Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Ammonium nitrate (AN) is crystallized along with copper oxide, titanium dioxide,
and lithium fluoride. Thermal kinetic constants for the decomposition reaction of the
samples were calculated by model-free (Friedman’s differential and Vyzovkins
nonlinear integral) and model-fitting (Coats-Redfern) methods. To determine the
decomposition mechanisms, 12 solid-state mechanisms were tested using the Coats-
Redfern method. The results of the Coats-Redfern method show that the decompo-
sition mechanism for all samples is the contracting cylinder mechanism. The phase
behavior of the obtained samples was evaluated by differential scanning calorimetry
(DSC), and structural properties were determined by X-ray powder diffraction
(XRPD). The results indicate that copper oxide modifies the phase transition beha-
vior and can catalyze AN decomposition, whereas LiF inhibits AN decomposition,
and TiO2 shows no influence on the rate of decomposition. Possible explanations
for these results are discussed.
Supplementary materials are available for this article. Go to the publisher’s online
edition of the Journal of Energetic Materials to view the free supplemental file.
Introduction
As an inorganic oxidizer, ammonium nitrate (AN) finds application in composite
propellant formulations, especially in gas generator systems and automotive air
bags. The potential environmental effects of the exhaust products of conventional
ammonium perchlorate (AP) containing rocket propellants have been assessed by
different investigators [1]. There is increasing interest in developing ecofriendly solid
propellant systems [2]. AN is receiving attention as a possible substitute for the
oxidizer AP. However, applications of AN in highly reliable systems are limited
because of the near–room temperature crystallographic phase transition, low
energetics, hygroscopicity, and inability for sustained burning.
146
Ammonium Nitrate 147
obtained from the manufacturer (Merck) was used for the thermogravimetric and
kinetic analyses.
Thermal Analysis
The AN mixtures were thermally cycled on a Mettler-Toledo DSC 1 from 20 to
100 C at a heating rate of 5 C=min. The cycling sequence was 20–100 C ! 100–
20 C ! 20–100 C ! 100–20 C ! 20–100 C. The samples were held for 2 min at
isothermal conditions at the final temperature before reversing the temperature.
For each experiment, 2 mg of sample was loaded into an aluminum pan, covered
with a pierced lid, and the purge gas (nitrogen) flow rate was maintained at
100 mL=min.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) measurements were carried out on a Met-
tler-Toledo TGA=DSC 1. In all experiments, samples of 1–2 mg were heated in open
90-mL alumina pans in a flowing nitrogen atmosphere (30 mL=min). The protective
gas used for the balancing chamber was also nitrogen, at a flow rate of 30 mL=min.
where
Z T
E
IðE; TÞ ¼ exp dT: ð4Þ
0 RT
b in Eq. (3) represents the heating rates, the indexes i and j denote the set of
experiments performed under different heating rates, and n is the total number of
experiments performed.
The third-degree approximation (Eq. (5)) proposed by Senum and Yang [22] was
used in the present study to evaluate the integral Eq. (4).
expðxxÞ x2 þ 10x þ 18
f ðxÞ ¼ 3 ; ð5Þ
x x þ 12x2 þ 36x þ 24
where
150 A. A. Vargeese et al.
E E
x¼ and IðE; TÞ ¼ f ðxÞ: ð6Þ
RT R
MatLab 7.0.1 was used to perform the kinetic computations.
If the correct g(a) is used, the plot of ln[g(a)=T2] against 1=T should give a
straight line with a high correlation coefficient in a linear regression analysis from
which the values of E and A can be derived. Table I (see online supplement) shows
different expressions of g(a) for 12 different solid-state mechanisms used in this study
for the estimation of reaction mechanisms using the Coats-Redfern method. The
TGA curve obtained at a heating rate of 5 C=min was used for the computation
of E and A using this method.
morphology (Fig. 3) with a size of 10 mm, and the XRPD reflections were found to
be in good agreement with JCPDS 89-3610 (LiF). In general, the catalytic activity of
the catalysts for thermal decomposition reactions was dependent on the material
property of the catalyst: surface area, shape, spatial distribution, surface compo-
sition, electronic structure, thermal and chemical stability, etc.
in bracket) 13.3 (43), 30.6 (48), 39.3 (79), 50.3 (38), and 50.9 (40) were observed, indi-
cating its presence. To avoid any ambiguity, peaks within 0.2 of the AN 2h values
were assigned to AN reflections. The peak at 2h ¼ 13.3 (011) can be assigned to
CTAN, because AN has only one reflection at 17.9 (001) in the 2h range of 10 to
20. These results showed the presence of crystallized AN along with the in situ formed
CTAN. Because the quantity of CuO added was 1% by weight, it was expected that
the amine complex concentration in the system will also be of the same order, and this
might have resulted in the low-intensity peaks. The XRD peak positions of the
AN-CTAN mixture showed small variations from the JCDPS values, probably due
to the elongation of the cell lengths originating from CTAN as an impurity
accompanied by internal stresses or stacking faults. The AN-TiO2 and AN-LiF
showed only reflections that correspond to AN.
