wide generation, dissemination, and
responsiveness to market intelligence (Martin & Javalgi, 2016). According to
Mokhtar, Yusoff, and Ahmad (2014), market orientation is an important internal
influence and has been shown to have a positive relationship to organizational
performance. In a study of 170 SMEs from various industries in Sabah, Malaysia,
Hassan and Sulaiman (2016) noted that market orientation has a significant
relationship with SMEs success. According to Kader et al. (2009), business
positioning and market orientation is very important internal factor in ensuring
business success among SMEs. Munoz, Welsh, Chan, and Raven (2015) in a study
on factors affecting microenterprise success in Malaysia commented that marketing
orientation would help new ventures predict business performance.
Based on the literature review, a conceptualized research model is proposed for this
study and is presented in Figure 1. This research model is supported by market
based view and resource based view theory. The independent variables of the study
are business positioning, capital investment, entrepreneurial ability and marketing
knowledge. The dependent variable is new venture growth.
4. HYPOTHESES DEVELOPMENT
5. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The proposed study has adopted a quantitative research approach using the mail
questionnaire survey recommended by Sekaran and Bougie (2010). The primary data
has been gathered and compiled specially for the research at hand. A cross-sectional
approach has been utilised in this study. In this study, the relationships between the
independent and dependent variables have been examined, hence making this study
a correlational investigation. The population of this study consists of manufacturing
SMEs in Malaysia, which have listed in business directories published by SME
Corporation Malaysia and Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers. Any
manufacturing SME registered with SME Corporation Malaysia and who obliged to
participate in the survey formed the sample for this study. For the purpose of this
study, questionnaires were mailed to SMEs in four major locations namely Penang,
Johor Bahru, Selangor and Kuala Lumpur. The minimum sample size required to
apply PLS–SEM is about 50 respondents. As part of data collection, 700
questionnaires were mailed in July & August 2017, to manufacturing SMEs in the
four major locations in Malaysia based on non-probability quota sampling. The
questionnaire was mailed with self-addressed envelope to companies based on the
listing available with SME Corporation Malaysia. The target participants of the
questionnaire were members of the senior management who represented the SME
companies with knowledge about new venture growth. 65 responses were obtained,
which achieves a 9.7% response rate. The data collected for this research were
analyzed using two statistical softwares; IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences
(SPSS) version 23 and Smart Partial Least Squares (SmartPLS) in Structural
Equation Modelling (SEM) version 3.0. SPSS was used to analyze and summarize
the respondents’ demographic profile whereas SmartPLS was used to examine and
conclude on the hypothesis developed in the earlier chapter based on the theoretical
framework and its variables.
Close to half of the respondents are SMEs located in Selangor (43.1%), followed by
about one third of the respondent SMEs from Kuala Lumpur (30.8%). About 11
(16.9%) companies responded from Penang. There were a handful of six (9.2%)
SMEs that responded from Johor Bahru. There were 20 SMEs (30.8%) which have
been established for the past 3-4 years. Slightly more than one fourth (27.7%) of the
companies that responded have been around for 5 – 6 years. 15 (23.1%) companies
that responded for the current study have been in existence for 7- 8 years. There
were 12 (18.5%) SMEs that are newbies in the industry with less than two years
presence. About one third (33.8%) of the companies had 76-125 employees, while
18 (27.7%) companies had 26 – 75 employees. One-fourth (24.6%) of the SMEs
who participated in the survey had 126 - 200 employees. Very few respondent
companies accounting to 9% had less than 25 employees who worked for them.
While 30 (46.2%) respondent firms had annual net revenue of RM 5 million to RM
25 million, 13 (20%) respondent firms reported annual net revenue lesser than or
equal to RM 5 million. About 22 (33.8%) companies reported annual net revenue
of more than MYR 25 million. Of the companies that responded, 28 (43.1%) SMEs
that responded were Private Limited Companies. About 12 (18.5%) companies were
partnership firms followed by 11 (16.9%) companies as joint venture; eight (12.3%)
companies had limited liability partnership and six (9.2%) firms held sole
proprietorship. In terms of position held by the representatives of the company, 20
(30.8%) were chief executive officers, 16 (24.6%) respondents were senior vice
presidents, 12 (18.5%) respondents are vice presidents, eight (12.3%) respondents
are Chief executive officers, seven (10.8%) respondents were Managing directors.
