You are on page 1of 7

See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/264141783

Consolidation of Iron Nanopowder by Nanopowder-Agglomerate Sintering at


Elevated Temperature

Article · February 2013


DOI: 10.4150/KPMI.2013.20.1.001

CITATIONS READS

2 138

4 authors, including:

Jai-Sung Lee Joonchul Yun


Hanyang University Hyundai Steel
137 PUBLICATIONS   1,402 CITATIONS    12 PUBLICATIONS   26 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Joon-Phil Choi
McGill University
39 PUBLICATIONS   168 CITATIONS   

SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Sintering mechanism of multimodal metal nanopowder View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Jai-Sung Lee on 01 August 2014.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.


J. Kor. Powd. Met. Inst., Vol. 20, No. 1, 2013

DOI: 10.4150/KPMI.2013.20.1.001

<PM리뷰>

Consolidation of Iron Nanopowder by Nanopowder-Agglomerate


Sintering at Elevated Temperature
Jai-Sung Lee*, Joon-Chul Yun, Joon-Phil Choi and Geon-Yong Lee

Department of Metallurgy and Materials Science, Hanyang University, Ansan 426-791 Korea
(Received February 12, 2013; Accepted February 25, 2013)

································································································································································································································

Abstract The key concept of nanopowder agglomerate sintering (NAS) is to enhance material transport by controlling
the powder interface volume of nanopowder agglomerates. Using this concept, we developed a new approach to full
density processing for the fabrication of pure iron nanomaterial using Fe nanopowder agglomerates from oxide powders.
Full density processing of pure iron nanopowders was introduced in which the powder interface volume is manipulated
in order to control the densification process and its corresponding microstructures. The full density sintering behavior of
Fe nanopowders optimally size-controlled by wet-milling treatment was discussed in terms of densification process and
microstructures.
Keywords: Iron nanopowder, Agglomerate sintering, Full densification, Microstructure
································································································································································································································

1. Introduction for the application of nanopowders to the pressureless


sintering method.
The potential application of nanoscale materials as The authors’ group reported that nc Ni-Fe powder
novel structural or functional engineering materials largely compacts sintered conventionally underwent the densifi-
depends on the consolidation of powders into bulk nanos- cation process strongly depending on the state of powder
cale solids. The retention of the metastable microstruc- agglomeration [4]. The consolidation was incomplete due
ture in the course of this consolidation process is mandatory to a severe influence of particle agglomeration. While
for preserving the often superior mechanical, magnetic, intra-agglomerate porosity could be eliminated almost
or catalytic properties of the material [1]. Various authors completely, inter-agglomerate porosity largely proved to
showed that pressure-assisted sintering proves particularly resist densification. Consequently, full densification of
adequate for both reaching full density and preventing nanopowder compact even at elevated temperature could
grain growth [2]. be achieved by optimizing the agglomerate size through
Besides the fabrication of nanoscale materials into either high-pressure compaction or reducing agglomerate
engineering components by hot pressing or sinter forg- size.
ing, another promising objective is the application of Based on these experimental findings, recently, Lee et
nanoscale powders to the net-shaping technique as pow- al. [5-7] have suggested a new technology for fabricat-
der injection molding. In this case pressureless sintering ing net-shape PM parts utilizing cost-effective Fe based
at elevated temperature is required. It is well known that nanopowders. These Fe based nanopowders produced by
agglomeration reduces the achievable packing density, hydrogen reduction of ball-milled Fe base oxide mixture
causes difficulties in mixing, and severely inhibits densi- are characteristics of agglomerated nanopowder structure
fication [3]. Since the tendency for cohesion between [8-11]. The sintering studies revealed that the densification
particles increases with decreasing particle size, the prob- process of such nanopowder agglomerates strongly depending
lem of particle agglomeration may be principal obstacle on the agglomerate size can reach full density even by

*Corresponding Author : Jai-Sung Lee, TEL: +82-31-400-5225, FAX: +82-31-406-5170, E-mail: jslee@hanyang.ac.kr

