Republic of the Philippines
8" Judicial Region
Province of Northern Samar
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT OF
i CAPUL-SAN VICENTE
ALBIN C. CALAMAY,
GENEROSA €. CALAMAY and
ANISETO C. CALAMAY
Plaintiffs, Civil Case No. 53
~versus- For:
IMELDA S. CASTILLO, RECOVERY OF POSSESSION
MAMERTA 8. MAGLOYUAN, & OWNERSHIP WITH DAMAGES.
LINO SAURO, NOEL SAURO,
RODOLFO SAURO, GLORIA
S. DENTE,
Defendants.
x
TO: IMELDAS. CASTILLO
Brgy. San Luis
Capul, Northern Samar
GREETINGS:
You are hereby required, within fifteen (15) days after service of this
summons upon you, to file with this court and serve on the plaintif your
answer to the complaint, copy of whieh is hereto attached, together with the
annexes. You are reminded of the provision in the IBP-OCA Memorandum
of Policy Guidelines dated March 12, 2002 to observe restraint in filing a
motion to dismiss and instead allege the grounds thereto as defenses in the
Answer: If you [ail to answer within the time fixed, the plaintiff will take
judgment by default and be granted the relief applied for in the complaint.
WITNESS MY HAND under the the seal of the Court, this 23rd day
of July, 2018 at Capul, Northern Samar.
VIR z we MONTOPAR
lerk of CourtRepublic of the Philippines
Province of Northern Samar
MUNICIPAL CIRCUIT TRIAL COURT OF
CAPUL-SAN VICENTE
Capul, Northern Samar
ALBIN C. CALAMAY,
GENEROSA C. CALAMAY and
ANISETO C. CALAMAY, as
Represented by ALBIN C. CALAMAY
Plaintiff, Civil Case No__ <3
-versus-
For:
Recovery of Possession and
Ownership with Damages
IMELDA S. CASTILLO,
MAMERTA S. MAGLOYUAN,
LINO SAURO, NOEL SAURO,
RODOLFO SAURO
GLORIA S. DENTE
Defendants.
x x
COMPLAINT
Plaintiffs, by counsel, and unto the Honorable Court, most
respectfully states, that:
1 Plaintiffs Generosa C. Calamay and Aniseto C. Calamay, with
capacity to sue and be sued, are of legal age, Filipino citizens, residents
of Barangay Barangay IV Poblacion, Capul, Northern Samar represented
by Albin C. Calamay pursuant to a Special Power of Attorney executed
by plaintiffs hereto attached as Annex “A” and made an integral part
hereof. Plaintiff Albin C. Calamay, also of legal age, married, Filipino, with
capacity to sue and be sued, and a resident of Barangay IV Poblacion,
Capul, Northern Samar, where he may be served with notices and other
processes of this Honorable Court;
2. Defendants Imelda S. Castillo, Mamerta S. Magloyuan, Lino
Sauro, Noel Sauro, Rodolfo Sauro, Jr. and Gloria S. Dente, with capacity
to sue and be sued, are likewise of legal age, siblings to each other,
Filipino citizens and are residents of Barangay San Luis, Capul, Northern
Samar where they may be served with summons and other court
processes;3. Plaintiffs are the absolute and lawful owners of a parcel of
agricultural land situated in Barangay San Luis, Capul, Northern Samar
covered by Original Certificate ‘of Title No. 19147 in the name of
GUALBERTO CALAMAY designated as Lot No. 2369, Pls 1056-D,
declared for taxation purposes also in the name of GUALBERTO
CALAMAY as per Tax Declaration No. 2012-05-011-00690 with an
assessed value of Php 4,4750.00, particularly described as follows:
“A parcel of an agricultural land denominated as Lot No. 2364,
Pls-1056-D, C-3 with an area of THREE THOUSAND THREE
HUNDRED NINETY (3,390) SQUARE METERS, bounded on
the SW., along line 1-2 by Barrio Road; on the NW along line 2-
3 by Lot by Lot 2365; on the NE. along line 3-4 by Capul Pass;
‘on the SE. along line 4-1 by Lot 2064, all of Pls-1056-D, Capul
Public Land Subdivision. Containing an area of 3,380 square
meters.”
Photo copies of the aforesaid title and tax declaration are attached
hereto as Annexes “B” and “C”, respectively to form part hereof,
4, Plaintiff Generosa Calamay, widow, and Plaintiffs Aniseto and
Albin Calamay, children, are the heirs of GUALBERTO CALAMAY,
decedent-registered owner of the whole lot described above. Decedent,
during his lifetime, in tum bought the same property from its primitive
owner, Candido Catucod as evidenced by instruments of conveyance
captioned Deed of Absolute Sale of Unregistered Land executed on
September 5, 1966.
Photocopy of the aforesaid deed is hereto attached as Annex “D”
to form part hereof,
5. Upon the death of Gualberto Calamay, the above-property was
inherited by plaintiffs and they eventually took over the possession and
cultivation of the same. They have consistently paid the real property
taxes thereof.
Photo copies of the tax payment receipts are attached hereto as
Annexes “E” and “F”, respectively to form part hereof;
6. That sometime year 2005, plaintiffs decided to use the whole
area to pave way for copra production. Unfortunately, they found that the
southwestern portion of Lot 2364 was being cultivated by the defendants.
