Climate change — |
_ vulnerability and
resilience') Chapter Causes of global
climate change
sometimes exceeding 1000°C.
Within the atmosphere there are four distinct eae
Fising or falling with altitude. The layers are:
* Thermosphere. ‘The thermosphere is the highest
| layer of he atmosphere, extending from about 80
Jlometres above sea level out othe farthest
|| The atmosphere limits ofthe atmosphere, The gases in this layer
| |) Theatmosphereis ike thin im surrounding the ofthe atmosphere ae wey thin an the
1 earth. If the earth were the size of a soccer ball on a thermosphere makes up only 0.001% of the mass
i Wet field, the atmosphere woutd be like the wet of the atmosphere. Infact, there is little
it layer around it. In fact the atmosphere is about 500 __ difference between the thermosphere and a
kilometres thick, although half the mass of the vacuum, The gases in this layer are oxygen,
| atmosphere is found in the lowest six kilometres, hnydrogen and nitrogen, and these absorb ultra
| and 99% of the atmosphere is contained in the violet radiation from the sun, heating up to very
! lowest 40 kilometres high temperatures exceeding 200°C and
layers, defined by whether the temperatures are * Mesosphere. The mesosphere isthe second
highest layer of the atmosphere, extendinghere is the highest
ding from about 80
1 the farthest
sases in this layer
and the
001% of the mass
eisll
sphere and a
are oxygen,
ese absorb ultra-
eating tp to very
OPC apd
isthe second.
wy} THERMOSPHERE
est eer r
stphrospHene i
Tempovalue
between about 50 and 80 kilometres above sea
level, This. the coldest part of the atmosphere
because there is very little cloud, dust, ozone or
Water vapour to absorb heat from the sun. ‘The
‘mesopause, which separates the mesospher
from the thermosphere above it, is alw
ays a
constant “PC. ‘The mesosphere also has the
strongest winds inthe atmosphere, approaching
3,000 kilometres per hour in places
Stratosphere. ‘The stratosphere is found below
the mesosphere in a band from about 20
Kilometres to 50 kilometres above sea level
There isa concentration of ozone in the
Stratosphere, and as ozone absorbs ultra-violet
radiation ver
increasing alt
well, temperatures rise with
tude in the stratosphere. In the
Causes of global climate change
lower parts of the stratosphere, most of the ultra
violet radiation has already been absorbed, 50
temperatures are cooler. ‘The temperature atthe
top of the stratosphere isa fairly constant 0°C,
but atts lower limit (the tropopause) the
temperature is typically about 50°C
4.3 The Loposphare ts layer of We atmoaniere Gosest a
the cuts surface, and ils where weather occu
veh 9 this
* Troposphere. ‘The troposphere isthe lowest
layer of the atmosphere, and it contains most of
the mass of the atmosphere, as well as most of the
dust, water vapour and pollution. Itis the layer
in which the weather occurs, and it behaves
quite differently to the other three layers,
Whereas the three upper layers obtain their heat
directly from solar radiation, the troposphere is
warmed indirectly by reflected heat from the
earth's surface and clouds. ‘Temperatures in the
troposphere fall by about 6.5°C for every 1000
‘metres rise in altitude, although this figure varies
from place to place. The troposphere comprises a
‘mixture of gases, but the most important ones
are nitrogen (78/2), oxygen (21), argon (almost
VW), and carbon dioxide (0.003%), Other gases
such as hydrogen, helium, krypton, methane,
neon, ozone and xenon together make up only
0.001% of the atmosphere. ‘The troposphere also
contains water vapour (the gaseous form of
water), but the proportion of water vapour varies
sreatly from place to place and from day to day.
L. Drow upa tile fsantrst the amcerstes she four
Iayersof he carts otoghenChapter 4
The global heat budget and
atmospheric circulation
All the processes of the atmosphere (and indeed all.
life on earth) depend on energy from the sun. ‘he
sun's enery is enormous. ‘The surface area of the
sun is 6 million billion square metres, and the
tenergy sent from each square metre is enough to
power one million ight bulbs. A smell part of the
tenergy produced by the sun reaches the earth, ‘The:
incoming solar radiation, known as insolation,
arrives in the form of short-wave radiation.