1
2 Jai-Sung Lee, Joon-Chul Yun, Joon-Phil Choi and Geon-Yong Lee

low temperature sintering [4,7,12-14]. The key concept almost same impurity contents of 0.052% Mg and 0.034%Cr
of the full density nanopowder sintering is based upon as the not ball-milled one. After ball milling, they were
so-called NAS process in which the sintering kinetics is dried and reduced at 450oC in hydrogen atmosphere
governed by material transport through the hierarchical (99.999%) for 1 hour. Then, in order to suppress particle
interface structures of the nanopowder agglomerates coarsening during cooling, the reduced powders were
[7,13,14]. From studies of the densification process quenched in the cooling chamber in argon atmosphere
[4,7,12-14] and the diffusion process [15-17], it has been (99.999%) which is directly connected to the furnace.
found that the hierarchical grain boundaries consisting of After cooling, the Fe powders were delivered to the
nanograin boundaries and agglomerate boundaries act as glove box for further processes where the glove box was
preferred diffusion paths for densification. kept very clean and dry in argon atmosphere. To control
This experimental finding provides a breakthrough in the agglomerate size and size distribution, the wet-mill-
processing full density nanopowders by optimal design of ing of as-reduced Fe nanopowder was performed in alco-
the agglomerate microstructure. Based on this processing hol [5].
concept, the authors succeeded in fabricating a nanograin For sintering experiment, the powders were compacted
structured Fe-Ni powder injection molded part with full at 250 MPa to reach 46±1% of theoretical density in a
density and superior mechanical property due to grain cylindrical shape. To investigate low temperature sinter-
refinement effect [5-7]. Thus we attempt to apply the ing behavior, the variation of the relative density during
NAS process for fabricating pure Fe nanopowder material heat-up and subsequent isothermal sintering was investi-
with full density and high strength. The idea of processing gated at an intermediate temperature of 700oC with a
full density Fe nanomaterial on the basis of NAS process is heating rate of 10oC/min in hydrogen atmosphere. The
basically distinguished from many previous studies on the sintering temperature was determined based on the previ-
consolidation of Fe nanopowders [18-20]. In this study, the ous works [4,7,12-14] in that the temperature near 700oC
full density sintering behavior of Fe nanopowders optimally is used for grain boundary diffusion predominating densi-
size-controlled by wet-milling treatment is discussed in fication process of Fe-Ni nanopowders.
terms of densification process and microstructures. The primary objective was to correlate the powder
characteristics and sintering properties with densification
2. Experimental Procedure behavior, microstructure and mechanical property. For
this, the sintered specimens were polished and etched
Fe nanopowder agglomerates with optimal size were using standard metallographic techniques and photo-
prepared by hydrogen reduction of ball-milled iron oxide graphed for examining the microstructures by OM, SEM
powders and subsequent wet-milling process. Experimen- and TEM observations. Vickers hardness was used for
tal details have been given elsewhere [5-11]. Briefly, characterizing its mechanical properties.
Fe2O3 (30 µm, 99.9%) powders were ball-milled at a speed
of 300 rpm for 10 hours. The chemical analysis of the 3. Results and Discussion
compositions of the oxide powders revealed that there
was nearly no change during milling process. It had Fig. 1(a) and (b) show the SEM-micrographs of Fe

Fig. 1. SEM-micrographs of iron nanopowders fabricated by hydrogen reduction of ball-milled iron oxide powder at 500oC for 2 h.
(a) as reduced iron nanopowder agglomerates and (b) after wet-milling in alcohol.

Journal of Korean Powder Metallurgy Institute (J. Kor. Powd. Met. Inst.)
Consolidation of Iron Nanopowder by Nanopowder-Agglomerate Sintering at Elevated Temperature 3

