Professional Documents
Culture Documents
- --=0,,1
ULTIMATE STRENGTH OF
LATERALLY LOADED COLUMNS
by
Le-Wu Lu
FRITZ ENGINEERING 'Hassan Kamalvand
LASORATORV LIB Y
November, 1966
by
Le-Wu Lu
and
Hassan Kamalvand
November, 1966
-i-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
SYNOPSIS i
1. INTRODUCTION 1
9. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 27
10. NOTATION 28
11. FIGURES 30
12. REFERENCES 40
-ii-
1. INTRODUCTION
such a member consist of (1) the axial stress caused by the com-
pressive force, (2) the primary bending stress due to the lateral
load, and "(3) the secondary bending stress produced by the so-called
of the section and the compressive force. The last stress intro-
stability theory.l,2,3
Page
SYNOPSIS i
1. INTRODUCTION 1
9. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 27
10. NOTATION 28
11. FIGURES 30
12. REFERENCES 40
-ii-
for practical applications, and recourse is sometimes made to
this paper].9 The same case was also studied by Ketter who developed
" "
lnteractlon curves f or a varlety
"f 0 co 1 umns. 6 A ·"
n emplrlca 1 met hd
0
was proposed by Horne and Merchant using the modified Rankine For-
3
mula. The validity of the method has not been verified by com-
paring the estimated strength with "the strength determined either
-2-
laterally loaded columns investigated in the paper are shown in
section.
and numerical results are then given for columns with slenderness
are elastic and perfectly plastic and the effect of strain hardening
is neglected.
final valuesof the axial force and bending moment and that the actual
-3-
3. The effect of shear is small and can be neglected.
-4-
2. GENERAL PROCEDURE OF NUMERICAL INTEGRATION
the initial slope, eO' at the left end is assigned a specific value.
This can·be accomplished by applying a segment-by-segment integration
process, starting from the left ~nd. For the first segment, whose
length is chosen to be P , the deflection at its mid-point (shown
l
as a dot in Fig. 2) is approximately equal to
PI
8 al == eO 2 (1)
-5-
and the corresponding bending moment is
the expressions
(3 ),
8I = 8 0 - 0alP I
(4 )
-6-
(6)
and
__ P2 [Moment Due to q ]
Ma2 Po a2 + VoCP 1 + -2 ) - MO - Applied Over p 1 + P 2/ 2 (7)
The average curvature, ¢a2' of the segment is then found from the
M-¢-P relationship. The slope, deflection, and bending moment at
the end of the segment can then be determined from the equations
(8)
( 9')
and
M = po + V ( + p ) - M - [Moment Due to q ] ( 10 )
2 2 a p1 2 a Applied Over p 1 + P2
-7-
is also possible to terminate the calculations when the slope of
last set of the numerical results gives the values of the slope,
"deflection, and bending moment of the point which is located at"
made for many columns with different loading and support conditions.
this program a moment vs. curvature curve was developed for a con-
stant axial thrust by dividing the cross section into a large number
of finite elements. The strains of the elements are related to the
moment. The relationship between the applied moment and the re-
sulting curvature can therefore be found through equilibrium and
-8-
14
method and the computer program are described elsewhere.
adopted in the calculations are the same as those used in the pre-
vious studies on beam-columns. 5 ,6,13 When the resulting M-¢-P
are valid for other column sections also. It has been found in
another study that the M-¢-P curves of the 8W31 section are close
rn
to t h e average M-p-P curves 0f
mostI tsec
co umn ·lons. 15
-9-
3. METHOD OF SOLUTION AND RESULTS FOR CASE (a)
for a given column (with known length and cross sectional proper-
Once the complete response curve is obt~ined, the maximum load can
the column has a zero slope at the midspan. The distance from the
left end of the column to the point of zero slope obviously will
-10-
vary with the assumed initial slope, eO.
tion. Both the slenderness ratio and the radius of gyration used
p = r if 0.8 M '
pc -
<IMI< 0.9 M
pc
(lIb)
segment the bending moment MlO is found to be 0.85 Mpc ' then the
-11-
.,
4 M M
R = _--=--p_c
L
_ pc
-sr (12)
pc20
-12-
to some assumed 8 , a maximum A is eventually reached. At this
0
point a further increase in eO causes a decrease in A. Although
plastic moment, Mpc ,of the section before the slope of the de-
from which the lateral load versus end slope relationships given in
line is first drawn from the point where A equals 30. The points
of intersection of this line with the various 8 0-A curves give the
(labelled 60) can be constructed. The peak of the curve gives the
ultimate load of the column. The lateral load is nondimensionalized
with respect to the individual plastic load, R ' not with respect
pc
-13-
to the reference load Rpc20 ' as was done in Fig. 3 •. This permits
a closer examination of the effect of instability on the strength
ticular column and gives the combinations of axial force and lateral
load that can be safely supported by the column. The lateral load
-14~
4. METHOD OF SOLUTION AND RESULTS FOR CASE (b)
moment is" generally higher at the midspan than at the two ends.
