Cac HW NS MDN 4G SHB2 Nae 089 L900 20200218 V2

1 (66)
Prepared No. Program Cluster Name

Rendhita/ Jhon P Seahawk NS_MDN_4G_SHB2_NAE_089
Approved Checked Date : Rev Reference
Waqas/ Kiki Chandra 2020-02-18
CLUSTER ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE (CAC)

LTE JPS PROJECT
Area Northern West
City Medan (Outer)
Cluster Name NS_MDN_4G_SHB2_NAE_089 (L900)
Abstract
This document is to provide report for XL Axiata on Provisional Acceptance Cluster based for commercial LTE launch.
PT.HUAWEI SOM
TECH INVESTMENT PT. XL AXIATA Tbk
${Level2}
Name :Edy Swasono Name :
Date : Date :
2 (66)

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION 6
1.1 Introduction 6
1.2 General Site Information 6
1.2.1 New Site Database 6
1.2.2 Neighbors First Tier 7
1.2.3 Punch List Database 7
1.3 Drive Test Methodology “Stationary Assessment” 8
1.4 FTP Server Information 8
1.5 Drive Test tool and Detail 8
2 MAP INFORMATION 9
2.1 Map Information 9
2.2 Drive test route, cluster border and coverage prediction 9
3 Performance Result 12
3.1 NMS KPI LTE Site Level 12
3.1.1 Availability 12
3.1.2 Accessibilityh
Error! Bookmark not defined.
3.1.3 Retainability 12
3.1.4 TX_RANK (Info Only) 12
3.1.5 Integrity 13
3.1.6 Utilization 14
3.1.7 CSFB 14
3.1.8 Traffic and Capacity 14
3.2 NMS KPI LTE CLUSTER 15
3.2.1 Availability 15
3.2.2 Accessibility 15
3.2.3 Retainability 15
3.2.4 Integrity 15
3.2.5 Utilization 16
3.2.6 CSFB 16
3.2.7 Traffic and Capacity 17
3 (66)

PRB Utilization 17
3.3 Drive Test KPI 22
3.3.2 Accessibility 22
3.3.3 CSFB 22
3.3.4 Integrity 22
3.3.5 Mobility 23
3.3.6 RSRP IDLE Drive Test 24
3.3.7 SINR-DL Dedicated Drive Test 26
3.3.8 PCI Plot 28
3.3.9 RSRQ 30
3.3.10 PS DL Throughput 31
3.3.11 PS UL Throughput 32
3.3.12 Transmission Modes Plot 33
3.3.13 Channel Bandwidth Plot 34
3.3.14 Event Failed 34
3.3.15 Sleeping Cell Identification 34
3.3.16 External Interference Identification 35
3.3.17 Cell Overshooting 35
3.3.18 Bad Spot analysis and Improvement 36
3.3.19 Optimation Result 38
3.3.20 Physical tuning summary 40
3.3.21 NMS KPI RAN LTE site Level 40
4 KPI 2G & 3G 46
4.1 List of 2G, 3G & LTE sites inside LTE Polygon 47
4.2 NMS 2G 47
4.3 NMS 3G 47
4.4 MRR 3G 48
5 FEATURE 48
Justification Ping Latency 32 bit and 1000 bit 51
5.1.1 Ping Latency 32bit 51
5.1.2 Ping latency 1000bit 52
5.2 Justification Bad spot 53
4 (66)

5.3 Justification Exclution 63

5.4 KPI 2G & 3G 64
5.5 AOR Report 64
Site Audit Database 64
6 Conclusion 66
5 (66)

Table of Figure
Figure 1: Cluster Map Information ......................................................................................................................... 9
Figure 2: Drive Test Route ....................................................................................................................................... 9
Figure 3: Coverage Prediction using Planning Tools & DT Route .......................................................................... 10
Figure 6: RSRP IDLE Drive Test Result ................................................................................................................... 24
Figure 7: RSRP CDF Distribution ............................................................................................................................ 25
Figure 8: SINR-DL Dedicated Drive Test Result ..................................................................................................... 26
Figure 9: CDF Plot on SINR-DL Drive Test .............................................................................................................. 27
Figure 15 PCI Plot .................................................................................................................................................. 28
Figure 17 CQI Distribution Result .......................................................................................................................... 29
Figure 16 RSRQ Drive Test Result .......................................................................................................................... 30
Figure 18 PS DL Throughput Drive Test Result ...................................................................................................... 31
Figure 19 PS UL Throughput Drive Test Result ...................................................................................................... 32
Figure 21: Channel Bandwidth Plot ...................................................................................................................... 34

6 (66)

1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Introduction
Provisional Acceptance shall be conducted after all the sites on air within cluster. If there
are some issues that halt the RFS e.g. due to delayed community case, tower
strengthening, etc, PAC can be conducted when at least 85% of sites are on air within a
cluster. In the case of mushroom site where there is only 1 new site only with existing
neighbor sites SSO is conducted for PAC.
This document presents the result of Cluster Drive test and Network Performance KPI
based on active measurement and OSS data collection for NS_MDN_4G_SHB2_NAE_089.
The drive-test KPIs are evaluated by drive-test coverage and statistic according to the pre-
defined drive-test route that is mutually agreed by both parties.
The results of the measurements are then compared with the passing criteria agreed upon
by XL and HUAWEI.
1.2 General Site Information

General Site Information
Cluster Name NS_MDN_4G_SHB2_NAE_089
Area Medan
Total number of cluster sites 6 Site
Total number of planned sites 1 Site
Total number of On-Air Macro sites: 6 Site
Total number of Pico Site 0 Site
Total number of pending On-Air Macro Sites 0 Site
Total number of pending On-Air Pico Sites 0 Site
1.2.1 New Site Database

Cel
eNB ID LTE Site Name Longitude Latitude TAC PCI Status OA Date
lID
4222515E9 4222515E9_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN 31 98.60528 3.52675 22027 27 Integrated 03-May-19
7 (66)

1.2.2 Neighbors First Tier

eNB ID LTE Site Name Longitude Latitude Remark
422E732E9 422E732E9_LTE_TANJUNG_SELAMAT 98.60672 3.541975 OA
422E765E9 422E765E9_LTE_SIMPANG_SELAYANG 98.62438 3.526438 OA
1.2.3 Punch List Database
There is no punch list at this Cluster.
Drive Test Methodology “Mobility Assessment”