ter bimodal pore distribution, which is due to the


coexistence of intra- and inter-agglomerate pores. In case
of much larger agglomerate powder compact of 500 µm
size with a higher green density of 73%, the densifica-
tion process almost stopped at a certain condition. Larger
inter-agglomerate pores locating at triple junctions among
agglomerates proved to be responsible for such incom-
plete densification behavior. Such retardation of densifi-
cation process, however, did not take place in smaller
agglomerate sample. According to the previous work
Fig. 2. Densification process of iron nanopowder compact [13], small sized agglomerate nanopowder compacts achieve
during heat-up to 700oC with a heating rate of 10oC/min and
subsequent isothermal sintering at 700oC for 4 h in a hydrogen steady densification process in which the inter-agglomer-
atmosphere. ate boundary disappears during sintering, leading to
microstructural homogenization.
nanopowders after wet-milling in comparison with that Based upon the previous works [4,7,12-14], the occur-
for as-reduced state. After wet-milling, the Fe nano- rence of full densification during heat-up process in Fig.
agglomerate powders consisting of Fe particles with 100 2 is closely related to NAS process in which the sinter-
nm in size had an agglomerate size distribution ranging ing kinetics are governed by material transport through
from 0.5 µm to 5 µm, reflecting a more homogeneous the hierarchical interface structures of the nanopowder
distribution than that for the as-reduced powders. It is agglomerates. This phenomenon can be explained well
also observed that the Fe particles with 100 nm in size by SEM micrographs which represent microstructural
are not changed during wet-milling process in this study. homogenization occurring during heat-up sintering pro-
The result of XRD pattern in Fig. 2(c) reveals that the cess.
wet-milled Fe powders consist of pure Fe phase. As seen in Fig. 3(a-c), the agglomerates with its initial
Fig. 2 shows the densification process of the wet- size ranging from 0.5 to 5 µm enlarged with increasing
milled Fe nanopowders during heat-up with a heating densification process where the growth of Fe nanograins
rate of 10oC/min and subsequent isothermal sintering at inside the agglomerates is accompanied. As a result, the
700oC in a hydrogen atmosphere. It is seen that remark- agglomerate boundaries gradually disappeared. Initially
able densification occurs at elevated temperature, espe- dominant sintering takes place first in the agglomerate,
cially during heat-up stage reaching near full density of followed by sintering between neighboring large pow-
96.5%T.D. at 700oC. Considering the amount of densifi- ders as locally densified agglomerate powders. When the
cation occurring during heat-up sintering only, it is neighboring agglomerate powders start to sinter together
thought that the heat-up sintering process includes entire at the agglomerate boundaries, then densification process
stages of sintering Fe nanopowders from early stage to can proceed continuously. Finally, fully densified homo-
final stage, mostly intermediate stage of sintering. Three geneous microstructure, as shown in Fig. 3(d), is obtained.
samples sintered only during heating-up to 600oC, 650oC In the aspect of sintering kinetics based on diffusion
and 700oC represent 72%, 88% and 96.5% T.D., respec- process, the powder interfaces consisting of hierarchical
tively. interfaces of agglomerate- and nanograin boundaries act
This result is quite different from the case for large as diffusion paths for material transport during such rapid
agglomerate nanopowders which are larger than a few 10 densification process. This argument has been confirmed
µm and not wet-milling treated powders [4,13]. The authors by our previous studies using Fe-Ni nanopowder agglom-
reported that the Fe-40 wt%Ni agglomerate nanopowder erates on densification process during heat-up sintering as
compact with about 20 µm in agglomerate size and the well as isothermal sintering [4-7,12-14] and radiotracer
low green density of 48% resulted incomplete densifica- diffusion behavior [15-17]. It was found that the domi-
tion process [4]. This is basically due to a difficult-to-sin- nant densification kinetic is governed by grain boundary

Vol. 20, No. 1, 2013


4 Jai-Sung Lee, Joon-Chul Yun, Joon-Phil Choi and Geon-Yong Lee

size at 4 h. It is also noted that fine pores are mostly


located at triple junctions and grain boundaries. The
results of SEM-EBSD (electronback scatter diffraction)
shown in Fig. 4 compare typical microstructures of two
samples sintered for (a) 1 h and (b) 4 h, showing the
microstructural characteristics of full density Fe nanopo-
wders. The SEM micrographs clearly show that fine
pores exist mostly at grain boundaries and triple junc-
tions in the final sintering stage. The EBSD results also
represent that the microstructure of sintered Fe nanopow-
der consists of different colored Fe grains indicating dif-
ferent crystallographic orientations. This is direct evidence
Fig. 3. SEM-fractographs of iron nanopowder compacts during
heat-up sintering with a heating rate of 10oC/min and furnace- that the sintered Fe sample in this study is composed of
cooled in a hydrogen atmosphere. (a) as compacted, (b) 600oC, high angle grain boundary structure.
(c) 650oC and (d) 700oC. It is very interesting that fine pores still exist at grain
boundaries and triple junctions even in the final stage of
sintering process in this study. This is a direct evidence
for the fact that nano pores at grain boundaries and triple
junctions affected the heat-up sintering process prevail-
ing the entire densification and grain growth. It is well
known that the pores at the interfaces or triple junctions
act as a barrier against grain boundary migration, leading
to two positive effects on full density of fine grained
powder materials [22]. Due to the pore at interfaces,
enhanced densification process can last until it reaches
final full density even in low temperature sintering. This
Fig. 4. TEM- and SEM-EBSD micrographs of iron nanopowder is because the grain boundary acting as a high-diffusion
compacts during isothermal sintering in a hydrogen atmosphere path for material transport in the intermediate sintering at
for 0 h and (b) 4 h (arrows denote the micro pores located at low temperature could be efficiently incorporated with
grain boundaries and triple junctions).
the pores in the entire sintering process.
Such enhanced densification process in this wet-milled
diffusion along the hierarchical boundaries. Fe nanopowder compact can be also discussed in terms
It is interesting that the pure Fe nanopowder compact of the kinetic aspect based on diffusion process. As
with optimal agglomerate size undergoes remarkable den- reported in the previous investigations [4,12-14], the den-
sification during heat-up sintering as well as isothermal sification kinetics in the intermediate sintering stage at
sintering at low temperature of 0.53 Tm of iron. This tem- elevated temperatures is governed by material transport
perature region is characteristic of grain-boundary diffu- process along grain boundaries. Especially, in NAS pro-
sion controlled reaction kinetics [21]. In particular, it cess, atoms diffuse much faster along inter-agglomerate
should be noted that the densification in isothermal sin- boundary than nanograin boundary by two orders of
tering reaches near full density in the range of 96.5%- magnitude [15,16]. In this respect, it is thought that rapid
99.2%. This indicates that the isothermal sintering pro- densification during heat-up stage results from enhanced
cess in this study corresponds to final stage of sintering material transport along the boundaries, especially the
[22]. Fig. 4 shows TEM micrographs for Fe nanopowder agglomerate boundary.
compacts sintered isothermally. With increasing sintering The fact that residual pores still exist at grain bound-
time, the Fe grains grew from 570 nm at 0 h to 1.3 µm in aries and triple junctions in the final stage of sintering as

