Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Aim: 4
Introduction: 4
Multistage Centrifugal Pump: 5
Description: 6
Efficiency of Centrifugal pumps 6
Nomenclature: 8
Procedure: 9
Observations: 10
Constant RPM 10
Constant Pd 12
Calculations: 14
Sample Calculations: 14
Single Stage Centrifugal Pump: 14
Parallel setup: 15
Series setup: 15
Complete Calculations: 16
Pure Water, constant RPM 17
Constant Pd 18
Innovation: 19
Solution Preparation: 19
Observations: 19
With Gelatin (0.01%w/v), constant RPM: 20
With Gelatin (0.01%w/v), Constant Pd: 21
With Gelatin (0.02%w/v),Constant RPM: 22
With Gelatin (0.02%w/v), Constant Pd: 23
Sample Calculations: 24
Single Stage Centrifugal Pump: 24
Parallel setup: 24
Series setup: 25
Single Stage Centrifugal Pump: 26
Series setup: 27
Parallel setup: 28
Complete Calculations: 29
With Gelatin (0.01%w/v), constant RPM 29
With Gelatin (0.01%w/v), constant Pd 30
With Gelatin (0.02%w/v), constant RPM 31
With Gelatin (0.02%w/v), constant Pd 32
Results: 33
Pressure Head 33
Pure Water 33
Summary 38
Efficiency: 38
Pure Water 38
Effect of Gelatin 39
Summary 42
Frequency Domain Analysis 42
Pump 1 43
Pump 2 44
Pump 1 vs Pump 2 46
Conclusions: 46
References: 47
Objective:
To study single and multistage centrifugal pump-Series and Parallel combination.
Aim:
The aim is to compute the following:
• Power input
• Shaft output
• Discharge
• Total head
• Pump output
• Overall efficiency
• Pump efficiency
Introduction:
Centrifugal pump converts mechanical energy to hydraulic energy (in form of pressure
energy) by the action of centrifugal force on the fluid. Common uses include water,
sewage, agriculture, petroleum and petrochemical pumping.
Theory:
The centrifugal pump acts as a reversed of an inward radial flow reaction turbine. This
means that the flow in centrifugal pumps is in the radial outward directions. The
centrifugal pump works on the principle of forced vortex flow, which means that an
external torque rotates a certain mass of liquid, the rise in pressure head of the rotating
liquid takes place. The rise in pressure head at any point of the rotating liquid is
proportional to the square of tangential velocity of (i.e. rise in pressure head = V2/ 2g or
ω2r2/2g) the liquid at that point. Thus at the outlet of the impeller where radius is more,
the rise in pressure head will be more and the liquid will be discharged at the outlet with
a high- pressure head. Due to this high-pressure head, the liquid can be lifted to a high
level.
Experimental Set-Up
This implies net pump head is equal to the change in the pressure head
Power delivered to fluid:
Pw = Q∆P
Efficiency:
Relevant Equations:
, kW
, m3 sec−1
, m of water
, kW
Nomenclature:
A = Area of measuring tank, m2.
EMC = energy meter constant, Pulses/kW-hr
Ei = Pump input, kW
ES = Shaft output, kW
Eo = Pump output, kW
FL = Flow rate, LPH.
g = Acceleration due to gravity, m/sec2.
H = Total Head, m.
hpg = Height of pressure gauge from suction of the pump, m.
N = Speed of Pump, RPM.
P = Pulses of energy meter.
Pd = Delivery pressure, kg/cm2
PS1 = Suction pressure of pump 1, mmHg.
PS2 = Suction pressure of pump 2, mmHg / kg/cm2.
Q = Discharge, m3/sec.
tp = Time taken for P pulses of energy meter, sec.
ⲣ = Density of fluid, kg/m3.
ηp = Pump efficiency, %.
ηo = overall efficiency, %.
ηm = Motor efficiency, %
Procedure:
1. The drain valves were fully closed.
2. The sump tank was ¾ filled with clean water while ensuring that no foreign
particles are present in the tank.
3. Flow Control Valve given on the water discharge line and control valve given on
suction line were fully opened.
4. It was ensured that all On/Off Switches given on the Panel are at OFF position.
5. The Main Power Supply (220 VAC, 50 Hz) was switched on and the Pump was
switched on.
6. The desired RPM of pump was set.
7. The Flow Control Valve was operated in order to regulate the flow of water
discharged by the pump.
8. The Control Valve was operated to regulate the suction of the pump
9. Discharge pressure, suction pressure, power consumption & discharge were
recorded.