Drive test shall be performed under below circumstances:
 Cluster is barred / reserved to ensure only single user camp in the cluster using USIM
class 11
 Hotrod Priorities profile to be used
LTE Mobile
KPI Measured Remark
No. UE Method RAT BAND
PDCP DL THP,
SINR,
Handset 1 Dedicated,
RSRQ,Transmitio 1 laptop, separated
(samsung continues Lock LTE LTE L900
n mode. Serving round between UL
Round s5) download
DL Bandwith & DL Test to
1
Plot. guarantee single
Handset 2 user
(samsung Idle Lock LTE LTE L900 RSRP,PCI Plot
s5)
PDCP DL THP,
SINR,
RSRQ,Transmitio 1 laptop, separated
(samsung continues Lock LTE LTE L900
n mode. Serving round between UL
Round s5) download
DL Bandwith & DL Test to
1
Plot. guarantee single
Dedicated, IRAT HO on user
Automatic WCDMA / L900/9
Handset 1 continues edge 4G
(Unlocked) LTE 00
download coverage
8 (66)

1.3 Drive Test Methodology “Stationary Assessment”
Stationary KPI’s will be tested based on the agreed-on methodology with XL team. Cell
Edge Performance for Link Budget Verification will be tested on the spot where the RSRP
reaches between -115dBm to -120dBm at the edge of a cluster.
LTE Mobile
KPI Measured Remark
No. UE Method RAT BAND
Speed test (OOKLA
& Open Signal) is
required at bad spot
Round area (-<115 dBm)
(samsung continues Lock LTE LTE L900 PDCP UL THP
2 which is detected
s5) Upload
from MR or DT with
maximum 3 spots
with GNet Track
Downlink QoS Test,

Handset 2 IRAT HO on
Automatic WCDMA / L900/9 best Condition Spot.
Static (samsung Idle edge 4G
(Unlocked) LTE 00 Continues
s5) coverage
download > 2 Min
1.4 FTP Server Information
Location : Medan
FTP Server information
IP: 192.168.42.54
1.5 Drive Test tool and Detail
Samsung Galaxy S5
DT Tools
GENEX Probe v3.18
Date of DT 04 January 2020
DT Team Harly
9 (66)

2 MAP INFORMATION
2.1 Map Information
L900
activation
Colocated
activation 5
Mhz
Figure 1: Cluster Map Information
2.2 Drive test route, cluster border and coverage prediction
L900
activation
Colocated
activation 5 Mhz
Figure 2: Drive Test Route
10 (66)

Figure 3: Coverage Prediction using Planning Tools & DT Route
Item Result Target PAC Ref

Site List, Polygon Border, DT Route and Coverage Must be matched with
Match Pass
Prediction match with agreed design agreed design
L900 activation
Colocated activation
5 Mhz
Prediction Data.csv
11 (66)

Figure 4: Residential Prediction using Planning Tools & RSRP Result
SubUrban_Open_A
Road_Open_Area(
Max Value (dBm)
Inland_Water(%)
Min Value (dBm)
Green_Land(%)
Percentage (%)
Coverage Area
% of Cumulate
% of Coverage
RSRP Criteria
Area(km2)
Village(%)
Forest(%)
Coverage
Scrub(%)
Legend
rea(%)
(dBm)
Area
%)
DL RSRP
-85 (dBm)>=- Infinity 8.0824 11.1814 100 1.8249 0 7.8255 49.5206 8.4132 5.1964 0
85
-90<=DL
RSRP
-90 -85 5.1601 7.1384 88.8185 2.4709 0 6.1531 53.6337 10.4651 7.0736 0
(dBm)<-
85
-100<=DL
RSRP
-100 -90 12.7726 17.6696 81.6801 0.8417 0 5.4022 55.3533 7.3791 6.9877 0.0196
(dBm)<-
90
-105<=DL
RSRP
-105 -100 10.0025 13.8376 64.0105 0.6248 0 5.6486 53.4366 8.5229 9.4226 0.05
(dBm)<-
100
-115<=DL
RSRP
-115 -110 14.5899 20.184 50.1729 0.8053 0 6.3742 54.6436 8.6532 8.7046 0.0857
(dBm)<-
105
DL RSRP
-
(dBm)<- -115 21.6774 29.9889 29.9889 0.6112 0 7.6346 56.5909 8.8686 5.7548 0.6228
Infinity
115
Total 72.2849 99.9999 414.6709 7.1788 0 39.0382 323.1787 52.3021 43.1397 0.7781
12 (66)

3 Performance Result
3.1 NMS KPI LTE Site Level
Before Date (Start - End) 26-Des-19 to 01-Jan-20

After Date (Start - End) 03-Jan-20 to 09-Jan-20
3.1.1 Availability
No Name Target Before After Status

1 Cell Availability > 99% 100 % 99.83 % Pass
3.1.2 Accessibility

1 Session Setup Success Rate > 99% 99.20 % 99.21% Pass
2 RRC Setup Success Rate > 98% 99.74 % 99.79 % Pass
3.1.3 Retainability
Session Abnormal Release

1 < 1.4% 0.24 % 0.20% Pass
Rate
3.1.4 TX_RANK (Info Only)
TX2 TX4 ISD

eNB ID LTE Site Name CID Remarks MIMO
(2T2R) (4T4R) (km)
MIMO
4222515E 4222515E_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN 31 33.35 - Normal 1.4 Km
2T2R
0.9 Km MIMO
4222515E 4222515E_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN 32 35.34 - Normal
2T2R
1.8 Km MIMO
4222515E 4222515E_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN 33 22.62 - Normal
2T2R
ran k2.xlsx
13 (66)

3.1.5 Integrity

1 UL Packet Loss (PDCP ) < 1e-3 0 4.76 Pass
2 DL Packet Loss (PDCP ) < 1e-3 0 0 Pass
> 15 Mbps (3 MHz)
3 Downlink User Throughput (Peak)* > 50 Mbps (10 MHz) 20.41 Mbps 23.08Mbps Info only*
> 75 Mbps (15 MHz)
> 4.5 Mbps (3 MHz)
4 Uplink User Throughput (Peak)* 4.50Mbps 5.20Mbps Info only*

> 20 Mbps (10 MHz)
> 33 Mbps (15 MHz)
> 5.1 Mbps (3 MHz)
5 Downlink User Throughput (Average)* > 17 Mbps (10 MHz) 5.20Mbps 5.64Mbps Info only*
> 25.5 Mbps (15 MHz)
> 3 Mbps (3 MHz)
6 Uplink User Throughput (Average)* > 10 Mbps (10 MHz) 0.78Mbps 0.87Mbps Info only*
> 15 Mbps (15 MHz)
7 DL Uu Latency < 8 ms 1.87ms 2.13ms Pass

* Depend on user behavior
Mobility

Handover Success Rate
1 > 98% 99.82 99.42 % Pass
Intra-Frequency
14 (66)