The formation of CTAN can be explained as follows. The addition of black CuO
powder to the hot acidic AN solution (pH ¼ 4.5) could result in hydrolyzation,
leading to the formation of Cu(OH)2 [25]. This formation was indicated by the
change in the solution color to light blue, because the Cu(OH)2 has a pale blue color.
In the presence of NH3, produced due to the dissolution of AN, the Cu(OH)2 may be
converted to CTAN [26,27]. In the initial stages, most of the Cu will be converted to
Cu(OH)2 and remain in hydroxide form. Concentrating the solution by evaporation
shifts the equilibrium toward the formation of CuðNH3 Þ2þ 4 , and this was visually
observed by the more deep blue color compared to the hydroxide. At this stage,
the uncreated AN crystals began precipitating out, and this complex was homo-
geneously mixed with the AN crystals. The final AN-CTAN mixture collected was
of deep blue color.
Reportedly, the CuO and AN reaction initially results in the formation of
[Cu(NH3)2](NO3)2, the copper diamine complex, and at room temperature the
diamine complex slowly converts to the tetramine complex and stabilizes AN [24].
The possibility of incorporation of Cu2þ, interstitially or substitutionally, in the
crystal lattice and the subsequent modification of the phase transition of AN was
also suggested [24]. However, the substitution mechanism is favored only if the host
cations have a cationic radii within 15% of the cation being replaced. NH4þ has
a reported ionic radius of 1.48 Å, and the replacement of this NH4þ by Cu2þ
(0.73 Å) might not be favored.
2HNO3 Ð NOþ
2 þ NO3 þ H2 O ðR2Þ
NH3 þ NOþ
2 ! N2 O þ H3 O
þ
ðR3Þ
Activation energy may be correlated to bond energy data and is generally considered
as a measurement of the energy barrier to a controlling (rate limiting) bond rupture
or bond redistribution step [30]. The activation energy provides reasonable
information about critical energy needed to start the decomposition reaction of
the compound. Hence, a reduction in the activation energy of the decomposition
reaction can be directly correlated to the catalytic activity of the added compounds.
Though the reported activation energy for AN decomposition varies from 86.2 to
206.9 kJ=mol, previous researchers in this area agree that the overall decomposition
reaction of AN is described by the first-order reaction kinetics [31]. A recent work
reported that the thermal gasification of AN has a similar kinetics in the solid and
liquid phases and requires an activation energy of 90 kJ=mol [10].
Figure 7. Activation energy (Ea) dependencies for AN mixtures, computed using Vyazovkin’s
method [21].
reaction and release Cu [32]. However, it is quite likely that CuO is quickly formed in
reaction with the nitric acid. An earlier investigation on the dissociation products of
CTAN, which accounts for CuO as the major residue [33], supports this presump-
tion. Because CuO is often used as a decomposition catalyst for AP and AP-based
propellants [34], it does not seem unreasonable to assume that CuO can act as a cata-
lyst for the AN thermal decomposition reaction. Thus, the Cu could enhance the
decomposition reaction by reacting early with the nitric acid, leading to the forma-
tion of CuO and the subsequent reaction of CuO with the remaining AN. Hence, due
to the interaction of Cu and CuO, decomposition products are removed at a faster
Figure 8. Isoconversional plots of samples based on Freidman’s method [20] (color figure
available online).
Ammonium Nitrate 157
Figure 9. Activation energy (Ea) dependencies for AN mixtures, computed using Friedman’s
method [20].
rate, and as per Le Chatelier’s principle, the equilibrium (R1) is displaced to the
right, which in turn will encourage the dissociative decomposition of AN. Possibly
this catalytic activity would have resulted in the lowering the activation energy
required for the AN-CTAN decomposition reactions.
Conclusions
AN crystallized along with CuO, TiO2, and LiF exhibited thermal behavior and
decomposition kinetics different from that of pure AN. The aqueous media reaction
of AN and CuO resulted in the formation of a mixture of AN and CTAN. The DSC
thermal cycling of the AN-CTAN mixture exhibited only one transition at around
55 C in the temperature range 20–100 C, indicating a modification of the phase tran-
sition behavior. The model-free and model-fitting kinetic analyses showed signifi-
cantly lower activation energy for the decomposition reaction of AN crystallized
with CuO. On the other hand, no significant variation in activation energy was
observed for AN crystallized with TiO2, and a higher activation energy was observed
for AN crystallized with LiF. From the 12 possible reaction models analyzed using
the Coats-Redfern method, a contracting cylinder mechanism seems to be the mech-
anism responsible for the decomposition process. In the case of CuO-modified AN,
Ammonium Nitrate 159
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Dr. V. N. Krishnamurthy and Professor S. P. Tewari for fruitful
discussions, DRDO for financial support to ACRHEM, and A. Rajesh, CIL,
University of Hyderabad, for collecting the thermal analysis data.