The other group with two (3.1%) respondents included chief financial officer and
director one each. About 15 (23.1%) respondents were electrical and electronics
manufacturers, seven (10.8%) respondents each were from Food & Beverage
products and palm oil & products followed by six (9.2%) companies from Rubber
industry. Petrochemical products, textile & apparels and machinery& engineering
sub sectors each had five (7.7%) respondents who participated in the survey. Metal
& metal products; paper, printing & publishing and plastic products had three (4.6%)
respondents each. Wood & wood products and leather subsectors had two (3.1%)
companies who participated in the survey. Footwear and construction related
material subsectors had one (1.5%) respondent each who participated in the survey.
The respondents of the current study rated the average scores from 4.36 to
2.82 out of 5.00 for the independent variables and an average of 5.61 out of 7.00
for the dependent variable. However, mean values of all the variables have been
found to be above the midpoint 2.50 and 3.50 for Likert scale 1-5 and 1-7
respectively. Among the variables measured on Likert scale 1-5, market
disorientation has the highest mean score of 4.46 with a standard deviation of 0.429,
which reflects high agreement among the respondents. On the other hand, lack of
internal financing has the lowest mean value of 2.82 with a standard deviation of
0.651, indicates that the respondents have slight differences in their opinions. Since,
the standard deviation is less than one for all independent variables, there is more
personal agreement (with less variation) among the respondents. The dependent
variable, new venture growth (NVG), measured on a 7-point Likert scale has a mean
value of 5.61, well above the average of 3.5 on a 7-point Likert scale. Interestingly,
the study sample reflected new venture growth amongst Malaysian manufacturing
SMEs. The VIF for each latent variable was less than 5, collinearity among the
predictor variables is not an issue in the structural model, and we can go ahead with
further analysis. The analysis was carried out to assess the extent to which data was
subjected to common method bias of the respondents. In the present study, 31
components were extracted for 31 question items of the model variables using
principal component analysis in the first factor run. The 31 extracted had Eigen
value more than one and the total variance explained by the 13 factors (whose Eigen
value is greater than one) was 81.519 percent and is well above the prescribed
specification of 50 percent. Since a single factor did not emerge and the first factor
did not account for most of the variance, this study concludes that the common
method bias was not a major concern. The respondents were able to understand the
questions well and respond without any bias.
This study applies Partial Least squares (PLS) using Smart PLS Version 3.0
and non-parametric bootstrapping (Wetzels, Odekerken-Schröder, & Van Oppen,
2009) with 5000 replications. First to be analysed was convergent validity which
comprises a latent variable, main loadings, and question items, Composite Reliability
(CR) and average variance extracted (AVE). The main loading for each question
item is above the cut-off point of 0.5 in the present study, as the main loading ranges
from 0.949 to 0.648. 10 question items were deleted due to main loading less than
0.708 for any further analysis. The Average Variance Extracted (AVEs) value ranged
from 0.796 to 0.599. All independent variables had Cronbach alpha greater than
0.80 as shown in Table 2, thereby satisfying the rule of thumb recommended by
Hair, Ringle, and Sarstedt (2013). The Cronbach alpha value for DV is slightly less
which could be improved by including more samples.
7. DISCUSSIONS
Despite the various measures taken by government agencies and SME Corporation
to ensure the sustenance of SMEs, only 32.31% of the surveyed 65 Malaysian
manufacturing SMEs considered themselves to be have growth in their new venture
business. This clearly brings to light the need for new venture businesses to
understand the internal and external factors that can help companies to survive and
grow. In comparison to large corporations and established firms, new ventures face
multiple challenges to start the business, survive and grow. The establishment of a
new venture is a cumbersome process right from obtaining finance to marketing the
product. Unlike established firms, new venture firms face myriad of obstacles to
finance their ideas. With little or no business achievement to back them up, new
venture SMEs face difficulties in borrowing money to fund projects and build their
credibility with banks or venture capitalists. Firms that are able to sustain themselves
with alternative methods of financing like internal financing are in a better position
to survive and grow. The relatively low number of firms reporting growth could be
because competition among SMEs is very high. While new venture businesses try
to capture the market through new product development, exploring new horizons,
stiff competition from other SMEs and established firms, makes it all the more
difficult for new venture firms to grow.