Handover Success Rate Applicable whereby LTE

2 > 98% N/A
Inter-Frequency 900/2300 are installed
Handover Success Rate

3 > 95% N/A N/A
Inter-RAT (PSHO, not RwR)
3.1.6 Utilization

Maximum eNodeB CPU
1 < 70% 6.91 % 6.85% Pass
Utilization
3.1.7 CSFB
No Name Target PAC Result Status Remark

1 Voice - Outgoing Call Setup Time ≤5s 4.8s Pass
In PAC,
Voice - Outgoing Call Setup Success
100% value is
2 Rate > 97% Pass
measured
3 Voice - Incoming Call Setup Time ≤ 3.5 s 2.4s Pass
on mobility
Voice - Incoming Call Setup Success
90.91% or
4 Rate > 97% Pass
stationary
5 Voice - Time to Return to LTE ≤5s 9.3s Not Pass
on each PCI
6 Voice - Return to LTE Success Rate > 97% 100% Pass
* Measured using probe (Smart Care or Anritsu)
3.1.8 Traffic and Capacity
3.1.8.1 Payload
Name CAC Before CAC After Status
UL Volume (Gigabyte) 35.6528 GB 38.9808 GB
*Info Only
DL Volume (Gigabyte) 422.7711 GB 455.6796 GB
*Calculation: Daily (summing all hour in a day for all cell within cluster). Weekly (summing 7 days in a week on each UL &
DL). Provided for information only.
15 (66)

3.2 NMS KPI LTE CLUSTER
Cell KPI Aggregate for 7 days, taken at cell busy hour except for Availability.
Availability is measured within 24 hrs in a day. Cell busy hour is defined as the hour when
downlink and uplink payload reach the peak value.
Measurement period:
Before Date (Start - End) 26-Des-19 to 01-Jan-20

After Date (Start - End) 03-Jan-20 to 09-Jan-20
3.2.1 Availability

1 Cell Availability > 99% 100 % 99.94 % Pass
3.2.2 Accessibility

1 Session Setup Success Rate > 99% 99.49 % 99.46 % Pass
2 RRC Setup Success Rate > 98% 99.77% 99.79% Pass
3.2.3 Retainability
Session Abnormal Release

1 < 1.4% 0.21 % 0.21 Pass
Rate
3.2.4 Integrity

1 UL Packet Loss (PDCP ) < 1e-3 3.17 6.34 Pass
2 DL Packet Loss (PDCP ) < 1e-3 0 0 Pass
3 Downlink User Throughput (Peak)* > 15 Mbps (3 MHz) 23.60 Mbps 24.59Mbps Info only*
16 (66)

> 50 Mbps (10 MHz)
> 75 Mbps (15 MHz)
> 4.5 Mbps (3 MHz)
4 Uplink User Throughput (Peak)* 4.53Mbps 5.05Mbps Info only*

> 20 Mbps (10 MHz)
> 33 Mbps (15 MHz)
> 5.1 Mbps (3 MHz)
5 Downlink User Throughput (Average)* > 17 Mbps (10 MHz) 5.36Mbps 5.50Mbps Info only*
> 25.5 Mbps (15 MHz)
> 3 Mbps (3 MHz)
6 Uplink User Throughput (Average)* > 10 Mbps (10 MHz) 0.87Mbps 0.90Mbps Info only*
> 15 Mbps (15 MHz)
2.09ms
7 DL Uu Latency < 8 ms 1.87ms Pass
* Depend on user behavior
3.2.5 Utilization

Maximum eNodeB CPU 7.00 %
1 < 70% 7.09% Pass
Utilization
3.2.6 CSFB

1 Voice - Outgoing Call Setup Time ≤5s 4.8s Pass In PAC,
2 Voice - Outgoing Call Setup Success > 97% 100% Pass value is
17 (66)


Rate measured
3 Voice - Incoming Call Setup Time ≤ 3.5 s 2.4s Pass on mobility
Voice - Incoming Call Setup Success or
90.91% stationary
4 Rate > 97% Pass
5 Voice - Time to Return to LTE ≤5s 9.3s Not Pass on each PCI
* Measured using probe (Smart Care or Anritsu)
3.2.7 Traffic and Capacity
3.2.7.1 Payload
Name CAC Before CAC After Status
UL Volume (Gigabyte) 101.2801 GB 105.8709 GB
*Info Only
DL Volume (Gigabyte) 1200.3488 GB 1255.2085 GB
*Calculation: Daily (summing all hour in a day for all cell within cluster). Weekly (summing 7 days in a week on each UL &
DL). Provided for information only.
PRB Utilization
DL PRB UL PRB DL PRB UL PRB

Utilizatio Utilizatio Utilizatio Utilizatio
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
Site ID CellI
LTE Site Name
LTE D (BH Daily (BH Daily
averaged averaged
Max Max
in a in a
week) week)
422E765
422E765E_LTE_SIMPANG_SELAYANG 32 76.9677 51.4791 38.5835 29.99922
E
422E765
E
18 (66)

422E765
E
4222515 4222515E_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_ME
32 95.5656 69.5052 57.12518 42.77525
E DAN
33 84.9032 52.9952 35.9361 29.01666
E DAN
31 79.5232 51.7773 34.23911 31.17557
E DAN
422E732
422E732E_LTE_TANJUNG_SELAMAT 32 98.2368 44.5143 65.52575 28.42728
E
422E732
E
422E732
E
*Calculation:
 Busy hour is defined as the hour in which sum DL & UL payload reach the highest value
 Daily : on busy hour, UL/DL PRB utilization is averaged for each cell on each site
 Weekly : averaging daily value
 Provided for information only
Number of RRC Connected User
RRC RRC
Site ID
LTE Site Name Connected Connected
LTE
User User
19 (66)

(Average
(Average
Week,
Week,
Daily
Daily Sum)
Max)
422E765E 422E765E_LTE_SIMPANG_SELAYANG 15.0433 1388.8066
4222515E 4222515E_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN 34.1695 3023.3685
422E732E 422E732E_LTE_TANJUNG_SELAMAT 46.5014 3532.2935

20 (66)

*Calculation:
3.2.7.2 Number of CSFB Attempt
CSFB
Attempt
Preparation
Site ID
LTE Site Name CellID
LTE
(Sum daily,
summing
on a week)
422E765E 422E765E_LTE_SIMPANG_SELAYANG 32 99.33333
422E765E 422E765E_LTE_SIMPANG_SELAYANG 33 100
422E765E 422E765E_LTE_SIMPANG_SELAYANG 31 99.89384
4222515E 4222515E_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN 32 99.98338

21 (66)

422E732E 422E732E_LTE_TANJUNG_SELAMAT 32 99.97326
*Calculation:
 Daily : on busy hour, IRAT HO Attempt is summed for each cell toward its relation
 Weekly : summing daily value
22 (66)