some yielding would also occur near the ends, no plastic hinges
-15-
The maximum loads determined for the five selected
(13)
end columns are usually stiffer and have less deflections at the
-16-
5. METHOD OF SOLUTION AND RESULTS FOR CASE (c)
Va at the left end depends not only on the lateral load, q, but
also on the span length, L. It is not possible to fully specify
relationship.
8M
w - pc (14)
pc -7
To determine the end slopes, a number of trial eO values are first
-17-
selected and the numerical integration process is carried out
column are found to be 0.0144 rad. and 0.0224 rad. These results
determine two points on the load versus end slope curve (Fig. 8).
procedure for other specified lateral loads. When all the five
determined.
computations made for the five columns. The maximum lateral load
of loading.
-18-
6. METHOD OF SOLUTION AND RESULTS FOR CASE Cd)
is the end slope eO. The problem is thus seen to.be the same as
that for Case (c) columns and the method of solution described
to heavy axial load, the bending moment at the center may be ampli-
moment may become larger than the moment at the two ends, and initial
cases, limited yielding can also take place at the ends, no plastic
analysis. This case is shown as Case II in Fig. 10, and the known
wL
conditions are: eO = 0, q = w, and V a = -
2
. It can be easily
-19~
problem to be solved is essentially the same as that involved in
resulting slope 8 . From this plot the correct MO value which pro-
c
duces zero slope at the midspan can be determined.
16M
wp =--p
2
(15)
1
-20-
condition. The same. curves can also be compared. with the. inter-
-21-
7. COMPARISON OF RESULTS 'WITH INTERACTION FORMULAS
stresses in the elastic range, studies have shown that they also
16 17
provided good estimates of the ultimate strength.' These
studies were made primarily for columns which are loaded by com-
study will be made for the four cases of laterally loaded columns
1.0 (16a)
P +
ew
m = 1.0 (16b)
p-
Cl'
( 1 - p)
p 'w p
e
-22-
for Case (c) and Case Cd) columns. There are three new terms,
P
e
= elastic critical load for buckling in the
herein
P
Case (a) C
m
= 1 - 0.2 p- (17a)
e
P
Case (b) C
m
= 1 - 0.6 p- (17b)
e
Case (c) C
m = 1.0 (17c)
P
Case (d) C
m =1 - 0.4 -
Pe (17d)
for the four types of columns are compared in Fig. 12 with the inter-
-23-
In general, the interaction formulas are seen to give good pre-
dictions for all the case~ investigated. For Cases (a) and (c),
low axial force range, but the difference is usually small. The
same trend can also be observed for Case (b) and Case Cd) columns,
-24-
8• SUMMARY ANP CONCLUSIONS
Fig. 1. For each case the general method was applied to obtain
about the major axis of the cross section. It has been assumed
-25-
'-'""1
ratio:
(18)
has the same distribution pattern over the cross section and the
-26-
9. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
from which the subject matter studied in the paper was developed.
Subcorrunittee.
-27-
10. NOTATION
C
m = a coefficient contained in the AISC interaction formula
L = length of column
M = bending moment
R
pc
= maximum value of R according to plastic theory. The
R
p
= maximum value of R according to simple plastic theory
v = shear force
w
pc = maximum value of w according to plastic theory (See R )
pc
wp = maximum value of w according to simple plastic theory
0 = deflection
-28-
e = slope
Itj~t.
-29-
R R
p
---0 1 O~
p
e-.~ t ~~
1- L j r. L
~
(0) (b)
w w
-
p
----
p
--- 1-
p
---
p
1- L
(c)
-I L
(d)
-I.
Fig, 1 Cases of Laterally Loaded Colurrms
Studied in the Paper
£; ~------""'-~----"'-""-....a.--..L---I~""--L...
p -..-
Mo ' t ~
VI I on
01 I I
1- I I I P
I I I :
I I I I V.
I ,I I I : I I n
~"r P3 -1-------- 1
Fig. 2 Numerical Integration Scheme
-30-
0.040
0.035
0.030
80
(Radi~ns)
0.025
I pP = 0.4
y
I
~
~c?o
0020
I
LN
I-J
I
0.015
0.010
0.005
o 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55
A
1.0
+- ·8 . R
40P~.~-p
20=
0.8
0.6
JL
Rpc
0.4 lao
: = 0.4
0.2 Y
Fig. 4 ,Lateral Load Vs. End Slope Curves for Five Columns
$ubjected to Concentrated Load
-32;
1.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,
R
':.. uoo----,----o 2
1- L.