Short-wave radiation from the sun is mainly visible
light towards the purple endl of the spectrum with a
wavelength 0f10.39 to 0.75 wm (micrometres, or
smierons). ‘The reason that the sun's energy is short-
wave radiation is that the: vc
Cooler bodies such as the moon and the earth, emit
Jong-wave radiation, which is mainly infrared heat
with a wavelength of about 4to 30 pm.
is so hot; 5,30
When the sun's energy reaches the atmosphere, itis
dispersed in different ways. Although clouds cover
about half ofthe earth at any time, they are poor
absorbers of the sun's energy. Miich move solar
‘energy is absorbed by dust and gases in the
Sar A c E
SHORT Waves
From sun 100%
Causes oF
atmosphere, especially water vapour. Altogether,
12 of incoming solar radiation is absorbed in the
atmosphere,
{Une earth's surface absorbs 47% of the insolation,
some directly and some after being reflected o
scattered by the atmosphere, A small amount oF
radiation is reflected by the earth’s surface back
into space
particular place depends on the kind of surface on
the earth at that point. Light, shiny surfaces, such
as snow and ice, have much higher reflectivity (or
albedo) than darker, duller surfaces, such as dark
soll ora gocen forest
The amount of energy reflected from a
45 Ws
angle low, but this fa
1 snow Have a high albedo (over 908) Ihe sis
view ofthe Pace Ocean in Ftshows
The amount of heat received at the earths surface
varies according to latitude, Less solar enengy is
absorbed by the ground in polar areas than
‘equatorial areas for three reasons, First, the sun's
rays strike the earth's surface at a lower angle nes
the poles, ‘Therefore an equivalent amount of sol
‘energy approaching the equator and the poles must of
bespreacl aver a larger area in polar areas, meaning J
that there is less heat per square metre on the %
surface. ol
‘The second reason that the poles receive less solar ing
radiation is that the sun's rays must penetrate a wi
_greater thickness of atmosphere near the poles tnd
than near the equator. This is because the rays thd
penetrate the atmosphere at an oblique angle. As a
result ofthis, the dust and gases of the atmosphe a
absor’ more heat and light, andl less reaches the thd
earth's surfaceur, Altogether,
s absorbed in the
ofthe insolation,
ig reflected OF
mall amount of
's surface back
y reflected from a
ind of surface on
ny surfaces, such
jer reflectivity (or
ces, such as dark
io (over 2035 the sun
146 The in
ays meet the eant'ssuror, Th
wr ggrom} an
nthe late, At Ni
he earth's surface
s solar energy is
areas than
s. Firs the sun's
a lower angle near
int amount of solar
and the poles must
olar areas, meaning
metre on the
receive less solar
vust penetrate a
e near the poles
cause the rays
sblique angle. Asa
“of theratmosphere
Tess reaches the
‘The third reason that the earth’s surface at the poles
absorbs less solar radiation is that more of the light
that does reach the surface is reflected back into
space, The shiny white ice and snow of the poles
has a much higher albedo than the water and
vegetation of the equatorial zones. In fact, snow
and ice reflect about 80% of the solar energy
whereas grass and trees will absorb between 65%
and 85); of solar energy. Furthermore, any surface
‘becomes shinier when light hits iat a low angle —
even a black bitumen road seems shiny when
viewed at a low angle. ‘The light that reaches the
Polar surfaces does s0 at a very low angle, and so
much of iis reflected rather than absorbed,
When radiation is reflected from the earth’s surface,
the wavelength becomes longer, which means that
the radiation shifts towards the red and infrared
tnd of the spectrum. In other words, less of the
‘ndiation is in the form of light, and more of itis in
the form of heat. This is significant because the
‘g88es of the atmosphere are relatively good
Causes of global climate change
absorbers of long-wave radiation and thus absorb
the energy emitted by the Earth's surface to a
seater extent than they absorb the short-wave
radiation coming from the sun.
1 we examine the amount of energy received and
lost at different latitudes over an entize year, we can
discern the heat budget shown in figare-47, The
{graph shows the average annual insolation at each
latitude (curve 1) and the average annual loss oF
long-wave enengy (curve Il). Although the total
incoming energy (curve D equals the total outgoing
cencrgy (carve ID, there isa net sueplis of energy
between the equator and latitudes 38° North and
South, while latitudes betiween 38° North and South
and the poles have anet deficit,
2 0 a 0
Latte
‘ver
lotus t shown by curve & whe avarage lose o longa
cov shor by cunVe Lats Between the equolar a
patvacen 2M and Sand the poles hav 7nd Hote hat
We know that over the history ofthe planet, the
‘equatorial regions have not continued to heat up
while the polar areas have not kept getting colder
‘The reason for this s that a complex mechanism of
atmospheric circulation sedistributes heat fom the
equatorial regions (low latitudes) tothe polar
regions (high latitudes). Itis this redistribution of
heat enengy that ereates the world’s pressure
systems and winds,
Of ll the solar energy received by the earth, 34% is.