3.3 Drive Test KPI
3.3.1 Retainability
PAC
No Name Target Status Remark
Result
Session Abnormal In PAC, value is measured on mobility or
1 < 1.4% 0% Pass
Release Rate stationary on each PCI
3.3.2 Accessibility
1 Session Setup Success Rate > 99% 100% Pass In PAC, value is measured on
mobility or stationary on
2 RRC Setup Success Rate > 98% 100% Pass
each PCI
3.3.3 CSFB
1 Voice - Outgoing Call Setup Time ≤5s 4.3s Pass
In PAC,
Voice - Outgoing Call Setup Success
100% value is
2 Rate > 97% Pass
measured
3 Voice - Incoming Call Setup Time ≤ 3.5 s 1.9s Pass
on mobility
Voice - Incoming Call Setup Success
100% or
4 Rate > 97% Pass
stationary
5 Voice - Time to Return to LTE ≤5s 9.2s Not Pass
on each PCI
3.3.4 Integrity
No Name Target PAC Result Status
RTT Packet Delay (ping) 32/1000 Pass with
<= 20 ms / 30 ms 60.50 ms/ 71.50 ms
1 bytes Justification
2 UL Packet Loss (PDCP ) < 1e-3 0 Pass
3 DL Packet Loss (PDCP ) < 1e-3 0 Pass
> 15 Mbps (3 MHz)
Downlink Peak User Throughput* > 50 Mbps (10 MHz) 32.78 Mbps Info only*
4 > 75 Mbps (15 MHz)
5 Uplink Peak User Throughput* > 4.5 Mbps (3 MHz) 9.02 Mbps Info only*
23 (66)

No Name Target PAC Result Status

> 20 Mbps (10 MHz)
> 33 Mbps (15 MHz)
> 4 Mbps (3 MHz)
Downlink Average User Throughput > 15 Mbps (10 MHz) 7.53 Mbps Pass
6 > 22.5 Mbps (15 MHz)
> 3 Mbps (3 MHz)
Uplink Average User Throughput > 10 Mbps (10 MHz) 4.29 Mbps Pass
7 > 15 Mbps (15 MHz)
8 Jitter (Uplink and Downlink) < 50 ms 3.20 ms Pass
Note: all above values are measured on mobility or stationary on each PCI
*Depends on single user scenario and Transmission Capacity
3.3.5 Mobility
No Name Ref PAC Result Status Remark
Handover Success Rate Intra-
1 > 98% 100% Pass 100%
Frequency
Handover Success Rate Inter- Applicable if L900/L2300 are
2 > 98% N/A N/A
Frequency deployed
Handover Success Rate Inter-
3 > 95% N/A N/A N/A
RAT (PSHO, not RwR)
24 (66)

3.3.6 RSRP IDLE Drive Test
L900 activation
5 Mhz
Figure 4: RSRP IDLE Drive Test Result

Min Value (dBm) RSRP Criteria (dBm) Max Value (dBm) Percentage (%) Legend
-85 DL RSRP (dBm)>=-85 Infinity 46.42%
-90 -90<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-85 -85 16.92%
-100 -100<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-90 -90 24.78%
-105 -105<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-100 -100 7.28%
-115 -115<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-105 -110 3.58%
-Infinity DL RSRP (dBm)<-115 -115 1.02%
RSRP≥ -105 95.40% Pass
PAC Result
Target Status
(RSRP Plot >-105 dBm Result)
In 95% of cluster, the RSRP must be ≥ -105 dBm -105 dBm @ 95.40% Pass
No low RSRP ( < -105 dBm ) is found near site ± 300m) Not found Pass
25 (66)

CDF Plot:
Figure 5: RSRP CDF Distribution

26 (66)

3.3.7 SINR-DL Dedicated Drive Test
L900 activation
5 Mhz
Figure 6: SINR-DL Dedicated Drive Test Result

Min Value (dB) SINR Criteria (dB) Max Value (dB) Percentage (%) Legend
20 SINR (dB)>=20 Infinity 7.62%
10 10<=SINR (dB)<20 20 30.74%
3 3<=SINR (dB)<10 10 29.13%
0 0<=SINR (dB)<3 3 11.65%
-5 -5<=SINR (dB)<0 0 12.66%
-Infinity SINR (dB)<-5 -5 8.21%
SINR ≥ 3 67.49% Not Pass
Target PAC Result Status
In 85% of cluster, SINR-DL must be > 3 dB 3 dB @ 67.49% Not Pass
No Low SINR (<3 dB) is found near site (± 300m) No Pass
27 (66)

CDF Plot :
Figure 7: CDF Plot on SINR-DL Drive Test

28 (66)

3.3.8 PCI Plot
L900 activation
5 Mhz
Figure 8 PCI Plot
No partial / full cross feeder is detected Information only Pass

29 (66)

CQI
Figure 9 CQI Distribution Result
Min Value CQI Max Value Percentage (%)

10 10 <= CQI Value < 15 2064 65.65%
5 5<= CQI Value < 10 1011 32.16%
3 3 <= CQI Value < 5 63 2.00%
0 0 <= CQI Value < 3 6 0.19%
Item Status
CQI Distribution* Info Only
30 (66)

3.3.9 RSRQ
L900 activation
5 Mhz
Figure 10 RSRQ Drive Test Result
Min Value (dB) RSRQ Criteria (dB) Max Value (dB) Percentage (%) Legend
-6 RSRQ (dB)>=-6 Infinity 10.45%
-9 -9<=RSRQ (dB)<-6 -6 29.92%
-11 -11<=RSRQ (dB)<-9 -9 32.16%
-14 -14<=RSRQ (dB)<-11 -11 15.12%
-Infinity RSRQ (dB)<-14 -14 12.35%
31 (66)

3.3.10 PS DL Throughput
L900 activation
5 Mhz
Figure 11 PS DL Throughput Drive Test Result
Min Value (Mbps) DL Throughput (Mbps) Max Value (Mbps) Percentage Legend
30 DL Throughput (Mbps)>=30 Infinity 28.76%
10 10<=DL Throughput (Mbps)<30 30 36.45%
0 0<DL Throughput (Mbps)<3 3 5.99%
PS DL Drive Test Target PAC Result Status
No low DL throughput (< 3 Mbps) near site (± 300m) No Pass
*PS DL Throughput test do in normal mode without cell bar.

32 (66)

3.3.11 PS UL Throughput
L900 activation
5 Mhz
Figure 12 PS UL Throughput Drive Test Result
Min Value (Mbps) UL Throughput (Mbps) Max Value (Mbps) Percentage Legend
15 UL Throughput (Mbps)>=15 Infinity 79.65%
10 10<=UL Throughput (Mbps)<15 15 11.10%
0 0<UL Throughput (Mbps)<3 3 2.75%
PS UL Drive Test Target PAC Result Status
No low UL throughput (< 3 Mbps) near site (± 300m) No Pass
*PS UL Throughput test do in normal mode without cell bar.