Plaintiffs demanded from the defendants to return possession of the oft-
repeated portion of Lot 2364 but defendants would not budge their
demand as the latter advised the former that the said area formed part of
Lot 2064, Pls 1056-D which was owned by the defendants. Plaintiffs’ lot
denominated as Lot 2364 and Defendants’ lot denominated as Lot 2064
are adjacent to each other. :
7. That in order to validate plaintiffs’ claim that the oft-repeated
portion is still part of the larger tract of Lot 2364 which belonged to them,
they requested from DENR-CENRO, Catarman N. Samar, a copy of theSketch Plan of Lot 2364, Pls 1056 which was plotted based on the
Technical Description of the aforesaid lot on file with the office.
Photocopy of the aforesaid Sketch Plan prepared by DENR-
CENRO is hereto attached as Annex “G” to form part hereof,
8. That plaintiffs, in order to dispel defendants’, claim of ownership,
tried to enartissloti ‘2 geodetic engineer sometime September 2015 to
conduct a relocation survey but to their dismay, they were surprised that
defendants had illegally and arrogantly placed a fence in the oft-repeated
area enclosing EIGHT FORTY-SEVEN (847) SQUARE METERS thereof.
Plaintiffs made several demands to vacate and surrender the fenced area,
albeit orally, but defendants would not surrender possession of the
premises and kept on claiming ownership over the same. Thus, plaintiffs
were constrained to enter the incident in the Police Blotter of PNP Capul.
Photocopy of the aforesaid police blotter accompanied by a receipt
for its issuance are hereto attached as Annex “H” and “H-1” to form part
hereof;
9. The defendants’ adamant position prompted the plaintiffs to
seek the assistance of the Public Attorney's Office in order to settle the
issue (pre-litigation conference) but defendants, despite entering into a
Compromise Agreement and agreeing to abide by the result of the
relocation survey conducted by a geodetic engineer commissioned by
both parties, still did not surrender the possession of the 847 square
meters disputed area which area was found out to be within plaintiffs’
property as shown in a Sketch Plan.
Photo copies of Compromise Agreement and the Sketch Plan are
attached hereto as Annexes “I” and “J”, respectively to form part hereof;
10. That with the defendants’ refusal to vacate the area subject
matter of this case, plaintiffs were compelled to lodge a complaint before
the Office of the Punong Barangay of San Luis, Capul, Northem Samar
for conciliation and mediation proceedings as mandated under the
Katarungang Pambarangay Law, but said dispute was not settled as
shown in a Certification to File Action, photocopy of which is attached
hereto as Annex “K” to also form part of this complaint;
141. Due to the wanton, malicious, and unjustified refusal of the
defendants to vacate and surrender the possession of the aforementioned
“lot, plaintiffs suffered serious anxiety moral shock, mental anguish social
humiliation, besmirched reputation and similar injuries for which
defendants should pay plaintiffs the amount of not less than
Php100,000.00.
12. That because of the contumacious stance of the defendants in
refusing to vacate the property in question, plaintiff was constrained to
institute this action, availing the services of the Public Attorney's Office in
order to prosecute the instant claim and that in so doing, plaintiff has
already incurred and would be further incurring litigation expenses until
the termination of this case in the amount of Php20,000.00PRAYER
WHEREFORE, foregoing premises considered, plaintiff prays that
after due notice and hearing, judgment be rendered:
1. Declaring plaintiff as the lawful owner of the property in
controversy;
2. Ordering defendants to immediately and peacefully vacate the
subject lot and to remove and demolish any and all
improvements found thereon;
3. Ordering defendants to pay plaintiffs actual and moral damages
in the amount of Php100,000.00
4. Ordering defendants to pay attorney's fees in the sum of
Php10,000.00 as allowed under Section 4 (Sec. 16-D) of
Republic Act No. 9406, otherwise known as PAO Law of 2007;
and if
5. Ordering defendants to pay litigation expenses in the amount of
Php20,000.00 and costs of suit.
2
. Other reliefs, just and equitable under the premises are likewise
prayed for.
Allen for Capul, Norther Samar, "WH 28 2m
PUBLIC ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Hall of Justice
Public Attohney Ill/District Officer-In-ChargeVERIFICATION/CERTIFICATION
Republic of the Philippines)
Province of Northern Samar) S. S.
Municipality of Allen)
|, ALBIN CALAMAY, of legal age, married, Filipino citizen and a
resident of Barangay IV Poblacion, Capul, Northem Samar, after having
wom to in accordance with law, depose and state:
1. That | am the plaintiff in the above-entitled case; that | have
caused the preparation of the foregoing complaint and have
read the contents thereof; and that the allegations therein are
true and correct based on my own personal knowledge and on
authentic documents and records at hand;
2. That | have not commenced any similar action before the
Supreme Court, the Court of Appeals or any court or tribunal;
that to the best of my knowledge, there is no case with similar
Parties and issues that is pending today with the Supreme Court,
the Court of Appeals, or any other body or tribunal; that |
undertake to report to this Honorable Court if | should learn
thereafter of any similar case within five (5) days from
knowledge thereof.
AY WITNESS WHEREOF, we have hereunto affix our signatures
Juthis & ** day of June 2018 in Allen, Northern Samar.
ALBIN C. CALAMAY
Plaintiff/Affiant
ID No, 0804 -
gun 28 208
SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN to before me this ® day of
June 2018 in Allen, Northern,
ar, affiants showed to me their
respective identification cards jfdicafed above as competent evidence of
their identities.