reflected back into space, either from the earth’s
surface (2%), from the atmosphere itself (7) or
from clouds (25%). However, before the energy is
reflected back into space, some ofits retained
the atmosphere for a while, and this is the heat that|
|
|
Yi
i
Chapter 4
provides the warmth that makes the earth habitable
by humans. ‘This process where the output of heat
from the atmosphere equals the input atthe same
time as at amount i retained fora while is known
as the natural greenhouse effeet. This s the same
principle by which a greenhouse provides a warm
environment for eraps to grow hence the name.
Without the natural greenhouse effet the earth
‘would be 33C* cooler than itis now. (Note Hit her
zee refer to actual temperatures, we use the orm 33°C
tout rhen we discuss sifferences betwen fo
temperatures ro use te form 33C).
Foarhuses bp Duly up leat for cual ol
48 Farner
‘ri and vegetasies inc
the earh’s atmosphere Ike a greenhouse. These greethouses
near Borat n Albarie ar belg used to cullvate tomatoes,
1 enc gure A tte the propor
sd ya at's ca
aie
insole i is
esta by dhe oasphae and (c lsa gpace,
ic th sf reg
an te
raion en te epee fons drt
a sup igre?
3 pn aly Mat puto nary ie cun
Ahaha pals i his
Whar the aon gras i?
i
jerte
If the global heat budget never varied, the natural
greenhouse effect would always be constant. Tf
there were no changes in the planet's inputs or
‘outputs of energy, our climate would never change,
However, we know from historical, geological and
biogeographical records that Farth’s climate has
Causes of global climate change
always fluctuated through warm and cold periods.
Climate is not static ibis dynamic,
Figure 446 shows the changes in Greenland’s
climate over the past 75,000 years up until the
id-19805, We can see from these graphs that the
climate has only been warmer than present levels
for about 15% of the past 75,000 years. We can also
see that temperatures have varied even within short
periods of time, and in some cases, this has had
‘major effects on human activities such as fishing
and farming.
3 =
{49 Temperature changes in Greeniand over the past 75,000
years up tothe mic-1806. in the top graph (a we see that the
That ice age ended about 1,000 years ogo. Inthe mkt aaa
{B). ne see tat avorage temperatures forthe past L000 years
fepproximately) were ower than forthe period since 1950,
" neh.we
relatively min Gr
that tamperare changes ean occur qu iy. a ba
vein them. We so vee sl warm and cold peaks can naw
gniieant mllence on human actos anc
Obviously, the changes shown in Figure 4.6
occurred due to natural eauses, as the number of
‘humans for most of the past 75,000 years was far
too smal to have any significant impact on the
‘environment ata global scale. Natural causes of
mate change might include changes in levels of
solar activity; the impact of volcanic activity (extra
dust in the atmosphere can lead to cooling),
variations in Earth's orbit (perhaps with changingn and cold periods.
Greenland’s
up until the
se graphs that the
pan present levels
years. We can also
ed even within short
es, this has had
such as fishing,
aid aver the past 75,00
2p ow sea at tN
5 fr tha pst L000 yes
Ne paod snes 1980,
nperatures since 1420 nav
in figure 46
_as the number of
000 years was far
t impact on the
Natural causes of
anges in levels oF
aie agtivity (extra
it cooling),
aps with changing
distances from the sun) and changes in the
humidity and loud cover.
Notivithstanding the importance of natural causes
of climate change, extensive research and data
analysis by geographers and scientists has led to a
‘general acceptance that humans also have a
significant impact on Earth’s climate. Moreover,
‘human impact is increasing as world population
sgrows and human activities produce more
pollutants.
The global enengy balance is not static, and
consequently climate changes. World climate is
vulnerable to pressures and processes that can
distort the global energy balance. Any change in
the balance betiveen insolation and energy radiated
‘back to space is known as radiative forcing
Positive forcing warms the atmosphere as more
incoming solar energy (insolation) is received or the
amount of radiation lost back to space is reduced,
Negative forcing cools the atmosphere as less
insolation is received or the quantity of radiation
lost to space increases. Pressures and processes that
cause radiative forcing are called forcing agents.
Some forcing agents arv external, which means they
‘originate away from Planet Earth and its
atmosphere, Examples of external forcings include
changes in the sun's production of energy and
variations in Earth's orbit. Forcing agents that are
not external are internal, which means they
originate within Planet Earth and its atmosphere.