33 (66)

3.3.12 Transmission Modes Plot
L900 activation
5 Mhz
Figure 20: Transmission Mode Plot
MIMO Check Result

eNB ID eNB Name ID
Design Implementation
4222515E9 4222515E9_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN 31 MIMO MIMO
34 (66)

3.3.13 Channel Bandwidth Plot
Figure 13: Channel Bandwidth Plot
3.3.14 Event Failed
No event failed found.
EVENT.csv
3.3.15 Sleeping Cell Identification

No sleeping cell is found Pass
sleeping cells.xlsx
35 (66)

3.3.16 External Interference Identification

No external interference is found Information only
L.UL.Interference.xls
x
3.3.17 Cell Overshooting
Inter
Site Overshooting
Site name Cell name Distance Target Remark
Factor
(KM)
4222515E_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN MD4G09_4222515E9_31 1.8 KM >=80% 97.80% Pass
4222515E_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN MD4G09_4222515E9_32 2.1 KM >=80% 99.97% Pass
Open
4222515E_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN MD4G09_4222515E9_33 >=80% 100% Pass
Area
36 (66)

3.3.18 Bad Spot analysis and Improvement
Bad Spot RSRP
Spot
Spot Bad Spot Description Recomendation
Type
Bad Coverage Due to No serving cell dominant Site
Bad 4223800E9_LTE_DR_MASYUR_TJ_SELAMAT. Distance Need check actual & audit site
1
coverage Site 4223800E9_LTE_DR_MASYUR_TJ_SELAMAT to bad 4222515E9_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN
spot area already 1.3 Km and Hilly.
37 (66)

Bad Spot SINR
Spot
Spot Bad Spot Description Recommendation
Type
Bad Quality Due to Back Loop and No Serving dominant
Site 4222515E9_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN.
Bad Need check actual & audit site
1 Distance Site 4222515E9_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN
Quality 4222515E9_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN
to bad spot area already 0.7 Km and Hilly. small road and
blocked Tree.
Bad Quality Due to No Serving dominant Site

Bad 4222515E9_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN. Distance Need check actual & audit site
2
Quality Site 4222515E9_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN to bad 4222515E9_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN
spot area already 1.2 Km. Have downhill and Hilly.
Bad Quality Due to No serving cell dominant Site

Bad 4223800E9_LTE_DR_MASYUR_TJ_SELAMAT. Distance Site Need check actual & audit site
3
Quality 4223800E9_LTE_DR_MASYUR_TJ_SELAMAT to bad spot 4222515E9_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN
area already 1.3 Km and Hilly. Inline with RSRP.
38 (66)

3.3.19 Optimation Result
RSRP
RSRP BEFORE OPTIMIZATION RSRP AFTER OPTIMIZATION
System DL Throughput (Mbps) Legend Before After

DL RSRP (dBm)>=-85 43.97% 46.42%
-90<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-85 14.95% 16.92%
-100<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-90 27.11% 24.78% LTE Coverage Strength (> -105) is Improve
LTE -105<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-100 8.71% 7.28% from 94.74% to 95.40%
-115<=DL RSRP (dBm)<-105 4.29% 3.58%
DL RSRP (dBm)<-115 0.97% 1.02%
RSRP >= -105 94.74% 95.40%
PAC Result PAC Result

Name Target Before After Remark
Optimization Optimization
RSRP (Dedicated) <-105 > 95% area on Pass With
94.74% 95.40%
dB the cluster Target
Spot
Spot Bad Spot Description Action Taken
Type
Bad Coverage Due to No serving cell dominant Site Already Tuning and Audit Site
4223800E9_LTE_DR_MASYUR_TJ_SELAMAT. 4222515E9_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN
Bad
1 Distance Site Reazimuth from : 15/110/315 to 15/110/300
coverage
4223800E9_LTE_DR_MASYUR_TJ_SELAMAT to bad Mecanical : 4/4/4 to 4/4/6
spot area already 1.3 Km and Hilly. Electrical : 4/4/4 to 4/4/6
39 (66)

SINR
SINR BEFORE OPTIMIZATION SINR AFTER OPTIMIZATION
System Level Legend Before After

SINR (dB)>=20 7.76% 7.62%
10<=SINR (dB)<20 30.32% 30.74%
3<=SINR (dB)<10 27.38% 29.13% LTE Quality Strength (> -105) is improved
LTE 0<=SINR (dB)<3 12.59% 11.65% from 65.46% to 67.49%
-5<=SINR (dB)<0 16.04% 12.66%
SINR (dB)<-5 5.91% 8.21%
SINR >= 3 65.46% 67.49%
PAC Result Before PAC Result After

Name Target Remark
Optimization Optimization
> 85% area on the Not Pass With
SINR (Dedicated) > 3 dB 65.46% 67.49%
cluster Target
Spot
Spot Bad Spot Description Action Taken
Type
Bad Quality Due to Back Loop and No Serving dominant Already Tuning and Audit Site
Site 4222515E9_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN. Distance 4222515E9_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN
Bad
1 Site 4222515E9_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN to bad Reazimuth from : 15/110/315 to 15/110/300
Quality
spot area already 0.7 Km and Hilly. small road and blocked Mecanical : 4/4/4 to 4/4/6
Tree. Electrical : 4/4/4 to 4/4/6
40 (66)

Bad Quality Due to No Serving dominant Site Already Tuning and Audit Site
4222515E9_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN
Bad 4222515E9_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN. Distance Site
2 Reazimuth from : 15/110/315 to 15/110/300
Quality 4222515E9_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN to bad spot
Mecanical : 4/4/4 to 4/4/6
area already 1.2 Km. Have downhill and Hilly. Electrical : 4/4/4 to 4/4/6
Bad Quality Due to No serving cell dominant Site Already Tuning and Audit Site
Bad 4223800E9_LTE_DR_MASYUR_TJ_SELAMAT. Distance Site
Quality 4223800E9_LTE_DR_MASYUR_TJ_SELAMAT to bad spot
area already 1.3 Km and Hilly. Inline with RSRP. Electrical : 4/4/4 to 4/4/6
3.3.20 Physical tuning summary

