Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Private Zoo
Private Zoo
Zoo in India is one of the most basic, enjoyable and protective form for animals. They help in
animals to live safely and freely. As in the endangered species which in India need to be
protected as they are very less in no; zoo in India play a very crucial role in helping animals
lead a life which is full of protection and there is nothing in the zoo which creates an
obnoxious environment for the animals, but are present these zoo’s cable of protecting
animals and people visiting there is a matter of fact.
Extension Activities
3.9.1 To provide the urban population with a window to nature and to serve as
green lungs for the polluting environment, zoos shall extend their expertise
and help to State Governments and local authorities to create nature parks
extending over extensive areas near big cities.
Amenities to Visitors
3.10.1 Zoo shall provide basic civic amenities to the visitors like toilets,
drinking water points, shelters and first-aid facilities. Ramps shall also be
provided for the benefit of visitors in wheel chairs for approach to animal
enclosure and other civic amenities.
3.10.2 Zoos shall not provide any infrastructure for recreation/entertainment of
visitors that is inconsistent with the stated objective of zoos.
The Endangered Species Act (ESA) applies only to specifically listed animals, and even then
it only regulates the import or export of species being bought or sold in foreign commerce.
There are currently over 1,050 animal species designated as “endangered” or “threatened” by
the Secretary of the Interior. The US Fish and Wildlife Service is in charge of administering
and enforcing the Act. The ESA applies to both public and private actors; prohibiting the
“take” of listed animals by anyone. “Take” is further defined within the Act as harming or
harassing; however, the Secretary’s regulations exempt normal animal husbandry, which
includes exhibition of endangered species. Therefore, exhibiting an endangered species alone
is not a violation of the Act. Additionally, the Secretary may grant specific exemptions
allowing for the take of an endangered species. One benefit of this Act is that it contains a
citizen suit provision, which allows a concerned citizen to bring suit to enforce the Act,
subject to some limitations.
In addition to the international, federal, state and local laws, additional voluntary standards
are also in place for zoos that choose to implement them. The American Zoo and Aquarium
Association (hereinafter “AZA”), an organization of zoos and related facilities, regulates the
zoo industry through voluntary standards. To become a member, zoos must be accredited and
related facilities must be certified, according to the guidelines the AZA sets forth. Related
facilities are those that house wild animals, but are not open to the public on a regular basis.
The AZA Code of Professional Ethics, a heightened standard for the care and welfare of zoo
animals, governs AZA members. AZA Membership is highly regarded within the industry.
The standards regulate everything from the movement of zoo animals to the image the zoo
must set forth to the public.
Several findings seem apparent after reviewing existing laws to protect zoo animals. First,
zoo animal welfare protections are only found in state and federal anti-cruelty statues. The
majority of existing statutes and regulations govern only the transport or trade of animals or
animal products, ensuring their status in the world market without wiping the species out
entirely. These laws purport to protect the well-being of the species as a whole, rather than a
specific animal. Secondly, well-known charismatic animals are afforded much more
protection under existing laws, with regard to specific statutes and the Animal Welfare Act,
which exempts all cold-blooded animals. Additionally, certain species are afforded much
more protection than others depending on the specific statutes and funding in place to help
conservation efforts. Thirdly, there is a lack of adequate enforcement mechanisms within the
statutes. Adding to the problem, most state and federal governing agencies are over-worked
and under-funded leading, to less than optimal enforcement of the statutes that exist. An
increase in funding and/or public concern would put pressures on such agencies to ensure that
at the very least, minimal standards are upheld. Lastly, only minimal standards currently
exist. Tighter controls and stricter regulations would lead to an overall improved quality of
life for zoo animals.
One result of the scarcity of laws and insufficient enforcement of existing laws, is the
existence of a prospering black market in the trade of rare and exotic species. Surplus zoo
animals from breeding programs and retired zoo animals are easily sold off to dealers for
canned hunts, shoddy roadside attractions, or slaughterhouses to be sold for their parts. This
trade is a thriving industry, as exotic species can be worth a great deal of money. There are
countless documented cases of zoos selling animals to dealers in the black market disguised
as conservationists, despite the AZA being aware of the imposter’s true identity. For more
information on this subject, see Alan Green, “Animal Underworld: Inside America’s Black
Market for Rare and Exotic Species.”
In light of the commendable goals the AZA sets forth in education, conservation, recreation
and science, the question remains: is it okay to keep wild animals in captivity? Recently,
there have been several incidents of zoos nationwide deciding to release their elephants to
sanctuaries, acknowledging that their facilities were inadequate to properly care for them.
Elephants are highly intelligent creatures, capable of being trained in captivity. They are also
very emotional creatures, known to mourn their dead in the wild and nurture their young into
their teens. In the wild, elephants usually live past 65 years-old and roam up to 60 miles a
day in social groups comprised of eight to ten animals. They are capable of communicating
through infrasound and vocalizations. In captivity, elephants are confined to small enclosures,
kept with only a few other elephants, if any. Imprisoned elephants die at a much younger age
than wild elephants. Additionally, in captivity, elephants are plagued with diseases such as
Tuberculosis, Arthritis, and mental illness, in addition to suffering to feet and joint ailments –
a direct result of not being allowed to roam. In the last few months, the Detroit Zoo, the San
Francisco Zoo, and the L.A. Zoo have all decided to close their elephant exhibits and release
the animals to one of the two sanctuaries nationwide. Hopefully, this is a trend that more zoos
will follow in the future, evaluating the welfare of their animals as the top priority, above the
selfish human desire to observe wild animals in captivity.
In a public-private partnership, how should the process work?
The people that you outsource to should be freely allowed to manage and handle all legal
schedules of animals. Existing clauses state that only the chief wildlife warden can give out
certain permissions. So, we need to stop mixing up zoos with the Wildlife Act. There is a
need for a white paper on how to outsource zoos and pave the road for new laws on the same.
The Modi government believes in rapid action and public-private partnerships. Let's start
with the 200 zoos of India and overhaul them in every way.