Examples of internal forcings include changes in
the composition of the atmosphere, changes in
‘ocean currents and circulation, and volcanic activity
such as eruptions.
In this section, three sets of forcing agents will be
considered: solar variability, terrestrial changes in
albedo, and greenhouse gas emissions such as
methane.
Solar radiation variations
The Sun is the star at the centre of our solar system
that provides the energy for most processes that
‘occur on Earth, including our weather and climate.
The Sun isa ball of gases that are constantly.
owirling in a turbulent, seething mass at extremely
high temperatures. The surface temperature of the
Sun is about 6,0010°C, and like any hot object, it
emits energy as electromagnetic radiation. In the
case of the Sun, the energy roleased covers a wide
spectrum of wavelengths from long wavelength
(lovy frequency) radio waves through to short
wavelength (high frequency) gamma rays. Visible
Hight occurs within a narrow band in between low
frequency infrared radiation (or heat) and high
frequency ultraviolet radiation. ‘The spectrum of
visible light we seein a rainbow is an expansion of
this narrow band of visible (white) light, ranging,
fom red at the low frequency (long wavelength)
‘end of the spectrum through orange, yellow, green,
blue to violet atthe high frequeney (short
wavelength) end of the vi
440 A rainbow fons inthe spray at Fos do Iguacu Nusa
rowing ths
th 63 (8 He op)
wavelength voll a the Dott)
Fol) on he border of Brae and Argent
fun of vse light from tang weave
‘The Sun’s energy travels outwards in straight lines,
called rays, at a speed of about 300,000 kilometres
per second. At thal speed, it takes about eight and
half minutes for the Sur's enezgy to reach Earth,
‘which orbits the Sun ata distance averaging about
150 million kilometres,
As energy radiates away from the Sun, none of itis
lost as it travels through space. However as the
Sun's rays spread outwards with increasing
distance from their source, planets that are further
away receive less energy than those that are closer.
The Sun produces energy at arate that is wearly
constant, and therefore the quantity of solar energy
the Earth receives each day is almost constant, The
rate at which energy comes from the Sun is known
as the solar constant. The solar constants,
measured beyond the limits of Earth's atmosphere
before any of itis diffused or absorbed, and it has a
‘mean vale of 1367.7 W/m? (Watts per square
etre.Chapter 4
‘We say thatthe solar constant isa mean (or
average) figure because it does vary slightly, and
this results in fluctuations inthe amount of energy
available for Earth's atmospheric and other
‘processes. We use the term solar variability to refer
to the changes in energy (or radiation) produced by
the Sun, Solar variations arse for several reasons:
+ Solar evolution: About 4.5 billion years ago, the
Sun was about 8% smaller and about 3% less
radiant than it is now, so the solar constant at that
‘time was about 30% less than the present figure.
When they first form, all stars (including the Sun)
comprise about 75% hydrogen and 25% helium.
Asbillions of years pass, the hydrogen at the core
of stars such as the Sun burns, producing helium
as a product. Helium is denser than hydrogen, so
Beara
Causes of global élimate change
the helium ‘sinks’ towards the core of the Sun,
forcing the lighter hydrogen outwards to the
surface,
Asa result ofthis process, the hydrogen-helium
mixin the Sun is gradually becoming denser,
thus raising the pressure, which causes the
nuclear reactions within the Sun to become
hotter. This causes the Sun to become brighter.
‘The Sunis almost half-way through its process of
‘buming hydrogen at its core, so this trend of
brightening is expected to continue for about
‘another 4.8 billion years. By that time, the Sun is
predicted to be about 67% brighter and about
10% larger than its present size, raising the mean
solar constant toa level that is about 1.5 times the
‘current figure.
SER ERR S
r ™ =
Ps
e
Mad Wal
ean =e = lh oN \g
‘bust conceriaton
“Thousands of years ago
41 Ice cote data from Vostok Station, Antarctica. The top graph shows temperature varatlons n macro-cycles that last ale 0%
‘han 100,000 years, wth smaller cycles of aferent curation superposed. The IPCC notes thal the Ice age cycles were driven BY
Milankoch Cycles, wth changes In carbon doxide folowing temperalure changes wih a lag of several hundred years. This tO
‘expected as warm periods lead to Increased plant growth, ad expansion of vegetation increases carbon cloxide production,
Furthermore, carbon dloxie fs more soluble in colé water than in warm wate. so there wll be less carbon dloxide nthe atmospie
during an ice age because more Is absorbed inthe oceans, The higher cust levels are belleved to be caused by cold ry peocs
preciptation levels drop in colder climates, Source: NOAA,ore of the Sun,
twards to the
ydrogen-helium
>ming denser,
causes the
nto become
ecome brighter.