Business ventures with creativity and innovation survives the most, others
have limited options to survive and grow in the market place. The increasing labour
costs and lack of modernized technology to keep up with the rapid pace of
development is being a hindrance for new venture growth. Another key factor to
note is the limited resources available to new venture firms. Most often than not
there is a shortage of manpower, funds, technical skills and so forth making it
difficult for new ventures to grow. The findings of the study indicate that market
disorientation negatively and significantly influences new venture growth in
Malaysian manufacturing SMEs. The survey respondents strongly agreed that the
inflexibility to adapt to rapidly changing external conditions lead to market
disorientation with average mean score of 4.48 on a 5-point Likert scale. The lack
of emphasis on studying the market environment was highlighted as the next
important factor that leads to market disorientation with average mean of 4.46 on a
5-point Likert scale. Respondents have scored relatively low with average mean of
4.15 on the question item discussing the time taken by new ventures for new
product launch. Respondents opined that failure to capitalize on first mover
advantage can lead to market disorientation by scoring average mean score of 4.37
on a 5-point Likert scale. New venture firms are not sure of the market and are
unable to predict the market place. The results reflect that new venture SMEs have
limited knowledge compared to established SMEs and MNCs. There is also less
information sharing amongst new ventures. The lack of information diffusion is
creating challenges for new venture growth. Information exchange amongst SMEs
is not prevalent. There is less collaboration among the new venture firms. At times,
new venture firms tend to grab the opportunities of other new venture firms,
thereby subduing the overall growth of new venture firms.
It is worthwhile to mention that less innovation strategy negatively and
significantly influences new venture growth in Malaysian manufacturing SMEs.
New venture businesses require innovation to some extent for new product
development. The respondents surveyed for this study have opined that if routine
work is done exemplarily firms can grow even with little innovation. The results
reflect that innovation is not a hindrance to growth and generally there is an over
emphasis on innovation by market players. The survey respondents felt new creative
ideas do not help customers grow with highest average mean score of 4.54 on a
5-point Likert scale. This was supported by scoring average mean of 4.49 in
favouring that innovative ideas are not quickly implemented by new venture
businesses. The SMEs surveyed have responded that problems arising in new
venture businesses are solved using creative solutions only to a limited extent with
average mean score of 4.45. In new venture businesses, the respondents favoured
that innovation is not viewed as key to organizational survival with average mean
score of 4.22. The survey respondents felt that continuous innovative improvement
on daily business activities is not essential for new venture business with average
mean score of 4.20. The respondents favour less the need to be first in market with
new products with average mean score of 4.18 on 5-point Likert scale. The
minimum average score of 3.22 was given for question regarding using creative
methods in daily operations. Probably new ventures focus on running their business
rather than placing emphasis on innovation and creativity.
The survey findings indicate that internationalization did not positively and
significantly influence new venture growth. New venture firms are interested but
are not able to nurture international markets maybe due to funding issues, product
considerations or business positioning strategies. While new venture businesses
have interest in internationalization strategies, they might face funding problems to
grow their business in international markets. In addition, new venture SMEs at times
have to play the supporting role of doing sub contract activities for large MNCs
where opportunities to grow internationally is sparse. The respondents of this
survey highly favoured the use of both personal and business networks at the
international level to grow business with average mean score of 4.09 on 5-point
Likert scale. To some extent respondents agreed that growth target has been
achieved through internationalization with average mean score of 3.75. The survey
respondents also agreed that previous experience of internationalizing business
ventures come in handy with average mean score of 3.55. The SMEs who
participated in this survey favoured less the need to go global from inception with
low average mean score of 3.52. Surprisingly, internal financing constraint had no
positive significant influence on new venture growth in Malaysian manufacturing
SMEs. The results clearly show that SMEs found internal financing to be
insufficient to do business and systems are not supportive for funding new venture
businesses. While internal financing can grow the business at a small level, it is
insufficient to grow beyond a point and SMEs require the support of external
financing. The government agencies and banking system should encourage new
ventures to grow by providing them financial viability. All the questions on internal
financing constraint received low scores. The impact of initial financial resources on
new venture growth had the highest average mean score of 2.49 on a 5-point Likert
scale. The survey respondents have expressed that initial capital constraint hinders
performance with average mean score of 2.48. The SMEs who participated in this
research survey have given very low scores for the difficulties in procuring loans
and difficulty to sustain business without external finance. New venture team
competencies were not found to be positively and significantly influencing new
venture growth. One of the main reasons for this could be that leveraging on
competencies of NVTs is still in a primitive state in Malaysia. SMEs need to create
an environment to groom new venture team competencies. In addition, competency
is a very subjective term and more studies are required to understand the impact of
new venture team competencies on new venture growth. A competency index for
SMEs will be a useful guide. In the current survey conducted, respondents rated the
pivotal role of the new venture team in scanning & selecting opportunities as most
important factor with average mean score of 4.54 on a 5- point Likert scale. The
respondents agreed on the business networking skills of new venture teams to
ensure business survival. The SMEs surveyed for the survey acknowledged that
functional expertise of new venture teams adds value to new venture growth with
average mean score of 4.26. Interestingly, the respondents gave low ratings on prior
industry experience (average mean score of 3.38) and professional experience
(average mean score of 2.62) of new venture teams. There seems to be varied levels
of agreement on these factors by the survey respondents.
