Peer Evaluation for Research Project 2 Peer Evaluation in Research Project 2

Name of Evaluator: _____________________________________________

Name of Evaluated: _____________________________________________
Put a checkmark on the appropriate rating you want to give to your partner.
1. Participation in
developing ideas and
planning
2. Willingness to discuss the
ideas of partner
3. Cooperation with other
group members
4. Interest and enthusiasm
in the research
5. Completed his/her
assigned tasks as part of
the group
6. Submitted his/her
assigned tasks and
outputs in a timely
manner
7. Contributed to the edits
and revisions of the paper
8. His/her portion/s of the
task for the paper were
well-written, of good
quality and is aligned to
the research paper's
purpose and objectives
9. Responded to messages
(e-mail, chats, telephone,
etc) regarding group
issues and tasks in a
timely manner
10. Participation in
leading/facilitating
discussion
11. Knowledgeable with
his/her assigned tasks
and outputs, his/her role
and dutifully fulfills that
role
12. Reliable with meeting
deadlines for work in
progress and for the final
paper
13. Ease and familiarity with
the discussion material
14. Works harmoniously and
dynamically with his/her
partner
15. Overall contribution to the
development of the
research paper and
output
I would work with this person
in a group/partnership again
Name of Evaluator: _______________________________________________
Name of Evaluated: ______________________________________________
Put a checkmark on the appropriate rating you want to give to your partner.
Always Usually Seldom Never Always Usually Seldom Never
(4 pts) (3 pts) (2 pts) (1 pt) (4 pts) (3 pts) (2 pts) (1 pt)
16. Participation in
developing ideas and
planning
17. Willingness to discuss the
ideas of partner
18. Cooperation with other
group members
19. Interest and enthusiasm
in the research
20. Completed his/her
assigned tasks as part of
the group
21. Submitted his/her
assigned tasks and
outputs in a timely
manner
22. Contributed to the edits
and revisions of the paper
23. His/her portion/s of the
task for the paper were
well-written, of good
quality and is aligned to
the research paper's
purpose and objectives
24. Responded to messages
(e-mail, chats, telephone,
etc) regarding group
issues and tasks in a
timely manner
25. Participation in
leading/facilitating
discussion
26. Knowledgeable with
his/her assigned tasks
and outputs, his/her role
and dutifully fulfills that
role
27. Reliable with meeting
deadlines for work in
progress and for the final
paper
28. Ease and familiarity with
the discussion material
29. Works harmoniously and
dynamically with his/her
partner
30. Overall contribution to the
development of the
research paper and
output
 Yes I would work with this person  Yes
 No in a group/partnership again  No

Reflection Reflection

A. What did you learn from the experience?
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
A. What did you learn from the experience?
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________

B. What would you have done differently if given the opportunity?
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
B. What would you have done differently if given the opportunity?
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________