Physical tuning activity
New Site and 1St Tier Neigbor Before Final Height

B
Cell Long Lat TAC Antenn
Site ID Site Name W AZ/E/M AZ/E/M
ID a (m)
4222515E9 4222515E9_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN 31 98.60528 3.52675 22027 3 60/1/1 90/2/2 42
422E732E9 422E732E9_LTE_TANJUNG_SELAMAT 31 98.60672 3.54198 22027 3 45/4/-4 45/4/4 36
422E732E9 422E732E9_LTE_TANJUNG_SELAMAT 32 98.60672 3.54198 22027 3 215/4/4 215/4/4 36
422E732E9 422E732E9_LTE_TANJUNG_SELAMAT 33 98.60672 3.54198 22027 3 305/2/2 330/3/3 36
422E765E9 422E765E9_LTE_SIMPANG_SELAYANG 31 98.62439 3.52644 22027 3 15/4/4 15/4/4 35
422E921E9 422E921E9_LTE_ADAM_MALIK_RELOC 31 98.61556 3.51058 22027 3 10/1/1 110/2/2 40
422E937E9 422E937E9_LTE_UNISKA 31 98.62119 3.54153 22027 3 80/2/2 90/2/2 30
422E937E9 422E937E9_LTE_UNISKA 32 98.62119 3.54153 22027 3 195/1/1 205/2/2 30
422E937E9 422E937E9_LTE_UNISKA 33 98.62119 3.54153 22027 3 295/1/1 305/2/2 30
AOR_HW_NW_4222 AOR_HW_NW_422E AOR_HW_NW_422E AOR_HW_NW_422E AOR_HW_NW_422E

765E9_LTE_SIMPANG_SELAYANG_L900_20191019_V1.xlsx
921E_LTE_Adam_Malik_Reloc_L900_20200217_V1.xlsx
732E9_LTE_TANJUNG_SELAMAT_L900_20200201_V1.xlsx
515E9_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN_L900_20200217_V1.xlsx 937E9_LTE_UNISKA_L900_20200107_V1.xlsx
41 (66)

3.3.21 NMS KPI RAN LTE site Level
Availability Session Setup Success Rate
Cell Availability stable below reference value after Session Setup Success Rate is maintained above
site on air reference value 99%
RRC Setup Success Rate Session Abnormal Release Rate
RRC Setup Success Rate is maintained above Session Abnormal Release Rate unstable at the
reference value 98 % reference value 1.4 %
UL/DL PDCP Packet Loss UL/DL Average Cell Throughput
42 (66)

Cell DL Throughput Average is 15.17 Mbps, Cell

PDPCP UL/DL Packet Loss performance is not
UL Throughput Average is 1.89 Mbps.(Only for
stable and above reference value 1e-3.
Information)
HOSR Intra-frequency IRAT-HO SR
Ho intra success rate is maintained above Handover Success Rate Inter RAT disabled to Keep
reference value 98 % traffic on 4G
Processor Load 3G HSDPA users vs LTE RRC users

43 (66)

eNodeB processor load maximum is lower 3G and LTE User Number. (Only for Information)
below reference value 70.00 %.
3G vs LTE Payload Trend (Daily sum in GB) 3G throughput vs LTE throughput (BH)
Payload (only for information) Throughput (only for information)
Figure 23: NMS KPI Trend

44 (66)

3.2.30 NMS KPI RAN LTE ClusterLevel
Availability Session Setup Success Rate
Cell Availability stable below reference value after Session Setup Success Rate is maintained above
site on air reference value 99%
RRC Setup Success Rate Session Abnormal Release Rate
RRC Setup Success Rate is maintained above Session Abnormal Release Rate unstable at the
reference value 98 % reference value 1.4 %
UL/DL PDCP Packet Loss UL/DL Average Cell Throughput
45 (66)

Cell DL Throughput Average is 14.97 Mbps, Cell

PDPCP UL/DL Packet Loss performance is not
UL Throughput Average is 2.27 Mbps.(Only for
stable and above reference value 1e-3.
Information)
HOSR Intra-frequency IRAT-HO SR
Ho intra success rate is maintained above Handover Success Rate Inter RAT disabled to Keep
reference value 98 % traffic on 4G
Processor Load 3G HSDPA users vs LTE RRC users

46 (66)

eNodeB processor load maximum is lower 3G and LTE User Number. (Only for Information)
below reference value 70.00 %.
3G vs LTE Payload Trend (Daily sum in GB) 3G throughput vs LTE throughput (BH)
Payload (only for information) Throughput (only for information)
4 KPI 2G & 3G
Drive Test is out of LTE vendor scope of work, hence the 2G & 3G DT KPI would be
reviewed during quarterly Drive Test with PTHS. Therefore, the 2G & 3G aspect only review
the NMS KPI, plus MRR data of 3G in PAC report.
The target for NMS KPI is maintained of improved, comparing the best week (within 3
weeks) after Frequency Carving/TRX Shutdown versus the week when PAC is collected.
2G & 3G nodes involved are applicable for nodes which are inside LTE polygon, regardless
they have collocated LTE installed or not. All KPI, except availability are calculated during
47 (66)

busy hour-payload UL+DL daily, averaged within a week. Availability is monitored 24 hr

daily.
4.1 List of 2G, 3G & LTE sites inside LTE Polygon

Item Target PAC Result Status
Site List 2G & 3G inside the polygon is Must be matched with
Match Pass
matched with actual actual
4.2 NMS 2G
KPI Baseline Week 1 PAC Week 2 Comments
Assignment Success Rate #N/A #N/A #N/A
Perceive Drop Rate #N/A #N/A #N/A
Perceive Congestion Rate #N/A #N/A #N/A
SDCCH Drop Rate #N/A #N/A #N/A
SDCCH Congestion Rate #N/A #N/A #N/A
SDCCH Success Rate #N/A #N/A #N/A
TBF Failure Rate #N/A #N/A #N/A
Cell Availability #N/A #N/A #N/A
HO Success Rate #N/A #N/A #N/A
* Fill comments with: Degraded or Maintained or Improved according to current week compared with baseline
4.3 NMS 3G
KPI Baseline Week 1 PAC Week 2 Comments

RRC Success Rate 99.71 99.80 Maintain
Speech Access Rate 99.74 100 Maintain
PS Access Rate 99.43 99.50 Improved
Speech Drop Rate 0.46 0.10 Maintain
PS Drop Rate 0.26 0.12 Improved
RAB Congestion 0.010 0.015 Improved
Cell Availability 100 100 Maintain
CS IRAT-HO SR 100 100 Maintain
48 (66)

