Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Development Management - Sanidad
Development Management - Sanidad
ASSIGNMENT
3. Do you think non-economic factors like culture, religion, political stability, climate change and
others affect the development management of a country?
Definitely yes. Such non-economic factors are still part of the society being the subject of
development management. These factors cannot be ignored and independently treated upon
during the process. Culture and religion of the people in a community has an important impact
on how the community behave and act toward activities and processes of development because
their culture and religion shapes the identity of the society as whole, since societies have
considerable potential for economic development, such as discipline and positive attitudes
towards work, capital accumulation, production, and the quantity and quality of consumption are
in a better position to become economically developed than those which are deprived of these
attitudes. On the part of religion, there are a wide range of religious world views and various
religious attitudes to material life. Some religions have considered economic activities as an
important aspect of life, though they are a means for spiritual growth rather than an aim and, in
contrast, some religions recommend their followers to have an ascetic life. Moreover, political
stability as well greatly affects development management of a country through its planning stages
On the other hand, Economic development is a normative concept. It applies in the context
of people's sense of morality (right and wrong, good and bad). The definition of economic
development given by Michael Todaro is an increase in living standards, improvement in self-
esteem needs and freedom from oppression as well as a greater choice. The most accurate
method of measuring development is the Human Development Index which takes into account
the literacy rates & life expectancy which affects productivity and could lead to Economic
Growth. It also leads to the creation of more opportunities in the sectors of education,
healthcare, employment and the conservation of the environment. It implies an increase in the
per capita income of every citizen.
Economic Growth does not take into account the size of the informal economy. The informal
economy is also known as the black economy which is unrecorded economic activity.
Development alleviates people from low standards of living into proper employment with
suitable shelter. Economic Growth does not take into account the depletion of natural resources
which might lead to pollution, congestion & disease. Development however is concerned with
4. How do you assess or evaluate the management of economic development? When do we say
that an organization is able to attain its development objectives?
Management of economic development can be assessed and evaluated through various process
of monitoring whether or not the organization is able to attain its development objectives. We
may infer that development is both a physical reality and a state of mind in which society has,
through some combination of social, economic, and institutional processes, secured the means
for obtaining a better life. Whatever the specific components of this better life, development in
all societies is said to have attained its development objectives if it is able to increase the
availability and widen the distribution of basic life-sustaining goods such as food, shelter, health,
and protection, able to raise levels of living, including, in addition to higher incomes, the provision
of more jobs, better education, and greater attention to cultural and human values, all of which
will serve not only to enhance material well- being but also to generate greater individual and
national self-esteem and be able to expand the range of economic and social choices available to
individuals and nations by freeing them from servitude and dependence, not only in relation to
other people and nation-states, but also to the forces of ignorance and human misery.
Michael Todaro’s objectives of development are all geared toward the betterment of the quality
of human life more than just economic growth per se. His three objectives focus on (1) life
sustaining goods, (2) levels of living, and (3) freedom. The first objective is “to increase the
availability and widen the distribution of life-sustaining goods such as food, shelter, health and
protection.” Provision of basic needs is almost always the first reason why man needs a job, or
in a larger scale, why a country finds ways to improve or develop its economy. A country should
always seek to provide life sustaining goods to its people first before anything else since they are
one of the most important resources for further economic development. The second objective is
“to raise levels of living, in addition to higher incomes, the provision of more jobs, better
education, and greater attention to cultural and humanistic values, all of which will serve not only
to enhance material well-being but also to generate greater individual and national self-esteem.”
If the first objective deals somewhat with survivability, this second objective deals with
sustainability. This second objective of Todaro is saying that economic development should not
only seek to “give a man a fish” (first objective) but move from that to “teach a man to fish” so
that “you feed him for a lifetime.” Take note that included here is not just the raising of incomes
or provision of more jobs but most importantly, the provision of better education. Eventually, the
more educated people are in a country, the more likely for that country to develop. The third
objective is “to expand the range of economic and social choices available to individuals and
nations by freeing them from servitude and dependence not only in relation to other people and
nation-states but also to the forces of ignorance and human misery.” The last objective talks
about how economic development liberates the people by providing the tools they need to break
free from “servitude and dependence” and from “the forces of ignorance and misery.” A truly
economically developed country is not seen in the country’s economy in itself but one has to look
at the lives of the people. Do they have the choice to improve their lives if they want to? Do they
have the tools to be able to do this?
9. What is globalization? Why is it a growing trend? Do you agree that not opening up means
being left behind?
12. In a developing country like the Philippines, what do you think is the best economic growth
model in which the country would adopt to reach economic take-off? Defend your answer.
Since the early years of the post-World War II period, the Philippine government has prepared
socioeconomic plans to guide its development. These plans spelled out the visions of development
of the population, the goals to be attained, the strategies for attaining them, and the instruments
for the goals’ successful realization. On the average, there have been two such plans every
decade. Representative plans include the Rehabilitation Plan for the 1950s; the Socio-Economic
Development Plan for the 1960s; the Development Plan for the 1970s; the Poverty Eradication
Plan for the 1980s; the Human Development Plan for the 1990s; and the Good Governance Plan
during the initial years of the 21st century. No doubt these plans have been the products of the
innate intelligence and perspicacity of the planners, especially in the early years, but perhaps,
they have been influenced by growth models.
In other words, all these economic growth models have greatly influenced the development
planning and implementation in the Philippines. At bottom, the general direction of strategy as
well as the relative effectiveness of instruments for the achievement of goals can be deduced
from growth models. Whatever economic growth model to adopt, the success depends on the
systematic and intelligible construction of the plan which arise from orderliness of thought. In the
Philippines, planning and implementing authorities correctly regard the plan as “indicative” and
not “commanding,” a program for non- interference in the dynamics of market forces. However,
noninterference has often been interpreted to mean “to do nothing at all.” As a result, the
situation is not that there is “too much” intervention in the workings of the market arising from
imperatives of development plans but that there is “too little.” What seems needed today is
intervention at two levels: articulation and actual execution. The private sector, domestic and
foreign, if not the people as a whole, certainly can benefit from a more careful articulation of
policies, plans and programs. The high authorities can reinforce this through moral suasion and
demonstration. On their part, the line departments must perform their duty with greater