10. The same procedure for different RPMs of the pumps was repeated.
11. The same procedure for different discharge pressures with constant speed of
pumps was repeated.
12. When experiment is over, gate valve provided on the discharge line was properly
opened.
13. The RPM of the pump was reduced with the help of DC Drive.
14. The pump was switched off.
15. The Power Supply to Panel was switched off.
Observations:
EMC = 3200 pulses/k W hr
ⲣ = 1000 kg/m3
hpg =
1 m
g = 9.81 m/s2
ηm =0.8 (assumed)
Constant RPM
Centrifugal pump-1 (Single Stage)
Parallel Stage
Series Stage
Parallel Stage
Series setup:
P 3600
Ei = tp x EM C
=E
= 0.664 kW
Es = Ei × ηm
= 0.664*0.8
= 0.531 kW
Fl
Q = 1000 3600
*
8000
= 1000 3600
*
= 0.0022 m3/s
P s1
H= 10 × [Pd + 760 ]+h⍴g
160
= 10*[0.25+ 760 ]+1
= 5.61 m of water
⍴gQH
Eo = 1000
1000*9.8*0.0022*5.61
= 1000
= 0.121 kW
Eo
ηo = E *100
i
0.121
= 0.664 *100
=18.22 %
Eo
ηp = E *100
s
0.121
= 0.531 *100
= 22.79 %
Complete Calculations:
Pure Water, constant RPM
Single Stage - Pump 1
Ei Es Q H Eo ηo ηp
0.34 0.272 0.0031 5.42 0.162 47.744 59.680
0.362 0.2896 0.0028 5.89 0.160 44.328 55.410
0.373 0.2984 0.0022 7.61 0.166 44.404 55.505
0.38 0.304 0.0017 8.32 0.136 35.743 44.679
0.391 0.3128 0.0014 8.55 0.116 29.773 37.216
Parallel Stage
Ei Es Q H Eo ηo ηp
0.995 0.796 0.0039 4.22 0.161 16.153 20.191
0.971 0.7768 0.0036 4.05 0.143 14.770 18.463
1.017 0.8136 0.0033 4.45 0.145 14.306 17.883
Series Stage
Ei Es Q H Eo ηo ηp
0.664 0.5312 0.0022 5.61 0.122 18.384 22.980
0.687 0.5496 0.0019 6.71 0.128 18.613 23.267
0.711 0.5688 0.0017 6.82 0.111 15.657 19.572
0.737 0.5896 0.0014 7.05 0.096 13.025 16.281
0.755 0.604 0.0011 7.79 0.085 11.234 14.043
Constant Pd
Single Stage - Pump 1
Ei Es Q H Eo ηo ηp
0.469 0.375 0.0024 7.63 0.182 38.759 48.449
0.455 0.364 0.0022 7.11 0.150 32.945 41.182
0.427 0.342 0.0020 6.84 0.135 31.624 39.531
0.435 0.348 0.0016 6.05 0.095 21.779 27.224
0.445 0.356 0.0013 6.06 0.074 16.662 20.827
Parallel Stage
Ei Es Q H Eo ηo ηp
1.105 0.884 0.0045 5.47 0.242 21.913 27.391
1.163 0.9304 0.0043 5.21 0.220 18.904 23.630
1.179 0.9432 0.0036 4.95 0.175 14.850 18.563
1.207 0.9656 0.0040 5.21 0.202 16.746 20.933
1.217 0.9736 0.0029 4.36 0.124 10.229 12.786
Series Stage
Ei Es Q H Eo ηo ηp
0.78 0.624 0.0011 4.29 0.046 5.838 7.298
0.795 0.636 0.0020 5.34 0.105 13.262 16.577
0.816 0.6528 0.0026 6.39 0.165 20.267 25.333
0.836 0.6688 0.0030 6.92 0.203 24.227 30.284
0.863 0.6904 0.0033 7.71 0.252 29.186 36.483
Innovation:
To test the effect of fluid properties on the pump, a gelatin solution was used instead of pure
water as the fluid circulating in the apparatus. This solution was prepared at two different
concentrations and the same experiment was carried out for single stage, parallel stage and
series stage setups.
Solution Preparation:
We have 128L of water.
The required amount of solutes were carefully weighed, and the solution was prepared by
dissolving the solute in a small volume of heated water (200 mL) and using magnetic stirrer to
obtain a well-mixed solution. This solution was added to the volume of water in the tank in order
to obtain the required concentration of solution circulating in the apparatus.