-I
T Major Axis
-~-Bending
0.5
o 0.5 1.0
R
Rp
-33-
I~O ...-------------------.
0.5
L
-=
r
o 0.5 1.0
R
Rp
-34-
0.028
~ =0.4 0.016
Y
0.012 '-0.0144
-'=r-- = 60
JL
wpc
= 0.66 0.008
0~004
l.0
w
p-~-p
0.8 .
a
40 0
60
0.6
80
0.4
0.2 ~ =0.4
Y
-35-
1.0 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,
P
~
w
rrrrr.-rrr-rrTl
--
p
T . MO.jOr Axis
-~- Ben,ding
0.5
o 0.5 1.0
w
-36-
w
(I)
an
Fig. 10 Deformation Modes of Case Cd) Columns
, - 37-
1.0-------------------------,
P.......~L--I-~..&.....I-...I-.oI-...a....-...t-~~ p
L
-I
_T_ Major Axis
~ Bending
0.5
-'r=-= 2
~ ----I-----+-- 4
60
- - + - - + - - - 80
10
o 0.5 1.0
-38-
l.
R R
P--e I o-p p p--~ I p_P
~ L
Per I· L
·1 ~r
0
I.. ·1
...L
L
T r
D
0.5 o 20 A 0.5 o 20
• 40 .6.
0
• 40
.6 60
A 80
o 100
D
, A
A
60
80
o '00
~e
~
1.0
VI
p~! II I II 11 I III 116-P p__ ~ 1111111111111 ~_p
p
P
Pcr
[]
I. L .1 ~r
I.. L .. I
~L 0 L
T 0
T
0.5 o 20 0.5 o 20
• 40 o 40 .0
.6 60 /:}. 60
A 80 6- 80
-39-
"C.----.-.- - - - - - - - - - - . - -..- . - - - ..- . -.... ------------------------------_~~
12 • REFERENCES
4. AISC
COMMENTARY ON THE SPECIFICATION FOR THE DESIGN,
FABRICATION, AND ERECTION OF STRUCTURAL STEEL FOR
BUILDINGS, AISC, New York, N. Y., 1963
5. Galambos, T. V. and Ketter, R. L.
COLUMNS UNDER COMBINED BENDING AND THRUST, Trans.
ASeE, Vol. 126, Part I, Proc. Paper 1990, 1961, p. I
6. Ketter, R. L.
FURTHER STUDIES ON THE STRENGTH OF BEAM-COLUMNS,
Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, Vol. 87,
No. ST6, Proc. Paper 2910, August 1961, p. 135
9. Wright, D. T.
THE DESIGN OF COMPRESSED BEAMS, The Engineering Journal,
Canada, Vol. 39, February, 1956, p. 127
-40-
10. von Karman, T. ..
UNTERSUCHUNGEN DBER KNICKFESTIGKEIT, Mitteilungen uber .
Fors chungsarbeiten , herausgegeben vom Verein Deutscher
Ingenieure, No. 81, Berlin, 1910
11. Chwalla, E.
AUSSERMITTIG GEDRUCKTE BAUSTAHLSTABE MIT ELASTISCH
EINGESPANNTEN ENDEN liND VERSCHIEDEN GROSSEN
ANGRIFFSHEBELN, Der Stahlbau, Vol. 15, Nos. 7 and 8,
- 1937, pp. 49 ~nd 57
12. Oja1vo, M.
RESTRAINED COLUMNS, Thesis presented to Lehigh University'
at Bethlehem, Pa. in 1960 in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
(University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Mich.)
13. Ketter, R. L., Kaminsky, E. L., and Beedle, L. S.
P~ASTIC DEFORMATION OF WIDE-FLANGE BEAM-COLUMNS,
Transaction, ASCE, Vol. 120, 1955, p. 1028
14. Parikh, B. P.
ELASTIC-PLASTIC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF UNBRACED MULTI-
STORY STEEL FRAMES, Thesis presented to Lehigh University
at Bethlehem, Pa., in 1966, in partial fulfillment of the
requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
(University Microfilms, Inc-, Ann Arbor, Mich.)
15. Lu, L. W.
COLUMNS, Lecture No.4, in Lecture Notes on "PLASTIC
DESIGN OF MULTI-STORY FRAMES," Lehigh University, 1965
16. Galambos, T. V.
COMBINED BENDING AND COMPRESSION, Chapter 11, in
ffSTRUCTURAL STEEL DESIGN," Ronald Press, New York,
1964
-41-