Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Canagahan BSCE-2A
2. What are the issues that the three reformers namely, Luther, Calvin and
Zwingli fought and sought to be reformed in the Catholic Church. Kindly
discuss one by one. (10 Pts.)
Martin Luther (1483) – He nailed his famous (95) theses on the door of
the Church at Wittenberg as his “protest” to the Catholic Church; an act
that would bring Luther to separation from the Church and to an
eventual birth Protestant movements. His enduring legacies to
Protestantism are the following: the condemnation of the sale of
indulgence, the translation of the Bible into the vernacular (German
Language) in order to make it available to the Ordinary People,
consideration of Baptism and Eucharist as the only valid sacraments, his
attack on the veneration of saints and Marian devotions, the Sacred
Scripture as the only authority of Christian teaching ( sola scriptura,
scripture alone) and his famous doctrine on justification by faith alone (
sola fide, faith alone).
John Calvin (1564) – He was a Protestant reformer known for his
influential writing, Institutes of the Christian Religion, which eventually
became a “handbook of Protestant doctrine.” Like his Protestant
counterparts, he put primacy on the Sacred Scripture as a source of
belief, rejected the papacy and stressed on divine grace for salvation. He
went to extreme in his teaching on Predestination. He taught that “God
has already determined our destiny… and that God indeed allows many
to be damned to manifest divine justice.” Thus, the Church, for Calvin, is
the “Company of the elect.”
Ulrich Zwingli (1531) – Ulrich Zwingli of Zurich, Switzerland “began to
abolish the Mass itself. He also challenged the legitimacy of some of the
Sacraments. Zurich began to seize Church property, rejected celibacy
and the convents and monasteries were suppressed.” He even claimed
as far as the saying that the Holy Eucharist is just an ordinary, memorial
meal: thus, “Jesus was not really present in the Eucharist.”
3. How did the Catholic Church respond to the reformers such as Luther,
Calvin, and Zwingli? (10 Pts.)
With the problems inherent in the Church and the external
controversies caused by the Protestant Reformers, the Catholic
Church braced itself to resolve its own concerns and carefully
addressed the valid points raised by the reformers. According to
scholars and historians, reform was already underway in the Church,
even before the emergence of the reformers. For instance, there
was great development in the fields of Christian mission and
education especially the ones initiated by Ignatius of Loyola and his
companion, (known today as the Society of Jesus), who “sought to
be the servants of the Church par excellence.” In addition, there was
“the flowering of spirituality and the rise of religious orders” like the
Order of the Carmelites in Spain (notable among them were Saints
Teresa of Avila and John of the Cross). Fairly, we may say that the
Church was conscious of its own problems and made independent
progress prior to the reformation.
4. What happened to the Catholic Church after Vatican II? If you are to
describe the Post Vat. II Catholic Church, what would it be? (10 Pts.)
If I were to describe the Post Vat. II Catholic Church, it would be
Proper Organized or Well Utilized it is because of the greatest
number of delegates with 2600 Bishops from all over the world and
the additional participation of theologians and experts. It was also
greatly represented in terms of nations and cultures, wherein
bishops and participants from various countries like South America,
North America, Asia, Africa, Central America and Oceania attended
the Council. And these priests and bishops were non-Europeans,
native citizens from missionary areas representing their place and
culture of origin. It is also the first council to include the presence of
non-Catholics, lay participants as guests and observers of the
council. First to utilize the gift of modernization, like the modern
means of communication and transportation and was emphasized
promotion of peace and unity among nations, not the usual pattern
in an ecumenical council which usually focused on the
condemnation of heretics, or the formulation of doctrines.
5. Can the Church separate herself from the social-political realities of the
world? Kindly expound. (10 Pts.)
Yes it can separate itself from the social-political problems and
realities of the world. It’s because separation of Church and state is
a philosophic and jurisprudential concept for defining political
distance in the relationship between religious organizations and the
nation state. Conceptually, the term refers to the creation of a
secular state (with or without legally explicit church – state
separation) and to disestablishment, the changing of an existing,
formal relationship between the church and the realities of the
world. The Church – state separation varies from total separation,
mandated by the country’s political constitution to a state religion.
6. What is the meaning of the term, ‘’ Church of the Poor’’? Kindly elaborate
further. (10 Pts.)
In my own opinion the term, “Church of the Poor” somehow means
that it is a Church for the people who are Poor in Spirit whereby
individuals humble themselves and seek for the Lord. It is a place
where you can find peace and people treated as equal. A Church
that embraces and practices the evangelical spirit of poverty which
combines detachment from possessions with a profound trust in the
Lord as the only source of salvation. A Church that will courageously
defend and vindicate the rights of the poor and the oppressed even
doing so will mean alienation or persecution from the rich and
powerful. A Church where nobody is so poor as to have nothing to
give, and nobody so rich as to have nothing to receive.”
7. Why is it that the family is considered ‘’ Domestic Church’’? What are the
challenges that the family faces today? (10 Pts.)
The term “Domestic Church” refers to the family, the smallest body
of gathered believers in Christ. Though recovered only recently, the
term dates all the way back to the first century (After Death). “Our
Early Church Fathers understood that the home was fertile ground
for discipleship, sanctification, and holiness. Domestic Church plays
a key role in our sanctification because it is the primary place where
we practice coming to intimately love other persons and also to the
person who we loved the most.
9. In your own opinion, do you think that Jesus is happy with the way the
institutional Church is administered and manage today? Why? (10 Pts.)
Yes, because the people and its ministers are well administered and
well managed of their daily living routine within the institute and
also no, it’s because not of a 100% people or individuals are willing
to participate this kind of institution, some may participating but
aren’t willing, it is by the heart to participate by willingness in this
kind of administration.
10. As Cor Jesian, what suggestions or actions can you contribute for the welfare
of the church and kits members in today’s time? (10 Pts.)
As a Cor Jesian it is a call of action, we must contribute for the
welfare of the church because it is an appeal especially to the
pastors, educators, and catechists to teach the Catholic social
tradition in its fullness. These reflections are not a comprehensive
summary of its rich heritage and content. Our social tradition has
been developed and expressed through a variety of major
documents. The Catechism of the Catholic Church summarizes the
essence of this social teaching of the Church. The focus of this action
statement is the urgent task to incorporate Catholic social teaching
more fully and explicitly into Catholic educational program. This
must be undertaken the context of efforts to share Faith in its
entirety and to encourage Catholics to experience the gospel call to
conversion in all its dimensions. The sharing of our social tradition is
a defining measure of Catholic education and formation.