Observations:
With Gelatin (0.01%w/v), constant RPM:
Centrifugal pump-1 (Single Stage)
Parallel Stage
Series Stage
Parallel Stage
Series Stage
Series Stage
Parallel Stage
Series Stage
Parallel Stage
Parallel setup:
P 3600
Ei = tp x EM C
= 0.995 kW
Es = Ei × ηm
= 0.995*0.8
= 0.796 kW
Fl
Q = 1000 3600
*
14000
= 1000 3600
*
= 0.0039 m3/s
(P s1 +P s2 )/2
H = 10 × [Pd + 760 ]+h⍴g
(160+25)/2
= 10*[0.2+ 760 ]+1
= 4.21 m of water
⍴gQH
Eo = 1000
1000*0.0039*4.21*9.8
= 1000
= 0.161 kW
Eo
ηo = E *100
i
0.161
= .995 *100
= 16.18 %
Eo
ηp = E *100
s
0.161
= 0.796 *100
= 20.23 %
Series setup:
P 3600
Ei = tp x EM C
=E
= 0.664 kW
Es = Ei × ηm
= 0.664*0.8
= 0.531 kW
Fl
Q = 1000 3600
*
8000
= 1000 3600
*
= 0.0022 m3/s
P s1
H= 10 × [Pd + 760 ]+h⍴g
160
= 10*[0.25+ 760 ]+1
= 5.61 m of water
⍴gQH
Eo = 1000
1000*9.8*0.0022*5.61
= 1000
= 0.121 kW
Eo
ηo = E *100
i
0.121
= 0.664 *100
=18.22 %
Eo
ηp = E *100
s
0.121
= 0.531 *100
= 22.79 %
= 20×3600
60×3200
=0.375 kW
Es = Ei × ηm
=0.375x0.8
=0.3 kW
Fl
Q = 1000 3600
*
6000
= 1000*3600
= 0.0017m3/s
P s1
H= 10 × [Pd + 760 ]+hpg
= 10(0.3+100/760) +1
= 5.32 m
⍴gQH
Eo =1000
1000*9.8*0.0017*5.32
= 1000
= 0.087 kW
Eo
ηo = E *100
i
0.087
= 0.375 *100
= 23.2 %
Eo
ηp = E *100
s
0.087
= 0.3 *100
= 29.0 %
Series setup:
P 3600
Ei = tp x EM C
= 37×3600
60×3200
= 0.694 kW
Es = Ei × ηm
=0.694x0.8
=0.555 kW
Fl
Q = 1000 3600
*
4000
= 1000*3600
= 0.0011m3/s
P s1
H= 10 × [Pd + 760 ]+hpg
= 10(0.15+260/760) +1
= 5.92 m
⍴gQH
Eo = 1000
1000*9.8*0.0011*5.92
= 1000
= 0.064 kW
Eo
ηo = E *100
i
0.064
= 0.694 *100
= 9.2 %
Eo
ηp = E *100
s
0.064
= 0.555 *100
= 11.53 %
Parallel setup:
P 3600
Ei = tp x EM C
48×3600
= 60×3200
= 0.9 kW
Es = Ei × ηm
= 0.9*0.8
= 0.72 kW
Fl
Q = 1000 3600
*
12000
= 1000 3600
*
= 0.0033 m3/s
(P s1 +P s2 )/2
H = 10 × [Pd + 760 ]+h⍴g
(160+30)/2
= 10*[0.55+ 760 ]+1
= 7.75 m of water
⍴gQH
Eo = 1000
1000*0.0033*7.75*9.8
= 1000
= 0.253 kW
Eo
ηo = E *100
i
0.253
= 0.9 *100
= 28.11 %
Eo
ηp = E *100
s
0.253
= 0.720 *100
= 35.139 %
Complete Calculations:
Parallel Stage
Ei Es Q H Eo ηo ηp
0.761 0.6088 0.0042 4.95 0.202 26.546 33.183
0.778 0.6224 0.0039 5.32 0.203 26.040 32.550
0.796 0.6368 0.0036 5.68 0.201 25.271 31.589
0.813 0.6504 0.0033 5.82 0.190 23.389 29.237
0.839 0.6712 0.0031 5.66 0.169 20.193 25.242
Series Stage
Ei Es Q H Eo ηo ηp
0.358 0.2864 0.0011 7.95 0.087 24.173 30.216
0.377 0.3016 0.0014 7.47 0.102 26.983 33.728
0.398 0.3184 0.0017 7.87 0.129 32.291 40.364
0.42 0.336 0.0019 7.50 0.143 34.028 42.535
0.434 0.3472 0.0022 7.26 0.158 36.446 45.557
With Gelatin (0.01%w/v), constant Pd
Parallel Stage
Ei Es Q H Eo ηo ηp
0.4488 0.35904 0.0031 3.48 0.109 24.320 30.400
0.629 0.5032 0.0029 3.35 0.095 15.240 19.050
0.644 0.5152 0.0033 3.48 0.114 17.680 22.100
0.667 0.5336 0.0030 3.49 0.104 15.654 19.567
0.683 0.5464 0.0029 3.49 0.102 14.940 18.675
Series Stage
Ei Es Q H Eo ηo ηp
0.457 0.3656 0.0018 7.50 0.133 29.039 36.299
0.563 0.4504 0.0012 7.24 0.084 14.871 18.589