rugh its process of
sthis trend of
rive for about
at time, the Sun is
iter and about
‘raising the mean
sbout 1'5 times the
|
ces that last alitie more
o cycles were ven by
ired years. This 6 10 Be
oxlde production,
aide nthe almospiord
ec by col ky pea
Although the changes are miniscule on an annual
basis, the Sun is gradually becoming hotter and
brighter, and therefore sends marginally more
energy to the Earth each year. If this has any
impact on the Earth’s climate, itis only on an
‘extremely long-term basis.
+ Changes in Farth’s orbit: Earth's annual orbit
around the Sun does not follow precisely the
same path each year. When the Earth is closer to
the Sun, mote insolation is received than when
the Earth is more distant, There have been
several attempts to calculate the Earth’s
deviations from its regular patter of orbits,
notably by the Serbian geophysicist and
astronomer Milutin Milankovie (sometimes spelt
Milankoviteh).
ln the 1920s, Milankovié developed his theory
that a combination of changes in the Earth's orbit
and the angle of it ofits axis affected the world’s
climate overtime. ‘This impact on climate is
known as orbital forcing, and Milankovig
caleulated that each cycle of orbital changes
lasted about 21,000 years, Superimposed on that
21,000 year cycle is a longer cycle of changes in
the tlt of Barth’ axis that lasts 41,000 years.
Overall, the impact of orbital changes i believed
to be stronger than the axial tit changes, but each
amplifies the other, resulting in an overall cycle of
alitie over 100,000 years
‘The combination of major orbital cycles with
‘minor axial tit cycles superimposed upon them
are known as Milankoviteh Cycles. Evidence for
Milankovitch Cycles and orbital forcing is seen in
the regular eycle through which Earth seems to
experience ice ages, which seem to have followed
lange and small scale cycles superimposed upon
each other (figure 4.11),
‘Sunspots and short solar cycles: Sunspots are
dark areas on the Sun’s outer layer that zones of
lower temperatures. They vary greatly size from
about 15 kilometres up to about 150,000
Kilometres in diameter. They are not permanent
features, but they occur for short periods ofa few
days to a few months when magnetic distortions
interfere with the normal conveetion flows within
the Sun's gases. ‘They typically appear in pairs
with each adjoining sunspot having the reverse
Polarity of the other (one is positive while the
other is negative),
Sunspots occur in fairly regular eyeles of about 11
years that reflect changing magnetic levels of the
Sun. ‘The point in the ¢yele when the Sun's
_magnetic field is strongest coincides with the
period of maximum sunspot activity, and is,
known as the solar maximum, Conversely, the
point when the magnetic field is weakest and
sunspot activity is reduced is known as the solar
‘This 1-year cycle is significant because more
radiation is emitted from the Sun during the time
around the solar maximum when sunspot
activity is greatest. Research is stil underway to
‘measure the magnitude of this variation, but a
general consensus suggests that the solar
radiation emitted between the solar maximum
and solar minimum differs by about 0.2%
442 Sunspots onthe Sun's sur
er February 2013, The
since betivean the ower ve unspots fe abont the se
icinas the diameter of the Fath
+ Global dimming: Global dimming is a decrease
of insolation reaching the Farth’s surface, Itis
the opposite of global brightening, which is an
inerease in the amount of solar radiation reaching,
the Earth's surface. The most common cause of
‘global dimming is tiny particles that are
suspended in the atmosphere which absorb and /
or reflect radiation back into space. Global
dlimming has two main effects on climate,
causing a cooling of the Farth’s suefaee and a
reduction of evaporation that leads in turn to a
reduction of precipitation,
‘The twwo most common natural sources of
airborne particles are fires and volcanic
eruptions, ‘The 1883 eruption of Krakatoa, a
volcano in Indonesia, was one of the largest inon ar Wis a
nana Neve
banat, Al
recorded history. The noise of the eruption was
reported to have been heard 5,000 kilometres
away. ‘The eruption poured sulphur gas and ash
into the atmosphere, causing a voleanic winter
for five years as average global temperatures fell
by 1.2C’. Written records from the time describe
‘spectacular red sunsets around the world.
following the eruption as alzbome particles
dispersed the afternoon sunlight. Although most
volcanic eruptions are smaller than the Krakatoa
event, the cumulative effect of volcanic eruptions
is significant, especially during periods when
several eruptions occur in difforent parts of the
world.