The study has contributed to the knowledge of influence of internal factors on new
venture growth in Malaysian manufacturing SMEs. However, the study covers
selected places in Malaysia like Selangor, Kuala Lumpur, Penang and Johor Bahru.
More places in Malaysia were not considered due to practical difficulties in data
collection. The number of years of establishment for a firm to qualify as potential
new venture respondent for the study was fixed as eight years based on literature
The research model of the current study can be applied to other SME sectors in
Malaysia. A comparative study of manufacturing firms and service firms will throw
more light on the differences in the relationship among the identified internal
factors for new venture growth. Similarly, the external factors influencing new
venture growth in Malaysian manufacturing SMEs can be identified and the effect
of external factors on new venture growth can be studied.
11. CONCLUSIONS
SMEs play vital role in the economic growth of many nations. However, many start-
up ventures do not survive beyond the first five years and sustain to succeed. The
current research extends the knowledge of new venture growth in Malaysian
manufacturing SMEs by developing a research model, which provides deeper
insights into the relationship between internal factors, and new venture growth.
This study was conducted amongst Malaysian manufacturing SMEs registered with
SME Corporation and which have been established during or after the fiscal year
2009. To the knowledge of the researcher, this is one of the first descriptions of
internal factors influencing firm growth in Malaysian SME manufacturing sector.
The major theoretical contributions of the present study are identifying the internal
factors that negatively influence new venture growth in the Malaysian
manufacturing SMEs using the Market Based View (MBV) and Resource Based
View (RBV) theory. Overall, the study identifies the contributing factors to improve
new venture growth and concludes that less innovation strategy and market
disorientation negatively influence the new venture growth in Malaysian
manufacturing companies.
References
Ahmad, N. H., & Seet, P.-S. (2009). Understanding business success through the
lens of SME founder-owners in Australia and Malaysia. International Journal of
Entrepreneurial Venturing, 1(1), 72-87.
Hassan, R. A., & Sulaiman, R. S. (2016). Social network and market orientation as
the key factors in determining the success of Small and Medium Enterprises
(SMEs) in Malaysia. The International Journal Of Business & Management, 4(5),
393-397.
Ipinnaiye, O., Dineen, D., & Lenihan, H. (2017). Drivers of SME performance: a
holistic and multivariate approach. Small Business Economics, 48(4), 883-911.
Jin, L., Madison, K., Kraiczy, N. D., Kellermanns, F. W., Crook, T. R., & Xi, J.
(2016). Entrepreneurial Team Composition Characteristics and New Venture
Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.
Jin, L., Madison, K., Kraiczy, N. D., Kellermanns, F. W., Crook, T. R., & Xi, J.
(2017). Entrepreneurial Team Composition Characteristics and New Venture
Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(5), 743-
771.
Kader, R. A., Mohamad, M. R. B., & Ibrahim, A. A. H. C. (2009). Success factors
for small rural entrepreneurs under the one-district-one-industry programme
in Malaysia. Contemporary management research, 5(2).
Keskin, H. (2006). Market orientation, learning orientation, and innovation
capabilities in SMEs: An extended model. European Journal of Innovation
Management, 9(4), 396-417.
Khavul, S., Pérez-Nordtvedt, L., & Wood, E. (2010). Organizational entrainment
and international new ventures from emerging markets. Journal of Business
Venturing, 25(1), 104-119.
Kirkley, W. W., & Kirkley, W. W. (2016). Creating ventures: decision factors in new
venture creation. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 10(1), 151-
167.
Larrañeta, B., Zahra, S. A., & Galán González, J. L. (2014). Strategic repertoire
variety and new venture growth: The moderating effects of origin and industry
dynamism. Strategic Management Journal, 35(5), 761-772.
Love, J. H., & Roper, S. (2015). SME innovation, exporting and growth: A review
of existing evidence. International Small Business Journal, 33(1), 28-48.