4.4 MRR 3G
During LTE Optimization process, some physical tuning might be executed to enhance LTE
quality. While in some sites, the antenna is shared between 3G and LTE. Therefore, LTE
vendor must provide the MRR before and after physical tuning is executed. The CPICH
RSCP must be maintained, or if due to less sample, the deviation of 2% is accepted.
5 FEATURE
PAC acceptance validates the feature state on each RAN LTE nodes. The validation refers to Bill of
Quantity stated in Purchased Order with the actual feature status on the node. The feature may be
applicable on the cell level, site level (eNB) or RRC Connected user level. Each LTE vendor may have
their own feature ID.
We define 2 type of feature:
- Basic: standard deliverables on each product package
- Optional: selectable feature chosen by customer.
RECOMME
FEATURE FEATURE BoQ Current
FEATURES FEATURE ID NDED
DOMAIN TYPE Checking Status
BASELINE
CS Fallback to UTRAN LOFD-001033 RF Optional YES ON ON
CS Fallback to GERAN LOFD-001034 RF Optional YES OFF OFF
CS Fallback with LAI to
LOFD-001069 RF Optional YES OFF OFF
GERAN
LoCation Services(LCS) LOFD-001047 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
Support of UE
LOFD-001030 RF Optional YES ON ON
Category2/3/4
Enhanced Scheduling LOFD-001015 RF Optional YES ON ON
Active Queue
LOFD-001027 RF Optional YES Trial Trial
Management(AQM)
Enhanced Admission
Control
PS Inter-RAT Mobility
between E-UTRAN and LOFD-001020 RF Optional YES OFF OFF
GERAN
Security Mechanism LOFD-001010 Product Optional YES ON ON
Intra-LTE Load Balancing LOFD-001032 RF Optional YES Temporary Temporar
49 (66)

RECOMME
BASELINE
OFF y OFF
Intra-LTE User Number Temporary Temporar
LOFD-070215 RF Optional YES
Load Balancing OFF y OFF
PS Inter-RAT Mobility
between E-UTRAN and LOFD-001019 RF Optional YES ON ON
UTRAN
RObust Header Temporary Temporar
Compression (ROHC) OFF y OFF
Flash CS Fallback to
UTRAN
Flash CS Fallback to
GERAN
Temporary Temporar
Flexible User Steering LOFD-001054 RF Optional YES
OFF y OFF
Inter-RAT Load Sharing to
UTRAN
UL Interference Rejection
Combining
Automatic Neighbour
Relation(ANR)
Self-configuration LOFD-002004 Product Optional YES ON ON
PCI Collision Detection &
Self-Optimization
Mobility Robust
Optimization (MRO)
Remote Electrical Tilt
LOFD-001024 Product Optional YES Scene On Scene On
Control
RIM Based LTE Target Cell Temporary Temporar
Selection OFF y OFF
DL 2x2 MIMO LOFD-001001 RF Optional YES ON ON
Enhanced Transmission
LOFD-003011 Product Optional YES ON ON
QoS Management
IP Performance Temporary Temporar
LOFD-003012 Product Optional YES
Monitoring OFF y OFF
S1 and X2 over IPv6 LOFD-003017 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
IPsec LOFD-003009 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
Public Key
LOFD-003010 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
Infrastructure(PKI)
Integrated Firewall LOFD-003014 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
S1-flex LOFD-001018 Product Optional YES ON ON
50 (66)

RECOMME
BASELINE
2G/3G and LTE Co-
transmission
UL 64QAM LOFD-001006 RF Optional YES ON ON
Inter-RAT ANR LOFD-002002 RF Optional YES Trial Trial
RACH Optimization LOFD-002015 RF Optional YES Scene On Scene On
RF Channel Intelligent
Shutdown
PSU Intelligent Sleep
Mode
Temporary Temporar
UL 2x2 MU-MIMO LOFD-001002 RF Optional YES
OFF y OFF
Intra-eNodeB UL CoMP LOFD-001066 RF Optional YES ON ON
LOFD-
CQI Adjustment RF Optional YES ON ON
00101501
LOFD-
Dynamic Scheduling RF Optional YES ON ON
00101502
Control Channel IRC LOFD-001094 RF Optional YES Trial Trial
CS Fallback with LAI to
UTRAN
Temporary Temporar
SRVCC to UTRAN LOFD-001022 RF Optional YES
OFF y OFF
Intelligent Access Class
LOFD-070207 RF Optional YES Scene On Scene On
Control
IP Active Performance
Measurement
Dynamic Inter-Cell
Interference LOFD-001014 RF Optional YES OFF OFF
Coordination
Static TDM eICIC LAOFD-002001 RF Optional YES OFF OFF
Temporary Temporar
TTI Bundling LOFD-001048 RF Optional YES
OFF y OFF
FeICIC LAOFD-081234 RF Optional YES OFF OFF
SFN LOFD-003029 RF Optional YES Scene On Scene On
CPRI Compression LOFD-001076 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
Cell Outage Detection
LOFD-002012 Product Optional YES ON ON
and Compensation
Enhanced
Synchronization
IPsec for IPv6 LOFD-003024 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
51 (66)

RECOMME
BASELINE
Ethernet OAM LOFD-003004 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
Antenna Fault Detection LOFD-002011 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
Multi-mode BS Common
MRFD-231601 Product Optional YES OFF OFF
Reference Clock
Below is the detail log file on feature validation:
Criteria Result Remark
Feature status matched with BoQ Match Pass
Justification Ping Latency 32 bit and 1000 bit
5.1.1 Ping Latency 32bit
t1 t2 t3 t4
t1' t2' t3' t4'

UE eNodeB SGW PGW FTP
t1 ≈ t1’ 、t2 ≈ t2’、t3 ≈ t3’、t4 ≈ t4’

RTT = t1
Ping Latency (UE to FTP) = t1 + t2 + t3 + t4 + t4’ + t3’ + t2’ + t1’ = 53.10 ms (UE ping
Huawei FTP)
Ping Latency (eNodeB to SGW) = t2 + t2’ = 48 ms
Ping Latency(UE to FTP) − Ping Latency(eNodeB to SGW) 53.10−48

t1 +t3 +t4 = 2
= 2
= 2.55 ms
RTT = t1 = 1.8 ms – t3 – t4 < 8ms (Target)
52 (66)

5.1.2 Ping latency 1000bit
t1 t2 t3 t4
t1' t2' t3' t4'

UE eNodeB SGW PGW FTP
t1 ≈ t1’ 、t2 ≈ t2’、t3 ≈ t3’、t4 ≈ t4’

RTT = t1
Ping Latency (UE to FTP) = t1 + t2 + t3 + t4 + t4’ + t3’ + t2’ + t1’ = 58.15 ms (UE ping
Huawei FTP)
Ping Latency (eNodeB to SGW) = t2 + t2’ =49 ms
Ping Latency(UE to FTP) − Ping Latency(eNodeB to SGW) 93.5−49

t1 +t3 +t4 = 2
= 2
= 4. 5 ms
RTT = t1 = 5.33 ms – t3 – t4 < 8ms (Target)
53 (66)

5.2 Justification Bad spot
5.2.1.1 Justification RSRP
RSRP
Spot Spot Bad Spot Description Recommendation

54 (66)