Journal of Korean Powder Metallurgy Institute (J. Kor. Powd. Met. Inst.)
Consolidation of Iron Nanopowder by Nanopowder-Agglomerate Sintering at Elevated Temperature 5

Table 1. The sintering properties of Fe nanopowder agglomerate


compacts isothermally sintered at 700oC
Composition Heating
(h)
time Relative density Hardness Grain size
(%) (Hv) (µm)
0 96.3 210 0.57
0.5 97.6 191 0.64
Fe 1 97.7 176 0.77
2 98.6 167 1.1
4 99 160 1.3

described above, offers a possibility for processing full


density fine-grained powder materials in low tempera-
ture sintering. This is because material transport for den-
Fig. 5. Dependence of hardness on grain size in the Fe
sification process is governed by grain boundary diffusion at nanopowder compact sintered at 700oC.
low temperature where the contribution of volume diffu-
sion to the densification might be ignored comparing to However, these values are higher than the values for con-
that of grain boundary diffusion. Calculating the mean ventional PM steel parts containing carbon content. This
diffusion distances (x=(Dt) ) in grains or at grain bound-
1/2
remarkable strengthening effect of the pure Fe nanopowder
aries under the maximum sintering condition (at 700 C o
without the presence of carbon is well interpreted in
for 4 h), the approximate values are obtained; first, diffu- terms of grain refinement effect. Fig. 5 shows the dependence
sion distance by volume diffusion (x =(D t) ) is about
vol. vol
1/2
of hardness value on grain size which represents Hall-
120 nm in which the volume diffusion coefficient for Petch relationship. It is clearly seen that the hardness
pure Fe system, D corresponds to exp(36-104422.5/
vol values are in a good agreement with a normal Hall-Petch
T+28686100/T ) m /s [23], while that by grain boundary
2 2
relationship. This means that the strengthening effect by
diffusion (x =(D t) ) is about 54 µm where the effec-
gb gb
1/2
grain refinement described above holds in this grain size
tive grain boundary diffusivity, P is equal to 3.42×10−
gb
11
range. These results are indicative of promising applica-
exp(-198 kJ/mol/RT) [24]. Therefore, it is obvious that tions for high strength pure Fe powder materials.
under this low temperature sintering process, the mate-
rial transport via volume diffusion is negligible and rather 4. Conclusion

preferentially via grain boundary diffusion. Therefore, it


is concluded that low temperature sintering of size con- Full density processing of pure Fe nanopowder agglomer-
trolled nanopowder agglomerates provides a break- ates size-controlled by wet-milling during heat-up and
through for solving full densification owing to uniform subsequent isothermal sintering at low temperature of
distribution of fine pores suppressing grain growth effec- 700 C was investigated based upon the concept of NAS
o

tively. process. It was found that the dominant densification


It is interesting that no drastic grain growth takes place kinetic is governed by grain boundary diffusion along the
during isothermal sintering at 700 C. As depicted in
o
hierarchical boundaries and the densification in isother-
Table 1, the average grain size was increased by about mal sintering reached near full density above 99%T.D.
1.7 times from 570 nm to 1.3 µm during 4 hours of Such a pronounced densification behavior results from
sintering. It is intuitive that pore pinning effect is mostly pore pinning effect of fine pores which are located at
responsible for such a slow grain growth. To examine grain boundaries and triple junctions even in the final
mechanical property, Vickers hardness was measured stage sintering process. No drastic grain growth takes
after various sintering times and summarized in Table 1 place during isothermal sintering at 700 C. Pore pinning
o

in comparison with that for the conventional PM materials. It effect is mostly responsible for such a slow grain growth,
is seen that the hardness value decreased with increasing leading to remarkable strengthening owing to grain
sintering time from H of 210 at 0 h to H of 160 at 4 h.
v v refinement effect despite no carbon content. These results