Martin, S. L., & Javalgi, R. R. G. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation, marketing
capabilities and performance: the moderating role of competitive intensity on
Latin American International new ventures. Journal of Business Research, 69(6),
2040-2051.
Mokhtar, S. S. M., Yusoff, R. Z., & Ahmad, A. (2014). Key elements of market
orientation on Malaysian SMEs performance. International Journal of Business and
Society, 15(1), 49.
Moorthy, M. K., Tan, A., Choo, C., Wei, C. S., Ping, J. T. Y., & Leong, T. K. (2012).
A study on factors affecting the performance of SMEs in Malaysia. International
journal of academic research in business and social sciences, 2(4), 224.
Munoz, J. M., Welsh, D. H., Chan, S. H., & Raven, P. V. (2015). Microenterprises
in Malaysia: a preliminary study of the factors for management success.
International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 11(3), 673-694.
Olawale, F., & Garwe, D. (2010). Obstacles to the growth of new SMEs in South
Africa: A principal component analysis approach. African Journal of Business
Management, 4(5), 729.
Radzi, N. M., Shamsuddin, A., & Wahab, E. (2017). Enhancing the Competitiveness
of Malaysian SMES Through Technological Capability: A Perspective. The
Social Sciences, 12(4), 719-724.
Rao, R. S., Chandy, R. K., & Prabhu, J. C. (2013). The fruits of legitimacy: Why some new
ventures gain more from innovation than others.
Rauch, A., & Rijsdijk, S. A. (2013). The effects of general and specific human capital
on long-term growth and failure of newly founded businesses. Entrepreneurship
Theory and Practice, 37(4), 923-941.
Rigtering, J. C., Kraus, S., Eggers, F., & Jensen, S. H. (2014). A comparative analysis
of the entrepreneurial orientation/growth relationship in service firms and
manufacturing firms. The Service Industries Journal, 34(4), 275-294.
Salikin, N., Ab Wahab, N., & Muhammad, I. (2014). Strengths and Weaknesses
among Malaysian SMEs: Financial Management Perspectives. Procedia-Social
and Behavioral Sciences, 129, 334-340.
Schulz, A., Borghoff, T., & Kraus, S. (2009). International entrepreneurship:
towards a theory of SME internationalization. International Journal of Business and
Economics, 9(1), 1-12.
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2010). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building
Approach: UK: John Wiley & Sons.
Sleuwaegen, L., & Onkelinx, J. (2014). International commitment, post-entry
growth and survival of international new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing,
29(1), 106-120.
SSM. (2014). SSM Annual Report.
Sun, Y., & Du, D. (2011). Domestic firm innovation and networking with foreign
firms in China's ICT industry. Environment and Planning A, 43(4), 786-809.
Taghizadeh, S. K., Rahman, S. A., & Ramayah, T. (2017). Innovation-Driven
Planned Behaviour Towards Achieving the Wellbeing of the Malaysian SMEs
Handbook of Research on Small and Medium Enterprises in Developing Countries (pp.
280-296): IGI Global.
Täuscher, K., & Abdelkafi, N. (2017). Scalability and robustness of business models
for sustainability: A simulation experiment. Journal of Cleaner Production.
Umrani, A. I., Johl, S. K., & Ibrahim, M. Y. (2017). Ownership Structure Attributes,
Outside Board Members and SMEs Firm Performance with Mediating Effect
of Innovation in Malaysia. Global Business and Management Research, 9(1s), 393.
Unger, J. M., Rauch, A., Frese, M., & Rosenbusch, N. (2011). Human capital and
entrepreneurial success: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Business Venturing,
26(3), 341-358.
Wan, H. L. (2016). Organisational Justice and Citizenship Behaviour in Malaysia: Springer.
Wang, T., Thornhill, S., & De Castro, J. O. (2017). Entrepreneurial orientation,
legitimation, and new venture performance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal.
Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2011). David Storey’s optimism and chance
perspective: A case of the Emperor’s new clothes? International Small Business
Journal, 29(6), 714-729.
Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path
modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and
empirical illustration. MIS quarterly, 177-195.
Worldbank. (2016). The World Bank Annual Report 2016. Retrieved from
https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/24985.
Yamakawa, Y., Peng, M. W., & Deeds, D. L. (2015). Rising from the ashes:
Cognitive determinants of venture growth after entrepreneurial failure.
Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 39(2), 209-236.