Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Acknowledgement
The researchers would like to express their deepest gratitude to everyone who
To MR. TEOFILO G. FRANCISCO JR., their thesis adviser, for his guidance
To the Senior High School Head, MS. MAGGIE GIVANIM for the the approval
in making this research study. Also for imparting her knowledge and guidance in our
study.
ARIGO together with MS. MARYLOURD T. DAROY AND MR. KIM LEONARD
S. PASCUAL for sharing their experience in this study. The researchers highly
appreciate the advice and knowledge imparted to develop our skills to pursue this
research.
To FAMILY AND FRIENDS, for their endless support, motivation and for a
GOD ALMIGHTY, for the wisdom. He bestowed upon the researchers, the
strength, peace of mind, and good health in order to finish this research.
Abstract
Intelligence Quotient of the Identical Twins of the Junior and Senior High
aim of the study was to answer the following specific questions: (a) what
is the Intelligence Quotient level of the first born junior and senior high
the Intelligence Quotient level of the second born Junior and Senior High
first and second born Identical Twins?. Data were collected from the
Identical Twins of the Junior and Senior High School from the school
mentioned above.
The sampling technique used was the non-purposive sampling. The total
sampling size was a total of ten (10) pairs of twins that is equivalent to twenty
(20) students in Theresian School of Cavite. The instrument used was a flash-
gather the participant’s information such as their gender, age, and birth order.
Data generated from these instruments were compared using the Independent
Sample T-test method. The researchers found out that the average intelligence
quotient of first born and second born are both classified as having a normal range
List of Appendices
APPENDIX A………………………………………………………………………….. 29
30
APPENDIX B……………………………………………………………………………..
List of Tables
22
Students……………………………………………………………………………………..
Table 2 T-Test Result for the Difference in Identical Twin Students across
23
Individualized Intelligence Quotient………………………………………………………
List of Figures
20
Figure 2 Data Collection Procedure………………………………………………………..