Vol. 20, No. 1, 2013


6 Jai-Sung Lee, Joon-Chul Yun, Joon-Phil Choi and Geon-Yong Lee

are indicative of promising applications for high strength [8] X. Y. Qin, J. S. Lee, J. G. Nam and B. S. Kim: Nanostr.
pure Fe powder materials. It is concluded that low Mater., 11(3) (1995) 383.
temperature sintering of size controlled nanopowder [9] B. S. Kim, J. S. Lee, T. Sekino, Y H. Choa and K. Nii-
hara: Scripta Mater., 44 (2001) 2121.
agglomerates provides a breakthrough for solving full [10] S. S. Jung, Y. S. Kang and J. S. Lee: J. Kor. Powder Met-
densification owing to uniform distribution of fine pores all. Inst., 13(3) (2006) 205.
suppressing grain growth effectively. [11] S. S. Jung and J. S. Lee: Mater. Trans., 50(9) (2009) 2270.
[12] J. S. Lee and Y. S. Kang: Scripta Mater., 44 (2001) 1591.
[13] J. S. Lee, H. G. Kang and Y. S. Kang: Advances in Pow-
Acknowledgement der & Particulate Materials-2008, Metal Powder Indus-
tries Federation, Princeton, NJ, 2(5) (2008) 14.
This work has been supported financially by the Korea [14] J. S. Lee, W. K. You and B. H. Cha: Mater. Sci. Forum,
Research Council for Industrial Science and Technology 638 (2010) 93.
(“Development of the Preparation Technology of 0.1-10 [15] S. V. Divinski, F. Hisker, Y. S. Kang, J. S. Lee and Chr.
Herzig: Z. Metallkd., 93 (2002) 256.
µm Sized Metal Powders and Fine-Components for [16] S. V. Divinski, F. Hisker, Y. S. Kang, J. S. Lee and Chr.
Micro Electronics”, 2012-00000001921). The authors are Herzig: Z. Metallkd., 93 (2002) 265.
also grateful to colleagues for their essential contribution [17] S. V. Divinski, F. Hisker, Y. S. Kang, J. S. Lee and Chr.
to this work. Herzig: Interface Sci., 11 (2003) 67.
[18] Z. Livne, A. Munitz, J. C. Rawers and R. J. Fields: Nanostr.
Mater., 10(4) (1998) 503.
References [19] R. Kalyanaraman, Sang Yoo, M. S. Krupashankara, T. S.
Sudarshan and R. J. Dowding: Nanostr. Mater., 10(8)
[1] C. Suryanarayana: Int. Mater. Rev., 40 (1995) 41. (1995) 383.
[2] J. R. Groza and R. J. Dowding: Nanostr. Mater., 7(7) (1996) [20] L. J. Kecskes and R. H. Woodman: Scripta Mater., 48
749. (2003) 1041.
[3] R. M. German: Sintering Theory and Practice, John Wiley [21] I. Kaur and W. Gust: Fundamentals of Grain and Inter-
and Sons, New York (1996). phase Boundary Diffusion, Ziegler Press, Stuttgart (1998).
[4] P. Knorr, J. G. Nam and J. S. Lee: Metall. Mater. Trans., [22] R. M. German: Powder Metallurgy and Particulate Materials
31A (2000) 503. Processing, Metal Powder Industries Federation, Princeton,
[5] J. S. Lee, B. H. Cha and Y. S. Kang: Adv. Eng. Mater., NJ (2005).
7(6) (2005) 467. [23] M. Luebbehusen and H. Mehrer: Acta Metall. Mater., 38
[6] B. H. Cha and J. S. Lee: J. Kor. Powder Metall. Inst., (1990) 283.
16(5) (2009) 342. [24] S. V. Divinski, J. Geise, E. Rabkin and Chr. Herzig: Z.
[7] J. S. Lee, B. H. Cha and W. K. You: Intern. J. Powder Metallkde., 95 (2004) 10.
Metallurgy, 46(3) (2010) 27.

Journal of Korean Powder Metallurgy Institute (J. Kor. Powd. Met. Inst.)

View publication stats

You might also like