References
[1] Bennett, R. R., J. R. Whimpey, R. Smith-Kent, and A. J. McDonald. 1997. Effects of
rocket exhaust on the launch site environment and stratospheric ozone. International
Journal of Energetic Materials and Chemical Propulsion, 4: 92–105.
[2] Oommen, C. and S. R. Jain. 1999. Ammonium nitrate: A promising rocket propellant
oxidizer. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 67: 253–281.
[3] Hendricks, S. B., E. Posnjak, and F. C. Kracek. 1932. Molecular rotation in the solid
state. The variation of the crystal structure of ammonium nitrate with temperature.
Journal of the American Chemical Society, 54: 2766–2786.
[4] Marino, R. A. and B. Suryanarayana. 1985. Investigation of phase transitions in
ammonium nitrate by nitrogen-15 nuclear magnetic resonance. Journal of Energetic
Materials, 3: 57–74.
[5] Vargeese, A. A., S. S. Joshi, and V. N. Krishnamurthy. 2010. Use of potassium
ferrocyanide as habit modifier in the size reduction and phase modification of ammonium
nitrate crystals in slurries. Journal of Hazardous Material, 180: 583–589.
[6] Engel, W. 1973. Phase stabilization of ammonium nitrate. Explosivstoffe, 21: 9–13.
[7] Morozov, I. V., Y. M. Korenev, and S. I. Troyanov. 1996. Synthesis and crystal structure
of new amminecopper (II) nitrates: [Cu(NH3)2](NO3)2 and [Cu(NH3)](NO3)2. Zeitschrift
für Anorganische und Allgemeine Chemie, 622: 2003–2007.
[8] Morosin, B. 1976. The crystal structure of copper (II) tetraamine nitrate. Acta
Crystallographica Section B: Structural Science, 32: 1237–1240.
[9] Lang, A. J. and S. Vyazovkin. 2008. Ammonium nitrate–polymer glasses: A new concept
for phase and thermal stabilization of ammonium nitrate. The Journal of Physical
Chemistry B, 112: 11236–11243.
[10] Vyazovkin, S., J. S. Clawson, and C. A. Wight. 2001. Thermal dissociation kinetics of
solid and liquid ammonium nitrate. Chemistry of Materials, 13: 960–966.
[11] Vargeese, A. A., K. Muralidharan, and V. N. Krishnamurthy. 2011. Thermal stability of
habit modified ammonium nitrate: Insights from isoconversional kinetic analysis.
Thermochimica Acta, 524: 165–169.
[12] Rudloff, W. K. and E. S. Freeman. 1970. Catalytic effect of metal oxides on thermal
decomposition reactions. II. Catalytic effect of metal oxides on the thermal decompo-
sition of potassium chlorate and potassium perchlorate as detected by thermal analysis
methods. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 74: 3317–3324.
[13] Manelis, G. B., G. M. Nazin, Y. I. Rubtsov, and V. A. Strunin. 2003. Thermal
Decomposition and Combustion of Explosives and Powders. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
[14] Kwoka, Q. S.M., P. Kruusb, and D. E.G. Jonesc. 2004. Wettability of ammonium nitrate
prills. Journal of Energetic Materials, 22: 127–150.
[15] Vyazovkin, S., A. K. Burnham, J. M. Criado, L. A. Pérez-Maqueda, C. Popescu, and
N. Sbirrazzuoli. 2011. ICTAC kinetics committee recommendations for performing
kinetic computations on thermal analysis data. Thermochimica Acta, 520: 1–19.
160 A. A. Vargeese et al.
[16] Jia, W., E. Reitz, P. Shimpi, E. G. Rodriguez, P. Gao, and Y. Lei. 2009. Spherical CuO
synthesized by a simple hydrothermal reaction: concentration dependent size and its
electrocatalytic application. Material Research Bulletin, 44: 1681–1686.
[17] Mahshid, S., M. Askari, and M. S. Ghamsari. 2007. Synthesis of TiO2 nanoparticles by
hydrolysis and peptization of titanium isopropoxide solution. Journal of Material
Processing Technology, 189: 296–300.
