Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2020
Contents
Introduction .......................................................... 2
Elements of interaction model ............................. 2
The parties in the interaction process .................. 2
Process of interactions .......................................... 3
Types of interaction .............................................. 3
Interaction environment ....................................... 4
Analyse of a chosen relationship based on the
elements discussed above. ................................... 5
Conclusion. ............................................................ 6
References ............................................................ 6
1
Introduction
As business world is full of organisations which interact with each other in whole or partially
for some social and economic benefit. These interactions require individual, with diverse and
complex skills and characteristics, use of technology, other equipment and resources and
particular atmosphere which facilitate their activities in a given socio -economic and
controlling environment to achieve some desired objectives.
The Interaction Model, proposed by the IMP Group of researchers (Håkansson, 1982; Ford,
1990, 1997, 2001) when like-minded researchers from France, the UK, Italy and Germany
came together.
The atmosphere affecting and being affected by the interaction. This involve the power
dependency, conflict and cooperation, closeness and social distances which effect the
relationships strengths due to the inter dependency of the two organisations. (David
Ford,2002).
The environment within which interaction takes place consist of the market opportunities,
organisations size and structure, past experiences of the organisation in international level
and social system obstacles.
2
Process of interactions
The interaction process can be defined as both short- and long-term perspectives. Over time,
the relationship is developed through the routinisation of events /episodes and which tend
to institutionalize or destabilize it, depending on the evaluations made by the two firms in
the interaction. These episodes may vary in terms of types of exchange. Through social
exchange with the supplier, the customer attempts to reduce decision- making uncertainty.
With the passage of time and with mutual adaptation, a relationship-specific mode develops,
which protect the process of interaction in case a crises develops and forms the specific
procedures or patterns for mutual developments, communication style between individuals
and more or less implicit rules which serve as a framework for any future relationship.
The relationship could be short term or long term. The short-term relationships are mostly
transactional and ends with single or fewer sourcing activities. but quite often the
relationship between the organisation are long term (Ford,2002) and consist of continuity in
episodes/events. these long-term relationships of the two organisations may be affected
more or less by the events itself or the individual events of both organisations.
The events between the organisation take place in the areas of such as, the products and
services exchange, financial resources, the information and social exchanges.
Types of interaction
There are four types of interactions. The understanding of their characteristics is important
in persuading a relationship. the variety of collaboration of contractors as well as with
subcontractors as discussed by, Iper Blenker & Poul Rind Christensen ,2006 ,in detail.
Standard subcontracting. this involved the standard activities relating to production that a
organisation carries out daily basis in contract with other organisation.in this interaction
there is normally no need for adoration to fulfil specific customers needs this is very
important to the contractor. Sub- contractors possess a critical competence of value to the
contractor (Hollenson.2007).it represents the situations where there are relatively simple
customers. Interaction is very low and narrow
It is not always product or money that is exchanged. There is often a large amount of
informational contact. For example, technical details may be discussed by research,
production or engineering staff from both companies in respect of new product or process
initiatives (Cunningham and Homse, 1986).
Information exchange is simple because the contractor specifies criteria for contribution.
The contractor’s in-house capacity is often a major competitor.
Expanded subcontracting.
This interaction develops, where some mutual specialization between the two parties exist
and exit costs are higher for both organisations. So, replacing the interaction to multi
supplier may be viable.
3
activities are coordinated by dialogue.
Partnership-based subcontracting.
This is a relationship based on a strong mutual strategic value and dependency. The
subcontractor is highly involved in the resource & development activities of the contractor.
There is a certain overlap between the different types of subcontractor, and in a specific
relationship it can be very difficult to place a subcontractor in a certain type.
Relationship atmosphere
the atmosphere relates to power dependency, which restrict and centralise the interaction
among the organisation, cooperation and conflicts arise due to various activities and
interaction, closeness due to trust development. This trust develops when organisation
interact each other to relocate some facilities of productions and delivery etc, jointly for the
economic benefits. One of the reasons of closeness is the transaction cost
(Williamson,1975). The conflicts in organisation lead to the creation of distance.
Interaction environment
it consists of the set of external conditions and forces that have the potential to influence
the organisation. (Janice Edwards, 2014). the relationships between the organisations
evolve in a general macro environment that has great effect on their interaction. This
environment of interaction can be analysed in the following contexts.
Social system, market structure, market inter- nationalization
and market dynamism (growth, innovation rate).
The social system is formed by the cultural behaviours and practices. so organisation may
face certain obstacles in developing relationship in the process of exchanges with its
counterparts .these cultural and traditions differences and at some points the religious
practices form certain attitude which effect the buying certain products from the seller this
also involves the political interest of certain countries and law of land to prevent
organisation to enter in a relationship which does not comply to law of land or political
interest.
The stability in the market and rate of exchange of a country currency also effect the buyer
and seller relationships. understanding these aspects of the market help both organisations
to determine the ultimate effects on their mutual relations.
The dynamism in the market create the opportunities which in some cases, maybe more or
less violated in order to gain more financial benefits. Although it increases the organisations
share in the market due to the actions of other party in relationship as well as it decreases
the buying organisations dependency on single or fewer partners.
When it comes to developing the products or services the position of an individual
relationship is affected by more or less by the other party involvement in the process of
4
channelizing product from primary producer/manufacturer to the final customer.
The organisation which have their presence in the international market or are forced to
enter in the international market to reduce the cost of production or any other economic
benefits require in some cases heavy investment in outsourcing a production or selling their
subsidiary to cover the cost.
5
Conclusion.
This paper is very brief theorical description of various elements of IMP group, the process
understanding in business relationship and analysis of a hypothetical relationship in the light
of IMP group. A bit more in depth analysis will be require to serve the general reader to
understand the issues and action needed in a particular situation, where the process is more
complex in nature. Due to the time and briefness of the topic I tried to explain a common
understanding of the issue raised in the question using theoretical approach.
References
Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications: a study in the economics of
internal organisation, Oliver E. Williamson, Free Press, 1975 .
Mastering Strategic Management – 1st Canadian Edition 2014 Janice Edwards.( Chapter 3
Evaluating the External environment),
(https://opentextbc.ca/strategicmanagement/chapter/the-relationship-between-an-
organization-and-its-environment/) (accessed 10.02.2020)
Blenker, Per & Christensen, Poul. (1995). Interactive strategies in supply chains–a double-
edged portfolio approach to small-and medium-sized subcontractors’ position analyses.
Entrepreneurship and Regional Development - ENTREP REG DEV. 7. 249-264.
10.1080/08985629500000016.
European Journal of Operational Research, Vol: 128, Issue: 3, Page: 509-531( accessed
10.02.2020).
Turnbull, P., Ford, D. and Cunningham, M. (1996), "Interaction, relationships and networks
in business markets: an evolving perspective", Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing,
Vol. 11 No. 3/4, pp. 44-62.