0.496 0.3968 0.0011 6.45 0.067 13.446 16.808
0.519 0.4152 0.0017 7.24 0.118 22.775 28.469
0.54 0.432 0.0013 6.32 0.077 14.327 17.909
With Gelatin (0.02%w/v), constant RPM
Single Stage - Pump 1
Ei Es Q H Eo ηo ηp
0.375 0.300 0.0017 5.32 0.087 23.18 28.97
0.375 0.300 0.0019 4.83 0.092 24.56 30.70
0.394 0.315 0.0022 4.11 0.089 22.73 28.41
0.338 0.270 0.0014 5.85 0.080 23.63 29.53
0.319 0.255 0.0011 6.03 0.066 20.61 25.76
Parallel Stage
Ei Es Q H Eo ηo ηp
0.900 0.720 0.0033 7.75 0.253 28.16 35.20
0.938 0.750 0.0036 7.45 0.264 28.15 35.19
0.956 0.765 0.0039 7.51 0.287 29.97 37.47
0.975 0.780 0.0042 7.08 0.289 29.68 37.10
0.994 0.795 0.0044 6.78 0.295 29.73 37.16
Series Stage
Ei Es Q H Eo ηo ηp
0.694 0.555 0.0011 5.92 0.065 9.30 11.63
0.713 0.570 0.0017 5.18 0.088 12.39 15.49
0.713 0.570 0.0017 5.68 0.093 13.04 16.30
0.694 0.555 0.0014 5.82 0.079 11.42 14.28
0.713 0.570 0.0013 6.05 0.074 10.42 13.02
With Gelatin (0.02%w/v), constant Pd
Single Stage - Pump 1
Ei Es Q H Eo ηo ηp
0.375 0.300 0.0019 5.08 0.093 24.91 31.14
0.431 0.345 0.0022 5.47 0.116 26.81 33.51
0.544 0.435 0.0026 6.13 0.159 29.19 36.49
0.619 0.495 0.0028 6.66 0.186 30.05 37.57
0.694 0.555 0.0031 6.92 0.207 29.90 37.38
Parallel Stage
Ei Es Q H Eo ηo ηp
0.825 0.660 0.0042 6.01 0.246 29.79 37.24
0.881 0.705 0.0042 6.01 0.250 28.36 35.44
0.994 0.795 0.0043 6.34 0.268 26.96 33.69
1.219 0.975 0.0050 6.74 0.330 27.11 33.89
0.600 0.480 0.0036 5.29 0.187 31.23 39.04
Series Stage
Ei Es Q H Eo ηo ηp
0.713 0.570 0.0013 6.45 0.083 11.71 14.64
0.656 0.525 0.0013 6.18 0.076 11.56 14.44
0.525 0.420 0.0011 5.13 0.053 10.12 12.65
0.844 0.675 0.0015 6.97 0.105 12.39 15.48
1.106 0.885 0.0020 8.03 0.159 14.33 17.92
Results:
Pressure Head
Pure Water
1. The head decreases with increasing discharge flow rate for constant RPM.
2. An increased flow rate causes a decrease in the head because the increased
flow rate involved opening the valve that provides resistance against flow. As the
valve is opened, the decrease in resistance to flow causes head to decrease.
3. In case of the series set up, the pressure heads of the two pumps are added. For
identical pumps, this would cause the pressure head to double. Since the pumps
in consideration are non identical, we get an intermediate value for the pressure
head here.
4. In case of parallel set up, flow rates of the two pumps are added with
corresponding head.
1. The head increases with increasing discharge flow rate.
2. The series and parallel set ups have lower pressure head than Pump 1 for the
same discharge flow rate.
3. The series set up has almost the same pressure head as Pump 2, but this might
be since Pump 2 had a much lower RPM than Pump 1 and thus, the parallel and
series set up are primarily dominated by Pump 1.
Effect of Gelatin
1. Adding gelatin reduces the pressure head as compared to that due to just water.
This is due to the fact that adding gelatin increases viscosity of the fluid.