[18] Sarraf-Mamoory, R., S. Nadery, and N. Riahi-Noori. 2007. The effect of precipitation
parameters on preparation of lithium fluoride (LiF) nano-powder. Chemical Engineering
Communications, 194: 1022–1028.
[19] Brown, M. E. 2001. Introduction to Thermal Analysis: Techniques and Application.
New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
[20] Friedman, H. L. 1964. Kinetics of thermal degradation of char-forming plastics from
thermogravimetry. Application to a phenolic plastic. Journal of Polymer Science, Part
C: Polymer Symposium, 6: 183–195.
[21] Vyazovkin, S. 1997. Evaluation of activation energy of thermally stimulated solid-state
reactions under arbitrary variation of temperature. Journal of Computational Chemistry,
18: 393–402.
[22] Senum, G. I. and R. T. Yang. 1977. Rational approximations of the integral of the
Arrhenius function. Journal of Thermal Analysis, 119: 445–447.
[23] Coats, A. W. and J. P. Redfern. 1964. Kinetic parameters from thermogravimetric data.
Nature, 201: 68–69.
[24] Owens, F. J. 1982. Electron paramagnetic resonance study of the role of CuO additives
in altering phase transition behaviour of ammonium nitrate. Journal of Applied Physics,
53: 368–371.
[25] Palmer, D. A. and P. Benezeth. 2004. Solubility of copper oxides in water and steam.
In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on the Properties of Water and
Steam, August 29–September 3, Kyoto, Japan.
[26] Lane, R. W. and H. J. McDonald. 1946. Kinetics of the reaction between copper
and aqueous ammonia. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 68: 1699–1704.
[27] Ziemniak, S. E., M. E. Jones, and K. E. S. Combs. 1992. Copper (II) oxide solubility
behaviour in aqueous sodium phosphate solutions at elevated temperatures. Journal of
Solution Chemistry, 21: 179–200.
[28] Rosser, W. A., S. H. Inami, and H. Wise. 1964. Decomposition of liquid ammonium
nitrate catalyzed by chromium compounds. Transactions of the Faraday Society, 60:
1618–1625.
[29] Sinditskii, V. P., V. Y. Egorshev, A. I. Levshenkov, and V. V. Serushkin. 2005.
Ammonium nitrate: Combustion mechanism and the role of additives. Propellants,
Explosives, Pyrotechnics, 30: 269–280.
[30] Schmid, R. and V. N. Sapunov. 1982. Non-formal Kinetics: In Search of Chemical
Reaction Pathways. Weinheim, Germany: Verlag Chemie GmbH.
[31] Gunawan, R. and D. Zhang. 2009. Thermal stability and kinetics of decomposition
of ammonium nitrate in the presence of pyrite. Journal of Hazardous Materials,
165: 751–758.
[32] Gorbunov, V. V. and L. F. Shmagin. 1972. Burning of copper (II) tetramine salts.
Combustion, Explosion and Shock Waves, 8: 429–431.
[33] Southern, T. M. and W. W. Wendlandt. 1970. The thermal decomposition of metal
complexes—XX: Some amine copper (II) nitrate complexes. Journal of Inorganic and
Nuclear Chemistry, 32: 3783–3792.
[34] Solymosi, F. and E. Krix. 1962. Catalysis of solid phase reactions effect of doping of
cupric oxide catalyst on the thermal decomposition and explosion of ammonium
perchlorate. Catalysis, 1: 468–480.
[35] Il’chenko, N. I. 1976. Catalytic oxidation of ammonia. Russian Chemical Reviews,
45: 1119–1134.
Ammonium Nitrate 161
[36] Vargeese, A. A. and K. Muralidharan. 2011. Anatase–brookite mixed phase nano TiO2
catalyzed homolytic decomposition of ammonium nitrate. Journal of Hazardous
Materials, 192: 1314–1320.
[37] Kubota, N. and N. Hirata. 1985. Inhibition reaction of LiF on the combustion of
ammonium perchlorate propellants. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 20:
2051–2056.
[38] Jankovic, B., B. Adnadevica, and J. Jovanovica. 2007. Application of model-fitting and
model-free kinetics to the study of non-isothermal dehydration of equilibrium swollen
poly (acrylic acid) hydrogel: Thermogravimetric analysis. Thermochimica Acta, 452:
106–115.
[39] Vyazovkin, S. 2001. Modification of the integral isoconversional method to account for
variation in the activation energy. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 22: 178–183.
[40] Budrugeac, P., D. Homentcovschi, and E. Segal. 2001. Critical analysis of the isoconver-
sional methods for evaluating the activation energy II. The activation energy obtained
from isothermal data corresponding to two successive reactions. Journal of Thermal
Analysis and Calorimetry, 63: 465–469.