Itis speculated that global dimming may have
‘been a contributory factor in causing ice ages at
‘various times in the planet's history, as we know
from geological evidence that there have been
periods of intense volcanic activity. From written
records we know that the 23 kilometre long
Lakagigar fissure in Iceland erupted
continuously for an eight-month period during
1743 to 1784, ‘The eruption was one ofthe langest
in recorded history, producing about 20 cubic
kilometres of lava and clouds of hydrofluoric acid
and sulphur dioxide that killed a quarter of
lecland’s population and half the livestock. ‘The
eruption led to global dimming with widespread
impacts, such as reduced rainfall in the Sahel
rogion of Sub-Saharan Africa, and prolonged,
abnormally cold winters in North America
AA conesn vnw of
oto nish foreign mnt
Terrestrial albedo changes and
feedback loops
The Earth's albedo is the proportion of insolation
that i reflected by the surface of the Earth back into
space. Albedo can be meastred, and as an
example, a surface that reflects 357 of the radiation
it recoives has an albedo of 0.35. Therefore, a
surface that has a high albedo such as snow or ice
(0.40 to 085) reflects most the radiation it receives,
absorbing only a small proportion. On the other
hand, a surface with alow albedo such as dark soil
(0.08 0 0.13) ora dark roadway (0.05) absorbs
almost all the incoming energy. Table 4.1 shows
typical albedo values fora variety of objects and
surfaces.
45. Show anc ee have high rates of elect, of abe.
own by this area of snow over the Gieenland ice cap,a
retnfcoland toxay. The
etited for etght month
tion of insolation
the Earth back into
of the radiation
uch as snow or ice
diation it receives,
on, On the other
do such as dark soil
ay of objects and
Chapter 4
Feedback loops occur when the outputs of a
system circulate back and become inputs in a
said to ‘feed back’ into itself
When a forcing agent tig
of the climate in an area, the
revealed and grassland colonises the area.
Table 44
Typical alnedo values for short. wave
succession of cause-and-offect cycles. ‘The system is
gers a warming or cooling,
bedo may change as
a consequence. For example, if the climate in an
area cools, the surface cover of snow and ice might
‘expand to cover grassland or bare earth, and this
‘will increase the area's albedo because snow and ice
are light-coloured and shiny. Conversely, if an area
‘warms up, the surface cover of snow and ice might
shrink, increasing the area’s albedo as bare earth is
Figure 4.16 shows how a change to the albedo can
trigger a chain reaction that leads to an ongoing
feedback loop. When the temperature of an area
near the poles rises and the albedo decreases, more
insolation is absorbed by the ground which causes
the temperature to rise further asthe air above the
foes
oa
Steed
Forcing agent triggers a change in cl
Cees
ee
ned St
Fresh snow 02010 090
Bry cones ays10020
Bison toads oxstoo%0
Bouts 08019090
Bebatines 0810020
Seneca ges wet season 01510020
Brow giana easton 02618030
Terese gist 1010020
[Bei teat 010030
Tove oes o0sto'5
Baio torons oo
= 00119020
rth ner tion appox.049
Beco sun naa verhoos appro. 005
"chore adton s dened sels an @ pistons
kromates whan includes aed edaton ele Hp. unk
ele aye and ge a,
Bis snow 240% 080
Sn anal gical ce 02010050
Lain sons pastas
Ba dc su oostooss
si cians 1010020,
4.46 Albedo fodb:k ops that aria a ight
‘warmer ground is also heated, On the other hand,
if a forcing agent triggers the cooling of an area
near the poles, the albedo rises a the ice caps
expand. Thus, more radiation is reflected back into
space, the ground absorbs less radiative energy
causing the air temperature to drop further, leading
to another cycle, and then another, and so on. This
is known as an amplifying feedback loop because
the repeated looping increases and perpetuates the
impact of the intial tigger,
Feedback loops reinforce changes in the albedo in
other parts of the world that are away from the
polar ice caps and glacial areas. For example, in
areas that are experiencing the process of
desertification, such as the Sahel region of Africa,
the drying of the climate expands the surface cover
Causes of global climate changeChapter 4
of sand or bare earth as vegetation dies. Sand and
bare earth (that is usually light in colour in avid
areas where the soil contains very little humus)
have a higher albedo than the vegetation that has
died, leading, to greater reflection of insolation
which can further exacerbate the aridity of an area.
‘Once again, once the change has been triggered, a
feedback loop perpetuates the spiral of climate
change.