Type
Bad Coverage Due to No serving cell dominant Site Already Tuning and Audit Site
coverage 4223800E9_LTE_DR_MASYUR_TJ_SELAMAT to bad spot
area already 1.3 Km and Hilly. Electrical : 4/4/4 to 4/4/6
55 (66)

SINR 1
Spot
Type
Bad Quality Due to Back Loop and No Serving dominant Already Tuning and Audit Site
Site 4222515E9_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN. 4222515E9_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN
Bad
1 Distance Site 4222515E9_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN Reazimuth from : 15/110/315 to 15/110/300
Quality
to bad spot area already 0.7 Km and Hilly. small road and Mecanical : 4/4/4 to 4/4/6
blocked Tree. Electrical : 4/4/4 to 4/4/6
56 (66)

SINR 2
Spot
Type
Bad Quality Due to No Serving dominant Site Already Tuning and Audit Site
Bad 4222515E9_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN. Distance
Quality Site 4222515E9_LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN to bad
spot area already 1.2 Km. Have downhill and Hilly. Electrical : 4/4/4 to 4/4/6
57 (66)

SINR 3
Spot
Type
Bad Quality Due to No serving cell dominant Site Already Tuning and Audit Site
Quality 4223800E9_LTE_DR_MASYUR_TJ_SELAMAT to bad spot
area already 1.3 Km and Hilly. Inline with RSRP. Electrical : 4/4/4 to 4/4/6
58 (66)

JUSTIFICATION BAD QUALITY
Found bad quality inside border cluster NS_MDN_4G_SHB2_NAE_089 During drive test on
04 January 2020.
L900 activation
5 Mhz
Bad Quality during drive test due to implementation UL Cloudair impact network
59 (66)

60 (66)

Spot
Spot Bad Spot Description
Type
Bad Found bad quality inside border LTE L900 EARFCN 3750 after UL Cloud Air implement.Bad
1
Quality quality impact from interference from LTE L900 EARFCN 3087,UMTS UARFCN 3087.
61 (66)

UL 900 Cloud Air

7.5M Progress KPI Analysis Result_20191028.pptx
62 (66)

63 (66)

64 (66)

5.3 KPI 2G & 3G
KPI 2G & 3G are maintained
5.4 AOR Report

Site Audit Database
SITE INVESTIGATION
Site Id 4222515E9 Site Name LTE_SIMPANG_MELATI_MEDAN
Longitude 98.604783 Latitude 3.5269047
SECTOR 1 2 3
Orientation(°) Before 60 220 350
Orientation(°) After 90 240 0
Mech Tilt(°) Before 1 1 1
Mech Tilt(°) After 2 2 2
Antenna
Elect Tilt(°) Before 1 1 0
Elect Tilt(°) After 2 2 2
Model DXXXXX DXXXXX DXXXXX
Antenna Height (M) 42M 41M 41M
Tower Heigth 42M 42M 42M
ITEM SECTOR 1 SECTOR 2 SECTOR 3
SECTORAL ANTENNA
VIEW
(Before)
SECTORAL ANTENNA
VIEW
(After)
MECHANICAL TILT
(Before)
65 (66)

ITEM SECTOR 1 SECTOR 2 SECTOR 3
MECHANICAL TILT
(After)
ELECTRICAL TILT
Before
ELECTRICAL TILT
After
ANTENNA TYPE
RRU TYPE (IF

RELATED TO
RRU ACTIVITY)
66 (66)

6 Conclusion
We conclude that PAC of Cluster NS_MDN_4G_SHB2_NAE_089 is:
Pass, without note 

Pass, with note 
Not pass 
*Tick one appropriate result

Cac HW NS MDN 4G SHB2 Nae 089 L900 20200218 V2

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Cac HW NS MDN 4G SHB2 Nae 089 L900 20200218 V2

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

1 (66)

Prepared No. Program Cluster Name

CLUSTER ACCEPTANCE CERTIFICATE (CAC)

Area Northern West

City Medan (Outer)

Cluster Name NS_MDN_4G_SHB2_NAE_089 (L900)

Name :Edy Swasono Name :

Prepared No. Program Cluster Name

Prepared No. Program Cluster Name

Prepared No. Program Cluster Name

5.3 Justification Exclution 63

Prepared No. Program Cluster Name

Figure 2: Drive Test Route ....................................................................................................................................... 9

Figure 3: Coverage Prediction using Planning Tools & DT Route .......................................................................... 10

Figure 6: RSRP IDLE Drive Test Result ................................................................................................................... 24

Figure 7: RSRP CDF Distribution ............................................................................................................................ 25

Figure 8: SINR-DL Dedicated Drive Test Result ..................................................................................................... 26

Figure 9: CDF Plot on SINR-DL Drive Test .............................................................................................................. 27

Figure 15 PCI Plot .................................................................................................................................................. 28

Figure 17 CQI Distribution Result .......................................................................................................................... 29

Figure 16 RSRQ Drive Test Result .......................................................................................................................... 30

Figure 18 PS DL Throughput Drive Test Result ...................................................................................................... 31

Figure 19 PS UL Throughput Drive Test Result ...................................................................................................... 32

Figure 21: Channel Bandwidth Plot ...................................................................................................................... 34

Prepared No. Program Cluster Name

1.2 General Site Information

1.2.1 New Site Database

Prepared No. Program Cluster Name

1.2.2 Neighbors First Tier

1.2.3 Punch List Database

There is no punch list at this Cluster.

Drive Test Methodology “Mobility Assessment”

Prepared No. Program Cluster Name

1.3 Drive Test Methodology “Stationary Assessment”

Downlink QoS Test,

1.4 FTP Server Information

1.5 Drive Test tool and Detail

Prepared No. Program Cluster Name

Figure 1: Cluster Map Information

2.2 Drive test route, cluster border and coverage prediction

Prepared No. Program Cluster Name

Figure 3: Coverage Prediction using Planning Tools & DT Route

Item Result Target PAC Ref

Prepared No. Program Cluster Name

Figure 4: Residential Prediction using Planning Tools & RSRP Result

Prepared No. Program Cluster Name

3.1 NMS KPI LTE Site Level

Before Date (Start - End) 26-Des-19 to 01-Jan-20

No Name Target Before After Status

No Name Target Before After Status

No Name Target Before After Status

Session Abnormal Release

3.1.4 TX_RANK (Info Only)

TX2 TX4 ISD

Prepared No. Program Cluster Name

No Name Target Before After Status

> 15 Mbps (3 MHz)

> 75 Mbps (15 MHz)

> 4.5 Mbps (3 MHz)

4 Uplink User Throughput (Peak)* 4.50Mbps 5.20Mbps Info only*

> 33 Mbps (15 MHz)

> 5.1 Mbps (3 MHz)

> 25.5 Mbps (15 MHz)