2. The more gelatin is added, the more decrease is observed in the pressure head.
For the first concentration of gelatin the pressure head increases but for the second
concentration of gelatin, the pressure head decreases (which is the expected result).
Thus, no conclusion can be drawn.
1. Adding gelatin increases the pressure head as compared to that due to just
water.
2. The more gelatin is added, the more increase is observed in the pressure head.
1. Adding gelatin decreases the pressure head compared to that due to just water.
This is due to the fact that viscosity increases on adding gelatin.
2. The more gelatin is added, the more decrease is observed in the pressure head.
For the first concentration of gelatin the pressure head decreases but for the second
concentration of gelatin, the pressure head increases. Thus, no conclusion can be
drawn.
1. Adding gelatin increases the pressure head compared to that due to just water.
2. The more gelatin is added, the more increase is observed in the pressure head
(as per the trend line).
Summary
1. For single pump set up, adding gelatin leads to reduction in the head due to increase in
the viscosity of the fluid.
2. For series set up, the results are ambiguous.
3. For the parallel set up, adding gelatin leads to an increase in head of the pump.
Efficiency:
Pure Water
1. Efficiency increases, reaches a maxima and then decreases with increase in flow
rate. This is in keeping with the theoretical expectation.
2. This trend is not observed for the parallel, which just shows an increase in the
efficiency with increase in flow rate. This is most likely due to the fact that the
flow rates are very high and the maxima could not be reached due to the
constraints in the apparatus.
1. We observe that the efficiency increases with increase in flow rate.
2. The efficiency of the single pumps is more than that of the series and parallel set
ups for the same flow rate.
3. The series set up has a higher efficiency than the parallel set up.
Effect of Gelatin
Adding gelatin reduces efficiency. This makes sense since the addition of gelatin leads to an
increase in the viscosity of the fluid circulating through the set up. However, addition of more
gelatin increases efficiency. Thus, results are inconclusive.
1. Adding gelatin increases efficiency.
2. Adding more concentration of gelatin leads to greater increase in efficiency.
Adding gelatin increases efficiency. However, too much concentration of gelatin decreases
efficiency to a value comparable to that which was achieved with pure water. Thus, results are
inconclusive.
Adding gelatin reduces efficiency for the first concentration of gelatin, which makes sense since
the viscosity of the fluid has increased. However, it increases efficiency for the second
concentration. Thus, results are inconclusive.
Summary
1. For single pump set up, adding gelatin leads to reduction in the efficiency due to
increase in the viscosity of the fluid.
2. For series pump set up, adding gelatin leads to an increase followed by a decrease in
the efficiency of the pump. This could be because different portions of the efficiency
curve were investigated (which shows a maxima).
3. For the parallel set up, adding gelatin leads to an increase in efficiency of the pump.
It can be seen that the amplitude of the pump’s vibrations reduces upon adding gelatin for both
concentrations of gelatin.
Among the two concentrations of gelatin added, there is not significant difference in the
amplitude of the pump’s vibrations. However, the amplitude is slightly lower for the higher
concentration.
Pump 2
All recordings for Pump 2 were done at RPM = 1620 and Flow Rate = 4250 LPH.
It is again seen that the amplitude for the pump’s vibrations reduces upon adding gelatin, as in
the case of Pump-1.
It is clearly seen that the amplitude of the pump’s vibrations is lower in the case of higher
concentration of gelatin.
Pump 1 vs Pump 2
Since Pump 1 was operated at a higher RPM than Pump 2, its amplitude is predictably higher
than that of Pump 2.
Thus, we may conjecture that adding solute has the same effect as increasing the RPM for a
pump. Alternatively, adding gelatin causes the power requirement to increase, which is in
keeping with expectations since adding gelatin increases the viscosity of the fluid, which now
requires more work in order to be circulated.
Conclusions:
1. In this experiment we studied the centrifugal pump in three different
configurations and by a series of experiment plotted the performance
characteristics.
2. It was verified that parallel pumps give us much higher discharge flow rate as
compared to single pumps and series pumps give us much higher head as
compared to single pump.
3. When solute (Gelatin) was added, decrease in efficiency was observed for single
stage setups while efficiency slightly improved for series and parallel setup.
4. Adding solute (Gelatin) also caused the power input of the pumps to increase.
References:
1. CHE391A Lab Manual
2. Viscosity effects:
https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/centrifugal-pumps-viscosity-d_670.html
3. Pump theory: http://ecoursesonline.iasri.res.in/mod/page/view.php?id=1864