Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IN THE MATTER OF
VINOD
(PETITIONER)
V.
SHILPA
(DEFENDANT)
1.
2.
3.
THE PETITIONER HAS APPROACHED THIS HON’BLE FAMILY COURT OF DELHI UNDER SECTION 7 OF
FAMILY COURTS ACT, 1984
Vinod and Shilpa got married in the year 1990. At the time of marriage, Vinod was getting
Rs 3500/- per month as his salary from the firm M/s Jain and Company, whereas Shilpa was
working with a multinational company and earning Rs 7000 per month and as well as other
perks. Both were posted at Jaipur.
Subsequently, Vinod got a lucrative job in Delhi where his salary was Rs 6000/- per month.
After joining, he requested his wife to resign from her job and move over to Delhi but the
request was refused by Shilpa on one pretext or the other. She thought that it was necessary
for her to retain the job at Jaipur as her husband’s income was not sufficient to maintain the
family. Further, despite the marriage subsisting for 4 yours, the couple was not having a
child. Though earlier Shilpa at her insistence and initiative got her pregnancy terminated
medically, thrice during the last four years. When Vinod was anxious for a child. Shilpa is of
the opinion that in the initial years of her career she is not ready for a child and she will not
be able to handle both.
Greatly perturbed by the turn of events in the marital life, Vinod files a petition for restitution
of conjugal rights against Shilpa, and in the alternative prays for grant of Divorce on the
ground of wife’s cruelty. Per contra, Shilpa contends that she has a right of equality under
Article 14 of the Constitution and thus, a right to continue her job. Furthermore she contends
that to have a child on the insistence of her husband would be violative of Article 21 which
guarantees right to personal liberty.