“Vhe dying back of forest areas, whether caused by
human action through deforestation or natural
processes, usally iereaes the albedo of an area as
forests absorb most ofthe insolation in the area.
Once the albedo inereases, reflected radiation
casually rises (depending on the state of tbe
underlying soil and the vegetation that replaces the
forest, leading to further dieback of the forests and
the start ofa feedback loop.
n ohare, Maly
447 Tivsares
nation. The eas aed timate 38.98 dn
sy rm cath,
Tye abeto vl bacome Ii)
Many geographers believe that albedo feedback
oops were a significant factor in causing ice ages
and interglacial warmings throughout the Earth's
history. ‘They speculate that periods with intense
voleanic activity could trigger a severe volcanic
‘winter that would staeta long spiral of albedo
foedback loops. If the voleanic winter following the
Krakatoa explosion had been slightly longer or a
little more intense, some climate scientists speculate
that it may have been enough to trigger a small ice
‘age due to amplifying feedback loops.
Causes of global climate
change
Greenhouse gas release and
feedback loops
Greenhouse gases are gaseous compourels in the
atmosphere that trap heat by absorbing infrared
radiation, Some greenhouse gases are more
effective than others in trapping, heat, and those
that absorb heat efficiently are major contributors to
the greenhouse effect, When greenhouse gases
release the heat they have retained for a while,
sorne itis counter radiated back to the Earth's
surface, amplifying, the heating impact of the initial
insolation. IF greenhouse gases absorb more heat
than they lose, the atmosphere warms up. When.
the atmosphere warms consistently for a prolonged
period over an extensive area such asa continent or
the entire planet, global warming is said to occur,
Greenhouse gases occur naturally in the
atmosphere, which is why the planet has had a
rnatural greenhouse effect for as long as the
‘atmosphere has existed. The most significant
naturally occurting greenhouse gases are carbon
dioxide, methane, water vapour, ezone and nitrous
oxide, Human actions can influence the
concentrations of those gases in the atmosphere,
which is why itis believed humans play a part in
causing climate change. Human-induced climate
change is termed anthropogenic climate change.
(One facet of anthropogenie climate change is the
production of synthetic greenhouse gases such as
chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) and hydrofluorocar-
bons (HFCs), In this section, the emphasis will be
ring greenhouse pases.
fon naturally 0c
[The effectiveness of greenhouse gases to heat the
atmosphere is measured by their global warming,
potential (GWP). GWPisa relative measure that
‘compares the amount of heat trapped in a given
‘mass of gas to the amount of heat trapped in an
equivalent mass of carbon dioxide. Therefore, the
GWP of carbon dioxide is always 1. Estimates oF
GPs of some of the more common greenhouse
gases are shown in table 4.2,
Two main factors influence the GWP of a gas
+ the radiative efficiency of the gas, which i its
ability to absorb infrared radiation (ie. heat):
« the stability of the gas, which is how long,
remains in the atmosphere before decaying or
being converted into another substance.and
pounds in the
sng infrared.
nt and those
contributors to
pose gases
for a while,
the Barth
act of the initial
orb more heat
ms up. When
for a prolonged
asa continent or
« said to occur
inthe
et has had a
asthe
ignificant
yses are carbon
zone and nitrous
cothe
e atmosphere,
splaya part in
nduced climate
limate change.
» change is the
se gases such as
ydrofluorocar
mphasis will be
o gases
ases to heat the
slobal warming
ve measure that
ped ina given
teapped in an
2. Therefore, the
1, Estimates of
on greenhouse
WP of a gas:
as, which ists
jon (ie. heat);
show Jong it
re decaying or
ibstance,
Table 4.2
‘Global Warming Potential (WP)
of major greenhouse gazes
eee
ceded
Le i. EE
a.
PS ET coc,
‘Fgurs for water vapour are expanea me ex Chibon Conde an
ethane oct natural nthe enon and can soos produced
by human actons, The ther ses are ely sth ard donot.
cur naturay me ereonment, Note tha ectnates of GPS se
‘abject to change as research is cantnung. The estes son a
th otestovalatie hom the PCC tergoveravtal Panel on crate
‘Chango, puntshedn PCC ARS (2) n 20,
A high GWP indicates that a gas has a large
capacity to absorb and retain heat as well as a long
atmospheric lifetime. It should be noted that
although water vapour is the most significant
_greenhouse gas in terms of impact, with some
estimates saying it contributes about 95% of the
Farth’s greenhouse effect, its GWP eannot be
calculated because the methodology of GWP
assumes that a gas will decay in the atmosphere,
which water vapour dees not so, Furthermore, the
“amount of water vapour in the atmosphere
fluctuates so much with daily and seasonal
temperature changes that an average figure would
bbe meaningless.
