Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Language Acquisition - Theories 1
Language Acquisition - Theories 1
Language acquisition is the process whereby children achieve a fluent control of their native
language. Children learn a language, not because they are subjected to a similar conditioning
process, but because they possess an inborn capacity which permits them to acquire a language as
a normal maturational process. This capacity is universal. (Varshney, 2003).
NATURE NURTURE
Our genetics determine our behavior. Our Our environment, upbringing, and life
personal traits and abilities are in our “nature” experiences determine our behavior. We are
“nurtured” to behave in certain ways.
The controversial between nature and nurture is explored by the ancient theories of language
acquisition, that is: whether language is innate and God-given or learned by environment.
The major questions are:
to what extent is language hardwired into human brain (nature), and to what extent is it
learned through interaction with the environment (nurture)?
do parents teach children language, or does language simply unfold according to a genetic
program?
NATIVISM:
It is generally the idea that language acquisition is an innate ability of humans. Thus, the
approach is also known as “innatism”.
Nativists/Innatists deeply believe that language acquisition is the result of the innate
knowledge of the language within an infant. Innate is something which is already there in
mind since birth. They also claim that the underlying principle of language is deeply
rooted in human brain. It is genetically coded among humans since birth unlike other
living species.
THEORIES
1. Universal Grammar Theory by Noam Chomsky – “Language is a basic instinct”
Who is Noam Chomsky?
He argues that language acquisition is an innate structure, or function, of the human brain.
Chomsky believes that there are structures of the brain that control the interpretation and
production of speech. Children do not need any kind of formal teaching to learn to speak.
It is a theory that suggests that some rules of grammar are hard-wired into the brain,
and manifest without being taught.
This theory makes up the device in people’s mind which is needed to acquire language,
called the Language Acquisition Device (LAD).
It also leads directly to what Chomsky referred to as “Generative Grammar” which is used
to describe a system of grammar in people’s heads, which ultimately enables them to
understand an indefinite number of sentences.
Factors that Chomsky used to support his theory:
There is an optimal learning age. Between the ages 3 to 10 a child is the most likely to
learn a language in its entirety and grasp fluency.
The child does not need a trigger to begin language acquisition, it happens on its
own. The parent does not need to coax the child to speak, if it around language
production, the child will work to produce that language on its own.
It does not matter if a child is corrected, they still grasp the language in the same
manner and speak the same way. During one stage, a child will make things plural that
are already plural.
LIMITATION: The theory is hard to prove because it is not allowed to isolate somebody just to
do a research.
2. Neurofunctional Theory by Lamendella
It states that the acquisition of second and foreign languages are mainly the
product of brain-based processes.
Additionally, this theory states that language functioning is dependent on brain
activity, particularly on the left hemisphere of the brain (Logical Dominant).
The areas associated with language learning are identified as the Wernicke’s
Area and the Broca’s Area.
Broca’s Area is responsible for the precise Wenicke’s Area is the home of meaning
control of the mouth and the larynx muscles
and also to the seat of grammar, comprehension
and production.
It controls the movements of the lips, tongue, This area partially surrounds the auditory
jaw, and vocal cords. cortex.
Damage to this area results in the slow and Damage to this area results in speech that is
labored speech but does not affect fluent but also meaningless, and it also
comprehension. (Broca’s Aphasia – loss of the affects comprehension of language.
control of speech) (Wernicke’s Aphasia)
5. Cognitive Theory
This theory claims that children cannot acquire language about concepts they do
not understand yet.
o The development of cognition matches language acquisition.
o The thought and language develop parallelly.
Another significant aspect in cognitive studies is the interaction. Children
comprehend the social role of language for communication and their desire to
communicate becomes an intensive motivational factor for language acquisition.
Learning is due to: Social interaction + cognitive development
EMPIRICISM:
Empiricists believe that children learn the language by extracting all the linguistic
information from the environment.
To then language acquisition is all about habit formation and the outcome of nurture.
Hence, this approach is also known as “behaviorism”.
This approach is also an ancient one, going back (at least) to Aristotle, but in modern
times it is closely associated with the psychologist B.F. Skinner who is the well-known
proponents of behaviorism/empiricism.
THEORIES
1. Behaviorist Theory of B.F. Skinner
Who is Burrhus Fredric (B.F.) Skinner?
Children are often unable to repeat what an adult says especially if the adult utterance
contains a structure the child has not yet started to use.
Observational studies of parent-child conversations (Brown and Hanlon, 1970) show that
parents rarely reinforce correct grammar in a child’s speech, but instead tend to focus on
the truthfulness or accuracy of statements.
Vygotsky focused on the connections between people and the sociocultural context in
which they act and interact in shared experiences. According to him, humans use tools
that develop from a culture, such as speech and writing, to mediate their social
environments.
The More Knowledgeable Other (MKO): The MKO refers to anyone who has a better
understanding or a higher ability level than the learner, with respect to a particular
task, process, or concept. (e.g., teacher, & coach)
The Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) that learning occurred within. The ZPD is
the distance between a student’s ability to perform a task under adult guidance and/or
with peer collaboration and the student’s ability solving the problem independently.
4. Identity Theory
Identity is how a person understands his/her relationship to the world.
Norton in the case of language demonstrates identity as motivation either
instrumental or integrative.
Language learners can choose under what circumstances they will interact with
members of the target language community.
o Instrumental Motivation – the desire to learn a L2 for utilitarian reasons
o Integrative Motivation – the desire to learn a L2 to successfully fit in with the
target language community.
Norton also introduces the term, investment to signal the socially and historically
constructed relationship of learners to the target language.