‘Water vapour (10) is the most significant
igreenhouse gas in the atmosphere by volume, and
itis by far the largest contributor to the natural
‘greenhouse effect. Water vapour isthe gaseous
form of water, and it forms when liquid water
‘evaporates or is boiled, and when ice is Sublimated
(changed directly from a solid to a gas). Like other
gases, water vapour mixes freely through the
atmosphere, but unlike other gases, its
‘concentration varies greatly from day to day and
trom place to place. Water vapour ustally makes
up less than 1% of the atmosphere, but it can be as
high as 4% in warm, moist, humid cond
"auses of global climate change
Carbon dioxide (CO;) is the second most
significant greenhouse gas by volume in the
atmosphere. Its typical concentration is about
(0.04%; (400ppm ~ parts per million); before plobal
industrialisation began a few hundred years ago,
the typical concentration was about 290ppm,
Carbon dioxide is essential to life because plants.
depend upon it for photosynthesis, which converts
‘carbon dioxide into chemical compounds that build
up the plant’s tissues and supporting structures, as
well as releasing oxygen into the atmosphere as a
by-product.
Carbon dioxide is produced naturally by volcanoes
during eruptions, in hot springs and geysers in
geothermal areas, and its liberated from trees and
plants when they burn and from carbonate racks
when they are dissolved by running water and
acidic rainfall. Human activities such as burning,
fossil fuels and cutting down forests can increase
the atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide,
48 Hot sp
Although we know a great deal about the sources
that add carbon dioxide to the atmosphere,
predicting, future concentrations is more difficult
because not all the carbon dioxide emitted into the
atmosphere remains there. A complex system
known as the carbon cyele moves carbon through
the environment. Plants are an important
component of the carbon cycle as they absorb»
carbon dioxide, removing it from the atmosphere.
However, when plants die, the organisms that
decompose the plant tissue release carbon dioxide
into the atmosphere,ri
Chapter 4
Although these processes are normally held in
tralance, human actions have added greater
quantities of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere
than can be absorbed. However athe
concentration of atmospheric carbon dioxide has
increased, conditions forthe growth of plants have
improved, so trees, shrubs andl grasses have
flourished in some areas. At present, forests are
growing more rapidly than they are being,
destroyed in the northem hemisphere, an this
additional plant growth is helping to limit the
build-up of atmospheric carbon dioxide. On the
‘other hand, tropical deforestation in the southern
hemisphere scems to be overwhelming the gains of
the northern hemisphere, so any additional plant
growth has not been sufficient to absoeb the
Additional carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. This
is one of the key reasons that the atmospheric
‘concentration of carbon dioxileis continuing t0
449, The word's ropa enfon
won. os ike al ais, ey ab
fer to photosyni
Tepresent avast store of
When vegetation
diol fron tho
‘re ure, carbon doxide[s fleased back int the atmosp
This example isn Davee Reforest on the coast
‘Queensland, northeastern Attala
Another important element of the carbon cycle is
the world’s oceans, Carbon dioxide is absorbed
from Hhe atmosphere by floating, microscopic plant
life called phytoplankton that live in the surface
layer of the ocean, Once absorbed, carbon dioxide
gets mixed into the ecean water by turbulent
cuiace waves. When phytoplankton die, they sink
to the floor of the ocean where they decompose ant
lease carbon dioxide, thus enriching ocean waters
atdepth,
Causes of global cilmate change
1420 The Wolk’ oodans (even here in Fi) area huge sto
carbon diese.
‘Ocean eurents then carry the carbon dioxide
dough a vast network of slew-moving global
ccurcents thatact ikea huge conveyor belt. As the
level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere increases,
the oceans take in more carbon dioxide than they
release. Ttis believed thatthe oceans are currently
acting, as a carbon sink, absosbing, and storing,
‘additional carbon dioxide at great depths, anc if
this were not occurring, levels of atmospheric
carbon dioxide would be even higher and global
temperatures would be warmer.
Methane (C1
gas. Ibs major component (87% by volume) of
natural gas, and a suchy it cus naturally and
abundantly underground and beneath the ocean
floor. Methane is ceated in the upper level of the
Eacth’s surface by microorganisms in the process of
methanogenesis, an! then released into the
atmosphere
) is another significant greenhouse